Skip to content
Login / Signup
Menu Search
Palm oil assessments

Triputra Agro Persada Group PT https://www.spott.org/palm-oil/triputra-agro-persada-group-pt/

Established in 2005, Triputra Agro Persada is an agribusiness subsidiary of Triputra Investindo Arya (Triputra

Score:  16.9%

Latest update: 23 Nov 2017
Next scheduled: Nov 2018
Download data (CSV)
Download page (PDF)
  • Parent company:
    PT Triputra Investindo Arya (Triputra Group)
  • Landbank (oil palm):
    35,685 hectares
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private company
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:
    http://www.tap-agri.com/

Company assessment: Triputra Agro Persada Group PT – November 2017

SPOTT assesses companies against over 100 indicators across ten categories. Click on the icons or bars below to expand each category for further details, scoring and links to reports and sources.

Download data
Expand all categories

Assessment date:

Total: 16.9% 19.5 / 115.5
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • 2 media reports

      Companies should publish sustainability policies or similar covering their entire supply chain — including third party suppliers — implemented and enforced through high-level leadership that engages with wider industry schemes.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      2. Policy or commitment applies to direct and third-party suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      4. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      5. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve sustainability in relation to palm oil?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      6. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      7. Activities with government and/or NGOs to improve palm oil sustainability?

      States collaborates with local communities, government institutions, NGOs and other relevant stakeholders to improve sustainability practices, but no details given

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability 6.5 / 13 50%

    • Companies should publicly report figures on their total landbank and details of different areas under their management. They should also disclose maps of their management areas and provide details on traceability of their products, both to mill and plantation level.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      8. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      35,685.2

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      9. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      29,576.2

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      10. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      16,000 - Data more than one year old

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      11. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting)(ha)?

      5,250.05

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      12. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      859

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      13. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      14. Number of company owned mills?

      3

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      15. Maps or coordinates of company owned mills?

      Only one of the company's mills is available on Global Forest Watch under its subsidiary Brahma Bina Bakti

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      16. Number and names of supplier mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      17. Maps of estates/management units?

      Concession boundaries have been made available to the RSPO, but the company did not declare that they represent 100% of their concessions. Not all may be publicly available due to ongoing legal issues. Maps will become available on GeoRSPO. Some data is also available on Global Forest Watch but it is unclear if represents 100% of the companies concessions

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      19. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      20. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      21. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level (above 80%)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      22. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level (is above 75%)?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      23. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level (is above 75%)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity 0.5 / 12 4.2%
    • 1 media report

      Companies should commit to address deforestation and to set aside areas for conservation. They should report on any activities to manage or restore habitat in their conservation areas, or monitor deforestation in their supply chains. They should also provide evidence of species conservation and biodiversity protection.

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      Source

      24. Commitment to address deforestation?

      The company only states it abides by laws and regulations including the moratorium map on primary forest area

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      25. Commitment to zero deforestation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      26. Deforestation commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Criteria for defining deforestation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      28. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      29. Commitment to set aside areas for conservation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      30. Evidence of habitat management and/or habitat restoration?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. A landscape-level approach?

    • Yes
      0.5 / 0.5
      Source

      32. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

      A news article about orangutan conservation quotes Triputra's CEO Agro Persada Arif Rachmat as saying "This assistance is a manifestation of our Triputra Group commitment to biodiversity sustainability, especially to preserve orangutans as protected wildlife."

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      33. Commitment to not endanger species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      34. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      35. Commitment not to operate within internationally and nationally designated protected areas?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      36. Evidence of species conservation activities?

      Only state given assistance to Borneo Orangutan Survival Foundation

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments 2 / 10 20%

    • Companies should commit to the High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) approaches, and to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They should develop and publish monitoring and management plans, and provide evidence through SEIA, HCV and HCS assessments, typically published in summary form due to the sensitive nature of certain sites.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      37. Commitment to High Conservation Value (HCV) approach?

      Triputra Agro Persada states it implements HCV assessment at all sites, but does not state whether this is before all new planting

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      38. HCV commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      39. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      Do not state commitment explicitly, but commit as part of being an RSPO member

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      40. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      41. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      44. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach?

      The company states that it has 'commissioned reputable consultants to conduct HCS Assessment throughout all of its sites' but it does not refer to the HCS approach specifically

    • n/a
      -
      Source

      45. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

      This indicator is disabled as according to 2016 RSPO ACOP no new planting has occurred

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      46. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company states it implements SEIA assessments, but unclear if this is done for all new plantings

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      47. Social and environmental impact assessment (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions 0.5 / 17 2.9%
    • 1 media report

      Companies should commit to protect peatland and undertake best management practices for soils and peat. They should also have policies on zero burning and to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies should report their GHG emissions, as well as any fires that occurred in or around their estates, along with plans for managing and monitoring fires.

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      48. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      Only states abides by moratorium map on peat areas

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      49. Peat commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      50. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      51. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      53. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company only states that it abides by the prevailing laws and regulations in all aspects of its activities, such as zero burning policy, but unclear if this applies to all new planting

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. Zero burning commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      56. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      57. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      58. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. GHG commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      60. GHG emissions?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      61. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      63. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      64. Percentage of mills with methane capture (is above 75%)?

      Triputra Agro only states that its methane gas capture programme will reduce GHG emissions

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management 0 / 12 0%

    • Companies should commit to managing water use and water quality, providing evidence through time-bound reduction plans, policies on toxic chemical use and treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME).

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Time-bound commitment to improve water use?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      66. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      67. Progress towards commitment on water use?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      68. Progress towards commitment on water quality?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      69. Protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. Evidence of treating palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      71. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      72. No use of paraquat?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      73. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      74. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      75. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      76. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights 0.5 / 18 2.8%
    • 4 media reports

      Companies should commit to respect human rights, including those of indigenous peoples and local communities, consulted with free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Companies should respect the rights of workers, report relevant workforce data, and comply with health and safety legislation.

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      77. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration of Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

      The company only states that it respects human rights as a principle of IPOP, however IPOP has now disbanded

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      79. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights, referencing the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or ILO 169?

      The company only states it respects community rights as a principle of IPOP, however IPOP has now disbanded

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      80. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      The company only states it implements FPIC at all sites in relation to achieving certification, but does not state whether this is done for all new planting

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      82. Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      83. Process for addressing land conflicts?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      84. Commitment to ensure food security for local communities?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      85. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      86. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      87. Total number of employees?

      24,000 - Data is over five years old

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      88. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      90. Minimum wage that the company pays?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      91. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      92. Lost time accident rate?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      93. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Provision of personal protective equipment and pesticide training?

  • Certification standards Certification standards 5.5 / 14.5 37.9%
    • 1 media report

      Companies should become members of credible certification standards and report in accordance with all appropriate categories of membership. The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) requires members registered as growers to submit data relating to certification targets for their estates, scheme smallholders and independent fresh fruit bunch (FFB) suppliers, via an annual communications of progress (ACOP) report.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      95. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      2007

    • Yes
      0.5 / 0.5
      Source

      96. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      Source

      97. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      Triputra Agro Persada only states that is operates in Indonesia (Jambi and Central Kalimantan), however the company's website states they have operations in Jambi, East Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan and West Kalimantan

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      Source

      98. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      The company does not report a time-bound plan, however its subsidiary PT Brahma Binabakti reports a target of 2021 in its ACOP

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      Source

      99. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/associated smallholders within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of scheme/associated smallholders?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      100. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all supply chains?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      Source

      101. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      2014

    • Partial
      1.5 / 2
      Source

      102. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified (is above 75%)?

      2 (66.7%)

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      103. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified (is above 75%)?

      26,831 (75%)

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      104. Percentage of scheme/associated smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified (is above 75%)?

      0 (0%)

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      105. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified (is above 75%)?

      0 (0%)

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      106. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that are RSPO-certified (is above 75%)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      107. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

      Book & Claim; Mass Balance

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      108. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      The company states that they have received several RSPO and ISPO certifications and are working towards full certification for all plantations

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      109. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      110. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAN, RSB, etc.)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers 1.5 / 6 25%

    • Companies should report details of any programmes or schemes to support both schemed and independent smallholders, as well as criteria to assess suppliers on compliance with company policies, and in what cases suppliers should be suspended or excluded due to non-compliance.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      111. Programme to support scheme smallholders?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      112. Details of support programme for scheme smallholders?

      The company only states "our plasma program empowers farmers by giving them training on agricultural practices"

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      113. Number or percentage of scheme smallholders involved in programme?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      114. Programme to support independent smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      115. Details of support programme for independent smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      116. Number or percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      117. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      118. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      119. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances 2 / 7 28.6%
    • 3 media reports

      Companies should operate in an ethical manner at all levels, providing accessible channels and clear procedures for both employees and external stakeholders to raise any grievance or complaint with the company, as well as allowing for whistleblowing.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      120. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      121. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      122. Own grievance or complaints system?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      123. Grievance system accessible to internal stakeholders (i.e. employees)?

      The company refers to 'stakeholders' but it is unclear if this includes employees

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      124. Grievance system accessible to external stakeholders?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      125. Details of grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Triputra Agro Persada Group PT

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
Search:

November 2017

Dynasties: Part 6, Indonesia's Palm Oil Scandal

Visit external site

October 2017

Menguak Aksi Kerajaan Kecil Sawit di Kalimantan

Visit external site

October 2017

The palm oil fiefdom

Visit external site

September 2016

SDG 2: New Agri-Business Alliance Aims to Tackle Global Food Security by 2030

Visit external site

May 2015

New analysis: Palm Oil Producer Triputra Agro Persada's Lack of Transparency and Responsibility Puts Rapid Growth at Serious Risk

Visit external site
No article found for the selected categories.

Research protocols:

Research protocols guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 125 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

Download research protocols

Map of concessions: Triputra Agro Persada Group PT

Explore our interactive mapping tool for a satellite view of deforestation and fires in and around concession sites of companies featured on the SPOTT scorecard. These data can support SPOTT users in conducting further research to verify whether or not company commitments are being implemented on the ground.

Use the map search bar to find specific company concessions or locations. Click the concession sites marked by pins to zoom in for more information, then go to the company pages of featured concessions to view their assessments.

Only one of Triputra Agro Persada's mills is available on Global Forest Watch under their subsidiary Brahma Bina Bakti. Concession boundaries have been made available to the RSPO, but the company did not declare that they represent 100% of their concessions. Not all may be publicly available due to ongoing legal issues. Maps will become available on GeoRSPO. Some data are available on Global Forest Watch; however, ZSL is currently unable to ascertain if the maps disclosed constitute 100% of the company's palm oil estates. Some of the concessions are available on the SPOTT map.

About SPOTT and ZSL
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Contact the SPOTT team at ZSL
Disclaimer, cookies and privacy policy
SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)
Back to top

The Zoological Society of London (ZSL) is incorporated by Royal Charter. Registered Charity in England and Wales no. 208728. Principal Office: England - Company no. RC000749. Registered address: Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.

Please read our disclaimer to continue using the SPOTT website

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

Find out more here