Skip to content
Menu Search

Marubeni was founded in 1848, and is headquartered in Japan. It is engaged in timber

  • Landbank (timber/pulp):
    320,000 hectares
  • Market cap:
    11,345,541,537 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    8002.T
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    8002:JP
  • ISIN:
    JP3877600001
  • Activities:
    Timber production, pulpwood production, pulp and paper production, trading and distribution
  • Locations:
    Australia, Indonesia (Sumatra)
  • Headquarters:
    Japan
  • Website:

Company assessment: Marubeni – July 2019

SPOTT assesses companies against over 100 indicators across ten categories. Click on the icons or bars below to expand each category for further details, scoring and links to reports and sources.

Assessment date:

Total: 52.6% 60 / 114
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership 8.5 / 11 77.3%
    • Companies should publish sustainability policies or similar commitments covering their entire supply chain — including third party suppliers — implemented and enforced through high-level leadership that engages with wider industry schemes.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to all sourcing?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company has a Sustainability Management Committee. The Chairman of the Committee is named, and listed as Managing Executive Officer, Member of the Board

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      4. One or more board members have responsibility for sustainability?

      Three members of the Board are part of the Sustainability Management Committee

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      5. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 (10%)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      6. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      5.9%

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      7. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      8. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?

      The company is a member of the UN Global Compact and discloses to CDP.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      9. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?

      The company provides an example of supporting a REDD+ project in Laos along with various institutions including Waseda University, but limited details are given and the project does not appear to be in an area where the company has plantations or related operations

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      10. Climate risks assessment available?

      The company states it recognises the impact climate change is likely to have on its businesses and finances and it is in the process of conducting a climate risk assessment analysis

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      11. Natural capital assessment available?

  • Landbank, mills and traceability Landbank, mills and traceability 8.5 / 18 47.2%
    • Companies should publicly report figures on their total landbank and details of different areas under their management. They should also disclose maps of their forest management units and provide forest management plans, as well as details on mills.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      12. Lists countries and operations?

      Australia (plantation), Indonesia (plantation and processing facilities)

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      13. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      14. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      140,000 - The company states it has a total area of 320,000 ha out of which 140,000 ha are tree plantations

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      15. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't use outgrower schemes for wood/wood fibre production

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      17. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?

      50,840 - Figure includes HCV and conservation areas reported in the FSC reports of the two subsidiaries, WAPRES (3,547 ha) and Musi Hutan (47,293 ha)

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      18. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't have any intact forest landscapes within its landbank

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      19. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

      2

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      20. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

      Maps for the company's subsidiary PT MHP are published on Global Forest Watch but these maps do not cover the company's whole operations. WAPRES has static map on its website

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      21. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

      Forest Management Plan is available for WAPRES

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      22. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?

      Forest Management Plan and monitoring is available for WAPRES

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      23. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      24. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      25. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      26. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      3 - The company controls one pulp mill through its subsidiary PT. Tanjungenim Lestari Pulp and Paper (PT TEL) in Indonesia and two paper mills through its subsidiaries Koa Kogyo Co. Ltd. and Fukuyama Paper Co. Ltd. in Japan

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      27. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      28. Number of company owned sawmills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own sawmills

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      29. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own sawmills

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      30. Number of supplier mills?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Maps or addresses of supplier mills?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      32. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?

      The company has FSC and PEFC CoC certificates that cover traceability for FSC/PEFC certified materials. A separate process for non-certified materials could not be found

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      33. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?

      The company has FSC CoC certificates that only covers traceability for FSC certified materials. A separate process for non-certified materials could not be found

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      34. Percentage of supply traceable to country level (above 80%)?

      The company has many CoC certificates however percentage of certified procurements could not be ascertained. Procedure to trace non-certified products is not disclosed

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      35. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level (above 75%)?

      The company has many CoC certificates however percentage of certified procurements could not be ascertained. Procedure to trace non-certified products is not disclosed

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity 5.5 / 10 55%
    • Companies should commit to address deforestation and to set aside areas for conservation. They should report on any activities to manage or restore habitat in their conservation areas, or monitor deforestation in their supply chains. They should also provide evidence of biodiversity conservation and species or habitat management.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      36. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      37. Zero conversion commitment applies to all sourcing?

    • n/a
      -
      Source

      38. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      39. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      40. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      Methodology for monitoring deforestation is unclear and only covers parts of the operations

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      41. Amount of deforestation recorded?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      42. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      43. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      44. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      45. Identified species of conservation concern referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      46. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      47. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the introduction of genetically modified organisms in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004)

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments 3 / 7 42.9%
    • Companies should commit to the High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) approaches, and to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They should develop and publish summaries of assessments and monitoring and management plans.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      48. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company does not have a direct commitment to conduct HCV assessments across all of its operations. However, the company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of high conservation values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      49. HCV commitment applies to all sourcing?

      The company has committed not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of high conservation values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      50. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      This indicator is disabled until sufficient number of HCV ALS licensed assessors are available for the location where the company operates

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      51. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      53. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      54. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it hasn't expanded its plantation area since April 2015

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      55. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      56. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?

      One SEIA assessment and management plan is available within the Forest Management Plan for the company's subsidiary, WAPRES

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      57. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

  • Water, chemical and waste management Water, chemical and waste management 6 / 12 50%
    • Companies should commit to protect peatland and undertake best management practices for soils and peat, as well as commit to reduced impact logging. They should also have policies on zero burning and to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies should report their GHG emissions, as well as details on any fires that occurred in or around their estates, along with evidence for managing and monitoring fires.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      72. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company states to have met local legal water quality standards for BOD and COD for one of its pulp and paper mill

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      73. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      74. Commitment to protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

      Preserving waterways through buffer zones is a part of Forest Management Plan of WAPRES only

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      75. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      76. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own sawmills

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      77. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      The company only has a general commitment to reduce water use and a specific time-bound target that relates only to the company's head office

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      79. Commitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      80. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      Commitment does not cover all operations

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      81. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      82. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      83. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      IPM has been implemented in WAPRES FMU

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      84. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      Some of the chemicals used are published in the FSC Audit report however this does not cover all of the company's operations

  • Soils, fire and GHGs Soils, fire and GHGs 5 / 10 50%
    • Companies should commit to managing water use and water quality, providing evidence through time-bound reduction plans, policies on toxic chemical use, waste management and treatment of wastewater and mill effluents.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      58. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • n/a
      -
      Source

      59. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      60. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not have landbank on peat

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      61. Commitment on peatland planting applies to all sourcing?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't have suppliers with landbank on peat

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      62. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not have landbank on peat

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      63. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      64. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company's "no burn policy" only relates to tropical forest areas and the company's Australian subsidiary uses burning in certain circumstances

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to zero burning applies to all sourcing?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      66. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      67. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      68. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      69. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?

      The company reports general group emissions figures, but none specifically relating to its forestry operations

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. Report GHG emissions from land use change?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      71. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      GHG Protocol

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights 13.5 / 22 61.4%
    • Companies should commit to respect human rights, including those of indigenous peoples and local communities, and free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Companies should respect the rights of workers, report relevant workforce data, and address with health and safety issues.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      85. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration on Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      86. Commitment to human rights applies to all sourcing?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      87. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses the rights of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples as established by the ILO Convention 169

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      88. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?

      The company commits to respect legal and customary property rights only in relation to FPIC

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      89. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      90. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      91. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      92. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      93. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      94. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      95. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      96. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      97. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      98. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of any of the ILO Core Conventions. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      99. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      100. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      101. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      1,540 - Figure as of 2017

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      102. Percentage or number of women employees?

      26.8% - This figure refers to the percentage of female employees in 2018, across the company (not just specifically relating to timber and pulp operations)

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      103. Payment of minimum wage?

      Only has policy for payment of legally mandated minimum wage and endeavouring to pay at least a living wage as per basic supply chain sustainability policy. No evidence provided

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      104. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      105. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?

      The company commits to securing safety and health in the workplace, but does not refer to the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      106. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      0.36 - The company reports a lost-time injuries frequency rate of 0.36. Data as of 2018

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      107. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      0 - The company reports that the number of fatal occupational accidents in 2018 was zero

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

  • Certification standards Certification standards 4.5 / 14 32.1%
    • Companies should be certified by credible certification standards, or have time-bound commitments to achieve 100% certification of forest management units. They should also ensure that their supply is verified as being in legal compliance and commit to sourcing certified wood/wood fibre.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      109. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?

      The company has two FMUs, WAPRES is fully FSC certified in Australia and PT Musi Hutan Persada is fully IFCC (PEFC) certified in Indonesia

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      110. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      111. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      100% - The company has two FMUs, one of which is fully FSC certified in Australia and the other one is fully IFCC (PEFC) certified in Indonesia

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      112. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      113. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs or achieved 100% FSC-certification of FMUs?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      114. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 2
      Source

      115. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

      26,065 (8.1%) - Only the company's Australian subsidiary, WAPRES is FSC FM certified (26,065 ha) out of the company's total landbank (320,000 ha)

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      116. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      117. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed that are FSC certified (above 75%)?

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      118. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

      96.2% - The company's Indonesian subsidiary, PT MHP is fully PEFC certified (296,400 ha) and the company's total landbank is 320,000 ha

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers 3 / 4 75%
    • Companies should report details of any programmes or schemes to support outgrower scheme smallholders, as well as criteria to assess suppliers on compliance with company policies, and in what cases suppliers should be suspended or excluded due to non-compliance.

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      119. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not source wood/wood fibre from outgrowers

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      120. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not source wood/wood fibre from outgrowers

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      121. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company has a document outlining its procedure for managing non-compliance with the parts of its Basic CSR Policy that relate to labour standards. It also has a compliance manual outlining several compulsory commitments, such as legal compliance and respect for human rights

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      122. The company has a Due Diligence System (DDS)?

      DDS is available for WAPRES only

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      123. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      The company outlines criteria for considering exclusion of a supplier in relation to compliance with the labour standards set out in its Basic CSR Policy, but not for other parts of this policy

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      124. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

      The company reports that as of 31st March 2018, there were no business partners that did not comply with its supply chain labour standards (it clarifies that business partners include "Group companies, suppliers, service providers, contractors, third-party manufacturers, JV partners and outsourcing partners"). Reporting on compliance to other parts of the company's policies was not found

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances 2.5 / 6 41.7%
    • Companies should operate in an ethical manner at all levels, providing accessible channels and clear procedures for both employees and external stakeholders to raise any grievance or complaint with the company, as well as allowing for whistleblowing.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      125. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      126. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      128. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      129. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      130. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company has an"Anti-Corruption Hotline" and "Door of Courage" to report non-compliance with company guidelines. However, it is not open to external stakeholders

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      131. Details of grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Marubeni

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.
SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)