PT Adindo Hutani Lestari (previously assessed as Adindo Foresta)
Timber and pulp assessment- Latest update: September 2025
- Next scheduled: August 2027
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the timber and pulp supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:Private company
-
Bloomberg ticker:Private company
-
Activities:Unclear
-
Locations:Indonesia
-
Headquarters:Indonesia
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: PT Adindo Hutani Lestari (previously assessed as Adindo Foresta) – September 2025
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 0.5 / 43 1.2%
- Policy: 7 / 79 8.9%
- Practice: 11.5 / 63 18.3%
- Self-reported: 0 / 63 0%
- External: 11.5 / 63 18.3%
- Certified: 0 / 63 0%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership
0.5 / 12 4.2%- Organisation: 0 / 6 0%
- Policy: 0.5 / 2 25%
- Practice: 0 / 4 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
- External: 0 / 4 0%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?
The company has published an Environmental, Occupational Health & Safety policy on its website; however, this policy only covers the general commitments of the company.
-
0 / 1
2. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
-
0 / 1
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
-
0 / 1
5. Reports gender balance of senior management team?
-
0 / 1
6. Reports gender balance of board members?
-
0 / 1
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?
-
0 / 1
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?
-
0 / 1
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
-
0 / 1
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
-
0 / 1
11. Climate risks assessment available?
-
0 / 1
12. Natural capital assessment available?
-
Landbank, maps and traceability
1.5 / 27 5.6%- Organisation: 0.5 / 22 2.3%
- Policy: 1 / 2 50%
- Practice: 0 / 3 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
- Certified: 0 / 3 0%
-
13. Lists countries and operations?
The company states that it operates in Indonesia but does not state the nature of its operations.
-
0 / 1
14. Lists countries sourcing from?
-
15. Total land area managed/controlled for forestry (ha)?
191487 - The company reports it manages a total area of 191,487 ha in Indonesia, however, this information is from March 2018 and over five years old now. Global Forest Watch also reports 14,363 ha under two concessions of the company, however, this information is from 2019 and over five years old now.
-
0 / 1
16. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?
0
-
0 / 1
17. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?
0
-
0 / 1
18. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?
0
-
0 / 1
19. Unplanted area (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?
0
-
0 / 1
20. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
0
-
0 / 1
21. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?
0
-
22. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?
2 - The company does not report information on the FMUs controlled by it. GFW has information on two FMUs of the company, however, it is from 2019 and over five years old now. Also, it is unclear if the data from GFW covers all FMUs of the company.
-
23. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?
The GFW database has maps for two FMUs of the company. However, the data is from 2019 and is over five years old now.
-
0 / 1
24. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?
-
0 / 1
25. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation available?
-
26. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use right (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
27. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
28. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
0 / 1
29. Maps of all third-party supplying FMUs?
-
0 / 1
30. Number of company owned sawmills?
-
0 / 1
31. Names and locations of company owned sawmills?
-
0 / 1
32. Number of company-owned pulp and paper mills?
-
0 / 1
33. Names and locations of company-owned pulp and paper mills?
-
0 / 1
34. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned sawmills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
-
0 / 1
35. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned pulp and paper mills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
-
0 / 1
36. Number of third party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
37. Names and locations of all third party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
38. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?
-
39. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?
The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. Partial points have been awarded as the requirements do not full meet the SPOTT scoring criteria.
-
0 / 1
40. Percentage of supply traceable to country of harvest?
-
41. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?
The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. Partial points have been awarded as the requirements do not full meet the SPOTT scoring criteria.
-
0 / 1
42. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level?
-
Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives
0 / 9 0%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 0 / 4 0%
- Practice: 0 / 5 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
- External: 0 / 5 0%
- Certified: 0 / 5 0%
-
0 / 1
43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?
-
44. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
The company has some landbank certified under PEFC FM standards and SVLK; however, the area certified or the total landbank of the company is not known to calculate the percentage certified.
-
0 / 1
45. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?
-
0 / 1
46. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
-
0 / 1
47. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?
-
0 / 1
48. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs within 10 years?
-
0 / 1
49. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply (tonnes) from all suppliers that comes from FSC FM certified areas?
-
0 / 1
50. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood and/or PEFC Controlled Sources requirements?
-
51. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?
The company has some landbank certified under PEFC FM standards; however, the area certified or the total landbank of the company is not known to calculate the percentage certified.
-
Deforestation and biodiversity
4 / 26 15.4%- Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
- Policy: 0.5 / 16 3.1%
- Practice: 3.5 / 8 43.8%
- Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
- External: 3.5 / 8 43.8%
- Certified: 0 / 8 0%
-
0 / 1
52. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
-
0 / 1
53. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
54. Commitment to zero deforestation?
-
0 / 1
55. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
56. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
-
0 / 1
57. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
-
0 / 1
58. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
-
0 / 1
59. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
-
0 / 1
60. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
61. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
62. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
63. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?
-
64. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018). As the Standard does not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria limited, externally verified points have therefore been awarded.
-
0 / 1
65. Biodiversity policy?
-
0 / 1
66. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
-
67. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
68. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
[Externally verified] Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have not been awarded as the percentage of the company landbank certified by PEFC is not known.
-
0 / 1
69. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
-
0 / 1
70. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
-
71. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?
The company only commits to protecting biodiversity areas from illegal logging.
-
0 / 1
72. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?
-
73. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?
[Externally verified] Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have not been awarded as the percentage of the company landbank certified by PEFC is not known.
-
0 / 1
74. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms?
-
0 / 1
75. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms applies to all suppliers?
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments
1.25 / 11 11.4%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
- Practice: 0.8 / 5 15%
- Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
- External: 0.8 / 5 15%
- Certified: 0 / 5 0%
-
0 / 1
76. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
-
0 / 1
77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
-
78. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?
[Externally verified] The company has one HCV assessment with status "on track" on the HCVRN database. However, this assessment is not yet publicly available.
-
0 / 1
79. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?
-
0 / 1
80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
-
0 / 1
81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
82. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
-
0 / 1
83. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
-
84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. Partial points have been awarded as the requirements do not full meet the SPOTT scoring criteria.
-
0 / 1
85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
86. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
87. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions
3.75 / 24 15.6%- Organisation: 0 / 6 0%
- Policy: 1 / 10 10%
- Practice: 2.8 / 8 34.4%
- Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
- External: 2.8 / 8 34.4%
- Certified: 0 / 8 0%
-
0 / 1
88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
0 / 1
89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
-
90. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
34785 - The company reports it has 34,785 ha of 'Peat Ecosystem Protection Function Area'. However, the information reported is from 2018 and is over five years old now.
-
0 / 1
91. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
0 / 1
92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
-
0 / 1
93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
-
94. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have not been awarded as the percentage of the company landbank certified by PEFC is not known.
-
0 / 1
95. Commitment to reduced impact logging?
-
0 / 1
96. Commitment to reduced impact logging applies to all suppliers?
-
97. Evidence of implementing reduced impact logging practices?
[Externally verified] Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have not been awarded as the percentage of the company landbank certified by PEFC is not known.
-
98. Commitment to zero burning?
The company commits to zero burning.
-
0 / 1
99. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
-
100. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
[Externally verified] Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have not been awarded as the percentage of the company landbank certified by PEFC is not known.
-
0 / 1
101. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company FMUs?
-
0 / 1
102. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations?
-
0 / 1
103. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
104. GHG emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
105. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?
-
0 / 1
106. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?
-
0 / 1
107. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
108. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
-
Water, chemical and pest management
2.5 / 24 10.4%- Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
- Policy: 0 / 9 0%
- Practice: 2.5 / 13 19.2%
- Self-reported: 0 / 13 0%
- External: 2.5 / 13 19.2%
- Certified: 0 / 13 0%
-
0 / 1
109. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
110. Water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
111. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
112. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?
-
0 / 1
113. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?
-
0 / 1
114. Treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?
-
0 / 1
115. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?
-
0 / 1
116. Proportion of processing facilities with closed-loop water treatment system?
-
0 / 1
117. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
-
118. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
0 / 1
119. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
-
0 / 1
120. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
121. Evidence of eliminating chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?
-
0 / 1
122. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
-
0 / 1
123. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
124. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
-
0 / 1
125. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
126. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
-
0 / 2
127. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?
-
128. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
[Externally verified] Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have not been awarded as the percentage of the company landbank certified by PEFC is not known.
-
129. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
Community, land and labour rights
5 / 37 13.5%- Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
- Policy: 3 / 21 14.3%
- Practice: 2 / 11 18.2%
- Self-reported: 0 / 11 0%
- External: 2 / 11 18.2%
- Certified: 0 / 11 0%
-
0 / 1
130. Commitment to human rights?
-
0 / 1
131. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
132. Progress on human rights commitment ?
-
133. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights?
The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. Partial points have been awarded for this indicator as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
0 / 1
134. Commitment to Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
-
135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. Partial points have been awarded as the requirements do not full meet the SPOTT scoring criteria.
-
0 / 1
136. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
-
0 / 1
138. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
139. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
-
0 / 1
140. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
-
0 / 1
141. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
-
0 / 1
142. Supports the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?
-
143. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
0 / 1
144. Commitment to enable sustainable use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) by local communities?
-
145. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities ?
The company reports a commitment to providing essential community services and facilities.
-
0 / 2
146. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
-
0 / 1
147. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
-
148. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
149. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. Full points have been awarded as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT scoring criteria.
-
0 / 1
150. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
-
151. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
[Externally verified] Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have not been awarded as the percentage of the company landbank certified by PEFC is not known.
-
0 / 1
152. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
-
0 / 1
153. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
154. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
-
0 / 1
155. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
-
0 / 1
156. Reports gender balance of employees?
-
0 / 1
157. Commitment to pay a living wage?
-
0 / 1
158. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suplliers?
-
0 / 1
159. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
-
0 / 1
160. Reporting of salary by gender?
-
161. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. Partial points have been awarded as the requirements do not full meet the SPOTT scoring criteria.
-
0 / 1
162. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
-
163. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
[Externally verified] Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's PEFC FM certification (PEFC ST 1003:2018) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have not been awarded as the percentage of the company landbank certified by PEFC is not known.
-
0 / 1
164. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
-
0 / 1
165. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
-
Smallholders and suppliers
0.5 / 8 6.3%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 0.5 / 4 12.5%
- Practice: 0 / 4 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
- External: 0 / 4 0%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
0 / 1
166. Commitment to support smallholders?
-
0 / 1
167. Programme to support outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders?
-
0 / 1
168. Number or percentage of outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders involved in programme?
-
169. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. As SVLK requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria, partial points have been awarded on the basis of the company's SVLK certification.
-
0 / 1
170. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
0 / 1
171. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
-
0 / 1
172. Timebound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with timber and pulp sourcing commitments?
-
0 / 1
173. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation and/or conversion-free (DCF)?
-
Governance and grievances
0 / 7 0%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 0 / 5 0%
- Practice: 0 / 2 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
- Certified: 0 / 2 0%
-
0 / 1
174. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
-
0 / 1
175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
176. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
-
177. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
0 / 1
178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
-
179. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have forest management operations in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
0 / 1
180. Whistleblowing procedure?
-
0 / 1
181. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
-
0 / 1
182. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
No date
KEBIJAKAN LINGKUNGAN, KESEHATAN & KESELAMATAN KERJA PT. ADINDO HUTANI LESTARI (ENVIRONMENTAL, OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY POLICY PT. ADINDO HUTANI LESTARI) - PT. ADINDO HUTANI LESTARI - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Profil Perusahaan (Company Profile) - PT. ADINDO HUTANI LESTARI - WEBPAGE
-
March 2018
PENATAAN AREAL KERJA (WORK AREA ARRANGEMENT) - PT. ADINDO HUTANI LESTARI - WEBPAGE
-
2019
Indonesia Wood Fiber Concessions - GFW - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Daftar Pemegang Sertifikat LK (List of LK Certificate Holders) - SVLK - WEBPAGE
-
No date
PEFC FM certificate - PT. Adindo Hutani Lestari
-
December 2024
HCV report - PT Adindo Hutani Lestari
-
No date
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - PT. ADINDO HUTANI LESTARI - WEBPAGE
Media monitor: PT Adindo Hutani Lestari (previously assessed as Adindo Foresta)
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
June 2025
SosialSingkong Diracun, Masyarakat Adat Dayak, Geruduk PT Adindo Hutani Lestari (The Dayak Indigenous Community Raided PT Adindo Hutani Lestari After Cassava Was Poisoned)
May 2025
Greenpeace: RGE dan Bayangannya Babat 68 Ribu Ha Hutan Alam (Greenpeace: RGE and Its Shadows Clear 68 Thousand Ha of Natural Forest)
June 2024
Penyidik Polres Lembata Ungkap Kasus Dugaan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Lembata Police Investigators Reveal Case of Alleged Crime of Human Trafficking)
April 2024
Kala Perusahaan Kayu Babat Hutan Alam dan Gambut Ancam Orangutan Kalimantan (When Timber Companies Clear Natural Forests and Peat, Threaten Kalimantan Orangutans)
December 2018
PT Sebuku Inti Plantation Menangkan Gugatan Tukar Menukar Kawasan(PT Sebuku Inti Plantation Wins Regional Exchange Exchange Claims)
May 2018
Kepala DLHD Nyatakan Adindo Bersalah Gunakan Pelabuhan Ilegal(The Head of DLHD Declares Adindo Guilty of Using Illegal Ports)
May 2014
Laporan: Pemasok APRIL Masih Tebangi Hutan Gambut Kalimantan Utara(Report: APRIL Suppliers Still Reducing North Kalimantan Peat Forest)
0
3
1
4
1
0
2
3
0
2
Media monitor: PT Adindo Hutani Lestari (previously assessed as Adindo Foresta)
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.