Skip to content
Menu Search
  • Latest update: June 2021
  • Next scheduled: July 2022

Show media reports (13) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • About this company:

    Founded in 1940 and headquartered in Malaysia, WTK

  • Landbank
    10,000 hectares
  • Market cap:
    46,994,224 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    WTKH.KL
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    WTKH:MK
  • ISIN:
    MYL4243OO001
  • Website:

Company assessment: WTK Holdings – June 2021

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 19.7% 34.75 / 176
  • Organisation: 11 / 41 26.8%
  • Policy: 16.5 / 76 21.7%
  • Practice: 7.3 / 59 12.3%
  • Self-reported: 7.3 / 59 12.3%
  • External: 0 / 59 0%
  • Certified: 0 / 59 0%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    6.5 / 12 54.2%
    • Organisation: 4.5 / 6 75%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 2 75%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 4 12.5%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 4 12.5%
    • External: 0 / 4 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 4 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company has provided the commitment to conduct its business in a sustainable manner.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      2. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company only mentions that its supplier must create awareness of Group policy and commitment to sustainability. However, there is no clear policy stating that the company's sustainability commitments apply to all third-party suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company has a Group Sustainability committee whose key responsibility is to oversees the delivery of sustainability strategy, including review of strategic planning and to recommend strategic sustainability policies and framework to the BRMC.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      The Managing Director of the company is holds responsibility in managing sustainability within the company.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      0 - Gender balance not directly reported, but calculated from profiles of senior managment team.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 - The company reports that out of six board members only one board member is female, this constitutes the proportion of women on board as 16.7%.

    • N
      0 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?

      The company has provided examples of activities with stakeholder engagement. However, does not report actions taken (or planned) to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company has published an Integrated Annual sustainability report in 2019.

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • N
      0 / 1

      11. Climate risks assessment available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Natural capital assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    7 / 26 26.9%
    • Organisation: 6 / 21 28.6%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Lists countries and operations?

      The company states that all its timber production and processing, from natural forests and plantations, occurs in Sarawak (Malaysia).

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Lists countries sourcing from?

      The company states that all its timber production and processing, from natural forest and plantations, occurs in Sarawak (Malaysia).

    • N
      0 / 1

      15. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      8,700 - The company has 8,700 ha area of forest plantation.

    • N
      0 / 1

      17. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      18. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

      1,300 - The company state that the remaining plantable hectarage for the Group is approximately 1,300 hectares (Data as per 2018).

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      20. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      21. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

      Global Forest Watch data includes 10 wood fibre concessions, but it is unclear whether this covers all of the company's operations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      22. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

      Global Forest Watch data includes 10 wood fibre concessions, but it is unclear whether this covers all of the company's operations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation available?

    • 25. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use right (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • 26. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • 27. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • N
      0 / 1

      28. Names and locations of all third-party supplying FMUs?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      29. Number of company owned sawmills?

      4 - The company included four sawmills within its list of properties in 2019.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      30. Names and locations of company owned sawmills?

      The company has provided some details of sawmill locations, but these are insufficient to generate specific locations on Google map.

    • N
      0 / 1

      31. Number of company-owned pulp and paper mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Names and locations of company-owned pulp and paper mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      33. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned sawmills that come from company's own operations and/or third-parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      34. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned pulp and paper mills that come from company's own operations and/or third-parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      35. Number of third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      36. Names and locations of all third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      37. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      39. Percentage of supply traceable to country of harvest?

      100 - The company state that the production of logs from the Group's upstream logging operations as well as logs supplied from external sources are 100% traceable to known legal origins.

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      41. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level?

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    1 / 9 11.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 4 25%
    • Practice: 0 / 5 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
    • External: 0 / 5 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 5 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      42. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?

      The company has Sarawak Timber Legality Verification System ("STLVS") certification by the Sarawak State Government where the only verifiable sources of legal timbers are used for manufacturing plywood. The company has already met the target.

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

    • N
      0 / 1

      44. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs or achieved 100% FSC-certification of FMUs?

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply (tonnes) from all suppliers that comes from FSC FM certified areas?

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood and/or PEFC Controlled Sources requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      50. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    3.5 / 23 15.2%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 13 15.4%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 8 18.8%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 8 18.8%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      51. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • N
      0 / 1

      52. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      53. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      55. Evidence of monitoring deforestation in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded?

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      61. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

      Committed to conserving biodiversity.

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      63. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      The company has identifies species of animals and plants in accordance with the Malaysian Wildlife Conservation Act 2010, Wildlife Protection Ordinance 1998, and the International Union for Conservation of Nature ("IUCN") Red List of Threatened Species. This information is not externally verified.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      64. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company has provided multiple examples to protect conservation areas by setting up boundary fencing, putting up signs, and conducted monitoring activities through a patrol system. However, this information is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      65. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      The company has an explicit commitment to no hunting.

    • N
      0 / 1

      66. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      67. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

      The company only mentioned to prevent illegal hunting and encroachment into the HCV areas and does not provide a clear commitment.

    • N
      0 / 1

      68. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      69. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    2 / 10 20%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Practice: 0 / 4 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
    • External: 0 / 4 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 4 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      72. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company has provided the commitment to conduct a high conservation value assessment.

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      74. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      77. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      79. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company has provided the commitment to conduct a social and environmental impact assessments.

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • 82. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

  • Soils, fire and GHG emissions Soils, fire and GHG emissions
    2 / 23 8.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 10 15%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 8 6.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 8 6.3%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      83. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      89. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      90. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

      The company states that it uses helicopter harvesting in Sarawak since 1993 and also provides field Practical Training on Reduced Impact Logging. However, the company does not commit to reduced impact logging best practices across all operations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      91. Commitment to reduced impact logging applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      92. Evidence of implementing reduced impact logging practices?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      93. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company has a zero burning policy.

    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      95. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company has a proper fire management policy and the company also provides training in fire management and emergency response to employees, and all necessary equipment. Watch towers have also been built to monitor hotspots, but no monitoring plan or system is laid out. However, the information is over two years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company FMUs?

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      100. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    3.5 / 23 15.2%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 9 16.7%
    • Practice: 2 / 12 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 2 / 12 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 12 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 12 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      103. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      105. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      106. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      107. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

      Treatment of effluent from oil palm operations is detailed, but not pulp and paper mill effluent.

    • N
      0 / 1

      109. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

    • N
      0 / 1

      110. Proportion of processing facilities with closed-loop water treatment system?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      111. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The company states it establishes buffers zones but it is not clear whether this applies across all operations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      112. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      113. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company aims to reduce chemical usage by substituting the harmful substance with organic fertilisers and an integrated pest management system.

    • N
      0 / 1

      114. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      115. Evidence of eliminating chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

    • N
      0 / 1

      116. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      118. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      119. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      120. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      121. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

      The company state that it minimises chemical usage by substituting the harmful substance with organic fertilisers and integrated pest management system. However, no figures reported.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      122. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      The company clearly has an integrated pest management system. However, the information is not externally verified.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      123. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      The company has a waste management system for timber and plywood production for all its operations. However, this information is not externally verified.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    5 / 35 14.3%
    • Organisation: 0.5 / 5 10%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 21 16.7%
    • Practice: 1 / 9 11.1%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 9 11.1%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      124. Commitment to human rights?

      The company states that it identifies and respects all respective native/communal rights within timber operation areas, but does not refer to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (no. 169).

    • N
      0 / 1

      125. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      126. Progress on human rights commitment ?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      127. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company states that it identifies and respects all respective native/communal rights within timber operation areas, but does not refer to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (no. 169).

    • N
      0 / 1

      128. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      129. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      130. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      131. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      132. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      133. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      134. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      135. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      The company states it has a Resources Planning & Operations Department deals with customary land rights claims and resolves matters in an amicable matter.

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Supports the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • 137. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • N
      0 / 1

      138. Commitment to enable sustainable use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) by local communities?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      139. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities ?

      The company alludes to its dedication to community welfare, with initiatives aimed at safeguarding the rights, safety, and health of local communities. Examples are given of pass funds donated to improve local schools, but no clear commitment is made to future action.

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      140. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company state that it participated in collaborative environmental awareness and education projects within its concession areas among the school children, teachers, and communities in Sarawak. However, the information is between two and five years old and self-reported.

    • N
      0 / 1

      141. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

    • 142. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • N
      0 / 1

      143. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • N
      0 / 1

      144. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      145. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      146. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company has a commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment.

    • N
      0 / 1

      147. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      148. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • N
      0 / 1

      149. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      150. Percentage or number of women employees?

      1,169 (27%) - The company reports 27% women employees in its workforce in 2018.

    • N
      0 / 1

      151. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      153. Progress on commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      154. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      155. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company states that it has a health, safety, and environmental policy and that its operations are in compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 1994, but it does not make reference to the ILO Code of Practice.

    • N
      0 / 1

      156. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      157. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company only provides Personal Protective Equipment ("PPE") for workers who handle hazardous materials or other tasks as necessary and also provides training related to fire management and prevention.

    • N
      0 / 1

      158. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1

      159. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    0 / 8 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 4 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 4 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
    • External: 0 / 4 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 4 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      160. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      161. Programme to support outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      162. Percentage of outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      163. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Timebound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with timber and pulp sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from FMUs which are compliant with timber and pulp sourcing policies?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    4.25 / 7 60.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 5 70%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      168. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company has an explicit commitment to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      169. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      The company has provided the commitment to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption applies to all its suppliers.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      170. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company has provided the proper processes in place to identify and mitigate bribery and corruption the company also provides training to its employees. However, the information is self-reported.

    • 171. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • N
      0 / 1

      172. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • 173. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      174. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has provided the whistleblowing policy wherein it clarifies the company's whistleblowing system, communication channel and how they kept the anonymity of the informant.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      175. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company states it has a grievance procedure, but limited detail is provided and thei s procedure is only open to employees.

    • N
      0 / 1

      176. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: WTK Holdings

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Timber and pulp media reports (13) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

1

2

4

9

2

1

2

5

0

5


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)