Interholco
Timber and pulp assessment- Latest update: September 2025
- Next scheduled: August 2027
-
Parent company:Forset Group
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:Private company
-
Bloomberg ticker:Private company
-
Website:
Company assessment: Interholco – July 2019
Assessment date:
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
2017
Procurement Policy and responsible forest management
-
No date
Working across landscapes
-
No date
Facts and Figures webpage
-
2017
Sustainability Report
-
No date
FSC Members List
-
No date
ATIBT members list (Association Technique Internationale des Bois Tropicaux – International Tropical Timber Technical Association)
-
No date
Congo Basin Forest Partnership members list
-
2015
Plan d'amenagement de l'Ufa Ngombe (Management Plan of UFA Ngombe)
-
2017
News: Expert group leads to better understanding of open Marantaceae Forests in the North of Congo
-
No date
Climate Change risk assessment
-
2018
Natural Capital Protocol: Pilot Case Study Interholco: Sustainable Forest Management in the Republic of Congo
-
No date
Organisation
-
No date
Sustainable Hardwood – Made in Africa: the year in advance
-
No date
Protecting the integrity of Intact Forest Landscapes in the Congo Basin
-
2013
Identification et gestion des Forêts à Haute Valeur de Conservation (Identification and management of HCV forests)
-
No date
Forest Management Annual Audit 2018
-
No date
Global Forest Watch Managed Forest Concessions Database
-
No date
Open Timber Portal
-
No date
IFO (Industrie Forestière de Ouesso) FSC Certificate RA-FM/COC-007088
-
2017
MONITORING DE LA GESTION FORESTIÈRE DE L’UFA NGOMBÉ (Monitoring of Forest Management of UFA Ngombe)
-
No date
Industrie Forestière de Ouesso (IFO) - Google Maps
-
No date
Regulatory Landscape
-
2017
MONITORING FOREST MANAGEMENT IN UFA NGOMBÉ
-
No date
L’UFA Ngombé: Fiches didactiques (The UFA Ngombé: Fact sheets)
-
No date
Monitoring of the open Marantaceae forests in Northern Congo to understand their origins and dynamics
-
2018
MONITORING DE LA GESTION FORESTIÈRE DE L’UFA NGOMBÉ (2018)
-
2014
FSC Certification Assessment
-
2013
Manual Conflict Sensitivity Due Diligence
-
2015
Code of Conduct
-
No date
Career webpage
-
2018
Rainforest Alliance Standard for Forest Products Legality Verification certificate
-
2016
Implementation EU Timber Regulation and US Lacey Act
-
No date
Governance webpage
-
2017
Grievance mechanism and integrity line
Media monitor: Interholco
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
August 2019
Nachhaltig, ökologisch – und doch Prügelknabe (Sustainable, ecological - and yet whipping boy)
June 2019
Multinationales responsables: initiative ou contre-projet?(Responsible multinationals: initiative or counter-project?)
October 2017
Cut from Congo: Industrial logging and the loss of intact forest landscapes in the Congo Basin
May 2017
WWF and the loggers: A brief history of greenwashing in the Congo Basin
April 2017
Dutch court makes legal history in sentencing timber baron Gus Kouwenhoven to 19 years for war crimes and arms smuggling during Liberian civil war
January 2017
Central Africa: In the Congo Basin the Myth of 'Selective Logging Bites the Dust'
March 2016
Massive wildfire rips through Congo rainforest – is logging to blame?
0
1
8
1
0
2
6
5
1
3
Media monitor: Interholco
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.