Toba Pulp Lestari

Timber and pulp assessment

Total score: 32.9%

Latest update: September 2025
Next scheduled: August 2026

Parent company:

Pinnacle Company Limited
Market cap:

89,212,807 USD
Thomson Reuters ticker:

INRU.JK
Bloomberg ticker:

INRU IJ Equity

Website:

https://www.tobapulp.com/
Latest annual report (2024) | Sustainability report (2024)

Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.

Assessment date:

Expand all categories

Total: 32.9% 41.5 / 126

Sustainability policy and leadership

4 / 11 36.4%
4 media reports
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to all sourcing?
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
  
  The company states it has an independent team to ensure the transparency and implementation of sustainability policies. However, no further details are given.
- 0 / 1
  
  4. One or more board members have responsibility for sustainability?
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  5. Percentage or number of women board members?
  
  1 (20%) - Only photos of board members are available.
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  6. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?
  
  0 (0%) - Only photos of board of commissioners available.
- 0 / 1
  
  7. Sustainability report published within last two years?
- 0 / 1
  
  8. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  9. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?
  
  The company has worked with academic institutions and a foundation but these partnerships do not focus on improving sustainability of forest products.
- 0 / 1
  
  10. Climate risks assessment available?
- 0 / 1
  
  11. Natural capital assessment available?
Landbank, mills and traceability

6 / 21 28.6%
28 media reports
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  12. Lists countries and operations?
  
  Indonesia (forest concessions and mill).
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  13. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?
  
  185016
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  14. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?
  
  54834
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  15. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?
  
  8828 - The company's 2018 annual report states an area of 8,828 ha community plantations (PKR). However, it is unclear if the company's natural forest concessions include community forests.
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  16. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  17. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?
- 0 / 1
  
  18. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  19. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  20. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?
  
  Maps are available for seven of the company's FMUs on Global Forest Watch.
- 0 / 1
  
  21. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  22. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?
- 23. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
- 24. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
- 25. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  26. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?
  
  1
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  27. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?
- 28. Number of company owned sawmills?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't own sawmills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
- 29. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't own sawmills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
- 0 / 1
  
  30. Number of supplier mills?
- 0 / 1
  
  31. Maps or addresses of supplier mills?
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  32. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?
  
  The company states that it has a process to trace wood to the mill and forest levels but no details are given on the process. The company's mill has PEFC CoC certification, but it only covers traceability for the certified portion of its supply.
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  33. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?
  
  The company states that it has a process to trace wood to the mill and forest levels but no details are given on the process. The company's mill has PEFC CoC certification, but it only covers traceability for the certified portion of its supply.
- 0 / 2
  
  Source
  
  34. Percentage of supply traceable to country level (above 80%)?
  
  The company states that it has strict chain of custody system to ensure that all incoming wood can be traced to its source. However, it does not provide data on percentage traced.
- 0 / 2
  
  Source
  
  35. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level (above 75%)?
  
  The company states that it has strict chain of custody system to ensure that all incoming wood can be traced to its source. However, it does not provide data on percentage traced.
Deforestation and biodiversity

2.5 / 12 20.8%
43 media reports
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  36. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?
  
  The company only commits to eliminate deforestation from its supply chains.
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  37. Zero conversion commitment applies to all sourcing?
  
  The company only commits to eliminate deforestation from its supply chains.
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  38. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  39. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?
- 0 / 1
  
  40. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?
- 0 / 1
  
  41. Amount of deforestation recorded?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  42. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  43. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  44. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?
  
  The company has a commitment to conservation of ecosystem within the landscape. No evidence of implementation could be identified.
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  45. Identified species of conservation concern referencing international or national system of species classification?
- 0 / 1
  
  46. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  47. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?
HCV, HCS and impact assessments

4 / 9 44.4%
2 media reports
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  48. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  49. HCV commitment applies to all sourcing?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  50. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  51. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?
- 0 / 1
  
  52. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  53. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
- 0 / 1
  
  54. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  55. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
- 0 / 1
  
  56. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?
- 57. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
Soils, fire and GHGs

3.5 / 14 25%
14 media reports
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  58. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  59. Commitment to reduced impact logging?
  
  The company commits to implement low impact logging but no details on the practices are provided.
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  60. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
  
  The company has a commitment to no new development that applies to forested peatland only. Non-forested peatlands are not fully covered by the peatlands commitments.
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  61. Commitment on peatland planting applies to all sourcing?
  
  The company's peatland commitments are passed onto their suppliers and subcontractors. However, these commitments do not fully cover non-forested peatlands.
- 0 / 1
  
  62. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
- 0 / 1
  
  63. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  64. Commitment to zero burning?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  65. Commitment to zero burning applies to all sourcing?
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  66. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?
  
  The company states it is improving its fire protection system and conducts fire safety training but this only relates to the company's mill operation.
- 0 / 1
  
  67. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  68. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
  
  The company only states that it will monitor and reduce its overall emissions, without setting a specific time-bound target or mentioning GHG emissions explicitly.
- 0 / 1
  
  69. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?
- 0 / 1
  
  70. Report GHG emissions from land use change?
- 0 / 1
  
  71. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
Water, chemical and waste management

2.5 / 12 20.8%
8 media reports
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  72. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?
  
  The company states that BOD and COD levels are below the limits set by the government.
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  73. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?
  
  The company only reports a COD reduction of 43.2% in 2017 compared with 2016.
- 0 / 1
  
  74. Commitment to protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  75. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?
  
  The company states to treat waste water but does not mention pulp and paper production explicitly.
- 76. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't own sawmills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  77. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
  
  The company has a commitment to water conservation but it is not time-bound and does not refer to water use intensity.
- 0 / 1
  
  78. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
- 0 / 1
  
  79. Commitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?
- 0 / 1
  
  80. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
- 0 / 1
  
  81. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
- 0 / 1
  
  82. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
- 0 / 1
  
  83. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
- 0 / 1
  
  84. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
Community, land and labour rights

11.5 / 22 52.3%
90 media reports
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  85. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration on Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  86. Commitment to human rights applies to all sourcing?
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  87. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?
  
  The company commits to respect indigenous rights but no reference to UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (no. 169) given.
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  88. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  89. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  90. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  91. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
- 0 / 1
  
  92. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  93. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
- 0 / 1
  
  94. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  95. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
- 96. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  97. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?
  
  The company states that it respects the International Labor Organization's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  98. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?
  
  The company does not refer to minimum age (No. 138), equal remuneration (No. 100), or the right to organise and collective bargaining (No. 98).
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  99. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?
- 100. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
- 0 / 1
  
  101. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
- 0 / 1
  
  102. Percentage or number of women employees?
- 0 / 1
  
  103. Payment of minimum wage?
- 0 / 1
  
  104. Reporting of salary by gender?
- 0.5 / 1
  
  Source
  
  105. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?
  
  The company's commitment does not reference ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work.
- 0 / 1
  
  Source
  
  106. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
  
  The company reports the number of accidents recorded each year (34 in 2018, 31, in 2017), but does not provide data on time lost due to work-based injuries.
- 0 / 1
  
  107. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  108. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
Certification standards

3.5 / 14 25%
5 media reports
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  109. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?
  
  100% - SVLK.
- 0 / 1
  
  110. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  111. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
  
  100% - SVLK.
- 0 / 1
  
  112. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
- 0 / 1
  
  113. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs or achieved 100% FSC-certification of FMUs?
- 0 / 1
  
  114. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?
- 0 / 2
  
  115. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?
- 0 / 2
  
  116. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?
- 0 / 2
  
  117. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed that are FSC certified (above 75%)?
- 1.5 / 2
  
  Source
  
  118. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?
  
  177448 (74%) - 117,448 ha (74%).
Smallholders and suppliers

1 / 5 20%
4 media reports
- 0 / 1
  
  119. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?
- 0 / 1
  
  120. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?
- 0 / 1
  
  121. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
- 122. The company has a Due Diligence System (DDS)?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not trade wood/wood fibre. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  123. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
  
  The company states in its Sustainability Policy that it 'will source our raw material only through suppliers or subcontractors that abide by this policy and are transparent and provide a traceable supply (e.g. SVLK)'.
- 0 / 1
  
  124. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?
Governance and grievances

3 / 6 50%
33 media reports
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  125. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
- 126. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
- 0 / 1
  
  127. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
- 128. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
  
  This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  129. Whistleblowing procedure?
- 1 / 1
  
  Source
  
  130. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
- 0 / 2
  
  Source
  
  131. Details of grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Toba Pulp Lestari

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.

All media reports (106)

Download as CSV

Show media reports

By category By year

Last media reports:

Are we missing a story?

Submit a media report

May 2025

Public Clarification from PT Toba Pulp Lestari Tbk

Visit external site

May 2025

PT Toba Pulp Lestari Tbk Strongly Denies Baseless Allegations of Involvement in Environmental Activist Intimidation

Visit external site

May 2025

Indonesias National Commission of Human Rights Releases Report on Local Community Complaint Against TPL

Visit external site

May 2025

Ratusan Massa Demo Tuntut Tutup TPL, DPRD Taput Segera Bentuk Pansus (Hundreds of Mass Demonstrate Demanding Closure of TPL, Taput DPRD Immediately Forms Special Committee)

Visit external site

May 2025

Otoritas Gereja Batak Serukan Penutupan PT TPL (Batak Church Authorities Call for Closure of PT TPL)

Visit external site

May 2025

Royal Golden Eagle Group Indicated to be Connected to Network of Companies Triggering Deforestation (Royal Golden Eagle Group Indicated to be Connected to Network of Companies Triggering Deforestation)

Visit external site

May 2025

Greenpeace: RGE dan Bayangannya Babat 68 Ribu Ha Hutan Alam (Greenpeace: RGE and Its Shadows Clear 68 Thousand Ha of Natural Forest)

Visit external site

March 2025

Jejak Deforestasi PT TPL Picu Banjir Bandang Parapat? (Did PT TPL's Deforestation Footprint Trigger Parapat Flash Floods?)

Visit external site

March 2025

PT. Toba Pulp Lestari moratorium under scrutiny amid reports of violence against communities

Visit external site

February 2025

Tanah Adat Dirampas, Senator Penrad Siagian Tuntut Pemerintah Audit PT TPL (Customary Land Seized, Senator Penrad Siagian Demands Government Audit PT TPL)

Visit external site

January 2025

Tanggapan Terkait rumor yang disebarkan oleh salah satu LSM lokal (Response to rumors spread by a local NGO)

Visit external site

January 2025

Gangguan Operasional Sektor Aek Nauli TPL (Operational Disruption of Aek Nauli TPL Sector)

Visit external site

January 2025

Timbulkan Banyak Kerusakan, Masyarakat Minta Toba Pulp Lestari Ditutup (Causes Much Damage, Community Asks Toba Pulp Lestari to be Shut Down)

Visit external site

December 2024

Tanggapan TPL terhadap massa yang mengatasnamakan masyarakat adat Ompu Umbak Siallagan memaksa masuk kekawasan konsesi PT Toba Pulp Lestari Tbk (TPL's response to the masses claiming to be the Ompu Umbak indigenous community Siallagan forced their way into the concession area of PT Toba Pulp Lestari Tbk)

Visit external site

December 2024

Masyarakat Adat dan PT Toba Pulp Lestari Bentrok, Pemicunya Diduga Karena Jalan Ditutup (Indigenous People and PT Toba Pulp Lestari Clash, Trigger Allegedly Due to Road Closure)

Visit external site

December 2024

Menanti Tanah Sihaporas Kembali agar Hutan dan Air Terjaga (Waiting for Sihaporas Land to Return so that Forests and Water are Preserved)

Visit external site

October 2024

Sengketa Tanah Adat Batak dengan Pabrik Indorayon (Batak Customary Land Dispute with Indorayon Factory)

Visit external site

October 2024

KKLPM: Izin Usaha Industri PT TPL Telah Habis Masa Berlakunya (KKLPM: PT TPL's Industrial Business License Has Expired)

Visit external site

October 2024

Aliansi Gerakan Tutup Toba Pulp Lestari Menuntut Bebaskan Ketua Adat Sorbatua Siallagan, Ini Kasusnya Lawan PT TPL (Alliance of Movements to Close Toba Pulp Lestari Demands Release of Traditional Leader Sorbatua Siallagan, This is His Case Against PT TPL)

Visit external site

September 2024

Masyarakat Adat Tano Batak Tuntut Keadilan atas Tanah Adat yang Dirampas PT TPL (Tano Batak Indigenous Community Demands Justice for Customary Land Seized by PT TPL)

Visit external site

No article found for the selected categories.

Assessment summary

How transparent are all 100 timber and pulp producers in the latest SPOTT assessments?

Assessment summary

Download the data

Access the SPOTT Dashboard to download CSV data on company assessments

Download the data

Nominate companies

Are we missing companies that interest you? Please nominate them for future assessment

Nominate companies

Scoring criteria

View the full list of indicators and scoring criteria that inform SPOTT assessments

Scoring criteria

Toba Pulp Lestari

Company assessment: Toba Pulp Lestari – July 2019

Sustainability Policy

Forestry policy

Environmental policy

Annual Report

About us Webpage

Annual report

Annual Report

Business webpage

FSC Certificates and Reports: Santa Catarina

Global Forest Watch Wood Fibre Concessions Database

PEFC CoC certification

Standard operating procedure

Sustainable Production Forest Management Policy

Environment policy

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION STATEMENT

HCV assessment webpage

Annual report

Fundamental Policies on Corporate Governance

Environmental friendly mill project Webpage

FPIC Standard Operating Procedure

Complaints Handling Mechanism

Community Development webpage

List of IFCC certified Forest Management Units

Code of Ethics

Sustainability webpage

Media monitor: Toba Pulp Lestari

Public Clarification from PT Toba Pulp Lestari Tbk

PT Toba Pulp Lestari Tbk Strongly Denies Baseless Allegations of Involvement in Environmental Activist Intimidation

Indonesias National Commission of Human Rights Releases Report on Local Community Complaint Against TPL

Ratusan Massa Demo Tuntut Tutup TPL, DPRD Taput Segera Bentuk Pansus (Hundreds of Mass Demonstrate Demanding Closure of TPL, Taput DPRD Immediately Forms Special Committee)

Otoritas Gereja Batak Serukan Penutupan PT TPL (Batak Church Authorities Call for Closure of PT TPL)

Royal Golden Eagle Group Indicated to be Connected to Network of Companies Triggering Deforestation (Royal Golden Eagle Group Indicated to be Connected to Network of Companies Triggering Deforestation)

Greenpeace: RGE dan Bayangannya Babat 68 Ribu Ha Hutan Alam (Greenpeace: RGE and Its Shadows Clear 68 Thousand Ha of Natural Forest)

Jejak Deforestasi PT TPL Picu Banjir Bandang Parapat? (Did PT TPL's Deforestation Footprint Trigger Parapat Flash Floods?)

PT. Toba Pulp Lestari moratorium under scrutiny amid reports of violence against communities

Tanah Adat Dirampas, Senator Penrad Siagian Tuntut Pemerintah Audit PT TPL (Customary Land Seized, Senator Penrad Siagian Demands Government Audit PT TPL)

Tanggapan Terkait rumor yang disebarkan oleh salah satu LSM lokal (Response to rumors spread by a local NGO)

Gangguan Operasional Sektor Aek Nauli TPL (Operational Disruption of Aek Nauli TPL Sector)

Timbulkan Banyak Kerusakan, Masyarakat Minta Toba Pulp Lestari Ditutup (Causes Much Damage, Community Asks Toba Pulp Lestari to be Shut Down)

Masyarakat Adat dan PT Toba Pulp Lestari Bentrok, Pemicunya Diduga Karena Jalan Ditutup (Indigenous People and PT Toba Pulp Lestari Clash, Trigger Allegedly Due to Road Closure)

Menanti Tanah Sihaporas Kembali agar Hutan dan Air Terjaga (Waiting for Sihaporas Land to Return so that Forests and Water are Preserved)

Sengketa Tanah Adat Batak dengan Pabrik Indorayon (Batak Customary Land Dispute with Indorayon Factory)

KKLPM: Izin Usaha Industri PT TPL Telah Habis Masa Berlakunya (KKLPM: PT TPL's Industrial Business License Has Expired)

Aliansi Gerakan Tutup Toba Pulp Lestari Menuntut Bebaskan Ketua Adat Sorbatua Siallagan, Ini Kasusnya Lawan PT TPL (Alliance of Movements to Close Toba Pulp Lestari Demands Release of Traditional Leader Sorbatua Siallagan, This is His Case Against PT TPL)

Masyarakat Adat Tano Batak Tuntut Keadilan atas Tanah Adat yang Dirampas PT TPL (Tano Batak Indigenous Community Demands Justice for Customary Land Seized by PT TPL)

Media monitor: Toba Pulp Lestari

Assessment summary

Download the data

Nominate companies

Scoring criteria

Indonesias National Commission of Human Rights Releases Report on Local Community Complaint Against TPL