Skip to content
Menu Search

Founded in 1920, Empresas CMPC has forestry operations in Argentina, Brazil and Chile, where it

Company assessment: Empresas CMPC – July 2018

SPOTT assesses companies against over 100 indicators across ten categories. Click on the icons or bars below to expand each category for further details, scoring and links to reports and sources.

Assessment date:

Total: 41.8% 44.5 / 106.5
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership 5 / 6 83.3%
    • Companies should publish sustainability policies or similar covering their entire supply chain — including third party suppliers — implemented and enforced through high-level leadership that engages with wider industry schemes.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to direct and third-party suppliers?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Corporate Affairs Committee

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      4. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      5. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?

      FSC, UNGC, WBCSD, CDP, GRI

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      6. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?

      Examples include participation in the Pilot Project for Forest Certification for Ecosystem Services (ForCes), FSC® Chile’s technical committees, and the New Generation Plantations project; collaboration with the CODEFF NGO, in order to protect and restore the habitat of the huillín, an endangered freshwater otter; and collaboration with the Etica en los Bosques NGO on initiatives to protect native forests in the south of Chile

  • Landbank, FMUs and mills Landbank, FMUs and mills 6 / 14 42.9%
    • Companies should publicly report figures on their total landbank and details of different areas under their management. They should also disclose maps of their forest management units and provide forest management plans, as well as details on supplier pulp and paper mills.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      7. Lists countries and operations?

      Plantations in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, and Peru. Processing facilities in Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Columbia, and Mexico

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      8. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      9. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      686,600 - Chile: 471,000 ha, Brazil: 157,300 ha, Argentina: 58,300 ha. Data as of 2017

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      11. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

      62,502 - 45,293 ha Chile, 9,518 ha Brazil, 7,691 Argentina. Data as of 2016.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      12. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?

      1,051,120 - Data as of 2016

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      13. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      14. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

      Some of the company's FMUs are given in their FSC certificates. However, the total number of FMUs controlled by the company is unclear

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      15. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      16. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

      Forest Management Plans are not available for all of the company's FMUs

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      17. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      18. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      16 - The company has four pulp mills and 12 paper mills, however the number of paper mills is undated

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      19. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      20. Number of company owned sawmills?

      3

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      21. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity 7.5 / 13 57.7%
    • Companies should commit to address deforestation and to set aside areas for conservation. They should report on any activities to manage or restore habitat in their conservation areas, or monitor deforestation in their supply chains. They should also provide evidence of species conservation and biodiversity protection.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      22. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      23. Zero conversion commitment applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      24. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      25. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      26. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      The monitoring of forest extent and condition is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (percentage unclear)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Amount of deforestation recorded?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      28. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      29. Commitment to set aside areas for conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      30. Examples of habitat management and/or habitat restoration of set-aside areas?

      The management and restoration of habitat is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (percentage unclear)

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      31. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?

      The maintenance and restoration of appropriate landscape values, including environmental and economic resilience is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). However, this commitment does not extend to active engagement with stakeholders outside of the Forest Management Unit. Half points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (percentage unclear)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      32. Commitment to protect species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      33. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      34. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the introduction of genetically modified organisms in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      35. Commitment to only use alien species where impacts can be controlled?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      36. Examples of species conservation activities?

      The protection of rare, threatened and endangered species and their habitats, and the maintenance of ecological functions and values is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (percentage unclear)

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments 1 / 9 11.1%
    • Companies should commit to the High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) approaches, and to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They should develop and publish monitoring and management plans, and provide evidence through SEIA, HCV and HCS assessments, typically published in summary form due to the sensitive nature of certain sites.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      37. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company does not have a direct commitment to conduct HCV assessments across all of its operations. However, the company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of High Conservation Values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      38. HCV commitment applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of High Conservation Values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      39. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      40. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      41. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?

  • Soils, fire and GHG emissions Soils, fire and GHG emissions 4 / 10 40%
    • Companies should commit to protect peatland and undertake best management practices for soils and peat, as well as commit to reduced impact logging. They should also have policies on zero burning and to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies should report their GHG emissions, as well as any fires that occurred in or around their estates, along with plans for managing and monitoring fires.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      46. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      47. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      48. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not have landbank on peat

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      49. Commitment on peatland planting applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not have suppliers with landbank on peat

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      50. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not have landbank on peat

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      51. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?

      The conservation of soils, including control of erosion and minimising damage during operations is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). However, specific provisions are not set out for peatland operations. Half points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (percentage unclear)

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      52. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company has a commitment to no use of fire within HCVs and surrounding areas, but not clearly for all new development

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      53. Commitment to zero burning applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      54. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      55. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?

      The company reports that in 2016 there were a total of 339 fires and that 50% of these were located on lands belonging to third parties

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      56. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company has a target to increase the energy efficiency of its wood pulp mills by 20% by 2020, however this does not cover all of the company's operations

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      57. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?

      The company reports its direct emissions of CO2, CH4 and N2O measured in tons of CO2E/Year and reports a reduction between 2015 (12.241.700 ton CO2e) and 2016 (8,647,573.6 ton CO2e). This data covers only the companies pulp operations in Chile and Brazil. The company does not report GHG intensity and does not have a specific target in place

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      58. Report GHG emissions from land use change?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Water, chemical and waste management Water, chemical and waste management 4 / 14 28.6%
    • Companies should commit to managing water use and water quality, providing evidence through time-bound reduction plans, policies on toxic chemical use, waste management and treatment of wastewater and mill effluents.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      60. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      No source

      61. Progress towards commitment on water quality?

      The company reports its BOD and COD from 2007 (2.42 kg/ton of final product) to 2015 (1.32kg/ton). The company does not report a specific target for reducing BOD or COD

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      No source

      63. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      64. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      65. Time-bound commitment to improve water use?

      The company targets an annual reduction of 10% water intake against 2016 levels in all their productive areas. The target is not timebound

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      66. Progress towards commitment on water use?

      The company reports between 2015 and 2016, its paper business decreased total water intake by 2,115,261 m3 and its tissue business by 1,672,805.5 m3. However, water intake increased in its pulp business due to expansion in production. A timebound target was not in place at the time of this reporting

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      67. mmitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      68. Evidence of minimising or recycling solid waste produced during sawmilling processes?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      69. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company mentions avoiding the use of chemicals in pest management

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      71. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      72. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      73. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights 11.5 / 19.5 59%
    • Companies should commit to respect human rights, including those of indigenous peoples and local communities, consulted with free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Companies should respect the rights of workers, report relevant workforce data, and comply with health and safety legislation.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      74. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration of Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      75. Commitment to human rights applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      76. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses the rights of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples as established by the ILO Convention 169

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      77. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of traditional rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses customary rights. This policy does not reference legal rights and no reference to legal rights could be found in company sources

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      79. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      80. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      82. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company does not have a commitment but they have a project involving 33 Mapuche communities to help them develop raspberry, strawberry and blueberry orchards

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      83. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN) require certified organisations to contribute to the social and economic development of local communities. Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank (percentage unclear)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      84. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      85. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of any of the ILO Core Conventions. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004)

    • Yes
      0.5 / 0.5
      Source

      86. Total number of employees?

      17,145 - Number of direct workers. Data as of 2016

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      87. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      22,785 - The company reports a total of 22,785 contractors. This figure does not include contractors of Celulosa Riograndense (Brazil). Data as of 2016

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      88. Percentage or number of women employees?

      2,328 (14%) - The company reports the percentage of women employees among their direct workers. Data as of 2016

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Commitment to pay minimum wage?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      90. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?

      The company do not refer to the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      91. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company report an accident rate of 1.72 for its direct employees and 8.408 for its contractors. Data as of 2016

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      92. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      4 - The company report 1 fatality among its direct workers and 3 among its contractors in 2016

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      93. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company only mentions provision of training

  • Certification standards Certification standards 3 / 10 30%
    • Companies should be certified by credible certification standards, or have time-bound commitments to achieve 100% certification of both forest management units and outgrower schemes. They should also commit to only sourcing certified wood/wood fibre and ensuring that their supply is verified as being in legal compliance.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      94. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      944,446 (90%) - The company has FSC FM certificates for Forestal Mininco, CMPC Pulp and CMPC Celulose Riograndense LTDA, covering an area of 944,446 ha. The company reports a total landbank of 1,051,119 ha, therefore their certified area covers 90% of their operations

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      95. Percentage wood/wood fibre supply verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      96. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      97. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?

      The company has a commitment to supply its industrial processes with 100% certified or controlled wood from renewable plantations. However, they do not specify FSC Controlled Wood

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      98. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

      944,446 (90%) - The company has FSC FM certificates for Forestal Mininco, CMPC Pulp and CMPC Celulose Riograndense LTDA, covering an area of 944,446 ha. The company reports a total landbank of 1,051,119 ha, therefore their certified area covers 90% of their operations

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      99. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      100. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified?

      221,000 - The company has PEFC FM certification for Celulose Rio Grandense Ltda (221,000.76 ha) and CMPC PULP S.A. Esquema de Certificación en Grupo. However the total area this covers is not provided and so an overall percentage cannot be calculated

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers 1 / 5 20%
    • Companies should report details of any programmes or schemes to support both schemed and independent smallholders, as well as criteria to assess suppliers on compliance with company policies, and in what cases suppliers should be suspended or excluded due to non-compliance.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      101. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      102. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      103. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      104. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      105. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances 1.5 / 6 25%
    • Companies should operate in an ethical manner at all levels, providing accessible channels and clear procedures for both employees and external stakeholders to raise any grievance or complaint with the company, as well as allowing for whistleblowing.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      106. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      107. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has a complaint line for reporting any violation of laws or of the Company’s principles, values, or Code of Conduct. However, no process for protecting whistleblowers is detailed

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Own grievance or complaints system?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      109. Grievance or complaints system is accessible to internal and external stakeholders?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      110. Details of grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Empresas CMPC

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.
SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)