Integra Group
Timber and pulp assessment- Latest update: August 2022
- Next scheduled: July 2023
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the timber and pulp supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Parent company:PT Integra Indo Lestari (71.9% share ownership)
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:Private company
-
Bloomberg ticker:Private company
-
Activities:Timber production; Timber processing and manufacturing; Trading and distribution
-
Locations:Indonesia (East Kalimantan, East Java)
-
Headquarters:Indonesia
-
Website:
Company assessment: Integra Group – August 2022
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 10.5 / 34 30.9%
- Policy: 29 / 72 40.3%
- Practice: 27.8 / 55 50.5%
- Self-reported: 3.8 / 55 6.8%
- External: 5.5 / 55 10%
- Certified: 18.5 / 55 33.6%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership
3.5 / 12 29.2%- Organisation: 1.5 / 6 25%
- Policy: 1 / 2 50%
- Practice: 1 / 4 25%
- Self-reported: 1 / 4 25%
- External: 0 / 4 0%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?
The company has commitments that cover both environmental and social aspects of the company.
-
0 / 1
2. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
-
0 / 1
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
-
0 / 1
5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?
-
6. Percentage or number of women board members?
2 - The company reports total five members in the board, out of which two are female members. However, the gender balance is not directly reported by the company.
-
0 / 1
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?
-
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with timber and pulp production?
To minimize the environmental damage due to illegal logging activity, the company's subsidiary PT Narkata Rimba cooperates with The Nature Conservancy (TNC) from the US and develops a system called Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) along with its guideline to fulfill the FSC certification standards.
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company's latest sustainability report was published in 2021, covering the year 2020.
-
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
The company states that it aims to fullfill the GRI Standards in the comming years, but this is not the case yet for the latest report published.
-
0 / 1
11. Climate risks assessment available?
-
0 / 1
12. Natural capital assessment available?
-
Landbank, maps and traceability
8 / 21 38.1%- Organisation: 6 / 16 37.5%
- Policy: 1 / 2 50%
- Practice: 1 / 3 33.3%
- Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
- External: 1 / 3 33.3%
- Certified: 0 / 3 0%
-
13. Lists countries and operations?
The company reports that all operations related to forest concessions and production facilities are in Indonesia.
-
0 / 1
14. Lists countries sourcing from?
-
15. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?
163425 - The company has two forestry concession companies namely; Narkata Rimba with 65,925 ha and Belayan River Timber with 97,500 ha.
-
16. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests.
-
0 / 1
17. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?
-
18. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests.
-
19. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
19884 - The FSC reports of PT Narkata Rimba and of PT Belayan River Timber state 6,898 ha and 12,986 ha conservation area respectively.
-
0 / 1
20. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?
-
21. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?
2 - The company reports two concessions controlled by itself in the name of PT Narkata Rimba and PT. Belayan River Timber.
-
22. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?
The information on the company website as well as FSC reports only mention the coordinates of one point in each FMU.
-
23. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?
The forest management plans for PT Belayan River Timber and PT Narkata Rimba are available publically.
-
24. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation available?
[Externally verified] The monitoring of forest management plan implementation is available in the FSC reports of the company FMU.
-
25. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use right (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
26. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
27. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
0 / 1
28. Names and locations of all third-party supplying FMUs?
-
0 / 1
29. Number of company owned sawmills?
-
0 / 1
30. Names and locations of company owned sawmills?
-
31. Number of company-owned pulp and paper mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own pulp or paper mills.
-
32. Names and locations of company-owned pulp and paper mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own pulp or paper mills.
-
33. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned sawmills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
The company reports that its own forest concession supplies 30-50% of the production to its manufacturing, while the rest of the timber is sourced from certified suppliers. However, clear figures are not reported.
-
34. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned pulp and paper mills that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own pulp or paper mills.
-
0 / 1
35. Number of third party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
36. Names and locations of all third party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
37. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?
-
38. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Chain of Custody Certification Standard (FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1). Partial points have been awarded as the requirements do not full meet the SPOTT scoring criteria, and it not clear how much supply is covered by the certification.
-
0 / 1
39. Percentage of supply traceable to country of harvest?
-
40. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Chain of Custody Certification Standard (FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1). Partial points have been awarded as the requirements do not full meet the SPOTT scoring criteria.
-
0 / 1
41. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level?
-
Certification standards
4.5 / 8 56.3%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2.5 / 4 62.5%
- Practice: 2 / 4 50%
- Self-reported: 2 / 4 50%
- External: 0 / 4 0%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
42. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?
The company is 100% FSC FM certified since 2011.
-
43. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
100% - The company's total landbank (163,425 ha) is 100% FSC certified.
-
44. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?
The company reported that it sources only legal and certified timber for its production, but does not mention the name of verification system.
-
0 / 1
45. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
-
46. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?
100% - The company's total landbank (163,425 ha) is 100% FSC FM certified.
-
47. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs or achieved 100% FSC-certification of FMUs?
The FMU's of the company are 100% FSC certified since 2011.
-
0 / 1
48. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply (tonnes) from all suppliers that comes from FSC FM certified areas?
-
0 / 1
49. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood and/or PEFC Controlled Sources requirements?
-
50. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in a country with a PEFC-endorsed Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) standard.
-
Deforestation and biodiversity
9 / 24 37.5%- Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
- Policy: 3.5 / 14 25%
- Practice: 5.5 / 8 68.8%
- Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
- External: 1.5 / 8 18.8%
- Certified: 4 / 8 50%
-
0 / 1
51. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
-
0 / 1
52. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
-
53. Commitment to zero deforestation?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership. Also the company also has a commitment to combating illegal logging that leads to deforestation.
-
0 / 1
54. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
-
55. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).
-
0 / 1
56. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
-
0 / 1
57. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
-
0 / 1
58. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
59. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
60. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion?
-
0 / 1
61. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?
-
62. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
[Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2 EN). As the Standard does not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria limited, externally verified points have therefore been awarded.
-
0 / 1
63. Biodiversity policy?
-
0 / 1
64. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
-
65. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
66. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
67. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). As the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).
-
0 / 1
68. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
-
69. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.).
-
0 / 1
70. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?
-
1 / 1
1 / 171. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
72. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests.
-
0 / 1
73. Commitment to no use of genetically modified organisms applies to all suppliers?
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments
2 / 8 25%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2 / 5 40%
- Practice: 0 / 3 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
- Certified: 0 / 3 0%
-
74. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership.
-
0 / 1
75. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
76. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?
-
0 / 1
77. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?
-
78. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests.
-
0 / 1
79. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
-
80. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests.
-
81. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests.
-
82. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.).
-
0 / 1
83. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
84. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
85. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions
6 / 20 30%- Organisation: 0 / 4 0%
- Policy: 1.5 / 8 18.8%
- Practice: 4.5 / 8 56.3%
- Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
- External: 0 / 8 0%
- Certified: 4.5 / 8 56.3%
-
86. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests.
-
0 / 1
87. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
88. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
-
0 / 1
89. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
90. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
As for soils, the company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.), however peatlands are not covered and it's not clear whether the company has landbank on peat or not.
-
0 / 1
91. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
-
92. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
93. Commitment to reduced impact logging?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.). The company published a commitment to implement Reduce Impact Logging (RIL) practices in the process of wood harvesting.
-
0 / 1
94. Commitment to reduced impact logging applies to all suppliers?
-
95. Evidence of implementing reduced impact logging practices?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC. Also the company provided integrated training on RIL activities for it's employees, in collaboration with The Nature Conservancy, Tropical Forest Fund, and others.
-
96. Commitment to zero burning?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests.
-
0 / 1
97. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
-
0.75 / 2
98. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also states that it actively monitors, maintains, and improves its operating efficiency to mitigate the risk of fire in production facilities, however this is not externally verified.
-
0 / 1
99. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company FMUs?
-
0 / 1
100. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations?
-
0 / 1
101. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
102. GHG emissions intensity?
-
103. GHG emissions from land use change?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests.
-
0 / 1
104. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
105. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
-
Water, chemical and pest management
11.5 / 16 71.9%- Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
- Policy: 4 / 7 57.1%
- Practice: 6.5 / 8 81.3%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 8 9.4%
- External: 0.8 / 8 9.4%
- Certified: 5 / 8 62.5%
-
106. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own pulp or paper mills.
-
107. Water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own pulp or paper mills.
-
108. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own pulp or paper mills.
-
109. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own pulp or paper mills.
-
110. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own pulp or paper mills.
-
111. Treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own pulp or paper mills.
-
112. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?
The company states that it recycles and reuse wastewater and that it has coolers with closed circulation mechanisms as factory equipments. However, this is only self-reported.
-
113. Proportion of processing facilities with closed-loop water treatment system?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own pulp or paper mills.
-
114. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.).
-
115. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
The FSC reports of PT Belayan River Timber provide evidence that buffer zones are in place.
-
116. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.).
-
0 / 1
117. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
-
118. Evidence of eliminating chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not own pulp or paper mills.
-
119. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.).
-
0 / 1
120. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
-
121. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.).
-
0 / 1
122. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
-
123. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
As per the FSC reports, no chemicals and pesticides are used in the forestry operations by the company's FMUs.
-
124. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC. Also FSC reports indicate that no chemicals pesticides are used in the forestry operations.
-
125. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
126. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Also the company reports that in its manufacturing division, in line with its spirit to realize a zero-waste strategy, it uses its raw materials and wood waste such as sawdust and bark as fuel for its kiln dry machine. The company states that it recycles and reuses its water.
-
Community, land and labour rights
19.75 / 37 53.4%- Organisation: 2 / 5 40%
- Policy: 10.5 / 21 50%
- Practice: 7.3 / 11 65.9%
- Self-reported: 0 / 11 0%
- External: 2.3 / 11 20.5%
- Certified: 5 / 11 45.5%
-
127. Commitment to human rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership.
-
0 / 1
128. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
129. Progress on human rights commitment ?
-
130. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership.
-
0 / 1
131. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
-
132. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) and PEFC International Standard (PEFC ST 1003:2018). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC and PEFC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).
-
0 / 1
133. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
-
134. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.).
-
0 / 1
135. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
136. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
-
137. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
138. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). As the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).
-
0 / 1
139. Supports the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?
-
140. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
141. Commitment to enable sustainable use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) by local communities?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.).
-
142. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities ?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.).
-
1 / 1
1 / 1143. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank. Also the company has social programs to enhance the welfare of surrounding community, such as the provision of scholarships, nutritious food, basic food parcels, and free health services on a regular basis, however this is not externally verified so full points are awarded on the basis of FSC FM certificate.
-
144. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
The company has committed to continuously empowering the local workforce in accordance with the company's qualifications and policies, create job opportunities, especially for the community around the factory site.
-
145. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
146. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership.
-
0 / 1
147. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
-
148. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.
-
149. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). As the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).
-
0 / 1
150. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
-
151. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis the company's landbank is either 100% or ≥75% (and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years) FSC FM certified (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
152. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
0 (0%) - The company reports the total number of permanent and contract workers for itself and its subsidiaries. Data as of August 31, 2020.
-
153. Percentage or number of women employees?
392 (18.98%) - The company reports the number of women employees for all its operations. Data as of December 2020.
-
154. Commitment to pay a living wage?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). As the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years). The company also states that it pays regional minimum wage, but the living wage is not mentionned.
-
0 / 1
155. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suplliers?
-
156. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis the company's landbank is either 100% or ≥75% (and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years) FSC FM certified (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.
-
0 / 1
157. Reporting of salary by gender?
-
158. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years.). Also the company has a commitment to occupational health & safety standards which are compliant with national regulations, but it does not mention the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work.
-
0 / 1
159. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
-
160. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
The FSC report of company's subsidiary PT Belayan River Timber mentions evidence that company provides personal protective equipment (PPE) and related training in relation to forestry operations.
-
0 / 1
161. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
-
0 / 1
162. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
-
Smallholders and suppliers
1 / 8 12.5%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 1 / 4 25%
- Practice: 0 / 4 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
- External: 0 / 4 0%
- Certified: 0 / 4 0%
-
0 / 1
163. Commitment to support smallholders?
-
0 / 1
164. Programme to support outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders?
-
0 / 1
165. Number or percentage of outgrower scheme and/or independent smallholders involved in programme?
-
166. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
The company makes this commitment through SVLK certification requirements. As SVLK requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria, partial points have been awarded on the basis of the company's SVLK certification.
-
0 / 1
167. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
168. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Chain of Custody Certification Standard (FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1). Partial points have been awarded as the requirements do not full meet the SPOTT scoring criteria.
-
0 / 1
169. Timebound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with timber and pulp sourcing commitments?
-
0 / 1
170. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from FMUs which are compliant with timber and pulp sourcing policies?
-
Governance and grievances
2 / 7 28.6%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2 / 5 40%
- Practice: 0 / 2 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
- Certified: 0 / 2 0%
-
171. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company makes this commitment through the FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2). As the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (either 100% or ≥75% and a further commitment to be 100% certified within 5 years).The company also mentions a Code of conduct that includes considerations to business ethics and corruption but no explicit commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption was found.
-
0 / 1
172. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
173. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
-
174. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
0 / 1
175. Disclosure of the companyâs management approach to tax and payments to governments?
-
176. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal.
-
177. Whistleblowing procedure?
The company reports information on its whistleblowing policy and how the whistleblowers are protected, but no details are reported on the steps taken by the company to deal with the complaints received.
-
178. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company has a social and environmental complaint mechanism, and details the steps taken.
-
0 / 1
179. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
2020
Good Corporate Governance
-
No date
Sustainability Report
-
No date
About Us - Integra Group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Annual Report
-
No date
FSC FM/COC Certificate - PT Narkata Rimba
-
No date
FSC FM/COC Report - PT Belayan River Timber
-
No date
PT. Belayan River Timber - Integra Group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
PT. Narkata Rimba - Integra Group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
FSC FM/COC Report - PT Narkata Rimba
-
No date
FSC COC Certificate - PT. Integra Indocabinet Tbk
-
No date
FSC FM/COC Certificate - PT Belayan River Timber
-
No date
Prospektus (Prospectus)
-
February 2020
FSC FM/COC report- PT Belayan River Timber
-
No date
SVLK Certificate - PT. Integra Indocabinet TBK