Skip to content
Menu Search

Triputra Agro Persada Group PT

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: November 2020
  • Next scheduled: November 2021

Show media reports (33) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • About this company:

    Established in 2005, Triputra Agro Persada is an

  • Parent company:
    Triputra Group
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    74,896 hectares
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:

Company assessment: Triputra Agro Persada Group PT – November 2020

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 62.1% 103.16 / 166
  • Organisation: 19.5 / 34 57.4%
  • Policy: 55.5 / 72 77.1%
  • Practice: 28.2 / 60 46.9%
  • Self-reported: 5.9 / 60 9.8%
  • External: 13.8 / 60 22.9%
  • Certified: 8.5 / 60 14.3%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    8.75 / 11 79.6%
    • Organisation: 5.5 / 6 91.7%
    • Policy: 2 / 2 100%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 3 41.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0.8 / 3 25%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company's sustainable palm oil policy covering multiple dimensions of sustainability across the company's operations covering both social and environmental issues is integrated into the sustainability report 2019.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company's sustainable palm oil policy integrated into the sustainability report of the company applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Head of Sustainability Division.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      Managing Director of Sustainability, Trading & Downstream.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      1 (7.14%) - The company reports one female member and thirteen male members in senior management.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 (25%) - The company reports one female member and three male members on the board of directors.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      [Externally verified] The company is a member of the Global Agri-business Alliance (GAA).

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company reports its partnerships and collaborations with Yayasan Konservasi Alam Nusantara (YKAN), The Global Agri-business Alliance (GAA), Partnership for Indonesia's Sustainable Agriculture (PISAgro), ECOSITROP, Asian Venture Philanthropy Network (AVPN), and Lingkar Komunitas Sawit (LINKS). However, limited details of the partnerships are provided.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company's sustainability report for 2019 is published.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

      The company's sustainability report 2019 is prepared in accordance with GRI standards. However, the report is not published on the GRI database.

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    7 / 15 46.7%
    • Organisation: 7 / 12 58.3%
    • Policy: 0 / 1 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      74,896 - The company reports the total land area managed for palm oil in its RSPO ACOP 2019.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      55,748 - The company reports the total oil palm planted area in its RSPO ACOP 2019. However, this figure includes the infrastructure area along with the area under smallholders.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      9,572 - The company reports the total scheme smallholders planted area in its RSPO ACOP 2019.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      15,403 - The company reports the unplanted area in its RSPO ACOP 2019.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      3,745 - The company reports the total conservation set-aside area, including High Conservation Value (HCV) area in its RSPO ACOP 2019.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      18. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company reports having submitted concessions maps to the RSPO in its RSPO ACOP 2019.

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      20. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      21. Number of company-owned mills?

      10 - The company reports owning 10 mills as of December 2019.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      22. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

      The names and locations of nine mills owned by the company are available on the GFW Universal Mill list.

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and/or third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and/or third-parties?

    • 25. Number of third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 26. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 27. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and/or third party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 28. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 29. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • 30. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 31. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      33. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • 34. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 35. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • 36. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own palm kernel crushing facilities.

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    5.11 / 13 39.3%
    • Organisation: 2 / 2 100%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 2.1 / 9 23.4%
    • Self-reported: 1.1 / 9 12.3%
    • External: 1 / 9 11.1%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      37. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      2007 - The company is a member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO).

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      2020 - Member since 2007 and received the first RSPO certification in 2014.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      39. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      The company's RSPO ACOP 2019 was submitted.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      40. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      Indonesia (Central Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, Jambi).

    • P
      0.41 / 1

      41. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

      40.85% - The company reports the percentage of area RSPO certified.

    • P
      0.2 / 1

      42. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      20% - Only two out of the total of 10 mills owned by the company are RSPO certified. The certification process of PT PT First Lamandau Timber International is in process as reported by the company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      2023 - The company reports a time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills in its RSPO ACOP 2019.

    • 44. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a grower or miller.

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

      The company reports the target as 2026. Target is not within five years.

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • 48. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a grower or miller.

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      50. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      Only PT. Hamparan Perkasa Mandiri, PT. Dwiwira Lestari Jaya, PT. Buana Hijau Abadi, PT Gawi Bahandep Sawit Mekar and PT Brahma Binabakti are ISPO certified. The company states 12 subsidiaries are certified, however, this does not represent all operations and no certificates could be found.

    • 51. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.

    • N
      0 / 1

      52. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    9.66 / 17 56.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 5.5 / 9 61.1%
    • Practice: 4.2 / 6 69.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 6 12.5%
    • External: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Certified: 1.4 / 6 23.5%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      53. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company reports that it is committed to preventing deforestation in its business licenses by using the High Conservation Value and High Carbon Stock Forest protection approach.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      54. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports a commitment to no land clearing activities that result in deforestation and peatland clearance. This commitment applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      55. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      The company reports preventing deforestation in its business licenses by using the High Conservation Value and High Carbon Stock Forest protection approach. However, the cut-off date beyond which deforestation would not be accepted is not reported by the company.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      56. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      The company reports that it continuously monitors changes in land cover that occur in the permit by using "advanced technology" such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and drones that can provide a detailed description of changes in land cover, including the forest remaining in the permit.

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Evidence of monitoring deforestation in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      62. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it is committed to supporting the efforts of landscape conservation initiatives undertaken by the Regional Government. This includes Seruyan District Government (Central Kalimantan), and Kutai Timur and Berau District Governments (East Kalimantan). It states that it actively participates in discussions on the management of high conservation value areas so that it can provide constructive advice in the management of landscape-based conservation areas by the local governments.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      63. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

      The company commits to carry out conservation efforts on areas identified as having high biodiversity.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      64. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to carry out conservation efforts on areas identified as having high biodiversity. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.41 / 1

      65. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company has also identified species of conservation concern, referencing the IUCN Red List.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      66. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports information on habitats protected and restored in its sustainability report.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      67. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      The company only reports prohibiting hunting activity on protected animals in its concession areas.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      68. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

      The company only reports prohibiting hunting activity on protected animals in its concession areas. This applies to all suppliers.

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    7 / 13 53.9%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 7 / 8 87.5%
    • Practice: 0 / 5 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
    • External: 0 / 5 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 5 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      69. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also reports commitment to assess and protect areas of High Conservation Value (HCV).

    • Y
      1 / 1

      70. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports commitment to assess and protect areas of High Conservation Value (HCV). This commitment applies to all suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      74. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also reports it has carried out a High Conservation Value (HCV) Assessment and the entire plantation through collaboration with third-party assessors accredited by the High Conservation Value-Resource Network (HCVRN) licensing scheme.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      75. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

      The company only reports a commitment to using licensed and accredited High Conservation Value assessors. This applies to all suppliers. However, it does not mention HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS).

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

      The company has undertaken one HCV assessment (subsidiary PT First Lamandau Timber), which was deemed unsatisfactory.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      77. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company reports that it is committed to identifying high carbon stock areas using the HCS Approach Toolkit for all operating permits of the Group Subsidiaries.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      78. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports to assess and protect areas of High Conservation Value (HCV) and approaches areas with High Carbon Stock (HCS). This applies to all suppliers. However, the company does not clearly mention it applies the HCS Approach, as defined by the HCS Approach Toolkit.

    • 79. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has not undertaken any new planting since January 2016.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      80. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also reports conducting SEIA and AMDAL in its sustainability report.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      81. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    9.16 / 20 45.8%
    • Organisation: 0.5 / 5 10%
    • Policy: 6 / 8 75%
    • Practice: 2.7 / 7 38%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 2.2 / 7 30.9%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      83. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company's own commitment only mentions protecting and managing peatlands in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations. It does not mention the depth.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      84. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment to protecting and managing peatlands in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations. This applies to all suppliers. However, the company does not mention the depth.

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      87. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company reports its commitment to best management practices for soils and peat in its sustainability report.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      88. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

      Only the company's commitment to performing the Best Management Practices in terms of peatland governance applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.41 / 1

      89. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also provides evidence of best management practices for soils and peat in its sustainability report.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      90. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company reports that it adheres to its commitment to conduct land clearing without burning as well as prevention and control of forest and land fires.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      91. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that it adheres to its commitment to conduct land clearing without burning as well as prevention and control of forest and land fires. This applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      92. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company reports using an early warning system in the form of a Fire Danger Rating System (FDRS) that can provide scientific calculation results regarding the alert stages based on the color of the fire hazard calculated based on the fire hazard index. In addition, the company conducts routine patrols based on the Fire Danger Rating System (FDRS), as well as specific patrols at fire monitoring towers. Patrol officers are equipped with binoculars, GPS, maps, Handy Talky (HT) radios, patrol guidebooks, and so on. For areas that cannot be reached by patrol officers, the company patrols them with the support of drones. The company also reports having a Forest and Land Fire Control Task Force.

    • N
      0 / 1

      93. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      95. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      96. GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports GHG emissions intensity as 1.23 tons CO2eq per ton of CPO products for the period between 2017 and 2019. However, this covers only three subsidiaries of the company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      98. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports the GHG emissions intensity of its three subsidiaries for the period between 2017 and 2019. However, the intensity of only two subsidiaries shows improvement while one subsidiary shows an increase in intensity as compared to the earlier years. Also, the figures are reported only for three subsidiaries of the company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      99. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      The company reports using the ISPO GRK calculator to calculate GHG emissions.

    • N
      0 / 1

      100. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    16.48 / 24 68.7%
    • Organisation: 1.5 / 2 75%
    • Policy: 9 / 11 81.8%
    • Practice: 6 / 11 54.4%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 11 0%
    • External: 1 / 11 9.1%
    • Certified: 5 / 11 45.3%
    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      102. Water use intensity?

      2,362,950 - The company reports the water consumption figures (in m3) for 2019. However, the figures are not reported as intensity.

    • N
      0 / 1

      103. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      105. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.41 / 1

      106. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports information on the treatment of POME in its sustainability report.

    • 107. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      108. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The company reports its commitment to protecting natural waterways through buffer zones (watersheds and springs).

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.41 / 1

      109. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      110. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company reports striving to reduce the use of chemicals, including chemical pesticides and fertilisers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      111. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports striving to reduce the use of chemicals, including chemical pesticides and fertilisers. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      112. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

      The company commits to not use class 1A and 1B pesticides based on WHO (World Health Organization) criteria, including paraquat and other chemicals registered under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      113. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports to not use class 1A and 1B pesticides based on WHO (World Health Organization) criteria, including paraquat and other chemicals registered under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      114. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

      The company commits to not use class 1A and 1B pesticides based on WHO (World Health Organization) criteria, including paraquat and other chemicals registered under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      115. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to not use class 1A and 1B pesticides based on WHO (World Health Organization) criteria, including paraquat and other chemicals registered under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      116. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

      The company commits to not use class 1A and 1B pesticides based on WHO (World Health Organization) criteria, including paraquat and other chemicals registered under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to not use class 1A and 1B pesticides based on WHO (World Health Organization) criteria, including paraquat and other chemicals registered under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      118. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      The company reports the use of fungicides (0.03), herbicides (1.49), and insecticides (0.02) in 2019 as 1.54 Lt/ha/thn.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      119. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

      The company reports information on the implementation of its commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use in its sustainability report.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.41 / 1

      120. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company reports information on the Integrated Pest Management approach.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      121. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports information on waste management in its sustainability report.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    28 / 36 77.8%
    • Organisation: 3 / 5 60%
    • Policy: 18 / 22 81.8%
    • Practice: 7 / 9 77.8%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 9 11.1%
    • External: 6 / 9 66.7%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      122. Commitment to human rights?

      The company reports that it recognises and upholds the rights of community and workers in line with the international human rights principles and law in the Republic of Indonesia. However, the company does not reference the UN Declaration of Human Rights or equivalent.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      123. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that it recognises and upholds the rights of community and workers in line with the international human rights principles and law in the Republic of Indonesia. This applies to all suppliers. However, the company does not reference the UN Declaration of Human Rights or equivalent.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      124. Progress on human rights commitment?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      125. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company reports that it respects the rights of indigenous people and local communities. However, it does not reference the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or to the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (no. 169).

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      126. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that it respects the rights of indigenous people and local communities. This applies to all suppliers. However, it does not reference the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or to the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (no. 169).

    • Y
      1 / 1

      127. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      The company reports that it respects the legal rights of community land tenure and customary communal tenure or customary land.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that it respects the legal rights of community land tenure and customary communal tenure or customary land. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      129. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also reports that free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) assessments will be carried out before starting any land clearing activities.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) assessments will be carried out before starting any land clearing activities. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain guidance and requirements on the process to conduct free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC). Points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's commitments under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also details the process of FPIC in its sustainability report.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      132. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company states it meets with community leaders, but does not provide much detail. Information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      133. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      134. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      135. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company reports that it supports community food security programs and implements programs to develop the community's economic potential, including creating employment opportunities for the local community.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      136. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that it supports community food security programs and implements programs to develop the community's economic potential, including creating employment opportunities for the local community. This applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      137. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company reports limited information on its commitment to mitigate impacts on food security.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      138. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company reports that through its CSR pillars, namely Education, Health, Infrastructure, and Culture, it is committed to supporting the community in the form of provision of vital services and facilities to improve their quality of life.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      139. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports the progress on the commitment to provide essential community services and facilities in its sustainability report.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      140. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

      The company reports that it supports community food security programs and implements programs to develop the community's economic potential, including creating employment opportunities for the local community.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      141. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company reports its commitment to Freedom of Association, Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining, No Forced Labour, Minimum Age, Worst Forms of Child Labour, and No Discrimination. However, no commitment is reported for Equal Remuneration.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      142. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment to Freedom of Association, Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining, No Forced Labour, Minimum Age, Worst Forms of Child Labour, and No Discrimination. This applies to all suppliers. However, no commitment is reported for Equal Remuneration.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      143. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      144. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company reports that it provides opportunities with equal rights to work without restrictions and discrimination of age, ethnicity, gender, language, local customs, physical abilities, race, socioeconomic status, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, and expression, and employment status.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      145. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that it provides opportunities with equal rights to work without restrictions and discrimination of age, ethnicity, gender, language, local customs, physical abilities, race, socioeconomic status, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and employment status. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      146. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      147. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      9,163 (49.2%) - The company reports the total number of contract employees across all operations in its sustainability report.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      148. Percentage or number of women employees?

      5,268 (28.28%) - The company reports the total number of women employees across all operations in its sustainability report.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      149. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

      The company reports that it is committed to providing a fair wage and in accordance with government regulations on minimum wage established under the prevailing laws and regulations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      150. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that it is committed to providing a fair wage and in accordance with government regulations on minimum wage established under the prevailing laws and regulations. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      151. Progress on commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      153. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company reports that it is committed to providing a workplace that is based on occupational health and safety (K3) principles for employees and contractors.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      154. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports that it is committed to providing a workplace that is based on occupational health and safety (K3) principles for employees and contractors. It also mentions that it expects that its suppliers will also carry out the same treatment.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      155. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      156. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      0.45 - The company reports the Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) per 1,000,000 work hours in 2019.

    • N
      0 / 1

      157. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    6 / 10 60%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3 / 4 75%
    • Practice: 3 / 6 50%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • External: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      158. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company reports that it supports the existence of smallholders and independent smallholders within the scope of the sustainable palm oil supply chain.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      159. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      160. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

      The company reports a combined figure for plasma and independent smallholders partnership as 34 cooperatives and 9,466 smallholders.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      161. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also supports the existence of suppliers from smallholders and independent smallholders by providing and conducting development and training programs on governance and the principle of Good Agriculture Practices (GAP).

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      162. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      The company reports a combined figure for plasma and independent smallholders partnership as 34 cooperatives and 9,466 smallholders.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      163. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      165. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      The company reports that it prepares criteria in the Work Contract with suppliers and third parties which includes warnings of suspension in the event they take actions that are not in compliance with company's policies and the laws and regulations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

    • 168. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 169. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 170. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 171. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 172. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 173. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    6 / 7 85.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 4 / 5 80%
    • Practice: 2 / 2 100%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 2 50%
    • External: 1 / 2 50%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      174. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company reports its commitment to corporate governance which is guided by ethical behavior and the prohibition of corruption.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment to corporate governance which is guided by ethical behavior and the prohibition of corruption. This applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      176. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports progress on the commitment to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption in its sustainability report.

    • N
      0 / 1

      177. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      178. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has established a whistleblowing procedure and protects those who provide information or company-related complaints.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      179. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company has established a procedure to manage complaints, both internal and external complaints.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      180. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

      The company provides comprehensive details for one grievance.

Media monitor: Triputra Agro Persada Group PT

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Palm oil media reports (33) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

5

1

2

18

2

1

8

8

10

8


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)