Skip to content
Menu Search
Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • About this company:

    Founded in 1976, AMCEL is a subsidiary of

  • Parent company:
    Nippon Paper Industries, NYK-Nippon Yusen Kaisha
  • Landbank
    310,000 hectares
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    Private company
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private company
  • Website:

Company assessment: AMCEL – July 2020

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 28.2% 32.75 / 116
  • Organisation: 8 / 33 24.2%
  • Policy: 15 / 40 37.5%
  • Practice: 9.8 / 43 22.7%
  • Self-reported: 3 / 43 7%
  • External: 3.5 / 43 8.1%
  • Certified: 3.3 / 43 7.6%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    0.5 / 11 4.6%
    • Organisation: 0 / 6 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 1 50%
    • Practice: 0 / 4 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
    • External: 0 / 4 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 4 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company has published social and environmental policies (2015), but does not make clear commitments or have a sustainability report.

    • 2. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • N
      0 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

    • N
      0 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?

    • N
      0 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?

    • N
      0 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • N
      0 / 1

      11. Climate risks assessment available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Natural capital assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    6.5 / 17 38.2%
    • Organisation: 6 / 16 37.5%
    • Policy: 0 / 0 0%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 1 50%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 1 50%
    • External: 0 / 1 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 1 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Lists countries and operations?

      The company has forestry operations in seven municipalities within Amapá state of Brazil.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Lists countries sourcing from?

      The company reports it sources wood exclusively from forests planted with its own resources.

    • N
      0 / 1

      15. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      180,000 - It is not clear whether the company has any natural forest areas under its ownership. The company reports having 180,000 hectares of "native forest", but the exact meaning of this is unclear and the figure is undated.

    • N
      0 / 1

      16. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      130,000 - Contradictory figures are reported. The company reports having 130,000 hectares of plantation on its website, but this figure is undated.

    • 17. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't use outgrower schemes for wood/wood fibre production.

    • N
      0 / 1

      18. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      19. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      79,795.4 - A figure for total conservation area of 79,795.42 ha is listed in the 2019 FSC audit report. However, this report does not cover all of the company's operations so it is not clear if this is all the conservation area the company has.

    • N
      0 / 1

      20. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      21. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

      The company does not report a clear figure for the number of FMUs it has. It has operations in seven municipalities, and its summary management plan appears to show forestry operations in at least five municipalities. Its FSC certificate covers only one FMU.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      22. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

      The company reports a map of the municipalities where the company has operations. It is unclear if the map covers all operations of the company.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      23. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

      The company provides a general summary management plan, but it is not clear whether it covers specific FMUs or all FMUs.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      24. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation available?

      The company discusses various monitoring activities, but it is unclear if these relate to specific management objectives, and whether the management plan covers all FMUs.

    • 25. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use right (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • 26. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • 27. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • 28. Names and locations of all third-party supplying FMUs?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      29. Number of company owned sawmills?

      The data provided by the company does not cover all operations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      30. Names and locations of company owned sawmills?

      The data provided by the company does not cover all operations.

    • 31. Number of company-owned pulp and paper mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills.

    • 32. Names and locations of company-owned pulp and paper mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      33. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned sawmills that come from company's own operations and/or third-parties?

      The company reports the wood used comes exclusively from forests planted with its own resources.

    • 34. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned pulp and paper mills that come from company's own operations and/or third-parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills.

    • N
      0 / 1

      35. Number of third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      36. Names and locations of all third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      37. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?

    • 38. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • 39. Percentage of supply traceable to country of harvest?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • 40. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • 41. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    0 / 5 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 3 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      The company has some FSC and CERFLOR certification but it is not clear what percentage of its land bank this covers.

    • 44. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • 45. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs or achieved 100% FSC-certification of FMUs?

    • 48. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply (tonnes) from all suppliers that comes from FSC FM certified areas?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • 49. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood and/or PEFC Controversial Sources requirements?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      50. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    6.25 / 15 41.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 4 / 7 57.1%
    • Practice: 2.3 / 7 32.1%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1.8 / 7 25%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      51. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company s FSC-certification.

    • 52. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      53. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC-certification.

    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      55. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded?

    • 56. Amount of illegal//non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • 58. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      60. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • 61. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      62. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      The company reports it has carried out flora and fauna surveys to identify species, but does not reference a classification system for determining the threatened status of species identified.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      63. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company reports examples of various habitat and species monitoring activities it has conducted, including surveys of flora and fauna, community education on species, monitoring and rehabilitation of HCV areas, erosion control and invasive species management.

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • 65. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      66. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

    • 67. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 2

      68. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      69. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms?

      The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC-certification. The company also makes this commitment through its environment policy.

    • 70. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    1.5 / 7 21.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 3 50%
    • Practice: 0 / 4 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
    • External: 0 / 4 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 4 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      71. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC-certification.

    • 72. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      74. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • 76. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      77. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      78. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company website mentions programs and procedures for SEIA, but no clear commitment is made.

    • 79. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • 81. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

  • Soils, fire and GHGs Soils, fire and GHGs
    0.5 / 16 3.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 4 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 6 0%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • 83. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • 87. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      88. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      89. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

    • 90. Commitment to reduced impact logging applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 2

      91. Evidence of implementing reduced impact logging practices?

    • N
      0 / 1

      92. Commitment to zero burning?

    • 93. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      94. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      Details of fire monitoring are available in the integrated management plan. As the data is for 2017 (3 years old), partial points are awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      95. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company FMUs?

    • 96. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • N
      0 / 1

      100. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Water, chemical and waste management Water, chemical and waste management
    3.25 / 12 27.1%
    • Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 4 12.5%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 7 25%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 1.8 / 7 25%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • 102. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills.

    • 103. Water use intensity?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills.

    • 104. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills.

    • 105. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills.

    • 106. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills.

    • 107. Treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills.

    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

    • 109. Proportion of processing facilities with closed-loop water treatment system?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      110. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The commitment made does not cover all operations.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      111. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      [Externally verified] Limited details are avaliable in the FSC report.

    • N
      0 / 1

      112. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • 113. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • 114. Evidence of eliminating chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills.

    • N
      0 / 1

      115. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • 116. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • 118. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      119. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • N
      0 / 2

      120. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

    • N
      0 / 2

      121. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      122. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    12.25 / 27 45.4%
    • Organisation: 1 / 5 20%
    • Policy: 6.5 / 13 50%
    • Practice: 4.8 / 9 52.8%
    • Self-reported: 2 / 9 22.2%
    • External: 1.8 / 9 19.4%
    • Certified: 1 / 9 11.1%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      123. Commitment to human rights?

      The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC-certification. The company also makes this commitment through its environment policy.

    • 124. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      125. Progress on human rights commitment ?

      The company has a communication channel which can be used by a person if he/she considers himself discriminated, humiliated or the target of prejudice, abusive practices or in a situation of disrespect promoted by employees, contractors, officers, representatives, suppliers or providers of services. Progress is not externally verified, so partial points have been awarded.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      126. Commitment to respect Indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC-certification.

    • 127. Commitment to Indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      128. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). As the Policy for Association's requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC-certification.

    • 129. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      130. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • 131. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      132. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      133. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company provides examples of stakeholder engagement activities to prevent conflict.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      134. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      The company has a 'Procedure for Conflict Resolution and Possible Losses and Damages' for addressing land conflicts.

    • N
      0 / 1

      135. Supports the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • 136. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • N
      0 / 1

      137. Commitment to enable sustainable use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) by local communities?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      138. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities ?

      No commitment could be found, but the company provides examples of projects it is conducting, relating to school education and vocational training for young people.

    • Y
      1 / 2

      139. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      140. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

    • 141. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      142. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC-certification. The company also makes this commitment through its environment policy.

    • 143. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      144. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      [Externally verified] Progress on commitment to workers rights is available in FSC report 2018. The data in the report is limited and from 2017 (three years old). Thus, awarded partial points.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      145. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • 146. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      147. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company mentions a communication channel where complaints regarding discrimination can be submitted, in its manual of conduct. This is not externally verified and so partial points have been awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      148. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      149. Percentage or number of women employees?

      82 - This figure is reported in an FSC audit report and does not clearly cover all company operations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      150. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • 151. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Progress on commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      153. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      154. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The integrated management plan has details about the occupational health and safety plan of the company, but no clear commitment found.

    • 155. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      156. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company provides relevant training to its employees, but it is not clear if personal protective equipment is provided.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      157. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company reports this accident frequency rate as 8.58 for the period May 2018 - April 2019 for one FMU. For the same FMU and time period it also reports an accident severity rate of 2.85, but does not clarify the units for this figure.

    • N
      0 / 1

      158. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    0 / 0 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 0 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 0 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 0 0%
    • External: 0 / 0 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 0 0%
    • 159. Commitment to support smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't source wood/wood fibre from smallholders.

    • 160. Programme to support outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't source wood/wood fibre from smallholders.

    • 161. Percentage of outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't source wood/wood fibre from smallholders.

    • 162. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • 163. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • 164. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • 165. Timebound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with timber and pulp sourcing commitments?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • 166. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from FMUs which are compliant with timber and pulp sourcing policies?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    2 / 6 33.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 4 50%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      167. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • 168. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      169. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • 170. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • 172. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • N
      0 / 1

      173. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      174. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      175. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: AMCEL

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: AMCEL

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full indicator framework contains 175 indicators across 10 categories.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)