Sampoerna Agro Tbk PT (Hutan Ketapang Industri PT)
Natural rubber assessment- Latest update: March 2025
- Next scheduled: March 2026
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the natural rubber supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Parent company:Twinwood Family Holdings SFO Limited
-
Landbank97,891 hectares
-
Market cap:238,223,118 USD
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:SGRO.JK
-
Bloomberg ticker:SGRO IJ Equity
-
LEI:
-
Activities:Natural rubber cultivation
-
Locations:Indonesia (West Kalimantan)
-
Headquarters:Indonesia
-
Related companies:The company is also assessed on SPOTT Palm Oil Sampoerna Agro Tbk PT. In 2007 PT Sampoerna Agro Tbk signed a joint venture with Triputra Agro Persada Group PT which is assessed on SPOTT Palm Oil.
-
Parent website:
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Sampoerna Agro Tbk PT (Hutan Ketapang Industri PT) – March 2025
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 21 / 25 84%
- Policy: 39 / 42 92.9%
- Practice: 37.8 / 46 82.1%
- Self-reported: 4.3 / 46 9.2%
- External: 17.5 / 46 38%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership
9 / 10 90%- Organisation: 5.5 / 6 91.7%
- Policy: 1 / 1 100%
- Practice: 2.5 / 3 83.3%
- Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
- External: 1.5 / 3 50%
-
1. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment for all its operations?
The company has published a sustainable natural rubber policy which covers all rubber operations.
-
2. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
The company reports Bona Ranto Pasaribu as the head of sustainability.
-
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
Sustainability, Research and Development Director: Dwi Asmono.
-
5. Reports gender balance of senior management team?
12 (10%) - The company reports a combined figure of 12 (10%) women in the senior management team and other managers. A separate figure for females in the senior management team is not reported.
-
6. Reports gender balance of board members?
0 (0%) - The company reports that all six board members are male. Data as of 2023.
-
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?
[Externally verified] The company's operating natural rubber subsidiary is a member of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC).
-
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?
The company reports it collaborated with West Kalimantan BKSDA to survey the existence of honey bears and monitor the potential carrying capacity in the 2022 honey bear corridor area. The company also reports multiple other collaborations, some of which include collaboration with the Faculty of Forestry UGM to conduct research in conservation areas including flora and fauna, research on staple crops, in the social and program fields.
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company's latest Sustainability Report is integrated into its Annual Report which was published in 2024.
-
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
The company's Annual Report 2023 is prepared in accordance with GRI 1: Foundation 2021 requirements.
-
11. Climate risks assessment available?
[Externally verified] The company has published a climate risk assessment summary. Some evidence is externally verified by a Tanjungpura University which collaborated on some aspects of the assessment.
-
Landbank, maps and traceability
7.5 / 8 93.8%- Organisation: 6.5 / 7 92.9%
- Policy: 0 / 0 0%
- Practice: 1 / 1 100%
- Self-reported: 0 / 1 0%
- External: 1 / 1 100%
-
12. Lists countries and operations?
Plantations (Indonesia).
-
13. Lists countries sourcing from?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
14. Total land area managed/controlled for natural rubber (ha)?
97 - The company reports that it has 97,891.38 ha of total land area managed/controlled for natural rubber. Data as of 2024.
-
15. Total natural rubber planted area (ha)?
22856 - The company reports that it has 22,856 ha of total natural rubber planted area. Data as of December 2023.
-
16. Scheme smallholders/outgrowers planted area (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
17. Unplanted area (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?
23 - The company has 23,533.95 ha of unplanted area as of December 2024. However, this information is over two years old now.
-
18. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
46 - The company has 46,772.35 ha of conservation set-aside area. Data as of 2024.
-
19. Maps of estates/management units?
A static geo-referenced map is available for the company's natural rubber operations. Polygons or shapefiles are required for full points.
-
20. Management plans for natural rubber production are available for all estates/management units?
A forest management plan covering all producing operations is publicly available.
-
21. Monitoring of management plan implementation available for all estates/management units?
[Externally verified] The company's forest management and monitoring implementation plan is available in its latest forest management plan and its 2020 FSC audit report.
-
22. Maps of all scheme/outgrower smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
23. Maps of all third-party supplying industrial estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party industrial plantations.
-
24. List of jurisdictions where sourcing from smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
25. Number of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate processing facilities.
-
26. Maps of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate processing facilities.
-
27. Number (or percentage) of company-owned processing facilities that source from company-owned operations and third parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate processing facilities.
-
28. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned processing facilities that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate processing facilities.
-
29. Number of company owned natural rubber manufacturing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.
-
30. Maps of manufacturing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.
-
31. Number of third party supplying processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any third-party processing facility suppliers.
-
32. Maps of all third party supplying processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any third-party processing facility suppliers.
-
33. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying processing facilities that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party industrial plantations.
-
34. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying processing facilities that come from the supplying facilities' own operations and third parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party industrial plantations.
-
35. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for manufacturing that comes from intermediary traders rather than directly from processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.
-
36. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to processing facility level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate processing facilities.
-
37. Percentage of supply traceable to processing facility level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate processing facilities.
-
38. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to industrial plantation level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party industrial plantations.
-
39. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party industrial plantations.
-
40. Percentage of supply from third-party processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any third-party processing facility suppliers.
-
41. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to jurisdictional level for smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
42. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to smallholder at jurisdictional level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
43. Percentage of supply from third party processing facilities traceable to smallholders at jurisdictional level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives
3.5 / 5 70%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 1.5 / 2 75%
- Practice: 2 / 3 66.7%
- Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
- External: 1 / 3 33.3%
-
0 / 1
44. Member of the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR)?
-
45. Percentage area (ha) FSC certified?
100% (93,230.38 ha) of the company's operational natural rubber landbank is FSC FM certified as of 2024.
-
46. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC FM certification of estates/management units?
100% (93,230.38 ha) of the company's operational natural rubber landbank is FSC FM certified as of 2024.
-
47. Percentage of scheme/outgrower smallholders (ha) FSC-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
48. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC certification of scheme/outgrower smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
49. Percentage of natural rubber supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party natural rubber suppliers that is FSC-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
50. Percentage of all natural rubber products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is FSC-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
51. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?
This indicator is disabled as the company is 100% FSC FM certified.
-
52. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?
[Externally verified] The company has SVLK PHPL (Sustainable Forest Management) certification.
-
53. Commitment to become 100% certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?
The company commits to 100% sustainable forest management certificaion schemes PHL, SMK3, FSC and IFC. But does not commitment to 100% coverage of operations under one scheme.
-
Deforestation and biodiversity
13.5 / 15 90%- Organisation: 0.5 / 1 50%
- Policy: 6.5 / 7 92.9%
- Practice: 6.5 / 7 92.9%
- Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
- External: 2.5 / 7 35.7%
-
54. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
The company reports commitment to no/zero conversion of natural ecosystems.
-
55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
56. Commitment to zero deforestation?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership. The company also commits to no development in High Conservation Value (HCV), High Carbon Stock (HCS) and peatland areas in its own reporting.
-
57. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
58. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (100%). The company's own reporting defines deforestation as the removal of HCV and HCS areas and specifies any deforestation/conversion past 1st October 2019 will not be accepted.
-
59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
60. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
[Externally verified] In October 2022, the company monitored deforestation via transects across its operations. The local government agency managing conservation areas (BKSDA) externally verifies the information reported. However, the external verification is over two years old now.
-
61. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
62. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
The company reports instances of illegal logging in 2020, 2021 and 2022. However, no figure for instances or the area logged since the company's cut-off date of 2019 could be found.
-
63. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
64. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?
The company commits to restore ecosystems in their own operations to their prior condition. The cut-off date beyond which deforestation/conversion is not accepted, and therefore will be restored, is 1st October 2019.
-
65. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
66. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company has also published a report with the local government agency that manages conservation areas detailing joint patrols to prevent encroachment, poaching and fires. However, own reporting is from 2022 and is over two years old.
-
67. Biodiversity policy?
The company has a biodiversity policy in which it commits to protecting biodiversity in its conservation areas and as part of the South Ketapang Landscape Conservation Initiative. However, a measurable time-bound biodiversity target is not reported in the policy.
-
68. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
69. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
[Externally verified] The company has identified several species of conservation concern, referencing the IUCN Red List and CITES. Evidence is externally verified by FSC FM audit and Hatfield consultants.
-
70. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC. The company also reports that it conducts surveys on sun bears, orangutans, and pangolins to know more about the population density in its concession areas.
-
71. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
The company commits to no hunting of all species in its operations.
-
72. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
73. Commitment to protect areas from illegal activities?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (100%).
-
74. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
75. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC. The company also conducts joint patrolling to prevent land burning, encroachment, illegal logging and hunting in its concession areas.
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments
6 / 8 75%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 3 / 3 100%
- Practice: 3 / 5 60%
- Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
- External: 3 / 5 60%
-
76. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership. The company also reports its own commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments.
-
77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
1 / 1
78. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?
[Externally verified] HCV assessment covering both concession blocks of the company for natural rubber is available. Evidence is externally verified by Ekologika.
-
1 / 1
79. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?
[Externally verified] An HCV report covering both concession blocks contains an HCV monitoring plan. Evidence is externally verified by Ekologika. A monitoring report is also available on the subsidiary company's website.
-
80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
The company commits to apply the HCS Approach, as defined by the HCS Approach Toolkit.
-
81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
0 / 1
82. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
-
0 / 1
83. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
-
84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (100%).
-
85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
1 / 1
86. Social and environmental impact assessment (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?
[Externally verified] The company has published an SEIA report prepared by Hatfield consultants.
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions
12 / 16 75%- Organisation: 2.5 / 4 62.5%
- Policy: 5 / 6 83.3%
- Practice: 4.5 / 6 75%
- Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
- External: 2.5 / 6 41.7%
-
87. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
The company commits to no planting on peat of any depth.
-
88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
1 / 1
89. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
0 - The company reports no landbank on peat as of 2023.
-
90. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
This indicator is disabled as the company has reported in the last two years that it has no peat in its operations.
-
91. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
The company reports that it does not have operations on peatland. The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC-certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to best management practices for soils and peat in its own reporting.
-
92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
93. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC. The company reports having no landbank on peat and its FM plan and FSC FM report states that the company uses Mucuna bracteata as a cover crop to protect the soil from erosion, shield the soil from weeds or plants, and provide nitrogen fixation.
-
94. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices?
The company commits to sustainable tapping practices.
-
95. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
96. Evidence of best/sustainable tapping practices?
[Externally verified] The company has published research it conducted with academics to evaluating production techniques. including tapping. Information is externally verified as it is written by academics external to the company.
-
97. Commitment to zero burning?
The company commits to zero burning.
-
98. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
0.75 / 2
99. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
[Externally verified] The company provides a map of hotspots and evidence of reporting hotspots to the local government. Further, it reports that it has a firefighter team, a fire monitoring tower, and a forest fire truck. It also provides training on forest and land fire control and has established procedures for fire patrol and forest fire alert. Evidence is externally verified by the FSC and local governments. However, the information is over two years old.
-
1 / 1
100. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates/management units?
The company reports the hotspot monitoring information for the year 2023.
-
101. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations/jurisdictions?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
0 / 1
102. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions?
-
103. GHG emissions?
In 2022, the company's scope 1 emissions totalled 11,921 tCO2e and scope 2 emissions totalled 3 tCO2e. However, the information reported is over two years old now.
-
0 / 1
104. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?
-
105. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
106. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions?
[Externally verified] The company's scope 1 and 2 emissions both increased in 2022 when compared to 2021. Scope 1 (2021): 8,481 tCO2e, (2022) 11,921 tCO2e. Scope 2 (2021) 0 tCO2e, (2022) 3 tCO2e. Evidence is externally verified by New Forests.
-
107. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
New Forests' GHG emissions methodology is aligned to the GHG Protocol.
-
Water, chemical and pest management
13 / 15 86.7%- Organisation: 1.5 / 2 75%
- Policy: 5 / 6 83.3%
- Practice: 6.5 / 7 92.9%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
-
108. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
The company only has a general commitment to reduce its water use and does not report a time-bound commitment to improve its water use intensity.
-
109. Water use intensity?
The company reports some figures for total water usage across its nurseries.
-
110. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
The company reports total water usage figures from 2022 to 2024 for it's nurseries only.
-
111. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate processing or manufacturing facilities.
-
112. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate processing or manufacturing facilities.
-
113. Treatment of effluents from processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate processing facilities.
-
114. Treatment of effluents from manufacturing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.
-
115. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (100%). The company also reports its own commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones.
-
116. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of the company landbank certified by FSC.
-
117. Reducing odours from natural rubber processing or manufacuring facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate processing or manufacturing facilities.
-
118. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (100%). The company also reports its own commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers.
-
119. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
120. Commitment to no use of paraquat?
The company commits to not use paraquat.
-
121. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
122. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
The company commits to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.
-
123. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
124. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (100%). The company also reports its own commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention.
-
125. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
126. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
The company has published a list of pesticides and fertilisers used to produce natural rubber.
-
1 / 1
1 / 1127. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of the company landbank certified by FSC.
-
128. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
Community, land and labour rights
27.5 / 30 91.7%- Organisation: 4.5 / 5 90%
- Policy: 13 / 13 100%
- Practice: 10 / 12 83.3%
- Self-reported: 0 / 12 0%
- External: 6 / 12 50%
-
129. Commitment to human rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership. The company also reports its own commitment to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
-
130. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
131. Progress on human rights commitment?
[Externally verified] The company reports that it has a committee that is responsible for monitoring human rights within the company, and minutes of meetings are also available. However, it is unclear whether human rights issues have been addressed in meetings or not. This information is externally verified by the local government.
-
132. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership. The company also commits to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (no. 169).
-
133. Commitment to Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
134. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (100%). The company also reports its own commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights.
-
135. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
136. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (100%). The company also commits to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) in its own reporting.
-
137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
138. Details on Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
The company provides the details of the FPIC process.
-
139. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also reports an example of stakeholder engagement to prevent potential conflicts. Evidence shows that there is a dedicated social team and that the company meets with affected parties. This information is externally verified by a local government official. However, the information is between two and five years old.
-
140. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
The company has published its land conflicts resolution process.
-
141. Supports the inclusion of women across natural rubber operations, including addressing barriers faced?
[Externally verified] The company provides an example to ensure that women are consulted in stakeholder engagement processes. Evidence is verified by SGS.
-
142. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
The company states a commitment to increasing food security for local communities.
-
143. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
[Externally verified] The company reports it has CSR programs in place to empower the economies of farmer groups through integrated agriculture and fish cultivation. Evidence is externally verified by the local government.
-
144. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (100%). The company also reports its own commitment to provide essential community services and facilities.
-
145. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC. The company also reports that it has supported the road repair initiatives of village and regional governments.
-
146. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
The company commits to provide work opportunities for local communities.
-
147. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company commits to Free and Fair Labour Principles.
-
148. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
149. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
150. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company commits to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.
-
151. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
152. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
[Externally verified] The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). As the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC-certified landbank (100%).
-
153. Reports gender balance of employees?
287 (3.09%) - The company reports that it has 287 (3.09%) temporary employees in 2023.
-
154. Percentage or number of women employees?
1328 (14.3%) - The company reporta 1,328 females as a part of its workforce of 9,283 in 2023.
-
155. Commitment to pay a living wage?
The company already pays a living wage to its workers.
-
156. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
157. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
[Externally verified] The company has done a living wage evaluation and determined the provincial minimum wage is slightly higher than the living wage. Figures have been verified by the local government.
-
158. Reporting of salary by gender?
The company reports that the salary ratio between male and female employees is 1:1. However, the information is not reported according to GRI 405, i.e. the ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men for each employee category, by significant locations of operation.
-
159. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (100%). The company also reports its own commitment to address occupational health and safety.
-
160. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
161. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
[Externally verified] The company delivers PPE and assigns training to all relevant staff. Evidence is externally verified through the FSC FM audit report and by the Ketapang District Government Manpower and Transmigration Office.
-
162. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
59843 - The company reports the total working hours lost due to work accidents as 59,843 hours, based on a 40-hour workweek in 2023.
-
163. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
1 - The company reports one fatality as a result of work-based accidents in 2023.
-
Smallholders and suppliers
0 / 0 0%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 0 / 0 0%
- Practice: 0 / 0 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 0 0%
- External: 0 / 0 0%
-
164. Commitment to support smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
165. Percentage of supply from smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
166. Programme to support scheme smallholders/outgrowers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
167. Percentage of scheme smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
168. Programme to support independent smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
169. Percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from smallholders.
-
170. Process used to engage smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
171. Number or percentage of smallholder suppliers engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
172. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
173. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
174. Suspension or exclusion criteria for non-smallholder suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
175. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with natural rubber sourcing commitments?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
176. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
177. Percentage of supply coming from agroforestry?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
Governance and grievances
5.75 / 6 95.8%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 4 / 4 100%
- Practice: 1.8 / 2 87.5%
- Self-reported: 1.8 / 2 87.5%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
-
178. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.
-
179. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
180. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company reports that it has established a 'Corporate Compliance Committee' (CCC) to ensure that it has the appropriate system required to train employees regarding legal responsibilities. The company also inculcates its employees with its Code of Ethics via training sessions, induction for new employees, and practical deepening at training forums involving external parties. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
181. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
The company has published its taxation policy and states that the CFO is responsible for its review.
-
182. Whistleblowing procedure?
The company has a whistleblowing system including information on how to report unethical conduct, steps taken, and how whistleblowers are protected.
-
183. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company has its own grievance handling mechanism open to all stakeholders.
-
184. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
The company discloses details of complaints and grievances, including the following details: date, issue, complainant category, actions taken, and status.
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
April 2023
KEBIJAKAN KEBERLANJUTAN (SUSTAINABILITY POLICY)
-
December 2023
KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN HUTANLESTARI (SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT POLICY)
-
2023
Annual Report and Sustainability Report 2023
-
No date
Members - FSC - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Download - PT. Hutan Ketapang Industri (HKI) - WEBPAGE
-
2024
RENCANA PENGELOLAAN HUTAN PT. HUTAN KETAPANG INDUSTRI (FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN PT. HUTAN KETAPANG INDUSTRI)
-
November 2022
SURVEY KEBERADAAN BERUANG MADU SERTA MONITORING POTENSI DAYA DUKUNG HABITAT (SURVEY OF SUN BEAR EXISTENCE AND MONITORING OF HABITAT CARRYING CAPACITY POTENTIAL)
-
January 2024
KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN TINGGI DAN KEBUDAYAAN UNIVERSITAS TANJUNGPURA FAKULTAS KEHUTANAN (MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND CULTURE TANJUNGPURA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF FORESTRY)
-
2023
PT. HUTAN KETAPANG INDUSTRI CLIMATE RISK ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
-
December 2024
Peruntukan Kawasan (Area Allocation)
-
2023
RINGKASAN RENCANA PENGELOLAAN HUTAN (SUMMARY FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN)
-
March 2024
FSC FM Report - PT Hutan Ketapang Industri
-
March 2020
FSC FM report - PT. Hutan Ketapang Industri
-
No date
Sertifikat PHPL PT HKI (PHPL Certificate of PT HKI)
-
December 2024
KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN HUTAN LESTARI (SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT POLICY)
-
No date
FSC FM/COC certificate - PT Hutan Ketapang Industri
-
June 2023
LAPORAN MONITORING AREAL KONSERVASI DI KONSESI PT HUTAN KETAPANG INDUSTRI TAHUN 2023 (CONSERVATION AREA MONITORING REPORT IN THE CONCESSION OF PT HUTAN KETAPANG INDUSTRY IN 2023)
-
October 2022
PATROLI BERSAMA DALAM RANGKA PENCEGAHAN KEBAKARAN HUTAN DAN LAHAN, PENCEGAHAN PERAMBAHAN, PEMBALAKAN DAN PERBURUAN LIAR DI AREAL KONSESI PT HUTAN KETAPANG INDUSTRI DAN DI SEKITAR CAGAR ALAM MUARA KENDAWANGAN (JOINT PATROL FOR PREVENTION OF FOREST AND LAND FIRES, PREVENTION OF ENGRAVATION, LOGGING AND ILLUCID HUNTING IN THE CONCESSION AREA OF PT HUTAN KETAPANG INDUSTRY AND AROUND THE MUARA KENDAWANGAN NATURE RESERVE)
-
September 2021
Kegiatan Patroli Pengamanan Hutan Laporan (Patrol Activities Forest Safeguarding Report)
-
December 2022
Kegiatan Patroli Pengamanan Hutan Laporan (Patrol Activities Forest Safeguarding Report)
-
October 2020
Laporan Perlindungan Hutan Tahun (Annual Forest Protection Report)
-
2019
RENCANA REHABILITASI AREAL KONSERVASI (CONSERVATION AREA REHABILITATION PLAN)
-
January 2024
KEBIJAKAN KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI (BIODIVERSITY POLICY)
-
December 2018
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for PT Hutan Ketapang Industri
-
August 2023
LAPORAN PELAKSANAAN PENGELOLAAN DAN PEMANTAUAN LINGKUNGAN (RKL-RPL) (IMPLEMENTATION REPORT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING (RKL-RPL))
-
2023
Laporan Monitoring Beruang Madu (Sun Bear Monitoring Report)
-
July 2023
LAPORAN MONITORING POPULASI ORANGUTAN DI AREAL KONSERVASI PT HUTAN KETAPANG INDUSTRI (ORANGUTAN POPULATION MONITORING REPORT IN THE CONSERVATION AREA OF PT HUTAN KETAPANG INDUSTRI)
-
2023
Monitoring Kepadatan Populasi Satwa Trenggiling (Manis javanica) pada Areal Konsesi (Monitoring of Animal Population Density Prangolin (Manis javanica) in Concession Areas)
-
No date
Planet - Sampoerna Agro Tbk PT - WEBPAGE
-
November 2023
PETA INDIKATIF PENGHENTIAN PEMBERIAN PERIZINAN BERUSAHA, PERSETUJUAN PENGGUNAAN KAWASAN HUTAN (INDICATIVE MAP OF TERMINATION OF GRANTING BUSINESS LICENSES, APPROVAL TO USE FOREST AREAS)
-
June 2023
Pelatihan Penderes Tahun 2023 (Tapper training 2023)
-
October 2023
SUPERVISI PRODUKSI TANAMAN KARET DAN PEMANFAATAN LAHAN MARGINAL DENGAN Acacia crassicarpa DI KEBUN HTI PT HUTAN KETAPANG INDUSTRI (SUPERVISION OF RUBBER PLANT PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION OF MARGINAL LAND WITH Acacia crassicarpa IN THE HTI PLANTATION OF PT HUTAN KETAPANG INDUSTRI)
-
2022
Hutan Ketapang Industri 2022 Emissions and Removals
-
January 2025
Monitoring Penggunaan Air PT. Hutan Ketapang Industri (Monitoring Water Usage PT. Ketapang Industrial Forest)
-
February 2023
FSC FM report - PT. Hutan Ketapang Industri
-
March 2022
Laporan LKS Bipartit ke DISNAKERTRANS 2022 (Bipartite LKS Report to DISNAKERTRANS 2022)
-
April 2022
LKS Bipartit 2022
-
January 2022
Pernyataan Tentang Magyarakat Adat (Statement Regarding Indigenous Communities)
-
September 2018
TALI ASIH PENGGARAPAN LAHAN KONSESI (TALI ASIH CONCESSION LAND CULTIVATION)
-
March 2021
Contoh Penyelesaian Konflik (Examples of Conflict Resolution)
-
August 2023
Resolusi Conflik (Conflict Resolution) - PT Hutan Ketapang Industri
-
November 2022
Forest Management and Stump to Forest Gate Chain of Custody Surveillance Evaluation Report - PT Hutan Ketapang Industri
-
March 2023
Form Monitoring & Evaluasi (M&E) Kegiatan CSR (Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) Form for CSR Activities)
-
2023
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LOCAL BUSSINESS DEVELOPMENT "SENTRA BUDIDAYA IKAN AIR TAWAR DENGAN SISTEM KOLAM TANAH DAN KOLAM TERPAL PLASTIK" DESA PANGKALAN BATU (CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LOCAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT "FRESHWATER FISH CULTIVATION CENTER WITH GROUND POND SYSTEM AND PLASTIC TARPAULIN POND" PANGKALAN BATU VILLAGE)
-
2023
LOCAL BUSSINESS DEVELOPMENT: PEMBANGUNAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN PERTANIAN TERPADU (IFS; INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEM) DUSUN KELUKUP BELANTAK DESA MEKAR UTAMA (LOCAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT: INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEM (IFS) DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF KULUKUP BELANTAK VILLAGE, MEKAR UTAMA VILLAGE)
-
September 2023
MANAGER MONTHLY REPORT C O M M U N I T Y & S O C I A L D E P A R T M E N T
-
No date
Hak Asasi Pekerja, Kebebasan Berserikat Dan Penghapusan Diskriminasi (Ras& Etnis) Pekerja (Workers' Human Rights, Freedom of Association and Elimination of Discrimination (Race & Ethnicity) of Workers
-
August 2021
FOREST MANAGEMENT AND STUMP-TO-FOREST GATE CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY SURVEILLANCE EVALUATION REPORT - PT. Hutan Ketapang Industri
-
January 2024
Pemerintah Kabupaten Ketapang Dinas Tenaga Kerja Dan Transmigrasi (Ketapang Regency Government, Department of Manpower and Transmigration)
-
July 2023
SISTEM KESEJAHTERAAN KARYAWAN (EMPLOYEE WELFARE SYSTEM)
-
January 2023
Wage Determination Memo
-
January 2018
K3 Policy
-
December 2023
OHS quarterly report
-
January 2020
Kebijakan Pajak Grup (Group Tax Policy)
-
September 2013
WhistleBlowing Policy
-
August 2022
Monthly Manager Report - PT Hutan Ketapang Industri
Media monitor: Sampoerna Agro Tbk PT (Hutan Ketapang Industri PT)
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
September 2024
Energi Biomassa Ancam Hutan Kalimantan Barat (Biomass Energy Threatens West Kalimantan Forests)
January 2022
Warga Desa Suka Mukti OKI Berang, Lahan Mereka Terendam Banjir Dampak Saluran Air Ditutup Perusahaan (Villagers Suka Mukti OKI Angry, Their Land Was Flooded Due to the Closure of Waterways by the Company)
September 2019
Sampoerna Agro Tanggapi Penyegelan PT HKI oleh KLHK (Sampoerna Agro Responds to the Sealing of PT HKI by KLHK)
September 2019
Walhi presses for stringent measures against firms behind forest fires
September 2019
Three companies with offices in Singapore fingered for involvement in haze
August 2019
11 Perusahaan Perusak Lingkungan Rugikan Negara Rp18 Triliun (11 Companies Damaging the Environment to the State Losses Rp18 Trillion)
0
0
0
1
0
1
6
1
5
5
Media monitor: Sampoerna Agro Tbk PT (Hutan Ketapang Industri PT)
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

