Sampoerna Kayoe
Timber and pulp assessment- Latest update: August 2024
- Next scheduled: August 2025
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the timber and pulp supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Parent company:Samko Timber Limited
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:Private company
-
Bloomberg ticker:Private company
-
Activities:Timber production; Timber processing and manufacturing
-
Locations:Indonesia
-
Headquarters:Indonesia
-
Parent website:
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Sampoerna Kayoe – August 2024
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 12.5 / 36 34.7%
- Policy: 16 / 75 21.3%
- Practice: 13 / 53 24.5%
- Self-reported: 4 / 53 7.6%
- External: 3 / 53 5.7%
- Certified: 6 / 53 11.3%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership6 / 12 50%
- Organisation: 4 / 6 66.7%
- Policy: 0.5 / 2 25%
- Practice: 1.5 / 4 37.5%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 4 18.8%
- External: 0.8 / 4 18.8%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?
The company states it has an ESG policy, but only reports a general sustainability policy and set of commitments within its sustainability report.
-
0 / 1
2. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
The company reports that Caroline Rosa Wijaya is the head of sustainability.
-
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
The company reports that Riko Setyabudhy Handoko and Hadi Daryanto have responsibility for sustainability within the board of directors.
-
5. Reports gender balance of senior management team?
0 - The company does not directly report the gender balance of its senior management team, but this information can be calculated from staff profiles. The company's senior management team is made up of 9 men and 0 women. However, this information is undated.
-
6. Reports gender balance of board members?
0 - The company reports the gender balance of its 7 board of directors (7 male, 0 female).
-
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?
[Externally verified] FSC.
-
0 / 1
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company's latest sustainability report was published in 2024.
-
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
The company only states that its sustainability report was prepared with reference to GRI standards, rather than in accordance with GRI standards.
-
11. Climate risks assessment available?
The company has conducted a climate risk assessment in line with TCFD recommendations.
-
0 / 1
12. Natural capital assessment available?
-
Landbank, maps and traceability5.5 / 22 25%
- Organisation: 4.5 / 17 26.5%
- Policy: 1 / 2 50%
- Practice: 0 / 3 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
- Certified: 0 / 3 0%
-
13. Lists countries and operations?
Indonesia (plantations and processing facilities).
-
14. Lists countries sourcing from?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
15. Total land area managed/controlled for forestry (ha)?
24827 - The company manages 24,827 ha, however this information does not clearly cover all operations.
-
16. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has plantation-based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
17. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?
23022 - The company has 23,022 ha of plantations, excluding outgrower schemes. However, it is not clear if this covers the company's entire forestry operations.
-
18. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?
1805 - The company has 1,805 ha of plantations within outgrower schemes. However, it is not clear if this covers the company's entire forestry operations.
-
0 / 1
19. Unplanted area (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?
-
20. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
1511.34 - The company reports that it has 1,327 ha of conservation area within one of its own concessions and 184.34 ha within its outgrower schemes. However, this information does not clearly cover the company's entire forestry operations.
-
0 / 1
21. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?
-
22. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?
2 - The company reports that it operates two forest management units, however it is not clear if this covers the company's entire operations.
-
0 / 1
23. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?
-
0 / 1
24. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?
-
0 / 1
25. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation available?
-
26. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use right (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not operate in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
27. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not operate in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
28. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not operate in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
0 / 1
29. Maps of all third-party supplying FMUs?
-
30. Number of company owned sawmills?
6 - The company report that it owns 6 timber processing plants.
-
0 / 1
31. Names and locations of company owned sawmills?
-
32. Number of company-owned pulp and paper mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
33. Names and locations of company-owned pulp and paper mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
0 / 1
34. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned sawmills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
-
35. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned pulp and paper mills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
0 / 1
36. Number of third party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
37. Names and locations of all third party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
38. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?
-
39. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Chain of Custody Certification Standard (FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1) and the PEFC International Chain of Custody Standard (PEFC ST 2002:2020). As the requirements of these certifications do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC/PEFC CoC certification.
-
0 / 1
40. Percentage of supply traceable to country of harvest?
-
41. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Chain of Custody Certification Standard (FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1) and the PEFC International Chain of Custody Standard (PEFC ST 2002:2020). As the requirements of these certifications do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC/PEFC CoC certification.
-
0 / 1
42. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level?
-
Certification standards0 / 9 0%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 0 / 4 0%
- Practice: 0 / 5 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
- External: 0 / 5 0%
- Certified: 0 / 5 0%
-
0 / 1
43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?
-
0 / 1
44. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
-
0 / 1
45. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?
-
0 / 1
46. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
-
0 / 1
47. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?
-
0 / 1
48. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs within 10 years?
-
0 / 1
49. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply (tonnes) from all suppliers that comes from FSC FM certified areas?
-
0 / 1
50. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood and/or PEFC Controlled Sources requirements?
-
0 / 1
51. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?
-
Deforestation and biodiversity6.5 / 26 25%
- Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
- Policy: 3 / 16 18.8%
- Practice: 3.5 / 8 43.8%
- Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
- External: 1.5 / 8 18.8%
- Certified: 2 / 8 25%
-
0 / 1
52. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
-
0 / 1
53. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
-
54. Commitment to zero deforestation?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification.
-
0 / 1
55. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
-
56. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). As the policy requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have been awarded on the basis of the company's partial FSC FM or CoC certification.
-
0 / 1
57. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation in supplier operations?
-
0 / 1
58. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
-
0 / 1
59. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
-
0 / 1
60. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
61. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
62. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
63. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?
-
64. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018). As the Standard does not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria limited, externally verified points have therefore been awarded.
-
0 / 1
65. Biodiversity policy?
-
0 / 1
66. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
-
67. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company has also identified protected species of conservation concern referencing the IUCN red list within its sustainability report, however this information is not externally verified.
-
68. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
69. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
The company states that forest security measures are in place to protect against wildlife hunting, but does not specify a clear commitment.
-
0 / 1
70. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
71. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?
-
0 / 1
72. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?
-
73. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
74. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification.
-
0 / 1
75. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms applies to all suppliers?
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments1 / 11 9.1%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 1 / 6 16.7%
- Practice: 0 / 5 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
- External: 0 / 5 0%
- Certified: 0 / 5 0%
-
76. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification.
-
0 / 1
77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
78. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?
-
0 / 1
79. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?
-
0 / 1
80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
-
0 / 1
81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
82. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
-
0 / 1
83. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
-
0 / 1
84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
-
0 / 1
85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
86. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
87. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not operate in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions2.5 / 19 13.2%
- Organisation: 1 / 6 16.7%
- Policy: 0.5 / 9 5.6%
- Practice: 1 / 4 25%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 4 12.5%
- External: 0 / 4 0%
- Certified: 0.5 / 4 12.5%
-
0 / 1
88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
0 / 1
89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
90. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
-
0 / 1
91. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
0 / 1
92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
-
0 / 1
93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
-
94. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
The company reports that it carries out monitoring activities to prevent and control soil erosion, including sediment traps to mitigate soil erosion caused by forestry operations and infrastructure development.
-
95. Commitment to reduced impact logging?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has plantation-based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
0 / 1
96. Commitment to reduced impact logging applies to all suppliers?
-
97. Evidence of implementing reduced impact logging practices?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has plantation-based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
0 / 1
98. Commitment to zero burning?
-
0 / 1
99. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
-
100. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
0 / 1
101. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company FMUs?
-
0 / 1
102. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations?
-
103. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
The company commits to reduce scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity by 3% in 2024 in line with its net zero assessment. However, the company does not report a baseline date for this target.
-
104. GHG emissions intensity?
The company reports that its scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions intensity in 2023 was 0.083 tCO2e/m3.
-
0 / 1
105. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?
-
0 / 1
106. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?
-
107. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
The company reports that its scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions intensity has not improved between 2022 and 2023.
-
0 / 1
108. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
-
Water, chemical and pest management2.5 / 16 15.6%
- Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
- Policy: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
- Practice: 2 / 8 25%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 8 6.3%
- External: 0.8 / 8 9.4%
- Certified: 0.8 / 8 9.4%
-
109. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
110. Water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
111. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
112. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
113. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
114. Treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
115. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?
The company reports that it has a wastewater treatment plant for industrial and domestic waste. The company states that wastewater is treated in line with legal requirements but does not provide further details.
-
116. Proportion of processing facilities with closed-loop water treatment system?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
0 / 1
117. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
-
118. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also reports implementing various riverbank buffer zones within one of its concessions.
-
119. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
The company commits to minimise the use of chemical pesticides only.
-
0 / 1
120. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
-
121. Evidence of eliminating chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
0 / 1
122. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
-
0 / 1
123. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
124. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
-
0 / 1
125. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
126. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
-
0 / 2
127. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?
-
0 / 2
128. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
-
129. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
Community, land and labour rights11.75 / 35 33.6%
- Organisation: 3 / 4 75%
- Policy: 5.5 / 20 27.5%
- Practice: 3.3 / 11 29.6%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 11 4.6%
- External: 0 / 11 0%
- Certified: 2.8 / 11 25%
-
130. Commitment to human rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification.
-
0 / 1
131. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
132. Progress on human rights commitment ?
-
133. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification.
-
0 / 1
134. Commitment to Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
-
135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). As the policy requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have been awarded on the basis of the company's partial FSC FM or CoC certification.
-
0 / 1
136. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
-
0 / 1
138. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
139. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
-
140. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
The company states that it uses conflict management strategies, including collaborative identification with local communities and addressing land tenure and resource utilisation rights through consultation and resolution processes. However only limited details are provided.
-
0 / 1
141. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
-
0 / 1
142. Supports the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?
-
143. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not operate in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
144. Commitment to enable sustainable use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) by local communities?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has plantation-based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
0 / 1
145. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities ?
-
146. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
The company reports that in 2023 it conducted renovations and road repairs in Noborejo village, and created a volleyball field in Pasren Hamlet. The company also reports that it provided plywood for the renovation of village halls, places of worship, government offices and emergency posts.
-
0 / 1
147. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
-
148. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not operate in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
149. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification.
-
0 / 1
150. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
-
151. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by PEFC.
-
152. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company commits to provide equal opportunities for all regardless of gender and opposes discriminatory practices, but does not specify a commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment.
-
0 / 1
153. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
154. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
-
155. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any temporary employees OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
156. Reports gender balance of employees?
837 - The company reports that it has 9,408 male employees and 837 female employees.
-
157. Commitment to pay a living wage?
The company only commits to paying a minimum wage.
-
0 / 1
158. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suplliers?
-
0 / 1
159. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
-
0 / 1
160. Reporting of salary by gender?
-
161. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company commits to address occupational health and safety.
-
0 / 1
162. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
-
163. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by PEFC.
-
164. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
2.35 - The company reports that 2.35% of work hours have been lost to work-based injuries.
-
165. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
0 - The company reports no fatalities in 2023.
-
Smallholders and suppliers2.75 / 7 39.3%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 1.5 / 4 37.5%
- Practice: 1.3 / 3 41.7%
- Self-reported: 1.3 / 3 41.7%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
- Certified: 0 / 3 0%
-
166. Commitment to support smallholders?
The company commits to promoting the adoption of sustainable forest management certification schemes among smallholders in all areas where it operates. It also commits to engaging, assisting and maintaining smallholder farmers through the FSC standards.
-
167. Programme to support outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders?
The company states that it has a forestry programme to help smallholders achieve FSC certification and improve their practices. However, only limited details are provided.
-
168. Number or percentage of outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders involved in programme?
60 - The company states that 60 community farmers are under its forestry programme in Jambi and Jombang.
-
0 / 1
169. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
0 / 1
170. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
171. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Chain of Custody Certification Standard (FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1). Partial points have been awarded as the requirements do not full meet the SPOTT scoring criteria.
-
0 / 1
172. Timebound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with timber and pulp sourcing commitments?
-
(NEW: not scored this year)-
173. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation and/or conversion-free (DCF)?
-
Governance and grievances3 / 7 42.9%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2.5 / 5 50%
- Practice: 0.5 / 2 25%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 2 25%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
- Certified: 0 / 2 0%
-
174. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company only commits to prevent corruption.
-
0 / 1
175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
-
176. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company states that it conducts anti-corruption policy briefings for employees and conducts risk assessments to identify operational units vulnerable to corruption. However, only limited details are provided.
-
177. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not operate in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
0 / 1
178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
-
179. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not operate in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
180. Whistleblowing procedure?
The company describes its whistleblowing procedure within its annual report.
-
181. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company has a grievance/whistle-blower form on its website that is accessible to all stakeholders. The company also states that its whistleblowing form is open to the public within its annual report.
-
0 / 1
182. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
2024
Sampoerna Kayoe Sustainability Report 2023
-
2024
Sampoerna Kayoe - Our Company - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Membership - FSC - WEBPAGE
-
2024
Sampoerna Kayoe Annual Report 2023
-
No date
PT Mangole Timber Producers CoC Certificate - PEFC Find Certified - WEBPAGE
-
No date
PT Sumber Graha Sejahtera Cabang Muaro Jambi CoC Certificate - FSC Search - WEBPAGE
-
No date
PT Sumber Graha Sejahtera Cabang Semarang CoC Certificate - FSC Search - WEBPAGE
-
No date
PT Sumber Graha Sejahtera Unit Jombang CoC Certificate - FSC Search - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Samko Trading Pte. Ltd. CoC Certificate - FSC Search - WEBPAGE
-
No date
PT Kalpika Wanatama (Unit I) FM Certificate - PEFC Find Certified - WEBPAGE
-
No date
PT Kalpika Wanatama Unit II FM Certificate - PEFC Find Certified - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Whistleblowing - Sampoerna Kayoe - WEBPAGE
Media monitor: Sampoerna Kayoe
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
August 2023
Kapal Tongkang Mengangkut Kayu Gelondongan di Pelabuhan Eks PT. Mangoli Timber Producare, Kapolres Sula Mengaku? (Barges Transporting Logs at the Former Port of PT. Mangoli Timber Producare, Sula Police Chief Admits?)
August 2023
WADUH .!! PT. Sampoerna Kayoe Diduga Tanpa Mengantongi Izin, Kades dan Kadis DLH Sula Akui Tidak Tahu (OMG .!! PT. Sampoerna Kayoe Allegedly Without a Permit, Village Head and Head of Sula DLH Admit Not Knowing)
June 2022
Tuntut Kenaikan Upah, Puluhan Buruh Perusahaan di Falabisahaya Unjuk Rasa (Demanding Wage Increase, Dozens of Company Workers in Falabisahaya Demonstrate)
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
Media monitor: Sampoerna Kayoe
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.
Download as CSV