Skip to content
Menu Search

Triputra Agro Persada Group PT

Palm oil assessment
Total score: 25.9%
  • Latest update: October 2019
  • Next scheduled: October 2020
Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores
  • About this company:

    Established in 2005, Triputra Agro Persada is an

  • Parent company:
    PT Triputra Investindo Arya (Triputra Group)
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    43,477 hectares
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:
    http://www.tap-agri.com/

Company assessment: Triputra Agro Persada Group PT – October 2019

Assessment date:

Expand all categories

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 25.9% 51.01 / 197
  • Organisation: 11 / 40 27.5%
  • Policy: 15.5 / 79 19.6%
  • Practice: 24.5 / 78 31.4%
  • Self-reported: 1.3 / 78 1.6%
  • External: 13.5 / 78 17.4%
  • Certified: 9.7 / 78 12.5%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    2.5 / 11 22.7%
    5 media reports
    • Organisation: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Head of Sustainability Division

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company is a member of the Global Agri-business Alliance (GAA)

    • N
      0 / 1
      Source

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company states it collaborates with local communities, government institutions, NGOs and other relevant stakeholders to improve sustainability practices, but no details are given and this is not dated

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    8 / 28 28.6%
    1 media report
    • Organisation: 8 / 18 44.4%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 8 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      43,476.6

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      27,468.7 - Figure includes scheme smallholders/plasma areas

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      20,000 - This figure is reported in a news article on the company's website, but only a figure of 7,560 ha is reported in the company's 2018 ACOP

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      7,587.42

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      860.44 - This is the figure reported by the company in its 2018 ACOP for the land designated and managed as HCV areas

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      20. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      21. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      22. Number of company-owned mills?

      3 - The company reports owning three mills. The names of two mills can be found through the RSPO Certified Growers page under two of the company's subsidiaries

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      23. Names and coordinates of company-owned mills?

      The names of two mills can be found through the RSPO Certified Growers page under two of the company's subsidiaries. Mills named for the three subsidiaries under the company's RSPO membership can be found in GFW

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      25. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      26. Number of supplier mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      28. Number (or percentage) of third-party supplier mills that source from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      29. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplier mills that come from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    5.62 / 18 31.2%
    9 media reports
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 9 22.2%
    • Practice: 3.6 / 7 51.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 2 / 7 28.6%
    • Certified: 1.6 / 7 23.1%
    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      38. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company states it abides by laws and regulations including the moratorium map on primary forest area, and that it supports the principles of NDPE, to pursue palm oil that is deforestation-free

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      39. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      40. Criteria for defining deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      41. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2
      Source

      46. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      47. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

      A news article on the company's website on orangutan conservation quotes the company's CEO as saying "This assistance is a manifestation of our Triputra Group's commitment to biodiversity sustainability, especially to preserve orangutans as protected wildlife". In a 2018 newsletter item referring to the creation of a wildlife conservation task force and associated training, the company states it has "realized commitment to protect and maintain biological diversity."

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      48. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.62 / 1
      Source

      49. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      50. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      51. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    2.5 / 13 19.2%
    2 media reports
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 8 31.3%
    • Practice: 0 / 5 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
    • External: 0 / 5 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 5 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      53. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company states it implements HCV assessment at all sites, but does not state whether this is before all new planting

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1
      Source

      56. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

      The company undertook one HCV assessment in 2017 (subsidiary PT First Lamandau Timber), which was unsatisfactory even after resubmission, and is therefore unavailable. No NPPs could be found for the company. As the company did not submit an ACOP in 2015, it is unclear whether new planting has taken place since January 2015

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      57. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      58. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company does not state this commitment explicitly, but does implicitly commit as an RSPO member under RSPO NPP

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      Source

      60. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

      The company has undertaken one HCV assessment (subsidiary PT First Lamandau Timber), which was deemed unsatisfactory

    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      61. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company states that it has "commissioned reputable consultants to conduct HCS Assessment throughout all of its sites" but it does not refer to the HCS approach specifically. The company also commits to this as an RSPO member under RSPO NPP

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • 63. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

      This indicator is disabled as according to 2016, 2017 and 2018 RSPO ACOPs no new planting has occurred since January 2016

    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      64. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company states it implements SEIAs, but unclear if this is done for all new plantings

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      66. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    4.87 / 20 24.4%
    1 media report
    • Organisation: 1 / 5 20%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 8 18.8%
    • Practice: 2.4 / 7 33.9%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 7 10.7%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1.6 / 7 23.1%
    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      67. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company only states it abides by the moratorium map on peat areas, and supports the principles of NDPE. However, although the company does not have an explicit commitment itself, it commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      68. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      69. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. Landbank or planted area on peat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      71. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      72. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.62 / 1
      Source

      73. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      74. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company only states that it abides by the prevailing laws and regulations in all aspects of its activities, "such as zero burning policy", but it is unclear if this applies to all new planting

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      75. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2
      Source

      76. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company launched a "Fire Free Village" program which will facilitate the implementation of fire training, early fire handling, and increase awareness of fire prevention, and reports that it has conducted forest fire prevention training for all subsidiaries in Central Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, and Jambi, and conducted regular joint patrols

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      77. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      Source

      79. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

      The company only states that its methane gas capture program will reduce GHG emissions and bring its plantations closer to being energy-neutral

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      80. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      Source

      82. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

      The company only states that its methane gas capture programme will reduce GHG emissions

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      83. GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      84. GHG emissions from land use change?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    5.36 / 22 24.4%
    7 media reports
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 11 4.5%
    • Practice: 4.9 / 9 54%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 9 0%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 4.9 / 9 54%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      85. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      86. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      87. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      88. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      90. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and/or palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      91. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.62 / 1
      Source

      92. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      93. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company states that its composting programme will reduce 'dependency on inorganic fertilisers', but a clear commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including both fertilisers and pesticides, could not be found

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.62 / 1
      Source

      95. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      96. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      97. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      98. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      99. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      100. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      101. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      102. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.62 / 1
      Source

      103. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      The company reports one example of using natural pest control: one of its subsidiaries has implemented a hatchery for barn owls as a pest control agent.Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    10.62 / 46 23.1%
    8 media reports
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 25 14%
    • Practice: 7.1 / 16 44.5%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 16 3.1%
    • External: 5 / 16 31.3%
    • Certified: 1.6 / 16 10.1%
    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      104. Commitment to human rights?

      The company states that it "supports the principles of NDPE, to pursue sustainable palm oil that is deforestation free, respects human and community rights"

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      105. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2
      Source

      106. Progress on human rights commitment?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      107. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      109. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      110. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company states that it "supports the principles of NDPE, to pursue sustainable palm oil that is deforestation free, respects human and community rights"

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      111. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2
      Source

      112. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      113. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      The company only states it implements FPIC at all sites in relation to achieving certification, but does not state whether this is done for all new planting

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      114. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      115. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain guidance and requirements on the process to conduct free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's commitments under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      116. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      117. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced, applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      118. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company states it is committed to contributing to 'national development by providing food … security' but does not clearly commit to supporting food security in the local communities it has an impact upon

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      119. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      120. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      121. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.62 / 1
      Source

      122. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company reports that it builds roads and provides free medical treatment, but this information is not dated. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      123. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      124. Commitment to respect all workers' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2
      Source

      125. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      126. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      128. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      129. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      130. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      131. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      132. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      133. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2
      Source

      134. Progress on commitment to pay minimum wage?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      135. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      136. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      137. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      138. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company reports that one of its subsidiaries, PT First Lamandau Timber International, achieved zero accidents in 2018

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      139. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      140. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      141. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • Y
      1 / 2
      Source

      142. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    6.04 / 15 40.3%
    2 media reports
    • Organisation: 1 / 2 50%
    • Policy: 2 / 3 66.7%
    • Practice: 3 / 10 30.4%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 10 0%
    • External: 3 / 10 30.4%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      143. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      2,007

    • N
      0 / 1
      Source

      144. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010 for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      2014

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      145. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      Source

      146. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      The company only states that is operates in Indonesia (Jambi and Central Kalimantan), however the company's website states it has operations in Jambi, East Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan and West Kalimantan

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      147. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within five years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      2020 - This target has changed from 2019 reported in 2017 ACOP

    • P
      0.62 / 1
      Source

      148. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

      26,821.3 (62%)

    • N
      0 / 1
      Source

      149. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

      0 (0%)

    • P
      0.67 / 1
      Source

      150. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      2 (66.7%)

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      151. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/ associated smallholders and outgrowers within five years or target already achieved?

      2023

    • N
      0 / 1
      Source

      152. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/ outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

      0 (0%)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      153. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      154. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/ processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1
      Source

      155. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

      Book & Claim, Mass Balance

    • P
      0.75 / 1
      Source

      156. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      [Externally verified] One of the company's subsidiaries has ISPO certification

    • 157. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      158. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB, etc.)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    3 / 16 18.8%
    10 media reports
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Practice: 2 / 10 20%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 10 0%
    • External: 2 / 10 20%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      159. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company reports that it supports independent smallholders through training in best management practices in agronomy, supporting mapping for traceability, through its fire free village program for fire prevention, and with education about environmental management

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      160. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      The company states it has a plasma program that trains farmers in agricultural practices. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      161. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      162. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

      The company reports that it supports independent smallholders through training in best management practices in agronomy, supporting mapping for traceability, through its fire free village program for fire prevention, and with education about environmental management. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      163. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      164. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      165. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      166. Time-bound plan to engage with all high-risk mills within three years?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      167. Programme to support high-risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      168. Regularly engages with a subset of high-risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      169. Procedures in place to assess all own and third-party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      170. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      171. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    2.5 / 8 31.3%
    8 media reports
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 5 30%
    • Practice: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company states that one of its values is integrity, including "adhering to the right ethics and business conduct" but does not mention corruption/bribery

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2
      Source

      177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      179. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • Y
      1 / 1
      Source

      180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Triputra Agro Persada Group PT

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
Reset
Search:

October 2019

GBSM: Kebakaran Di Lahan Konsesi Bukan Kesengajaan dan Kelalaian (GBSM: Fires on Concession Land Not Intentional and Negligence)

Visit external site

October 2019

Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan Terjadi Lagi di Indonesia (Forest and Land Fires Occur Again in Indonesia)

Visit external site

September 2019

"Tersangka Perusahaan Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan Bertambah Jadi 11" ("Suspects of Forest and Land Fire Companies Increased to 11")

Visit external site

September 2019

"Ditetapkan sebagai Tersangka Karhutla, Begini Klarifikasi PT GBSM" ("Defined as a Karhutla Suspect, Here's the clarification of PT GBSM")

Visit external site

September 2019

Respons GBSM Usai Jadi Tersangka Karhutla (GBSM Response After Being a Suspect of Forest and Land Fire)

Visit external site

January 2019

Mighty Earth Rapid Response Report 12

Visit external site

December 2018

USD 11B in Loans to Palm Oil Industry: ESG Issues May Create Indirect Risks for Bank Investors

Visit external site

December 2018

The Chain: Malaysian BLD Tops List of Major Deforesters in 2018

Visit external site

November 2018

In funding palm oil giants, banks may share in 'sins of the companies'

Visit external site

October 2018

Indonesia's anti-graft agency ‘eager to intervene' in palm oil sector

Visit external site

July 2018

Draw the line: A black book about the shady investments by Dutch banks in palm oil

Visit external site

April 2018

How a family of local elites is still pitching to control a district in Borneo

Visit external site

March 2018

Business group sells concession containing peat forests and orangutans

Visit external site

March 2018

How a series of shady deals turned a chunk of Borneo into a sea of oil palm

Visit external site

November 2017

Geram dengan Harapan Palsu: Tuntut Konflik Sengketa Lahan PT DLJ Diselesaikan (Furious with False Hope: Demand Conflict over PT DLJ's Land Dispute Resolved)

Visit external site

November 2017

Dynasties: Part 6, Indonesia's Palm Oil Scandal

Visit external site

October 2017

Menguak Aksi Kerajaan Kecil Sawit di Kalimantan

Visit external site

October 2017

The palm oil fiefdom

Visit external site

September 2016

SDG 2: New Agri-Business Alliance Aims to Tackle Global Food Security by 2030

Visit external site

May 2015

Chain Reaction Research: Triputra Agro Persada

Visit external site

May 2015

New analysis: Palm Oil Producer Triputra Agro Persada's Lack of Transparency and Responsibility Puts Rapid Growth at Serious Risk

Visit external site

April 2014

Banking on Shaky Ground: Australia?s big four banks and Land Grabs

Visit external site

February 2014

Tuntut Lahan, Ratusan Warga Desa Blokir Jalan ke Kebun Sawit (Demand Land, Hundreds of Villagers Block Roads to Oil Palm Gardens)

Visit external site
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: Triputra Agro Persada Group PT

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 181 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

Download scoring criteria
Palm oil assessment summary

Assessment summary

How transparent are all palm oil producers and traders in the latest SPOTT assessments?

Assessment summary
Download the data

Download the data

Access the SPOTT Dashboard to download CSV data on company assessments and scores

Download the data
Nominate companies

Nominate companies

Are we missing companies that interest you? Please nominate them for future assessment

Nominate companies
Palm oil indicators and scoring criteria

Scoring criteria

View the full list of indicators and scoring criteria that inform SPOTT assessments

Scoring criteria
About SPOTT and ZSL
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Contact the SPOTT team at ZSL
Terms and conditions
SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)
Back to top

The Zoological Society of London (ZSL) is incorporated by Royal Charter. Registered Charity in England and Wales no. 208728. Principal Office: England - Company no. RC000749. Registered address: Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.

Please accept these Terms and Conditions to continue using the SPOTT Website

You are free to view and use the SPOTT Website and download SPOTT Data (i.e. all company assessment related data), including for commercial use under the following conditions:

Restrictions – you may not, under any circumstances, repost, redistribute, transmit or sub-license the data in any way, part or form, including in derivative products created by altering, transforming, or building upon the content or data.

Attribution – you must attribute the data in the manner specified by ZSL (but not in any way that suggests that ZSL endorses you or your use of the work).

Waiver – any of the above conditions can be waived if you get written permission from ZSL. Contact us here.

By clicking any link on this page, you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.