Skip to content
Menu Search

APP (Asia Pulp and Paper) Group

Timber and pulp assessment
  • Latest update: September 2025
  • Next scheduled: August 2026

Show media reports (244) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • Substantiated concerns
    • In October 2007 Asia Pulp and Paper was disassociated from FSC because of substantial publicly available information that it was involved in destructive forestry activities. This included deforestation, destruction of HCVs, human/traditional rights violations and illegal logging/timber trade. See further details and updates here.
  • Media Monitor
    • ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.

Company assessment: APP (Asia Pulp and Paper) Group – September 2025

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 77.6% 130.44 / 168
  • Organisation: 27 / 34 79.4%
  • Policy: 60 / 76 79%
  • Practice: 43.4 / 58 74.9%
  • Self-reported: 8.4 / 58 14.5%
  • External: 21.8 / 58 37.5%
  • Certified: 13.3 / 58 22.9%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    10.75 / 12 89.6%
    • Organisation: 6 / 6 100%
    • Policy: 2 / 2 100%
    • Practice: 2.8 / 4 68.8%
    • Self-reported: 1.8 / 4 43.8%
    • External: 1 / 4 25%
    • Certified: 0 / 4 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company has published a sustainable forestry policy which covers all operations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      2. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company has published a sustainable forestry policy which applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company's chief sustainability officer has responsibility for sustainability.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      The company has a sustainability committee, chaired by the president director, and a sustainability board comprising members of the board of commissioners and board of directors. Both are responsible for overseeing the implementation of the sustainability vision and mission and providing strategic guidance on sustainability initiatives.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      5. Reports gender balance of senior management team?

      67 - The company reports that 27.46% of its senior managers are women.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      6. Reports gender balance of board members?

      1 - The company reports one female board member.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?

      [Externally verified] The company is a member of PEFC, UNGC, WBCSD, HCV, and NYDF.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?

      The company reports collaborating with the 'Tangerang Regency Government' to plant mangrove trees, aiding in the protection of the northern coastal areas from erosion. Additionally, it has partnered with the 'Ministry of Environment and Forestry' (MoEF) and the 'National Research and Innovation Agency' to conserve local tree species, as well as with 'Wava Husada Hospital' to promote healthy lifestyles among local communities.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company's latest sustainability report was published in 2023.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

      The company's sustainability report 2023 was prepared in accordance with GRI 1: Foundation 2021. Additionally, it has published the CDP Climate Change, Water, and Forest Questionnaire 2023 on its website.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      11. Climate risks assessment available?

      The company has published the CDP climate questionnaire 2023, which includes a summary of climate-related risks identified by the company, the process used to evaluate risks, and those responsible for evaluating risks.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Natural capital assessment available?

      The company reports that it has conducted a scoping assessment as part of plans to conduct a natural capital assessment in the future.

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    13.75 / 19 72.4%
    • Organisation: 10 / 14 71.4%
    • Policy: 2 / 2 100%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 3 58.3%
    • Self-reported: 1.8 / 3 58.3%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Lists countries and operations?

      Indonesia (pulp and paper mills, pulpwood suppliers and forest plantation).

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      14. Lists countries sourcing from?

      The company reports that 94% of its suppliers are based in Indonesia. The company also reports sourcing from open suppliers, including from Vietnam. However it is not clear if this covers all countries.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      15. Total land area managed/controlled for forestry (ha)?

      1758870 - The company has reported a total forest plantation area of 1,063,616 ha, an outgrower scheme area of 95,253.8 ha, and a conservation set-aside area of 600,000 ha. However, the reported outgrower scheme area is undated, and the conservation set-aside area data is over two years old.

    • N

      16. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has plantation-based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      1063620 - The company reports the forest areas of each FMU. PT. Arara Abadi, 296,373 ha, PT. Riau Abadi Lestari, 12,000 ha, PT. Finnantara Intiga, 299,700 ha, PT. Satria Perkasa Agung 77,702 ha, PT. Satria Perkasa Agung Serapung 11,927 ha, PT. Satria Perkasa Agung Sinar Merawang 10,070 ha, PT. Wirarakarya Sakti 290,378 ha, PT. Sumalindo Hutani Jaya I 10,976 ha and PT. Sumalindo Hutani Jaya II 54,490 ha. In the total area of forest plantation, outgrower scheme areas are not included.

    • N
      0 / 1

      18. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

      95253.8 - The company reports 95,253.8 ha of community forests. However, it is unclear whether this includes all outgrowers and the information is undated.

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Unplanted area (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

      0

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      20. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      600000 - The company states that it has a protected area of 600,000 ha within the concession. However, the information is now over two years old.

    • N

      21. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not produce wood/wood fibre.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      22. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

      9 - The company reports that it has nine FMUs.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      23. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

      The company reports georeferenced maps for all of its FMUs,.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      24. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

      The company has forest management plans available for all nine FMUs.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      25. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation available?

      The company has published public summary of all its FMUs which includes monitoring and management plans. These summaries are self-reported.

    • N

      26. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use right (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • N

      27. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • N

      28. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      29. Maps of all third-party supplying FMUs?

      The company reports maps of all of its third-party supplying FMUs, however this information is over two years old.

    • N

      30. Number of company owned sawmills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any sawmills.

    • N

      31. Names and locations of company owned sawmills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any sawmills.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      32. Number of company-owned pulp and paper mills?

      14 - The company has 14 mills located on the Java, Sumatra, and Kalimantan islands.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      33. Names and locations of company-owned pulp and paper mills?

      The company has reported the names and locations of all its mills.

    • N

      34. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned sawmills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any sawmills.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      35. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned pulp and paper mills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?

      The company reports that its sources 47% from its own plantations, 5% from third parties and 48% in the form of recycled material.

    • N

      36. Number of third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • N

      37. Names and locations of all third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • N

      38. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      39. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?

      The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. Full points have been awarded for this indicator on the basis that 100% of the company's wood/wood fibre supply is SVLK certified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      40. Percentage of supply traceable to country of harvest?

      100 - The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. Full points have been awarded for this indicator on the basis that 100% of the company's wood/wood fibre supply is SVLK certified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      41. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?

      The company reports its product tracing system allows it to trace wood to the forest of origin.

    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level?

  • Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives
    5.93 / 9 65.9%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3 / 4 75%
    • Practice: 2.9 / 5 58.6%
    • Self-reported: 2.9 / 5 58.6%
    • External: 0 / 5 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 5 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?

      The company is 100% legality verified by PHPL-VLK (SVLK, Timber Legality Assurance System).

    • Y
      1 / 1

      44. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      100% - The company states that it is 100% SVLK certified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      45. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?

      The company reports that it is already 100% SVLK certified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      46. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      100% - The company's suppliers and operations are 100% SVLK certified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs within 10 years?

      The company is working toward re-association with FSC following the introduction of the FSC remedy framework.

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply (tonnes) from all suppliers that comes from FSC FM certified areas?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      50. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood and/or PEFC Controlled Sources requirements?

      The company has reported that its 94% of suppliers' concession areas were PEFC Sustainable Forest Management certified while the remaining 6% certified under PHPL-VLK. Wood harvested from these areas is considered compliant with the PEFC Controlled Sources.

    • P
      0.93 / 1

      51. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

      93% - The company reports that 93% of its forest area is PEFC FM certified.

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    16.61 / 26 63.9%
    • Organisation: 1 / 2 50%
    • Policy: 8 / 16 50%
    • Practice: 7.6 / 8 95.1%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 3.8 / 8 46.9%
    • Certified: 3.9 / 8 48.3%
    • N
      0 / 1

      52. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      53. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all of its pulpwood suppliers to zero conversion of natural forests. However, the commitment does not explicitly include all natural ecosystems.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      54. Commitment to zero deforestation?

      The company commits to zero deforestation.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      55. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to zero deforestation.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      56. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

      The company defines deforestation as removal of HCV and HCS areas and specifies any deforestation past 1st February 2013 will not be accepted.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      57. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

      The company defines deforestation as removal of HCV and HCS areas and specifies any deforestation past 1 February 2013 will not be accepted.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      58. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

      [Externally verified] The company states that it employs a precision forestry concept, using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to capture monitoring images. While this information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas, the scope of the monitored area and the timeframe remain unclear. Additionally, the company states that it employs ESA Sentinel-1 active sensor satellites to continuously monitor land cover changes, providing monthly detection and alerts to district management levels. However, it is unclear whether this system has been fully implemented.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      59. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

      [Externally verified] The company has utilised RADARSAT-2 satellite technology since 2017 to establish a Forest Alert System for monitoring forest cover changes across its suppliers' concession areas. It also reports a decline in land cover change from 0.29% to 0.13% in 2023. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      60. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?

      0.13% - The company reports maintaining a forest cover loss rate of 0.13% in 2023. However, this figure includes both its own concession areas and those of its suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      61. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?

      0.13% - The company reports maintaining a forest cover loss rate of 0.13% in suppliers' concessions in 2023. However, no data has been reported since the 2013 cut-off date.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      62. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?

      The company reports its progress on the strategy and target of forest restoration. However, a clear commitment with a cut-off date could not be found.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      63. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?

      The company commits to the restoration of degraded natural forest areas across its supplier's concession areas. However, the company does not specify a cut-off date.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      64. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      [Externally verified] The company has reported collaborating with the government and the Mangrove Ecosystem Restoration Alliance (MERA) to protect and restore mangrove ecosystems across multiple locations in Indonesia. Additionally, the Tangerang Mill has partnered with the Tangerang District Government to plant 150,000 mangrove trees in the Ketapang area. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • N
      0 / 1

      65. Biodiversity policy?

      The company only states a general commitment to biodiversity protection with no detail given on scope and target.

    • N
      0 / 1

      66. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      67. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      [Externally verified] The company has identified protected species based on CITES, IUCN and government regulations such as Sumatran Tiger, Sumatran Elephant and Bornean Orangutan. The information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.93 / 1

      68. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company has been awarded full points on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also reports that it collaborated with the Mangrove Ecosystem Restoration Alliance (MERA) to protect and restore mangrove ecosystems in Indonesia. Additionally, it restored approximately 13,000 ha of degraded natural forests in 2023.

    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      71. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

      The company is committed to preventing illegal logging, encroachment, and forest fires. However, this commitment does not cover all illegal activities.

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.93 / 1

      73. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?

      Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also reports that it collaborated with various authorities to combat illegal logging and protect forests.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      74. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms?

      The company commits to not use genetically modified organisms.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      75. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to not use genetically modified organisms.

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    8.5 / 9 94.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 6 / 6 100%
    • Practice: 2.5 / 3 83.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 2 / 3 66.7%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      76. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company commits to conduct HCV assessments.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to conduct HCV assessments.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      78. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

      [Externally verified] The company has published HCV assessments for all its FMUs. Asia Pacific Consulting Solutions has conducted the assessments.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      79. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

      [Externally verified] The company has published HCV assessments for its FMUs that include management and monitoring plans. Asia Pacific Consulting Solutions has conducted the assessments.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company commits to apply the HCS Approach, as defined by the HCS Approach Toolkit.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to apply the HCS Approach, as defined by the HCS Approach Toolkit.

    • N

      82. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre OR only has natural forest operations OR has not undertaken any new planting since January 2015.

    • N

      83. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre OR only has natural forest operations OR has not undertaken any new planting since April 2015 OR if all new planting has been undertaken since November 2017 and has been covered under combined HCV-HCS assessments.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company commits to conduct social and environmental impact assessments.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to conduct social and environmental impact assessments.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      86. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

      The company has published summaries of EIAs for some of its FMUs.

    • N

      87. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

  • Soils, fire and GHG emissions Soils, fire and GHG emissions
    14.86 / 19 78.2%
    • Organisation: 4 / 5 80%
    • Policy: 6.5 / 8 81.3%
    • Practice: 4.4 / 6 72.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0.8 / 6 12.5%
    • Certified: 3.6 / 6 60.2%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company commits to protecting forest peatlands using HCV and HCS methodologies. However, it does not commit to no planting on non-forested peatlands.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment to protecting forest peatlands using HCV and HCS methodologies also applies to suppliers. However, this commitment does not apply to all forms of peatland.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      90. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      31496 - The company reports peat areas within the public summaries of some FMUs. However, it does not provide the total landbank or the planted area on peat for all FMUs.

    • N
      0 / 1

      91. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company reports that it restored 6,000 ha of peatland in a critical peat dome area in 2022, exceeding its target of 5,800 ha. It also states that 99% of critical peat dome areas were restored in 2023. However, the company does not provide updates on progress across its overall peat landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company commits to best management practices for peat and soils.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to best management practices for peat only.

    • P
      +
      0.75 / 1
      0.93 / 1

      94. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also provides examples like the use of LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) technology to understand peat distribution and typology. However, the information is now over two years old.

    • N

      95. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has plantation-based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.

    • N

      96. Commitment to reduced impact logging applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.

    • N

      97. Evidence of implementing reduced impact logging practices?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has plantation-based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      98. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company commits to zero burning.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      99. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to zero burning.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.93 / 1

      100. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by PEFC. The company also reports that it has implemented an Integrated Fire Management (IFM) system to mitigate fire risks. Additionally, it conducts routine patrols, maintains fire prevention infrastructure such as firebreaks and fire towers, installs early fire detection systems like CCTV cameras and heat sensors, and has a trained firefighting team equipped with the necessary gear.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      101. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company FMUs?

      0.025% - The company reports that fires covered 0.008% of the total concessions areas in 2023. However, it is unclear if this only covers concessions or also includes supplier operations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      102. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations?

      22 - The company reports the daily number of hotspots on its website.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      103. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

      The company commits to reduce GHG emissions intensity by 30% by 2030 from 2018 baseline. This figure includes scope 1 and scope 2 emissions.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      104. GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports carbon intensity figures as 1.02 tCO2e/tonne-product equivalent in 2023. This includes scope 1, and 2 emissions.

    • N

      105. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      106. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?

      The company reports 21,029,928 tCO2e biogenic scope 3 emissions.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      107. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that GHG emissions intensity figures remained constant between 2022 and 2023. This information is externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      108. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      The company uses Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the World Resources Institute (WRI)/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol methodology to calculate GHG emissions.

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    18.18 / 23 79%
    • Organisation: 1.5 / 2 75%
    • Policy: 8 / 9 88.9%
    • Practice: 8.7 / 12 72.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 12 4.2%
    • External: 6.3 / 12 52.1%
    • Certified: 1.9 / 12 16.1%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      109. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      The company commits to reducing water intensity by 30% by the year 2030 from a baseline of 2018.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      110. Water use intensity?

      27.3 - The company reports water use intensity as 27.3 m3/t in 2023.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      111. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      [Externally verified] The company reports a consistent water use intensity of 27.3 m³/t in both 2022 and 2023. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      112. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?

      The company commits to reduce COD levels by 30% by 2030.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      113. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that COD levels across all its mills remain below the government's standard of 350 mg/L. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      114. Treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

      [Externally verified] The company reports it has Wastewater Treatment (WWT) units comprising primary, secondary, post, and sludge treatment. The effluent is treated with Polyaluminum Chloride (PAC) and polymer chemicals to remove harmful substances. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • N

      115. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any sawmills.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      116. Proportion of processing facilities with closed-loop water treatment system?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that 17% of the water used in 2023 was recycled. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      118. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      [Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      119. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company ensures that the procurement and use of chemicals complies with national and international laws and regulations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      120. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment to procure and use chemicals that comply with national and international laws and regulations applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      121. Evidence of eliminating chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

      The company reports that it uses an elemental chlorine free (ECF) bleaching process.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      122. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

      The company commits to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      123. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      124. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

      The company commits to not use Stockholm and Rotterdam Convention chemicals.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      125. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to not use Stockholm and Rotterdam Convention chemicals.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      126. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      The company reports chemical usage for some FMUs only.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      127. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that it uses biomass byproducts, such as sludge and bio-ash, as fertilisers in its plantations. While this information has been externally verified, it is now over two years old.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.93 / 1

      128. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by PEFC. The company also reports the use of biological agents, including Trichoderma sp., Gliocladium sp., and Beauveria bassiana, to control pest growth in certain FMUs.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      129. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      [Externally verified] The company applies the 3Rs principle in its waste management system and has implemented various initiatives, such as using coal ash (a non-B3 waste) for road soil stabilisation, recycling plastic waste into Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) to reduce carbon emissions, and repurposing non-hazardous waste into new products with economic value. The information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    28.86 / 36 80.2%
    • Organisation: 4.5 / 5 90%
    • Policy: 16 / 20 80%
    • Practice: 8.4 / 11 76%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 11 0%
    • External: 4.5 / 11 40.9%
    • Certified: 3.9 / 11 35.1%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Commitment to human rights?

      The company commits to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      132. Progress on human rights commitment ?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that in 2023, 46% of its security personnel received human rights training. Additionally, it conducted a self-assessment of its operations using the Human Rights Due Diligence (HRDD) mechanism to identify key areas as part of its human rights risk assessment. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      133. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights?

      The company respects indigenous and local communities' rights. However, it does not refer to the UN Declaration or ILO Convention no. 169.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      134. Commitment to Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all its suppliers. However, it does not refer to the UN Declaration or ILO Convention no. 169.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. Partial points have been awarded as the requirements do not full meet the SPOTT scoring criteria. The company also commits to respecting customary land tenure rights in its own reporting.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      136. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. Partial points have been awarded for this indicator on the basis that 100% of the company's wood/wood fibre supply is SVLK certified and the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company's commitment to respecting customary land tenure rights also applies to its suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      The company commits to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) for indigenous and local communities.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      138. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) for indigenous and local communities, applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      139. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      The company reports the details of how FPIC principle is operationalised.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      140. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      [Externally verified] The company reports the establishment of 'Regional Social Working Groups', a 'Stakeholder Advisory Forum', and the conduct of bilateral and multilateral meetings to resolve conflicts among local stakeholders. Additionally, it has collaborated with EcoNusantara to address land conflicts. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      141. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      The company has a four-stage land dispute resolution process.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      142. Supports the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that it has created a high-level Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Roadmap and established a DEI Committee to address barriers for women in the forestry sector. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • N

      143. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • N

      144. Commitment to enable sustainable use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) by local communities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has plantation-based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      145. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities ?

      The company commits to providing essential services and facilities to communities.

    • Y
      1 / 2

      146. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      [Externally verified] The company has implemented key initiatives such as constructing roads, bridges, places of worship (mosques and prayer rooms), schools, and healthcare facilities, including maternal and child health centres and community clinics. Additionally, it has supported the construction of 44 housing units. This information has been externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      147. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

      The company commits to providing employment opportunities to local people.

    • N

      148. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      149. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company commits to the ILO's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      150. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to the ILO's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.93 / 1

      151. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by PEFC. The company also reports providing a comprehensive range of benefits to its employees, including health insurance, parental and maternal leave, sabbatical leave, paid annual leave, and participation in the company's pension plan.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      152. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company commits to preventing employment related discrimination based on gender.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      153. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment to preventing employment related discrimination based on gender, applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      154. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      [Externally verified] The company states that it provides a confidential service through the Integrated Call Centre (ICC), allowing employees to anonymously report discrimination or other concerns. This information has been externally verified by BV.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      155. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      2215 (6.7%) - The company reports 2,215 temporary employees in 2023.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      156. Reports gender balance of employees?

      2734 (8.27%) - The company reports 2,734 women employees in 2023.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      157. Commitment to pay a living wage?

      The company commits to providing wages that are equal to or above the minimum wage and reports that its wage, compensation, and benefit policy is grounded in the principles of a living wage. However, no specific commitment to paying the living wage is available.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      158. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suplliers?

      The company's commitment to providing minimum wage also applies to its suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      159. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      160. Reporting of salary by gender?

      The company reports a salary ratio of 1:1 between men and women. However, it has not disclosed the ratio of basic salary of women to men by employee category and significant locations of operation, as required under GRI reporting standards.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      161. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company commits to address occupational health and safety. However, the commitment does not refer to the ILO Code of Practice on safety and health in forestry work.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      162. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment to addressing occupational health and safety also applies to its suppliers. However, the commitment does not refer to the ILO Code of Practice on safety and health in forestry work.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.93 / 1

      163. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by PEFC. The company also reports that it provides training on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to all employees.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      164. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company reports the lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) for its mills and forestry operations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      165. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      1 - The company reports one fatality in 2023.

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    6 / 8 75%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 4 87.5%
    • Practice: 2.5 / 4 62.5%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
    • External: 2.5 / 4 62.5%
    • Certified: 0 / 4 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      166. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company commits to support smallholders.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      167. Programme to support outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that in 2023, it provided training programs to 90 Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), equipping participants with knowledge to enhance their business operations and boost revenue. Additionally, it implements the DMPA program to raise community awareness and preparedness against the risks of forest fires and deforestation. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      168. Number or percentage of outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders involved in programme?

      [Externally verified] 299 - The company reports supporting 209 farmer groups through the DMPA program and providing assistance to 90 MSMEs through its empowerment program. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas. However, it does not specify the number of smallholder suppliers involved in these programmes.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      169. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company has a Suppliers Evaluation and Risk Assessment (SERA), which describes a system to prioritise, assess or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      170. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that SERA is a mandatory screening tool for suppliers, and in 2023, 100% of new pulpwood suppliers were assessed using environmental criteria through SERA. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas. However, the data does not cover all suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      171. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      The company reports that suppliers found to breach legal requirements and the provisions of the company's policy shall receive immediate warnings. For repeated violations, their contracts will be reviewed for potential termination. However, no specific timeframes for these actions are reported.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      172. Timebound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with timber and pulp sourcing commitments?

      The company reports that it performs an initial screening and evaluation of risk for the new supplier's operations through its Supplier Evaluation and Risk Assessment (SERA) tools. Approved suppliers undergo annual SERA evaluations to ensure continued compliance with company's policy.

    • N
      0 / 1

      173. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation and/or conversion-free (DCF)?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    7 / 7 100%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 5 / 5 100%
    • Practice: 2 / 2 100%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 2 50%
    • External: 1 / 2 50%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      174. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company commits to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      176. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that in 2023, it provided anti-corruption training to 160,210 employees. Additionally, the Corporate Risk & Integrity (CRI) Division conducted a comprehensive integrity risk assessment across all operations to evaluate and mitigate fraud and corruption risks within the organisation. This information has been externally verified by Bureau Veritas.

    • N

      177. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

      The company provides details about its tax mechanism and states that the CFO is responsible for overseeing tax policy.

    • N

      179. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      180. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company states that everyone can report unethical conduct securely and confidentially through its Integrated Call Centre (ICC). ICC is a 24/7 'Speak Up'' channel for the company's internal and external parties to ask questions and raise concerns which is described in detail.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      181. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company has a grievance mechanism open to all stakeholders.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      182. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

      The company has disclosed a grievances list which includes the date, source, a summary of the complaint, status of the grievance and the date of feedback.

Media monitor: APP (Asia Pulp and Paper) Group

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.

Show media reports
Last media reports:
Are we missing a story? Submit a media report
No article found for the selected categories.

37

35

18

124

13

12

121

76

49

21


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)