Skip to content
Menu Search

Rain Forest Management (RFM)

Timber and pulp assessment
  • Latest update: July 2019
  • Next scheduled: July 2020

  • Landbank
    371,000 hectares
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    Private company
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private company
  • Website:

Company assessment: Rain Forest Management (RFM) – July 2019

Assessment date:

Total: 8.1% 7 / 86
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    0 / 8 0%
    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • 2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to all sourcing?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • 4. One or more board members have responsibility for sustainability?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • 5. Percentage or number of women board members?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      6. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      7. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      8. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      9. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Climate risks assessment available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      11. Natural capital assessment available?

  • Landbank, mills and traceability Landbank, mills and traceability
    4.5 / 11 40.9%
    • Yes
      1 / 1

      12. Lists countries and operations?

      Gabon (timber production and processing facilities)

    • Yes
      1 / 1

      13. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      371,000

    • 14. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests. 

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      15. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

    • 16. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests. 

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      17. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1

      19. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

      21

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1

      20. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

      Maps for some of the company's FMUs are available on Global Forest Watch

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      21. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      22. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?

    • 23. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • 24. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • 25. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • 26. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • 27. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1

      28. Number of company owned sawmills?

      1

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      29. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?

    • 30. Number of supplier mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • 31. Maps or addresses of supplier mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • 32. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • 33. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • 34. Percentage of supply traceable to country level (above 80%)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • 35. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level (above 75%)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    0 / 10 0%
    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      36. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?

    • 37. Zero conversion commitment applies to all sourcing?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      38. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      39. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      40. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      41. Amount of deforestation recorded?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Identified species of conservation concern referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      46. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?

    • 47. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests. 

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    0 / 5 0%
    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      48. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • 49. HCV commitment applies to all sourcing?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • 50. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      This indicator is disabled until sufficient number of HCV ALS licensed assessors are available for the location where the company operates

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      51. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

    • 53. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests. 

    • 54. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests. 

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      56. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?

    • 57. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

  • Soils, fire and GHGs Soils, fire and GHGs
    0 / 9 0%
    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      58. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

    • 60. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests. 

    • 61. Commitment on peatland planting applies to all sourcing?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      63. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • 64. Commitment to zero burning?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests. 

    • 65. Commitment to zero burning applies to all sourcing?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      66. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      67. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      68. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      69. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?

    • 70. Report GHG emissions from land use change?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests. 

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      71. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Water, chemical and waste management Water, chemical and waste management
    0 / 9 0%
    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      72. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      73. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      74. Commitment to protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • 75. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      76. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

    • 77. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • 78. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • 79. Commitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      80. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      82. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      83. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      84. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    0.5 / 20 2.5%
    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      85. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration on Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

    • 86. Commitment to human rights applies to all sourcing?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      87. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      88. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • 90. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      91. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      92. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      93. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1

      95. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company only provides examples of services provided to its own employees

    • 96. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      97. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      98. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      99. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • 100. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      101. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      102. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      103. Payment of minimum wage?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      104. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      105. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      106. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      107. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    1 / 7 14.3%
    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      109. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?

    • 110. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • Yes
      1 / 1

      111. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      321,000 (86.5%) - The company is NEPCon LegalSource certified and 50,000 ha is excluded from the scope of the certification therefore 321,000 ha out of 371,000 ha is certified (86.5%)

    • 112. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      113. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs or achieved 100% FSC-certification of FMUs?

    • 114. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      115. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

    • 116. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • 117. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed that are FSC certified (above 75%)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      118. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    1 / 1 100%
    • 119. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • 120. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • 121. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • Yes
      1 / 1

      122. The company has a Due Diligence System (DDS)?

      The company has a NEPCON LegalSource certification which requires a DDS

    • 123. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

    • 124. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it has no suppliers including outgrower scheme or independent suppliers

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    0 / 6 0%
    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      125. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • 126. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • 128. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      129. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      130. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      131. Details of grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Rain Forest Management (RFM)

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: Rain Forest Management (RFM)

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full indicator framework contains 131 indicators across 10 categories.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)