Skip to content
Menu Search

Maxland Berhad (previously assessed as Priceworth International)

Timber and pulp assessment
  • Latest update: August 2024
  • Next scheduled: August 2025

  • Media Monitor
    • ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.

Company assessment: Maxland Berhad (previously assessed as Priceworth International) – July 2018

Assessment date:

Total: 7.4% 8 / 107.5
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    1 / 6 16.7%
    • N
      0 / 1

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to direct and third-party suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      5. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?

    • N
      0 / 1

      6. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?

  • Landbank, FMUs and mills Landbank, FMUs and mills
    4.5 / 13 34.6%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      7. Lists countries and operations?

      The company's main country of operation is Malaysia. It has subsidiaries in some other countries - including Gabon and Papua New Guinea - but these are currently dormant.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      8. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      101000

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      28000

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      11. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      13. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      14. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      15. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      16. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

    • N
      0 / 1

      17. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?

    • N

      18. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N

      19. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      20. Number of company owned sawmills?

      4 - The company lists four sawmills that it owns, though it is not clear if all of them are currently in operation.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      21. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?

      The company provides names and addresses for four sawmills, but the addresses are unclear.

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    0 / 15 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      22. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Zero conversion commitment applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?

    • N
      0 / 1

      25. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      26. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      27. Amount of deforestation recorded?

    • N
      0 / 1

      28. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      29. Commitment to set aside areas for conservation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      30. Examples of habitat management and/or habitat restoration of set-aside areas?

    • N
      0 / 1

      31. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Commitment to protect species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • N
      0 / 1

      33. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      34. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?

    • N
      0 / 1

      35. Commitment to only use alien species where impacts can be controlled?

    • N
      0 / 1

      36. Examples of species conservation activities?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      37. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. HCV commitment applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      39. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      41. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      44. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?

  • Soils, fire and GHG emissions Soils, fire and GHG emissions
    0.5 / 14 3.6%
    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      47. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

      The company states it uses Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) techniques, but does not have a full commitment to use RIL across all of its operations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Commitment on peatland planting applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      50. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      51. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      52. Commitment to zero burning?

    • N
      0 / 1

      53. Commitment to zero burning applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

    • N
      0 / 1

      55. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Report GHG emissions from land use change?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Water, chemical and waste management Water, chemical and waste management
    1 / 10 10%
    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Progress towards commitment on water quality?

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N

      63. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

    • N

      65. Time-bound commitment to improve water use?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N

      66. Progress towards commitment on water use?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N

      67. Commitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      68. Evidence of minimising or recycling solid waste produced during sawmilling processes?

    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    0.5 / 19.5 2.6%
    • N
      0 / 1

      74. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration of Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. Commitment to human rights applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      77. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      83. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company commits to enhancing community sustainability, but there are no examples of relevant actions.

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?

    • N
      0 / 0.5

      86. Total number of employees?

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • N
      0 / 1

      89. Commitment to pay minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      90. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?

    • N
      0 / 1

      91. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1

      92. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • N
      0 / 1

      93. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    0 / 10 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

    • N
      0 / 1

      95. Percentage wood/wood fibre supply verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs?

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?

    • N
      0 / 2

      98. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

    • N
      0 / 2

      99. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?

    • N
      0 / 2

      100. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    0 / 5 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      103. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      105. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      106. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company has a Code of Ethics and Conduct, through which it commits to reporting improper conduct. However, this code is not publicly available so the details of it cannot be assessed.

    • N
      0 / 1

      107. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Own grievance or complaints system?

    • N
      0 / 1

      109. Grievance or complaints system is accessible to internal and external stakeholders?

    • N
      0 / 2

      110. Details of grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Maxland Berhad (previously assessed as Priceworth International)

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.

Show media reports
Last media reports:
Are we missing a story? Submit a media report
No article found for the selected categories.

0

3

3

3

0

1

0

0

0

1


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)