Pallisco
Timber and pulp assessment- Latest update: August 2024
- Next scheduled: August 2025
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the timber and pulp supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Parent company:PALLISCO-CIFM
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:Private company
-
Bloomberg ticker:Private company
-
Activities:Timber production; Timber processing and manufacturing
-
Locations:Cameroon (Mindourou, East Cameroon)
-
Headquarters:Cameroon
-
Parent website:
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Pallisco – August 2024
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 15.5 / 23 67.4%
- Policy: 24.5 / 37 66.2%
- Practice: 33.8 / 55 61.4%
- Self-reported: 3.9 / 55 7.1%
- External: 11.7 / 55 21.3%
- Certified: 18.2 / 55 33%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership
5 / 9 55.6%- Organisation: 3 / 4 75%
- Policy: 1 / 1 100%
- Practice: 1 / 4 25%
- Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
- External: 1 / 4 25%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?
The company has an environmental and social policy which covers all operations.
-
2. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
The company reports that the quality unit manager is responsible for sustainability.
-
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it is not publicly listed and does not have a board of directors.
-
5. Reports gender balance of senior management team?
1 - The company has published its structural organization that lists one woman in the senior leadership team of six members.
-
6. Reports gender balance of board members?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it is not publicly listed and does not have a board of directors.
-
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?
[Externally verified] Company is a member of FSC, WWF-GFTN and ATIBT.
-
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?
The company reports that it is collaborating with Nature+ (Belgium), FORTTROOP (Belgium), ZSL (United Kingdom), TEREA (Gabon, France), GIZ / GFBC (Cameroon), PPECF / GFBC (Cameroun), International Labour Office (Cameroon), and SILVA (France). However, all these collaborations are over five years old.
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company published a sustainability report in 2024, covering the year 2023.
-
0 / 1
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
-
0 / 1
11. Climate risks assessment available?
-
0 / 1
12. Natural capital assessment available?
-
Landbank, maps and traceability
11 / 14 78.6%- Organisation: 8.5 / 10 85%
- Policy: 0 / 0 0%
- Practice: 2.5 / 4 62.5%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 4 18.8%
- External: 1.8 / 4 43.8%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
13. Lists countries and operations?
Cameroon (forestry and industrial sites are located in the Mindourou area (between Abong-Mbang and Lomie), and logging concessions are located in the East Region of Cameroon).
-
14. Lists countries sourcing from?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
15. Total land area managed/controlled for forestry (ha)?
388949 - The total land area managed by the company for forestry is 388,949 ha. Data as of 2023.
-
16. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?
331764 - The company reports the total production area for its seven FMUs as 331,764 ha, six FMUs totalling 288,808 ha (10 030, 10 031, 10 039, 10 041, 10 042, 10 044) and one FMU totalling 42,956 ha (10 047b). However, the data for the group of six FMUs is from 2022 and is over two years old and the data for the seventh FMU is from 2017 and is now over five years old.
-
17. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
18. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it is not a producer with scheme smallholders/outgrowers.
-
19. Unplanted area (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
20. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
56699 - The company reports the total conservation and protection area for its seven FMUs as 56,699 ha (10 030, 10 031, 10 039, 10 041, 10 042, 10 044- 52,048 ha and 10 047b- 4,651 ha). However, the data for six FMUs is from 2022 and is over two years old and the data for the seventh FMU is from 2017 and is now over five years old.
-
21. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it is not a producer with Intact Forest Landscape (IFL) within its landbank.
-
22. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?
7 - Seven FMUs in total with three directly attributed to the company and four to the company's partners (SODETRAN-CAM and La Forestière de Mbalmayo SA), although all are under company management.
-
23. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?
Maps for all forest management units (FMUs) controlled by the company are available via Open Timber Portal and Global Forest Watch under the company names: Pallisco, SODETRANCAM, and LMF.
-
24. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?
Forest management plans are available for all of the company's FMUs.
-
25. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation available?
Monitoring of forest management plan implementation is available for all of the company's FMUs, however, the information is not externally verified.
-
26. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use right (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided 4/14 total valid legal documents required by Open Timber Portal on use rights. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
27. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided all valid legal documents required by Open Timber Portal on forest management. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
28. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided 11/24 total valid legal documents required by Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
29. Maps of all third-party supplying FMUs?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any sawmills or pulp and paper mills OR does not source wood/wood fibre.
-
30. Number of company owned sawmills?
1 - The company reports having one sawmill.
-
31. Names and locations of company owned sawmills?
The company only reports the name of its sawmill as CIFM processing unit.
-
32. Number of company-owned pulp and paper mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
33. Names and locations of company-owned pulp and paper mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
34. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned sawmills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
The company reports it exploited 116,306 m3 of timber from its own operations in 2023.
-
35. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned pulp and paper mills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
36. Number of third party supplying mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party mills.
-
37. Names and locations of all third party supplying mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party mills.
-
38. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party mills.
-
39. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
40. Percentage of supply traceable to country of harvest?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
41. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
42. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
Certification standards
2.88 / 5 57.6%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 1 / 2 50%
- Practice: 1.9 / 3 62.7%
- Self-reported: 1.9 / 3 62.7%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
- Certified: 0 / 3 0%
-
43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?
The company is 100% legality verified by OLB.
-
44. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
100% - 388,949 ha is verified as being legally compliant by OLB.
-
45. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
46. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
47. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?
88% - 341,708 ha of the total company landbank of 388,949 ha is FSC FM certified.
-
0 / 1
48. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs within 10 years?
-
49. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply (tonnes) from all suppliers that comes from FSC FM certified areas?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
50. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood and/or PEFC Controlled Sources requirements?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
0 / 1
51. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?
-
Deforestation and biodiversity
9.51 / 15 63.4%- Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
- Policy: 4 / 7 57.1%
- Practice: 5.5 / 7 78.7%
- Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
- External: 1.8 / 7 25%
- Certified: 3.8 / 7 53.7%
-
0 / 1
52. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
-
53. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
54. Commitment to zero deforestation?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification.
-
55. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
56. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). As the policy requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have been awarded on the basis of the company's partial FSC FM/CoC certification.
-
57. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation in supplier operations?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third party suppliers.
-
0 / 1
58. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
-
59. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
0 / 1
60. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
-
61. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
62. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?
The company commits to restore ecosystems to their prior condition in cases of conversion within its own operations.
-
63. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
64. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2 EN). As the Standard does not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria limited, externally verified points have therefore been awarded.
-
0 / 1
65. Biodiversity policy?
-
66. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
67. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
[Externally verified] The company has identified species of conservation concern, referencing the IUCN and CITES system of species classification. Evidence is externally verified by Nature Plus and Université de Liège.
-
68. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
69. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
The company reports an unclear commitment to reduce pressure on fauna from hunting and poaching.
-
70. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
71. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?
The company commits to protect the natural ecosystems and plantations under its management from illegal activities.
-
72. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
73. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC. The company's own reporting also mentions that monitoring of illegal activities is carried out by a specific team as well as by the guards assigned to the different entrance barriers to the concession/UFAs.
-
74. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only sources wood/wood fibre from natural forests.
-
75. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers OR only sources from natural forests.
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments
5.75 / 6 95.8%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2 / 2 100%
- Practice: 3.8 / 4 93.8%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 4 18.8%
- External: 3 / 4 75%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
76. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification. The company also reports is own commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments.
-
77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
78. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?
[Externally verified] HCV assessment of all FMUs controlled by the company is publicly available. Evidence is externally verified by Nature Plus and Université de Liège.
-
79. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?
HCV monitoring information is available for all the company's FMUs. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not produce wood/wood fibre OR only sources from natural forests.
-
82. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre OR only has natural forest operations OR has not undertaken any new planting since January 2015.
-
83. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre OR only has natural forest operations OR has not undertaken any new planting since April 2015 OR if all new planting has been undertaken since November 2017 and has been covered under combined HCV-HCS assessments.
-
84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
The company commits to conduct social and environmental impact assessments.
-
85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
86. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?
[Externally verified] Environmental impact assessments are available for six of the company's FMUs and an Environmental and social impact study is available for one FMU. Evidence is externally verified by JMN Consultant.
-
87. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided all valid legal documents to the Open Timber Portal on impact assessments. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions
4.76 / 15 31.7%- Organisation: 0 / 3 0%
- Policy: 0.5 / 4 12.5%
- Practice: 4.3 / 8 53.3%
- Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
- External: 0 / 8 0%
- Certified: 4.3 / 8 53.3%
-
88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not operate in a country currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
0 / 1
90. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
-
0 / 1
91. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
0 / 1
92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
-
93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
94. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
95. Commitment to reduced impact logging?
The company only commits to some Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) techniques.
-
96. Commitment to reduced impact logging applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers OR only sources from plantations.
-
97. Evidence of implementing reduced impact logging practices?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC. The company's own reporting states that the average annual rate of compliance with EFIR techniques remained above 90% in 2021.
-
98. Commitment to zero burning?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
99. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers OR only sources from natural forests.
-
100. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
0 / 1
101. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company FMUs?
-
102. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
0 / 1
103. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
104. GHG emissions intensity?
-
105. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only has natural-forest based operations OR does not produce wood/wood fibre.
-
106. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers OR only sources from natural forests.
-
0 / 1
107. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
108. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
-
Water, chemical and pest management
10.39 / 13 79.9%- Organisation: 0.5 / 1 50%
- Policy: 3.5 / 4 87.5%
- Practice: 6.4 / 8 79.9%
- Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
- External: 0.8 / 8 9.4%
- Certified: 5.6 / 8 70.5%
-
109. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
110. Water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
111. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
112. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
113. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
114. Treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
0 / 1
115. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?
-
116. Proportion of processing facilities with closed-loop water treatment system?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills.
-
117. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
The company commits to protect natural waterways using buffer zones.
-
118. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
119. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
The company commits to minimise the use of chemicals but does not mention chemical fertilisers or pesticides.
-
120. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
121. Evidence of eliminating chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own any pulp or paper mills OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
122. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
The company commits to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.
-
123. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
124. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
The company commits to not use Stockholm and Rotterdam Convention chemicals.
-
125. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
126. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
The company provides information on the amount of pesticides utilised per m3 of wood produced, however, it is uncertain whether any chemical fertilisers are employed in their operations. Additionally, the information reported is from 2021 and now over two years old.
-
127. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
128. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
129. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also has a waste management system is place to collect and dispose hazardous and non-hazardous waste, however, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
Community, land and labour rights
19.98 / 30 66.6%- Organisation: 3.5 / 4 87.5%
- Policy: 10 / 13 76.9%
- Practice: 6.5 / 13 49.9%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 13 3.9%
- External: 1.5 / 13 11.3%
- Certified: 4.5 / 13 34.7%
-
130. Commitment to human rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification.
-
131. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
0 / 1
132. Progress on human rights commitment ?
-
133. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification. The company also reports its own commitment to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and to the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (no. 169).
-
134. Commitment to Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). As the policy requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have been awarded on the basis of the company's partial FSC FM or CoC certification. The company's own reporting states an unclear commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights.
-
136. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
The company reports commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC).
-
138. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
0 / 1
139. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
-
140. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also reports to consult with local populations in cases of conflicts, through meetings and consultations, however, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
141. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
The company reports it has a social consultation program to prevent and resolve conflicts. However, the details of the process are limited and it is unclear if it covers land conflicts.
-
0 / 1
142. Supports the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?
-
143. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided 5/14 valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
144. Commitment to enable sustainable use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) by local communities?
The company commits to developing income-generating activities for local communities and lists NTFPs as an option. However, it is unclear if the company allows local communities to sustainably harvest NTFPs on land under its management.
-
145. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities ?
The company reports its commitment to providing essential community services through support for health (medical equipment and medicines), schooling (construction of classrooms, provision of teaching materials, provision of table-benches), construction of community sheds), endowment (construction equipment for housing huts), community forestry/agriculture, and supporting electrification (installation of photovoltaic plates).
-
146. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC. The company also reports examples of social services provided to the community which include health, education and housing support.
-
147. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
The company commits to providing work opportunities for local communities.
-
148. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided 5/14 valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
149. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V3-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification.
-
150. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
151. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
152. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company commits to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment.
-
153. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
0 / 1
154. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
-
155. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any temporary employees OR only trades wood/wood fibre.
-
156. Reports gender balance of employees?
27 (5.29%) - The company reports 27 women employees as a part of its workforce in 2023.
-
157. Commitment to pay a living wage?
The company reports that the salaries paid comply with and exceed the SMIG.
-
158. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suplliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
159. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
The company reports that the employees from its lumbering sector are paid minimum wages in line with SMIG, however, this does not cover all workers of the company and the figures are not externally verified.
-
160. Reporting of salary by gender?
The company reports the gender-based basic salaries of its employees, however, it does not provide information on compliance with GRI reporting requirements regarding the disclosure of salaries across all employee categories. Additionally, the information reported only covers the lumbering sector of the company.
-
161. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company reports commitment to address health and safety at work for all workers, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work.
-
162. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
163. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC Chain of Custody (FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1) and FSC FM (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) certifications as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company's own reporting also provides examples of providing PPE and relevant training to the workers, however, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
164. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
The company reports the annual lost days in 2023 for its lumbering and wood processing operations.
-
165. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
0 - The company reported zero work-related fatalities in 2023.
-
Smallholders and suppliers
0 / 0 0%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 0 / 0 0%
- Practice: 0 / 0 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 0 0%
- External: 0 / 0 0%
- Certified: 0 / 0 0%
-
166. Commitment to support smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have smallholder suppliers.
-
167. Programme to support outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from smallholder suppliers.
-
168. Number or percentage of outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders involved in programme?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from smallholder suppliers.
-
169. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
170. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers OR only sources from smallholders.
-
171. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers OR only sources from smallholders.
-
172. Timebound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with timber and pulp sourcing commitments?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
173. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation and/or conversion-free (DCF)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
Governance and grievances
4.5 / 8 56.3%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2.5 / 4 62.5%
- Practice: 2 / 4 50%
- Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
- External: 2 / 4 50%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
174. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company commits to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption.
-
175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source wood/wood fibre from third-party suppliers.
-
0 / 1
176. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
-
177. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided all valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
0 / 1
178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
-
179. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
[Externally verified] The company has provided all valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties. Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link.
-
180. Whistleblowing procedure?
The company reports indirectly that it allows whistleblowing, however, the details of the procedure are not reported.
-
181. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company has a grievance system in place for all stakeholders.
-
0 / 1
182. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
February 2021
Politique environnementale (Environment Policy)
-
February 2022
Politique Sociale (Social Policy)
-
2023
Gestion Responsable de l'Exploitation Forestière - Suivi des indicateurs pertinents (Responsible Forestry Management - Monitoring of relevant indicators)
-
2023
Organisation Structurelle- Pallisco-CIFM (Structural Organization- Pallisco-CIFM)
-
No date
ATIBT's Members Directory - ATIBT - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Membership - FSC - WEBPAGE
-
September 2018
GFTN Participants List
-
No date
Partnerships - Pallisco-CIFM - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Location - Pallisco-CIFM - WEBPAGE
-
2023
Chiffres clés (Key figures) - Pallisco-CIFM - WEBPAGE
-
April 2017
ÉVALUATION DE LA PRESENCE DE HAUTES VALEURS DE CONSERVATION (HVC) DANS LES CONCESSIONS GEREES PAR LA SOCIETE PALLISCO, CAMEROUN MASSIF FORESTIER DES UFA 10.030, 10.031, 10.039, 10.041, 10.042, 10.044, 10.047B (EVALUATION OF THE PRESENCE OF HIGH CONSERVATION VALUES (HVC) IN CONCESSIONS MANAGED BY THE PALLISCO COMPANY, CAMEROON FOREST MASSIF OF UFA 10.030, 10.031, 10.039, 10.041, 10.042, 10.044, 10.047B)
-
September 2022
Résumé des plans d'aménagement et exigences FSC® pour les UFA 10 030, 10 031, 10 039, 10 041, 10 042 et 10 044 (Summary of development plans and FSC® requirements for UFA 10 030, 10 031, 10 039, 10,041, 10,042 and 10,044)
-
March 2017
Résumé du plan d'aménagement et des directives internes pour l'UFA 10 047b (Summary of the development plan and internal directives for UFA 10 047b)
-
No date
Environment - Pallisco-CIFM - WEBPAGE
-
No date
FMUs (La Forestière de Mbalmayo) - OTP - WEBPAGE
-
No date
FMUs (PALLISCO) - OTP - WEBPAGE
-
No date
FMUs (SODETRANCAM) - OTP - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Ressource forestière (Forest resources) - Pallisco-CIFM - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Cameroon Forest Management Units - GFW - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Documentation (La Forestière de Mbalmayo) - OTP - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Documentation (PALLISCO) - OTP - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Documentation (SODETRANCAM) - OTP - WEBPAGE
-
October 2023
Historique (History) - Pallisco-CIFM - WEBPAGE
-
March 2024
OLB certification - Pallisco-CIFM - WEBPAGE
-
2023
Plan de Gestion Environnementale et Sociale - Rapport semestriel de surveillance- ( Environmental and Social Management Plan- Semi-annual monitoring report)
-
No date
Wood supply (external resource) - Pallisco-CIFM - WEBPAGE
-
2023
Logging Enterprise OLB Certified Bodies List
-
No date
FSC FM/COC certificate - PALLISCO SARL
-
No date
FSC COC certificate - PALLISCO SARL
-
October 2023
Politique d'amélioration contnue de la gestion responsable (Policy for continuous improvement of responsible management)
-
February 2022
Directives Lutte contre les Activités Illégales exercées dans les UFA (Combating Illegal Activities in FMUs)
-
November 2014
EIES du projet d'aménagement et d'exploitation de l'UFA 10 047b (SEIA of the development and exploitation project of UFA 10 047b)
-
November 2009
ETUDE D'IMPACT ENVIRONNEMENTAL DETAILLEE DES UFA GROUPEES 10 030 et 10 031 (DETAILED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY OF GROUPED UFAs 10,030 and 10,031)
-
November 2009
ETUDE D'IMPACT ENVIRONNEMENTAL DETAILLEE DES UFA GROUPEES 10 039 (DETAILED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY OF FMUs GROUPS 10,039)
-
November 2009
ETUDE D'IMPACT ENVIRONNEMENTAL DETAILLEE DES UFA GROUPEES 10 041, 10 042 et 10 044 (DETAILED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY OF FMUs GROUPS 10 041, 10 042 and 10 044)
-
2020
Brochure 2020
-
2021
Gestion Responsable de l'Exploitation Forestière - Suivi des indicateurs pertinents ? (Responsible Forestry Management - Monitoring of relevant indicators ?)
-
February 2022
DIRECTIVES POUR LES PEUPLES AUTOCHTONES (GUIDELINES FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES)
-
No date
Sociale (Social) - Pallisco-CIFM - WEBPAGE
-
February 2022
Directives Développement alternatives à la consommation de la viande de brousse (Development Directives Alternatives to Bushmeat Consumption)
-
February 2023
Les Échos de la Forêt (Echoes of the Forest)
-
February 2021
Politique de promotion de la non-discrimination selon les critères de sexe et de genre (Policy to promote non-discrimination based on sex and gender criteria)
-
February 2021
Politique Hygiène, Santé, Sécurité (Hygiene, Health, Safety Policy)
-
February 2021
Charte Ethique (Code of ethics)
-
February 2022
Politique de lutte contre la corruption en milieu du travail (Anti-corruption policy in the workplace)
-
No date
PROCEDURE DE GESTION DES DOLEANCES/PLAINTES (PROCEDURE FOR MANAGING GRIEVANCES/COMPLAINTS)
Media monitor: Pallisco
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
January 2022
Les Pygmées expulsés de force des forêts au Cameroun (Pygmies forcibly evicted from forests in Cameroon)
March 2021
Mindourou-Messamena road: the Minfof at the origin of social tensions
October 2017
Cut from Congo: Industrial logging and the loss of intact forest landscapes in the Congo Basin
May 2017
WWF and the loggers: A brief history of greenwashing in the Congo Basin
December 2015
Responses to concerns about illegal practices of FSC Certificate Holders in Cameroon
August 2015
CAMEROUN: L'impossible vérification des documents légaux liés aux permis d'exploitation des entreprises forestières (Cameroon: The impossible verification of the legal documents related to the logging companies)
0
2
3
3
0
0
0
3
1
0
Media monitor: Pallisco
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

