Skip to content
Menu Search

Triputra Agro Persada Group PT

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: November 2021
  • Next scheduled: November 2022

Show media reports (35) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting

Company assessment: Triputra Agro Persada Group PT – November 2021

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 65.1% 108.63 / 167
  • Organisation: 24 / 34 70.6%
  • Policy: 55.5 / 72 77.1%
  • Practice: 29.1 / 61 47.8%
  • Self-reported: 5.8 / 61 9.5%
  • External: 5 / 61 8.2%
  • Certified: 18.3 / 61 30%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    9.25 / 11 84.1%
    • Organisation: 6 / 6 100%
    • Policy: 2 / 2 100%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 3 41.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0.8 / 3 25%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company reports to have sustainability policy for all its operations covering social and environmental issues.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company's sustainable policy applies to plasma smallholders, mills and third-party suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company reports to have Head of Sustainability Division.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      The company reports that Head of Sustainability Division reports to Managing Sustainability, Trading & Downstream Directorate.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      3 (12%) - The company reports three female member and twenty two male members in the general management team.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 (20%) - The company reports one female member out of 5 members on the board of directors.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      [Externally verified] The company is a member of the Global Agri-business Alliance (GAA), Partnership for Indonesia's Sustainable Agriculture (PISAgro), Gabungan Pengusaha Kelapa Sawit Indonesia (GAPKI) and Kamar Dagang dan Industri Indonesia (KADIN). Since the information provided is self-reported, partial point is awarded. The company is a member of the WBCSD Global Agribusiness Action on Equitable Livelihoods project, this membership is reported on the WBCSD website.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company reports a conservation project with ECOSITROP (Ecology and Conservation Center for Tropical Studies) to develop a "Multi-Function Conservation Areas (AKMF) "Mayong Merapun Forest" covering an area of 600 Ha in one of its subsidiaries". No further details are provided. The company also reports its partnerships and collaborations with Yayasan Konservasi Alam Nusantara (YKAN), The Global Agri-business Alliance (GAA), Partnership for Indonesia's Sustainable Agriculture (PISAgro), ECOSITROP and DAEMETER. However, limited details of the partnerships are provided.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company's sustainability report for 2020 is published.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

      The company's sustainability report 2020 is prepared in accordance with GRI standards Core option.

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    9.86 / 15 65.7%
    • Organisation: 8 / 12 66.7%
    • Policy: 1 / 1 100%
    • Practice: 0.9 / 2 43%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0.9 / 2 43%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      137,300 - The company reports the total land area managed for palm oil to be 137300 ha.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      108,888 - The company reports the total oil palm planted area in its RSPO ACOP 2020. However, this figure includes the infrastructure area along with the area under smallholders, hence partial score is awarded.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      15,978 - The company reports the total scheme smallholders planted area in its RSPO ACOP 2020.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      34,259 - The company reports the unplanted area in its RSPO ACOP 2020.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      11,750 - The company reports the total conservation set-aside area, including High Conservation Value (HCV) area in its RSPO ACOP 2020.

    • N
      0 / 1

      18. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company reports to have not submitted concessions maps to the RSPO in its RSPO ACOP 2020 report.

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      20. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

      The company has a list of names and coordinates of all third-party supplying plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      21. Number of company-owned mills?

      15 - The company reports subsidiaries and associates had 15 (fifteen) palm oil mills.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      22. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

      The company reports to own 15 palm oil mills but information for only 9 mills is available on the GFW universal mill list. The company also reports a static image of a map of mill locations, hence partial point is awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and/or third parties?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      24. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and/or third-parties?

      The company reports that ±1.400.000 tonnes of FFB from nucleus estates, accounting for 60% of supply, ±770.000 tonnes from outgrowers, which is 31.5% and ±200.000 tonnes of FFB from plasma smallholders which accounts for 8.5% of supply.

    • 25. Number of third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 26. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 27. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and/or third party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 28. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 29. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 30. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 31. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

      The company commits to 100% traceability to plantation by 2025.

    • P
      0.86 / 2

      33. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

      The company reports 86% traceability of the total processed FFB originating from the nucleus, plasma nucleus and third parties.

    • 34. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 35. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 36. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    3.82 / 13 29.4%
    • Organisation: 2 / 2 100%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 9 20.2%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 9 9.1%
    • External: 1 / 9 11.1%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      37. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      [Externally verified] 2,007 - The company is a member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      2,014 - Company reports to be member since 2007 and received the first RSPO certification in 2014.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      39. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      The company's RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP) 2020 is submitted.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      40. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      Central Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, Jambi in Indonesia.

    • P
      0.19 / 1

      41. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

      19.21% - The company reports to have 19.21% of the total plantation area RSPO certified under RSPO ACOP 2020.

    • P
      0.13 / 1

      42. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      13.3% - Only two out of the total of 15 mills owned by the company are RSPO certified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      2,027 - The company reports a time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills in its RSPO ACOP 2020. Target over five years hence no points awarded.

    • 44. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

      The company reports the target as 2030. Target is not within 5 years, hence no point is awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • 48. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Sells RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • 50. Processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      51. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      The company states 13 subsidiaries are certified, however, this does not represent all operations and not all certificates could be found.

    • 52. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      53. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    8.69 / 18 48.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 5 / 10 50%
    • Practice: 3.7 / 6 61.5%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 6 12.5%
    • External: 0.8 / 6 12.5%
    • Certified: 2.2 / 6 36.5%
    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      55. Commitment to zero deforestation?

      Company reports that no land clearing activities will take place that results in deforestation and peatland clearance.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      56. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that the sustainability policy applies to company's own estates, plasma smallholders, mills and third-party suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      57. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation?

      The company reports High Conservation Value and High Carbon Stock Forest protection approach act as tools that can help the company to carry out a land management in a balance manner by adopting No Deforestation practices. However, the cut-off date beyond which deforestation would not be accepted is not reported by the company.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      58. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      The company reports to monitor land cover using aerial photographs of HCV areas and concludes here no significant cases of deforestation in the Company's HCV areas.

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Evidence of monitoring deforestation in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

      The company reports to Remediation and Compensation Procedures (RaCP) mandated by the RSPO for all Subsidiaries' plantations that do not have High Conservation Value HCV since November 2015. The company self reports a commitment to commitment to "remediation of non-compliant deforestation or degradation of HCV and HCS areas". However as restoration is not explicitly mentioned, partial points have been awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      63. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

      The company self reports a commitment to commitment to "remediation of non-compliant deforestation or degradation of HCV and HCS areas". However as restoration is not explicitly mentioned, partial points have been awarded. This applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      64. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      [Externally verified] The company reports to supports the landscape conservation initiatives undertaken by the local government but limited detail are provided. The company also reports working with Nusantara Nature Conservation Foundation (YKAN) to developed an integrated management of forest and land fire prevention. This example is externally verified by Tempo News. As only one example is externally verified, partial points have been awarded.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      65. Biodiversity policy?

      The company is committed to maintain the ecosystem's balance by protecting the biodiversity that resides in and around our concession areas but no target, hence partial point is awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      66. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.19 / 1

      67. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company has also identified species of conservation concern, referencing the IUCN Red List.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      68. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports information on habitats protected and restored in its sustainability report.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      69. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      The company reports that it ""prohibits hunting activities of all species except for sustainable hunting by local communities for livelihood purposes that does not cause decline of local species populations"".

    • Y
      1 / 1

      70. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that it ""prohibits hunting activities of all species except for sustainable hunting by local communities for livelihood purposes that does not cause decline of local species populations"". This applies to all suppliers.

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    8.5 / 14 60.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 7 / 8 87.5%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 6 25%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 1.5 / 6 25%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      71. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company commits to assess and protect areas of High Conservation Value (HCV) and approaches areas with High Carbon Stock (HCS).

    • Y
      1 / 1

      72. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports commitment to assess and protect areas of High Conservation Value (HCV) and approaches areas with High Carbon Stock (HCS) our own estates, plasma smallholders, mills and third-party suppliers.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      73. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

      [Externally verified] The company has one self-reported HCV assessment prior to 2015.

    • N
      0 / 1

      74. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      76. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company reports commitment to use licensed and accredited High Conservation Value assessors, but does not mention HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS).

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      77. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports commitment to using licensed and accredited High Conservation Value assessors applicable to all suppliers. However, it does not mention HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS).

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      79. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company reports to conducted a HCS Assessment using the HCS Approach Toolkit.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that commitment to assess and protect areas of High Conservation Value (HCV) and approaches areas with High Carbon Stock (HCS) is applicable to all suppliers but does not clearly mention to apply the HCS Approach.

    • 81. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      82. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?

      [Externally verified] Company reports to have peer review of High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessment for PT. Dwiwira Lestari Jaya only for year 2020.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      83. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company commits to conduct Social and Environmental Impact Assessment.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that the commitment to conduct Social and Environmental Impact Assessment applies to all suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    10.44 / 20 52.2%
    • Organisation: 2.5 / 5 50%
    • Policy: 5.5 / 8 68.8%
    • Practice: 2.4 / 7 34.9%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1.9 / 7 27.7%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      86. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      87. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports commitment in protecting and managing peatlands in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations applicable to all suppliers. However, the company does not mention the depth.

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      89. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      90. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company is committed to performing Best Management Practices in terms of peatland governance, but not for soils. However, no information soils management is available hence partial points are awarded.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      91. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment in performing Best Management Practices in of peatland governance applicable to all suppliers. However, no information soils management is available hence partial points are awarded.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.19 / 1

      92. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company provides evidence of best management practices for soils and peat.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      93. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company is committed to conduct land clearing without burning as well as prevention and control of forest and land fires.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      94. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment to conduct land clearing without burning as well as prevention and control of forest and land fires is applicable to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      95. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company provides evidence of fire monitoring and management in form of developing Fire Danger Rating System (FDRS) and patrol officers using peripheral vision binoculars, GPS, maps, Handy Talky (HT) radios, patrol books, and drones.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      96. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

      The company reports 0 cases of land fires in 2020.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      97. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

      2 - The company reports that in 2021 so far there were two hotspots and two fires "outside the concession (distance 5 km from boundary) - Smallholders". As this document is undated it is unclear what time period this is referring to, thus partial points have been awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

      The company commits to reduce GHG emissions from its operational activities but no target or time bound commitment.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      99. GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports GHG emissions intensity for 2020 and 2019. This covers all the company's subsidiaries.

    • N
      0 / 1

      100. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      101. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports the GHG emissions intensity of its six subsidiaries between 2020 and 2019. However, the intensity of only three subsidiaries shows improvement and other three subsidiary shows an increase in intensity as compared to the earlier years.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      102. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      The company reports using the ISPO GRK calculator to calculate GHG emissions.

    • N
      0 / 1

      103. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    15.82 / 24 65.9%
    • Organisation: 1.5 / 2 75%
    • Policy: 9 / 11 81.8%
    • Practice: 5.3 / 11 48.4%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 11 0%
    • External: 0 / 11 0%
    • Certified: 5.3 / 11 48.4%
    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      105. Water use intensity?

      6.8 - The company reports the water intensity to be 6.80 m3/ton of product for 2020. Since figure is not clearly related to palm oil operations partial score is awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      106. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company reports water intensity for 2020 to be 6.80 m3 /ton of product while for 2019 and 2018 to be 5.96 m3 /ton of product and 4.94 m3 /ton of product respectively. Since there is no improvement no point is awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      107. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.19 / 1

      109. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company is committed to managing POME in accordance with technical guidelines to meet the government's quality standards.

    • 110. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      111. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The company is committed to protect natural waterways through buffer zones.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.19 / 1

      112. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      113. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company is committed to reduce the use of chemicals, including chemical pesticides and fertilisers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      114. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment to reduce the use of chemicals, including chemical pesticides and fertilisers that is applicable to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      115. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

      The company is committed to not use Paraquat.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      116. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

      The commitment to not use Paraquat is applicable to company's all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

      The company is committed not use class 1A and 1B pesticides based on WHO (World Health Organization) criteria.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      118. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment not use class 1A and 1B pesticides based on WHO (World Health Organization) criteria is applicable to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      119. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

      The company is committed to not use chemicals registered under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      120. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

      The company is committed to not use chemicals registered under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention and applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      121. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      The company reports the use of fungicides (0.01), herbicides (2.68), and insecticides (0.18) in 2020 as 2.87 L/Ha/Yr.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      122. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

      The company reports commitment and implementation to minimise inorganic fertiliser use.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.19 / 1

      123. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company reports on integrated Pest Management approach.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      124. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company reports information on waste management.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    29.75 / 35 85%
    • Organisation: 4 / 5 80%
    • Policy: 19.5 / 21 92.9%
    • Practice: 6.3 / 9 69.4%
    • Self-reported: 1.3 / 9 13.9%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 5 / 9 55.6%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      125. Commitment to human rights?

      The company commits to the rights of community and workers in line the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      126. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to the rights of community and workers in line the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      127. Progress on human rights commitment?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company is committed towards respecting the rights of local communities and indigenous peoples in compliance with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      129. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports commitment to the rights of indigenous people, referencing the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      The company commits to respect legal and customary land tenure rights.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment to respect the legal rights of community land tenure and customary communal tenure or customary land is applicable to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      132. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company commits to Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) assessments to be carried out before starting any land clearing activities and request public opinion and implementing FPIC process as the fundamental to protect these rights.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      133. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports commitment to Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) assessments to be carried out before starting any land clearing activities and request public opinion and implementing FPIC process as the fundamental to protect these rights applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      134. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain guidance and requirements on the process to conduct free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's commitments under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also reports a FPIC process flow chart.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      135. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company self reports stake holder engagement method and frequency. But the information is not externally verified, hence partial point is awarded.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      136. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      The company provides a limited flow chart of the process for addressing land conflicts.

    • N
      0 / 1

      137. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

      The company commits to "protects female workers from discrimination and gender violence", citing "biological rights (childbirth, menstruation and breastfeeding)". No details on how this support is provided, thus no points can be awarded.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      138. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company commits to support community food security programs and implements program to develop the community's economic potential, including creating employment opportunities for the local community.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      139. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company self reports limited information on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      140. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company commits to provide education, health, infrastructure and culture and support the community in the form of provision of vital services and facilities to improve their quality of life.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      141. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company reports the progress on the commitment to provide essential community services and facilities.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      142. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

      The company is committed to implement program to develop the community's economic potential, including creating employment opportunities for the local community.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      143. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company commits to respects Human Rights, ILO (International Labor Organization) conventions on labor standards, and the prevailing laws and regulations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      144. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to respects Human Rights, ILO (International Labor Organization) conventions on labor standards, and the prevailing laws and regulations. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      145. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      146. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company commits to provide opportunities with equal rights to work without restrictions and discrimination of gender.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      147. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports the commitment to provide opportunities with equal rights to work without restrictions and discrimination of gender applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      148. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      149. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      6,087 (35.3%) - The company reports the total non permanent employees across all operations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      150. Percentage or number of women employees?

      4,780 (27.72%) - The company reports the total number of women employees across all operations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      151. Commitment to pay a Decent Living wage?

      The company is committed to providing a fair wage and in accordance with government regulations on minimum wage established under the prevailing laws and regulations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      152. Commitment to pay a Decent Living wage applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports commitment to providing a fair wage and in accordance with government regulations on minimum wage established under the prevailing laws and regulations applies to all suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      153. Progress on commitment to pay a Decent Living wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      154. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      155. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company is committed to providing a workplace that is based on the occupational health and safety (K3) principle for employees and contractors.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      156. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports commitment to provide a workplace that is based on the occupational health and safety (K3) principle for employees and contractors applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      157. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company reports to provide Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and occupational safety facilities or equipment only as a occupational safety programme. Since no detail is reported point is awarded for RSPO certified land.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      158. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      0.5 - The company reports the Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) per 1,000,000 work hours in 2020.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      159. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      1 - The company reports one fatality as a result of work based accident.

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    6.5 / 10 65%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 4 62.5%
    • Practice: 4 / 6 66.7%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • External: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Certified: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      160. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company commits to support the existence of smallholders and independent smallholders within the scope of the sustainable palm oil supply chain.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      161. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      162. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

      9,700 - The company reports until 2020 around 9,700 Plasma Smallholders to be involved in the programme but percentage is unclear, hence partial points is awarded.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      163. Programme to support independent smallholders?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company supports independent smallholders by providing and conducting development and training programs on governance and the principle of Good Agriculture Practices (GAP).

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      164. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      3,100 - The company reports until 2020 around 3,100 Independent Smallholders to be involved in the programme but percentage is unclear, hence partial points is awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      166. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      [Externally verified] 68% - The company reports that 68% of suppliers that have met sustainable sourcing requirements.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      167. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      The company reports that it prepares criteria in the Work Contract with suppliers and third parties which includes warnings to suspension in the event they take actions that are not in compliance with Company's policies and the laws and regulations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      168. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

      The company reports a target that by 2025 it will have received a "commitment by 100% of the supplying mills to abide by NDPE principles". It is unclear if compliance will be checked by the company or if it is based on a self-assessment by suppliers only. Therefore, partial points have been awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      169. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

    • 170. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 171. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 172. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 173. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 174. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 175. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    6 / 7 85.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 4 / 5 80%
    • Practice: 2 / 2 100%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 2 50%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 1 / 2 50%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company is committed to ethical behaviour and the prohibition of corruption.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      177. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports the commitment to ethical behaviour and the prohibition of corruption is applicable to all the suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      178. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports progress on the commitment to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

    • N
      0 / 1

      179. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      180. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has established a Whistleblowing procedure and protects those who provide information or company-related complaints.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      181. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company has established a procedure to manage internal and external complaints.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      182. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

      The company provides comprehensive details for one grievance.

Media monitor: Triputra Agro Persada Group PT

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Palm oil media reports (35) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

5

1

2

19

2

1

8

9

10

8


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)