Precious Woods Holding AG
Timber and pulp assessment- Latest update: August 2024
- Next scheduled: August 2025
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the timber and pulp supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Market cap:92,000,000 USD
-
Activities:Timber production; Timber processing and manufacturing; Trading and distribution
-
Locations:Brazil (Itacoatiara, Amazonas), Gabon (Libreville, Owendo)
-
Headquarters:Switzerland
-
Related companies:Through its parent company Norsudtimber], the company is a shareholder of [Sodefor which is assessed on SPOTT Timber and Pulp.
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Precious Woods Holding AG – August 2024
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 27.5 / 30 91.7%
- Policy: 64 / 68 94.1%
- Practice: 49 / 59 83.1%
- Self-reported: 12.3 / 59 20.8%
- External: 14.8 / 59 25%
- Certified: 22 / 59 37.3%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership10.75 / 12 89.6%
- Organisation: 6 / 6 100%
- Policy: 2 / 2 100%
- Practice: 2.8 / 4 68.8%
- Self-reported: 1.8 / 4 43.8%
- External: 1 / 4 25%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?
The company reports its commitment to all aspects of sustainability on its website and in its sustainability report. These commitments cover multiple dimensions of sustainability across the company's operations covering both social and environmental issues.
-
2. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
The company's commitment to all aspects of sustainability applies to all its direct and third-party suppliers.
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
Chief Sustainability Officer.
-
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
The company reports that the responsibility for ensuring and further developing sustainability lies with the 'Board of Directors'.
-
5. Reports gender balance of senior management team?
0 - The company reports zero women in its senior management team. Data as of 2023.
-
6. Reports gender balance of board members?
0 - The company reports zero women as a part of its board in 2023.
-
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?
[Externally verified] FSC, CBFP, ATIBT, UFIGA, STTC, and various other industry organisations.
-
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?
The company states it entered into a public-private partnership with the Gabonese government, and the NGO Conservation Justice to protect the fauna in Gabon against illegal hunting.
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company's latest sustainability report covering the year 2023 was published in April 2024.
-
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
The company has submitted CDP forest questionnaires for the years 2017-2022.
-
11. Climate risks assessment available?
The company has conducted and published an climate change risk assessment based on the methodology suggested by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. However, the assessment is not externally verified.
-
0 / 1
12. Natural capital assessment available?
-
Landbank, maps and traceability19.3 / 21 91.9%
- Organisation: 11.5 / 13 88.5%
- Policy: 2 / 2 100%
- Practice: 5.8 / 6 96.7%
- Self-reported: 1.8 / 6 30%
- External: 4 / 6 66.7%
- Certified: 0 / 6 0%
-
13. Lists countries and operations?
Brazil (forest concessions, sawmill), Gabon (forest concessions, sawmills, veneer plant).
-
14. Lists countries sourcing from?
The company reports sourcing from its own forest concessions in Brazil and Gabon. In 2023, timber products traded from third parties originated from forests in France, Hungary, Switzerland, and Gabon.
-
15. Total land area managed/controlled for forestry (ha)?
1169720 - The company controls 1,169,715 ha of forest area in Brazil (572,892 ha) and Gabon (596,822 ha). Data as of 2023.
-
16. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?
774056 - The company reports the total forest area designated for wood/wood fibre production as 774,056 ha. Data as of 2023.
-
17. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
18. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it is not a producer with scheme smallholders/outgrowers.
-
19. Unplanted area (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
20. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
145319 - Gabon - 75,255 ha and Brazil - 70,064 ha. Data as of 2023.
-
21. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?
242376 - The company reported its area of intact forest landscape in 2022.
-
22. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?
4 - The company controls 3 FMUs in Gabon and 1 FMU in Brazil.
-
23. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?
The maps of three FMUs controlled by the company in Gabon are available via the Open Timber Portal. For the company's FMU in Brazil, only a static map with coordinates published in 2021 is available.
-
24. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?
Forest management plans are available for all the company's FMUs.
-
25. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation available?
[Externally verified] The company reports monitoring information on the implementation of its management plan.
-
26. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use right (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided all valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use right. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
27. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided all valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
28. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided all valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
29. Maps of all third-party supplying FMUs?
The company sources timber from third-party FMUs for its trading activities, however it only reports the origin of timber at a national level.
-
30. Number of company owned sawmills?
3 - The company owns two sawmills in Gabon and one sawmill in Brazil.
-
31. Names and locations of company owned sawmills?
The names and locations of all company-owned sawmills are directly linked to google maps from the company website.
-
32. Number of company-owned pulp and paper mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
33. Names and locations of company-owned pulp and paper mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
34. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned sawmills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
The company reports that all of the wood sourced by its sawmills originated from its own concession areas in 2023.
-
35. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned pulp and paper mills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
36. Number of third party supplying mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party mills.
-
37. Names and locations of all third party supplying mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party mills.
-
38. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party mills.
-
39. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?
The company reports that it applies a supply chain and traceability system, referred to as a Chain of Custody System (CoC) which allows it to control its supply chain and ensure traceability at every stage of its production, processing, and trading activities.
-
40. Percentage of supply traceable to country of harvest?
100 - The company reports that in 2023, 100% of the supply was traceable to the country of harvest.
-
41. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?
The company reports that it applies a supply chain and traceability system, referred to as a Chain of Custody System (CoC) which allows it to control its supply chain and ensure traceability at every stage of its production, processing, and trading activities.
-
42. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level?
Only the supply coming from the company's own operations (80% of all supply) is clearly traceable to the FMU level. It is unclear whether the company's third-party supply (20% of total supply) is traceable to FMU level or FSC/PEFC FM-certified.
-
Certification standards6.97 / 8 87.1%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 4 / 4 100%
- Practice: 3 / 4 74.3%
- Self-reported: 3 / 4 74.3%
- External: 0 / 4 0%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?
The company's own operations are already 100% FSC and PEFC certified.
-
44. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
100% - 100% of the company's operational area (892,987.69 ha) is FSC and PEFC FM certified.
-
45. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?
The company only source legally verified wood using PEFC or FSC verification.
-
46. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
97.45% - The company states that 97.45% of all timber supply (from third-party and own concessions) was FSC or PEFC certified in 2023.
-
47. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?
100% - 100% of the company's operational area (892,987.69) ha is FSC FM certified.
-
48. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs within 10 years?
The company reports that all of its forest operations are 100% FSC FM certified since 2009.
-
0 / 1
49. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply (tonnes) from all suppliers that comes from FSC FM certified areas?
-
50. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood and/or PEFC Controlled Sources requirements?
The company states that it only sources wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood or PEFC controversial sources requirements for its trading activities, and the rest of its supply comes from its own concessions which are 100% FSC-FM certified.
-
51. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?
This indicator is disabled as the company is 100% FSC FM certified.
-
Deforestation and biodiversity20.75 / 24 86.5%
- Organisation: 2 / 2 100%
- Policy: 12.5 / 14 89.3%
- Practice: 6.3 / 8 78.1%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 8 9.4%
- External: 1.5 / 8 18.8%
- Certified: 4 / 8 50%
-
52. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
The company commits to a deforestation and conversion-free supply chain and extends this commitment to all natural ecosystems.
-
53. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to a deforestation and conversion-free supply chain and extends this commitment to all natural ecosystems.
-
54. Commitment to zero deforestation?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification. The company also reports its own commitment to no deforestation.
-
55. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to zero deforestation.
-
56. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years). The company's own reporting defines deforestation as the conversion of all natural ecosystems and mentions the cut-off date as 2009.
-
57. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation in supplier operations?
The company defines deforestation for suppliers as the exploitation of natural ecosystems and specifies any deforestation/conversion past 2018 will not be accepted.
-
58. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
The company provides evidence of monitoring deforestation within its forest management plans of CEB and MIL as well as in its sustainability report. Evidence is not externally verified.
-
0 / 1
59. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
-
60. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
21.02 - In 2023, the company reported that 21.02 ha of deforestation had occurred in its operational area since 2009. Deforestation had been committed by third parties.
-
61. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
0 (0%) - In 2023, the company reported 0 ha of deforestation had occurred in supplier operations since 2009.
-
62. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?
The company commits to restore ecosystems to their prior condition in cases of conversion within its own operations.
-
63. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?
The company states that suppliers must restore non-compliant deforestation or conversion occurring after the cut-off date of 2018.
-
64. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company making this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2 EN) and the PEFC International Standard (PEFC ST 1003:2018). As the requirements of these certifications do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC/PEFC-certified landbank. The company also reports that a convention has been elaborated between the government, the NGO Conservation Justice, and itself against illegal hunting.
-
65. Biodiversity policy?
The company reports a commitment to protect biodiversity with a clear scope, however, no measurable, time-bound target is reported.
-
0 / 1
66. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
-
67. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) and PEFC FM (PEFC ST 1003:2018) certifications as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company has also identified species in its Forest Management plans but it does not reference an international/national system of species classification.
-
68. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) and PEFC FM (PEFC ST 1003:2018) certifications as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC. The company also reports examples of species and habitat conservation management in its concessions.
-
69. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
The company reports its commitment to only sustainable hunting of species.
-
70. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
The company commits its suppliers to apply sustainable hunting.
-
71. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) and PEFC International Standard (PEFC ST 1003:2018). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC and PEFC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).
-
72. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?
The company commits its suppliers to protect forests and other natural ecosystems from deforestation, conversion, and other illegal activities.
-
73. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) and PEFC FM (PEFC ST 1003:2018) certifications as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC. The company's own reporting also provides multiple examples which include monitoring its concessions, having a monitoring team and community members acting as scouts, and carrying out anti-poaching patrols.
-
74. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only sources wood/wood fibre from natural forests.
-
75. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers OR only sources from natural forests.
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments4.83 / 8 60.4%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2 / 4 50%
- Practice: 2.8 / 4 70.8%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 4 18.8%
- External: 2.1 / 4 52%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
76. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification. The company also reports its own commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments.
-
0 / 1
77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
-
78. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?
[Externally verified] The High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments are available for all concessions of the company. Summaries of the HCV assessments are reported within FSC audit reports.
-
79. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?
[Externally verified] The self-reported management and monitoring plans are available in the HCV assessments of the company concessions. A piece of brief information about the monitoring of HCV areas is also available in the FSC report of CEB. The company states that it has not been able to obtain an externally verified assessment due to a lack of qualified auditors.
-
80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not produce wood/wood fibre OR only sources from natural forests.
-
82. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre OR only has natural forest operations OR has not undertaken any new planting since January 2015.
-
83. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre OR only has natural forest operations OR has not undertaken any new planting since April 2015 OR if all new planting has been undertaken since November 2017 and has been covered under combined HCV-HCS assessments.
-
84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) and PEFC International Standard (PEFC ST 1003:2018). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC and PEFC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).
-
0 / 1
85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
-
86. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?
The SEIAs and associated management plans are available as a part of a forest management plan for the company's operations in Gabon. However, the forest management plan is not externally verified.
-
87. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided 3/9 valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions16.5 / 17 97.1%
- Organisation: 4 / 4 100%
- Policy: 6 / 6 100%
- Practice: 6.5 / 7 92.9%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
- Certified: 6 / 7 85.7%
-
88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not operate in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
90. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
0 (0%) - The company reports having no landbank or planted area on peatlands. Data as of 2022.
-
91. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not produce wood/wood fibre OR produces wood/wood fibre but states that it has no operations on peatland OR only has natural forest operations.
-
92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
The company reports that it does not have operations on peatland. The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC-certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).
-
93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to best management practices for soils and peat.
-
94. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
The company reports that it does not have operations on peatland. Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
95. Commitment to reduced impact logging?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years). The company also reports its own commitment to reduced impact logging.
-
96. Commitment to reduced impact logging applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) and specifically mentions minimising the impact of logging roads along with other RIL practices.
-
97. Evidence of implementing reduced impact logging practices?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC. The company also states to reduce the number of new main roads to a minimum and prefers to open small secondary roads or reopen roads built during the last harvest cycle. As of 2023, 11 km of new main roads have been constructed out of the 95 km of roads being worked in 2023 meaning that impact-reducing reopening accounts for 88.4% (2022:100/462/78.3%).
-
98. Commitment to zero burning?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
99. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers OR only sources from natural forests.
-
100. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by PEFC. The company's own reporting mentions using the data from the National Institute for Space Research (INPE) in Brazil and FIRMS-VIIRS data provided by NASA in Gabon to monitor fires in its concession areas.
-
101. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company FMUs?
22 - For 2023, the company reports 16 slash-and-burn fires in its operations in Brazil and two in its operations in Gabon. The company also reports four natural wildfires in its operations in Gabon.
-
102. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations?
0 (0%) - The company reports that no wildfires were reported in supplier operations in 2023.
-
103. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
The company aims to reduce its overall intensity to below 0.07 tCO2 /m3 /year in 2024. This commitment includes scope 1, scope 2 and scope 3 emissions.
-
104. GHG emissions intensity?
The company reports the CO2 intensity (tCO2/m3) for 2023 as 0.0756 tCO2/m3. This figure includes scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3 emissions.
-
105. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
106. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers OR only sources from natural forests.
-
107. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
The company's GHG emissions intensity (Scope 1, 2, 3) for 2023 is reported as 0.0756 tCO2/m3 which shows an increase as compared to the intensity reported in 2022 (0.570).
-
108. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
The company reports that its CO2 emission is calculated using the classification of the World Resources Institute (WRI) methodology.
-
Water, chemical and pest management15.5 / 16 96.9%
- Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
- Policy: 7 / 7 100%
- Practice: 7.5 / 8 93.8%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 8 9.4%
- External: 0.8 / 8 9.4%
- Certified: 6 / 8 75%
-
109. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
110. Water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
111. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
112. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
113. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
114. Treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
115. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?
The company reports that run-off from its production sites in Brazil and Gabon are directed to clarifying basins for treatment. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
116. Proportion of processing facilities with closed-loop water treatment system?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
117. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years). The company also reports its own commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones.
-
118. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
119. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years). The company's own reporting mentions it only uses non-toxic components approved by FSC and PEFC in its forest and milling operations and does not use any other chemicals such as fertilizers or pesticides in its sustainable forest operations.
-
120. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to minimise the use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides.
-
121. Evidence of eliminating chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
122. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years). The company also reports its own commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.
-
123. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.
-
124. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years). The company also reports its own commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention.
-
125. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to not use Stockholm and Rotterdam Convention chemicals.
-
126. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
The company reports to only use non-toxic components approved by FSC and PEFC in its forest and milling operations, for the protection of logs but does not use any other chemicals such as fertilizers or pesticides in its sustainable forest operations.
-
127. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC. The company's own reporting mentions not using any toxic chemicals such as fertilizers or pesticides in its sustainable forest operations.
-
128. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC. The company also mentions that it is mandatory for them under PEFC and FSC certification, to develop and apply IPM.
-
129. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) and PEFC FM (PEFC ST 1003:2018) certifications as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also has a waste management system in place, however, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
Community, land and labour rights34.5 / 38 90.8%
- Organisation: 3 / 4 75%
- Policy: 20.5 / 21 97.6%
- Practice: 11 / 13 84.6%
- Self-reported: 1.5 / 13 11.5%
- External: 3.5 / 13 26.9%
- Certified: 6 / 13 46.2%
-
130. Commitment to human rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification. The company also reports its own commitment to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
-
131. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
-
0 / 1
132. Progress on human rights commitment ?
-
133. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0) and PEFC International Standard (PEFC ST 1003:2018). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/FSC membership and the company's PEFC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).
-
134. Commitment to Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits its suppliers to respect local communities' rights, however, the commitment does not reference the UN Declaration/ILO Convention.
-
135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN) and through the PEFC International Standard (PEFC ST 1003:2010). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC and PEFC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).
-
136. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to respect legal and customary land tenure rights.
-
137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) and PEFC International Standard (PEFC ST 1003:2018). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC and PEFC-certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years). The company also reports its own commitment to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC).
-
138. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
The company commits its suppliers to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC).
-
139. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
The FPIC process is available in the company's latest sustainability report.
-
140. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
The company reports multiple examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts, which include annual meetings in each community to streamline community grievance processes, and mechanisms to report grievances by the communities in cases of conflicts. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
141. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
The details of the process for addressing land conflicts are available in the company's latest sustainability report.
-
142. Supports the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?
The company reports multiple examples of the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced, some of which include employing women in administration, forest and technical engineering, and industry. This information is not externally verified.
-
143. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided all valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
144. Commitment to enable sustainable use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) by local communities?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).
-
145. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities ?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years). The company also reports its own commitment to providing essential community services and facilities.
-
146. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC. The company also reports information on progress on the commitment to provide essential community services and facilities, which includes providing healthcare and education facilities.
-
147. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
The company commits to provide business/work opportunities for local communities.
-
148. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided all valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
149. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0) and the PEFC International Chain of Custody Standard (PEFC ST 1003:2018). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification and 100% PEFC FM certified landbank.
-
150. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
The company commits its suppliers to respect all Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles.
-
151. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) and PEFC FM (PEFC ST 1003:2018) certifications as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC and PEFC. The company's own reporting states that all new employees receive training from its human resources team or certification managers on their worker's rights, obligations, safety procedures, and company values.
-
152. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company commits to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment.
-
153. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
The company commits to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment.
-
154. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis the company's landbank is either 100% or ?75% (and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years) FSC FM certified (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company's own reporting mentions how gender equality is implemented in its forestry operations, however, limited details are reported.
-
155. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any temporary employees OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
156. Reports gender balance of employees?
103 (8.18%) - The company reports 103 women as a part of its total workforce of 1259 in 2023.
-
157. Commitment to pay a living wage?
The company commits to pay the living wage, when the minimum wage is lower than the living wage.
-
158. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suplliers?
The company commits its suppliers to pay minimum wages and if the minimum wage is below the living wage, the commitment applies for living wages.
-
159. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis that the company's landbank is either 100% or ?75% (and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years) FSC FM certified (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company's own reporting mentions the legal minimum wage for Gabon and Brazil as ?229 and ?246, respectively, and the company minimum wage for Gabon and Brazil as ?259 and ?250, respectively. However, this information is not externally verified.
-
0 / 1
160. Reporting of salary by gender?
-
161. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) and PEFC International Standard (PEFC ST 1003:2018). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC and PEFC-certified landbank (either 100% or ?75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years). The company also reports its own commitment to addressing health and safety at work, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work.
-
162. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
The company commits its suppliers to address health and safety at work, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work.
-
163. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by PEFC. The company also states it provides personal protective equipment and related training to its employees.
-
164. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
143 - The company reports 143 accidents and an accident rate of 11.4% in 2023.
-
165. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
0 - The company reports zero fatalities in 2023.
-
Smallholders and suppliers3.75 / 4 93.8%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 3 / 3 100%
- Practice: 0.8 / 1 75%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 1 75%
- External: 0 / 1 0%
- Certified: 0 / 1 0%
-
166. Commitment to support smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have smallholder suppliers.
-
167. Programme to support outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from smallholder suppliers.
-
168. Number or percentage of outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders involved in programme?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from smallholder suppliers.
-
169. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
The company has a timber procurement policy in place that details the process used to prioritise, assess and engage suppliers in compliance with the company's policy and legal requirements.
-
170. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
100% - The company reports that suppliers are assessed annually on compliance. In 2023 all suppliers were deemed to be compliant with the company's procurement policy. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
171. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
The company states the suspension criteria for suppliers in its timber and procurement policy.
-
172. Timebound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with timber and pulp sourcing commitments?
In 2023, all suppliers were deemed to be compliant with the company's sourcing commitments via an annual assessment.
-
(NEW: not scored this year)-
173. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation and/or conversion-free (DCF)?
-
Governance and grievances7.67 / 9 85.2%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 5 / 5 100%
- Practice: 2.7 / 4 66.8%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 4 18.8%
- External: 1.9 / 4 48%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
174. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company commits to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption.
-
175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption.
-
176. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company reports it has a 'Corporate Ethics Official' and all operating units also have 'Ethics Officials' designated to support the implementation of the Ethics Program. In addition, the company mentions that its business ethics guidelines were fully implemented in 2016, and no violations or corruption cases were reported between 2016 and 2023. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
177. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided all valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
The company's tax policy discloses the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments and states that the CFO is responsible for the strategy and its review.
-
179. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided 12/13 valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
180. Whistleblowing procedure?
The company has a whistleblowing procedure in place.
-
181. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company has its own grievance system which is open to all stakeholders.
-
0 / 1
182. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
No date
Our Commitments - Precious Woods - WEBPAGE
-
2023
SUSTAINABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY REPORT 2023
-
2022
Annual Report 2022
-
No date
Membership - FSC - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Participants - STTC - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Our Members - UFIGA - WEBPAGE
-
No date
PEFC- - Member List
-
No date
Members / Colleges - CBFP - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Response - CDP - WEBPAGE
-
April 2021
Precious Woods Climate Change Risk Assessment
-
2023
Annual Report 2023
-
No date
Locations - Precious Woods - WEBPAGE
-
2022
SUSTAINABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY REPORT 2021 (including 2022 update)
-
No date
FMUs (Precious Woods (CEB)) - OTP - WEBPAGE
-
May 2023
FSC FM audit report - Mil Madeiras Preciosas Ltda.
-
August 2023
FSC FM audit report - PRECIOUS WOOD CEB
-
2021
Resumo Público Manejo Florestal Sustentável (Public Summary Sustainable Forest Management) - MIL
-
No date
Résumé public du Plan d'Aménagement (Public summary of Development plan) - CEB
-
No date
Forest Management Certification Audit Report PRECIOUS WOODS - CEB
-
No date
Resumen Público Mil Madeiras Preciosas Ltda. (Public Summary Report of Mil Madeiras Preciosas)
-
2023
Suivi-Évaluation des indicateurs de performance Environnementale et du maintien des HVC/AFEI (Monitoring-Evaluation of performance indicators Environmental and maintenance of HCV/AFEI)
-
No date
XII ATUALIZAÇÃO DO PLANO DE MANEJO FLORESTAL MIL MADEIRAS PRECIOSAS LTDA. (XII UPDATE OF THE FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN MIL MADEIRAS PRECIOSAS LTDA.)
-
No date
Documentation (Precious Woods (CEB)) - OTP - WEBPAGE
-
June 2022
Timber Procurement Policy
-
No date
Certification - Precious Woods - WEBPAGE
-
No date
FSC FM/COC certificate - Mil Madeiras Preciosas Ltda.
-
No date
FSC FM/COC certificate - PRECIOUS WOODS - CEB
-
No date
PEFC FM certificate - Mil Madeiras Preciosas LTDA - Itacoatiara/AM
-
No date
PEFC FM certificate - Precious Woods CEB
-
No date
Biodiversity - Precious Woods - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Protecting mammals in the Amazon forest
-
2017
Áreas de Alto Valor de Conservação- Resumo para Consulta Pública (Areas of High Conservation Value - Summary for Public Consultation)
-
2017
Résumé public Hautes Valeurs de Conservation et Aires Forestières Ecologiquement Importantes (Public Summary High Values of Conservation and Forest Areas Ecologically Important) - CEB
-
2017
IDENTIFICAÇÃO E MONITORAMENTO DE AAVC (HCV IDENTIFICATION AND MONITORING) - MIL
-
2020
SUSTAINABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY REPORT 2020
-
No date
Social Responsibility & Education - Precious Woods - WEBPAGE
-
August 2023
BUSINESS ETHICS GUIDELINE
-
2024
Precious Woods Tax Policy 2024
Media monitor: Precious Woods Holding AG
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
June 2018
Total Systems Failure: Exposing the secret networks destroying forests in the Democratic Republic of Congo
October 2017
Cut from Congo: Industrial logging and the loss of intact forest landscapes in the Congo Basin
2
1
3
4
0
0
1
1
1
2
Media monitor: Precious Woods Holding AG
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.
Download as CSV