Skip to content
Menu Search

Founded in 1924, Suzano Papel e Celulose is a Brazilian timber, pulp and paper producer.

  • Parent company:
    Suzano Holding S.A
  • Landbank (timber/pulp):
    1,266,920 hectares
  • Market cap:
    12,642,459,772 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    SUZB5.SA
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    SUZB5:BZ
  • ISIN:
    BRSUZBACNPA3
  • Activities:
    Timber production, pulpwood production, pulp and paper production, trading and distribution
  • Locations:
    Brazil (Sao Paulo, Bahia, Espķrito Santo, Minas Gerais, Piauķ, Tocantins, Para and Maranhao); Fibria - Brazil (Espķrito Santo, Bahia, Mato Grosso do Sul, Minas Gerais, Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul)
  • Headquarters:
    Brazil
  • Parent website:
  • Website:

Company assessment: Suzano S.A. – July 2019

SPOTT assesses companies against over 100 indicators across ten categories. Click on the icons or bars below to expand each category for further details, scoring and links to reports and sources.

Assessment date:

Total: 52.1% 62 / 119
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership 5.5 / 11 50%
    • Companies should publish sustainability policies or similar commitments covering their entire supply chain — including third party suppliers — implemented and enforced through high-level leadership that engages with wider industry schemes.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company has policies on Social Responsibility, Health and Safety, Environment and Quality. The company's Policy on Climate Change is not publicly available

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to all sourcing?

      The company has a Supplier Relations Policy however it only states that it prioritises suppliers that are aligned with its policies

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Sustainability and Strategy Committee that advises the Board of Directors

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      4. One or more board members have responsibility for sustainability?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      5. Percentage or number of women board members?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      6. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      7. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      2,017

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      8. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?

      PEFC, FSC, UNGC, GRI, Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact, Brazilian Coalition on Climate, Forests and Agriculture

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      9. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?

      The Forests Dialogue, Forest Forum, conservation NGOs (WWF, The Nature Conservancy, FoE Brazil, Pact to Restore the Atlantic Forest and others), and research institutions

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Climate risks assessment available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      11. Natural capital assessment available?

  • Landbank, mills and traceability Landbank, mills and traceability 8.5 / 19 44.7%
    • Companies should publicly report figures on their total landbank and details of different areas under their management. They should also disclose maps of their forest management units and provide forest management plans, as well as details on mills.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      12. Lists countries and operations?

      Brazil (São Paulo, Bahia, Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Piauí, Tocantins, Pará and Maranhão); Fibria – Brazil (Espírito Santo, Bahia, Mato Grosso do Sul, Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Rio Grande do Sul)

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      13. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      14. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      1,266,920 - Figure represents plantation area of Suzano (610,922 ha) and Fibria (656,000 ha) before merger as reported in 2017 Sustainability Reports

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      15. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

      63,947 - No information is provided on the area of plantation within outgrower scheme for Fibria

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

      102,570 - The company reports some figures but these do not cover the whole of its operations

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      17. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?

      912,168

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      18. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't have any intact forest landscapes within its landbank

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      19. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

      3 - Suzano has three FMUs.
      Fibria does not clearly state number of FMUs. It reports four industrial units

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      No source

      20. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

      The company presents static maps in its 2017 forest management plans. Geo-referenced maps (e.g. shapefile or KML) could not be identified

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      21. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

      FMP available for three units of Suzano and one unit of Fibria, however it is unclear if these cover all operations

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      No source

      22. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?

      There are some monitoring plans available however it is unclear if these cover all operations

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      23. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      24. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      25. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      26. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      12

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      27. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      Location/address for Fibria's second mill in Tres Lagoas cannot be traced

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      28. Number of company owned sawmills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own sawmills

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      29. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own sawmills

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      30. Number of supplier mills?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Maps or addresses of supplier mills?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      32. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?

      The company has CoC certification which only covers traceability for the certified portion of its supply

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      33. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?

      The company has CoC certification which only covers traceability for the certified portion of its supply

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      34. Percentage of supply traceable to country level (above 80%)?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      35. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level (above 75%)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity 7 / 10 70%
    • Companies should commit to address deforestation and to set aside areas for conservation. They should report on any activities to manage or restore habitat in their conservation areas, or monitor deforestation in their supply chains. They should also provide evidence of biodiversity conservation and species or habitat management.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      36. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      37. Zero conversion commitment applies to all sourcing?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      38. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      39. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      40. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      41. Amount of deforestation recorded?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      42. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      43. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      44. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?

      Landscape management through a partnership with The Nature Conservancy (TNC) to restore the springs of the Mucuri river; 3-year partnership with WWF to develop strategies and best practices for restoration at the landscape level

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      45. Identified species of conservation concern referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      46. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      47. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the introduction of genetically modified organisms in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). However, it is important to note that FuturaGene, a subsidiary of pulp and paper company Suzano, has received approval for the commercial use of genetically engineered eucalyptus trees. A 2016 Sustainalytics report states on the issue: "Suzano has demonstrated that they are undertaking a comprehensive engagement process with relevant stakeholders to address concerns around the use of GM plants. These stakeholders include the FSC, PEFC, non-governmental organizations, and all other relevant stakeholders in the sector, including sector specific bodies and other companies"

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments 4 / 8 50%
    • Companies should commit to the High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) approaches, and to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They should develop and publish summaries of assessments and monitoring and management plans.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      48. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company does not have a direct commitment to conduct HCV assessments across all of its operations. However, the company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of High Conservation Values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      49. HCV commitment applies to all sourcing?

      The company has a commitment to only source wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements which includes not sourcing wood from forests with a high conservation value

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      50. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      This indicator is disabled until sufficient number of HCV ALS licensed assessors are available for the location where the company operates

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      51. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

      All HCV assessments are available: Unidade Florestal Sao Paulo (SP), Unidade Florestal Bahia (BA), Unidade Florestal Maranhao (MA), however no such assessment is available for Fibria's HCV areas

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      52. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

      All HCV M&M are available: Unidade Florestal Sao Paulo (SP), Unidade Florestal Bahia (BA), Unidade Florestal Maranhao (MA), however no such assessment is available for Fibria's HCV areas

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      53. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      55. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company has commitment to SEIA in its forest management plans however it is unclear if all FMPs are available

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      No source

      56. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      57. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

  • Water, chemical and waste management Water, chemical and waste management 7 / 12 58.3%
    • Companies should commit to protect peatland and undertake best management practices for soils and peat, as well as commit to reduced impact logging. They should also have policies on zero burning and to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies should report their GHG emissions, as well as details on any fires that occurred in or around their estates, along with evidence for managing and monitoring fires.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      72. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company has BOD targets for all of its mills for 2018, however, no targets are provided to improve COD

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      73. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company reports only BOD figures for each of its mills in 2017

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      74. Commitment to protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The company states "We respect freshwater body protection laws, maintaining a 50-meter strip around springs and a 30-meter strip around waterways"

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      75. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

      The company reports that at all industrial sites effluents are treated by the company's own wastewater treatment plants, including primary treatment (physical) and secondary treatment (biological)

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      76. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own sawmills

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      77. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      The company has water consumption targets for all of its five mills for 2018. Fibria also has time-bound water reduction targets

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      78. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      1.3% - The company reports water usage figures for each of its mills and states that its water consumption was 1.3% lower than in the previous year

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      79. Commitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      80. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company mentions that it uses techniques to reduce the use of agrochemicals, but does not have clear commitment

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      82. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      83. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      84. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      The company has mentioned usage of main pulp-production chemical components for their Imperatriz unit – chlorine dioxide, caustic soda (sodium hydroxide) and sulfuric acid.However, no information available for other units. Also, the latest FSC audit reports of Fibria has reported pesticides usage for three FMUs

  • Soils, fire and GHGs Soils, fire and GHGs 4 / 11 36.4%
    • Companies should commit to managing water use and water quality, providing evidence through time-bound reduction plans, policies on toxic chemical use, waste management and treatment of wastewater and mill effluents.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      58. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      59. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      60. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't have landbank on peat

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      61. Commitment on peatland planting applies to all sourcing?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      62. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't have landbank on peat

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      63. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      64. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company states that it does not practice burning in its eucalyptus cutting and harvesting process, but does not have a clear commitment

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to zero burning applies to all sourcing?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      66. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

      The company has a forest fire prevention program that engages employees and local communities. The company also reports that it owns watchtowers and a camera monitoring system. In order to reduce response time to fire alarms, in 2017, Fibria installed 50 towers in the units of Três Lagoas (Mato Grosso do Sul state) and Aracruz (Espírito Santo state)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      67. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      68. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company only has a vague commitment to reduce GHG emissions

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      69. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?

      0.2 - The company reports its emissions intensity decreased by 8.37% between 2015 and 2017. However, the company has no time-bound target in place

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. Report GHG emissions from land use change?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      71. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights 15.5 / 22 70.5%
    • Companies should commit to respect human rights, including those of indigenous peoples and local communities, and free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Companies should respect the rights of workers, report relevant workforce data, and address with health and safety issues.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      85. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration on Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights.
      Fibria also has a detailed human rights policy based on UDHR and HNGP

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      86. Commitment to human rights applies to all sourcing?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      87. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses the rights of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples as established by the ILO Convention 169

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      88. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of traditional rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses customary rights

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      90. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      91. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      92. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company has discussed various tools that it uses for local engagement and socio-environmental agents responsible for maintaining relations and operational dialogue with local communities

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      93. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      95. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      96. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      97. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      98. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of any of the ILO Core Conventions. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      99. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      100. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      101. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      77 (0.95%)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      102. Percentage or number of women employees?

      3,594

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      103. Payment of minimum wage?

      The company reports that the variation between the lowest salary paid and the national minimum wage was +30% (up from +11.5% in 2016)

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      104. Reporting of salary by gender?

      The company reports on ratio of women’s compensation to men’s compensation by position level in 2017, however, it is not clear whether the temporary employees are included or not

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      105. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      106. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      12.44 - Rate of lost workdays among employees at Suzano. Fibria reports accidents per million km driven in wood transport which is not included in the number

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      107. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      2 - Including one accident at Fibria

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      108. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      Fibria does not mention providing PPE

  • Certification standards Certification standards 4 / 14 28.6%
    • Companies should be certified by credible certification standards, or have time-bound commitments to achieve 100% certification of forest management units. They should also ensure that their supply is verified as being in legal compliance and commit to sourcing certified wood/wood fibre.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      109. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      110. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      111. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      705,335 (83.64%)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      112. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      113. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs or achieved 100% FSC-certification of FMUs?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      114. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      115. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

      705,335 (83.64%)

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      116. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      117. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed that are FSC certified (above 75%)?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      118. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers 3.5 / 6 58.3%
    • Companies should report details of any programmes or schemes to support outgrower scheme smallholders, as well as criteria to assess suppliers on compliance with company policies, and in what cases suppliers should be suspended or excluded due to non-compliance.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      119. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?

      Forestry Partner Program: Technical support, seedlings, fertilisers and ant controls, monitoring. Environmental assessment of partners

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      120. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      121. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      Supplier Registration Governance project to strategically evaluate these stakeholders, including an online record-management platform which is publicly accessible. The company also requires its "business partners to adopt engagement policies in the areas of occupational health and safety, compliance with labor laws, social and environmental practices and respect for human rights". In addition the supplier assessment programme covers Quality, Safety and Environment

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      122. The company has a Due Diligence System (DDS)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      123. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      The company has developed a Supplier Performance Index to evaluate their suppliers in line with various criteria. Companies which do not score well are rejected

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      124. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

      66% - The company states that 66% of suppliers went through the analysis process for environmental criteria. As a result of the evaluation, action plans were made for six suppliers in regards to improving their environmental impact.
      Fibria does not report on the same

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances 3 / 6 50%
    • Companies should operate in an ethical manner at all levels, providing accessible channels and clear procedures for both employees and external stakeholders to raise any grievance or complaint with the company, as well as allowing for whistleblowing.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      125. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      126. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      127. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

      Only Fibria has a tax directive

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      128. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      129. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has an Ombudsman and states that issues can be reported anonymously, however no process is provided on how the received reports are processed

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      130. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      131. Details of grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Suzano S.A.

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.
SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)