Skip to content
Menu Search

Kencana Agri Ltd

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: October 2019
  • Next scheduled: October 2020

Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores
  • About this company:

    Singapore based producer Kencana Agri was established in

  • Parent company:
    Kencana Holdings Pte Ltd
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    186,713 hectares
  • Palm cultivation revenue:
    100%
  • Market cap:
    20,646,770 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    KCAL.SI
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    KAGR SP
  • ISIN:
    SG1CE4000000
  • RSPO member?
    No. Subsidiary PT Sawindo Kencana joined the RSPO in 2015, but resigned as a member in May 2018.
  • Website:

Company assessment: Kencana Agri Ltd – October 2019

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 29.6% 58 / 196
  • Organisation: 17 / 39 43.6%
  • Policy: 27 / 79 34.2%
  • Practice: 14 / 78 17.9%
  • Self-reported: 12.3 / 78 15.7%
  • External: 1.8 / 78 2.2%
  • Certified: 0 / 78 0%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    6.5 / 11 59.1%
    • Organisation: 5 / 6 83.3%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Head of Sustainability

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      4 (33%) - Figure refers to position of Head/General Manager in 2018

    • Y
      1 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 (17%)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company reports it collaborated with a research consortium including NGOs and academic institutions in 2016

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    6.5 / 26 25%
    • Organisation: 6.5 / 17 38.2%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 7 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      186,713

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      67,612 - This figure includes the plasma area

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      14,311

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      119,101 - It is unclear how much of the unplanted area reported by the company is available for future planting and how much of this covers infrastructural areas and areas for conservation

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      42,600

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

      One of the company's subsidiaries is listed in GFW datasets

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      20. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      21. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      22. Number of company-owned mills?

      5 - The company reports owning five mills, with a further one under construction

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      23. Names and coordinates of company-owned mills?

      A static map of mills without coordinates or mill names is available in the company's 2018 sustainability report, but it is at too broad a scale to accurately determine locations. Two of the company's subsidiaries are listed in GFW palm oil mills dataset

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      25. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      26. Number of supplier mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      28. Number (or percentage) of third-party supplier mills that source from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      29. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplier mills that come from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • 30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a refiner

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level?

    • 36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a refiner

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    4.5 / 18 25%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 3 / 9 33.3%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 7 21.4%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 7 21.4%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      38. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      39. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      40. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      HCV, HCS, peat

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      41. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      46. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      47. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      48. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      49. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      The company reports numbers of species on its estates classified according to IUCN and national systems of classification

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      50. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company reports that it maintains HCV signage, preserves river borders and cultivates local trees within HCV areas

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      51. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    3 / 14 21.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3 / 8 37.5%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      53. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

      The company has undertaken new planting since January 2015, but no HCV assessments could be found

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      57. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      58. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company only states it uses accredited independent HCV assessors

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      60. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      61. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company commits to carrying out HCS assessments but does not specifically refer to the HCS Approach

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      63. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      64. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      66. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    6.5 / 20 32.5%
    • Organisation: 1.5 / 5 30%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 8 43.8%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 7 21.4%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 7 21.4%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      67. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      68. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      69. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. Landbank or planted area on peat?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      71. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company commits to best management practices for existing plantations on soil, but does not have a commitment for peat

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      72. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      73. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company only details best management practices for soils

    • Y
      1 / 1

      74. Commitment to zero burning?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      75. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      76. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company reports it conducts satellite monitoring of fires, the use of fireboats and patrol cars in high risk areas, and emergency response and firefighting simulations and training

    • Y
      1 / 1

      77. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

      The company reports zero fires within its estates in 2018

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      79. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      80. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      ISCC EU System 205 v.3.0 standard

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      82. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      83. GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports 773.58 kg CO2e/dry-ton CPO for activities under subsidiary PT Sawindo Kencana and 833.76 kg CO2e/dry-ton CPO for activities under subsidiary PT Alamraya Kencana Mas but this does not cover the full scope of the company's operations

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      84. GHG emissions from land use change?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    7 / 22 31.8%
    • Organisation: 1.5 / 2 75%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 11 22.7%
    • Practice: 3 / 9 33.3%
    • Self-reported: 3 / 9 33.3%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      86. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company reports figures for water use intensity but it is unclear whether this is improving as contradictory information is provided

    • Y
      1 / 1

      87. Water use intensity?

      1.65 - Figure refers to m3 of water per ton of CPO produced

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      88. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company reports that BOD levels are within legal limits

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      89. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company reports that BOD is within specified legal limits

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      90. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and/or palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      91. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      92. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      93. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      95. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

      The company reports a reduction in use of pesticides, but no figures are reported

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      96. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      The company provides some pesticide and fertiliser usage data but it is not reported per hectare, nor are specific chemicals named

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

      The company is phasing out the use of paraquat but does not have a time-bound plan

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      98. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      99. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      100. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      101. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      102. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      103. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    17.25 / 46 37.5%
    • Organisation: 2.5 / 5 50%
    • Policy: 11 / 25 44%
    • Practice: 3.8 / 16 23.4%
    • Self-reported: 3.8 / 16 23.4%
    • External: 0 / 16 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 16 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      104. Commitment to human rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      105. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      106. Progress on human rights commitment?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      107. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      109. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      The company "endeavours to resolve community complaints and conflicts through an open, transparent and consultative process", but no further details could be found

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      110. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company commits to respect indigenous and local community rights in relation to FPIC, but it does not refer to the UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples or the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      111. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      112. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company states it holds feedback and awareness meetings, and stakeholder forums for complaints, grievance resolution and adhoc engagament

    • Y
      1 / 1

      113. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      114. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      115. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      116. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      117. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      118. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      119. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      120. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      121. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      122. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company reports constructing a bridge to improve access and that it supported access to free medical care

    • Y
      1 / 1

      123. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      124. Commitment to respect all workers' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      125. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      126. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      129. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      130. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Percentage or number of women employees?

      1,618 (20%)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      132. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      133. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      134. Progress on commitment to pay minimum wage?

      The company reports all workers are paid at least the minimum wage

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      135. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      136. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      137. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      138. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      139. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      111.33 - The company reports the accident severity rate for one of its estates in 2017, indicating that within 1,000,000 working hours in one year, the estate lost 111.33 hours

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      140. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      141. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      0

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      142. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    1.75 / 15 11.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 3 0%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 10 17.5%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 10 0%
    • External: 1.8 / 10 17.5%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      143. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      Subsidiary PT Sawindo Kencana joined the RSPO in 2015, but resigned as a member in May 2018

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      144. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010 for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      Subsidiary PT Sawindo Kencana joined the RSPO in 2015, but resigned as a member in May 2018

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      145. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      146. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      147. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within five years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      148. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

      0 (0%)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      149. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

      0 (0%)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      150. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      0 (0%)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      151. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/ associated smallholders and outgrowers within five years or target already achieved?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      152. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/ outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

      0 (0%)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      153. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      154. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/ processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      155. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      156. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that three of its subsidiaries, PT Sawindo Kencana, PT Alamraya Kencana Mas and PT Sawit Kaltim Lestari (SKL), are ISPO certified, but only a fourth subsidiary, PT Agro Inti Kencanamas, can be found on the ISPO website

    • 157. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia

    • Y
      1 / 1

      158. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB, etc.)?

      Two of the company's subsidiaries, PT. Sawindo Kencana and PT Alamraya Kencana Mas, are ISCC certified

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    3 / 16 18.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Practice: 2 / 10 20%
    • Self-reported: 2 / 10 20%
    • External: 0 / 10 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      159. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      160. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      The company has a Plasma Programme, which helps to provide funds for communities' plantation development, and provides training and mentoring in areas such as good agricultural practices, administration, basic financial management

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      161. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

      8,000 - The company reports 8,000 farmers within the Plasma partnership, but does not state the percentage this represents, or the total number of smallholders in its area of operation

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      162. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      163. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      164. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      165. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      166. Time-bound plan to engage with all high-risk mills within three years?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      167. Programme to support high-risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      168. Regularly engages with a subset of high-risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      169. Procedures in place to assess all own and third-party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      170. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      171. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    2 / 8 25%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 5 40%
    • Practice: 0 / 3 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      179. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has a whistleblowing policy, but the procedure is not detailed

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company states it is possible to file a letter of grievance, but no further details are provided

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Kencana Agri Ltd

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: Kencana Agri Ltd

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 181 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)