Skip to content
Menu Search

Founded in 1920, Empresas CMPC has forestry operations in Argentina, Brazil and Chile, where it

  • Parent company:
    Matte Group
  • Landbank (timber/pulp):
    686,623 hectares
  • Market cap:
    6,671,373,164 USD
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    CMPC:CI
  • ISIN:
    CL0000001314
  • Activities:
    Timber production, pulpwood production, timber processing and manufacturing, pulp and paper production, trading and distribution
  • Locations:
    Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Columbia, Mexico
  • Headquarters:
    Chile
  • Website:

Company assessment: Empresas CMPC – July 2019

SPOTT assesses companies against over 100 indicators across ten categories. Click on the icons or bars below to expand each category for further details, scoring and links to reports and sources.

Assessment date:

Total: 42.2% 51.5 / 122
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership 8 / 11 72.7%
    • Companies should publish sustainability policies or similar commitments covering their entire supply chain — including third party suppliers — implemented and enforced through high-level leadership that engages with wider industry schemes.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to all sourcing?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Corporate Affairs Committee

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      4. One or more board members have responsibility for sustainability?

      The Chairman of the Board of Directors of the company, Mr. Luis Felipe Gazitúa is a member of Corporate Affairs Committee. This committee defines the objectives and evaluates implementation of CMPC sustainability including community relations programs and environment

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      5. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 (10%)

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      6. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      0 (0%) - Only photos of senior management are available on company's website

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      7. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      8. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?

      FSC, UNGC, WBCSD, CDP, GRI

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      9. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?

      Examples include participation in the Pilot Project for Forest Certification for Ecosystem Services (ForCes), FSC Chile's technical committees, and the New Generation Plantations project; collaboration with the CODEFF NGO, in order to protect and restore the habitat of the huilli­n, an endangered freshwater otter; Forestal Mininco Program (in collaboration with FSC and Certfor) for the Restoration of Native Forests and collaboration with the Etica en los Bosques NGO on initiatives to protect native forests in the south of Chile

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      10. Climate risks assessment available?

      The company publishes a summary of some climate change-related risks on its forestry operations and some adaptation measures adopted as a result

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      11. Natural capital assessment available?

  • Landbank, mills and traceability Landbank, mills and traceability 7 / 22 31.8%
    • Companies should publicly report figures on their total landbank and details of different areas under their management. They should also disclose maps of their forest management units and provide forest management plans, as well as details on mills.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      12. Lists countries and operations?

      Plantations in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, and Peru. Processing facilities in Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Columbia, and Mexico

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      13. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      14. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      686,623

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      15. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

      62,502 - 45,293 ha Chile, 9,518 ha Brazil, 7,691 Argentina. Data as of 2017.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      17. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?

      262,065

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      19. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      20. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      21. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

      Forest Management Plans are not available for all of the company's FMUs

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      22. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      23. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      24. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      25. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      26. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      4 - The company reports four pulp mills, however, no information on number of paper mills is available

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      28. Number of company owned sawmills?

      5

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      29. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      30. Number of supplier mills?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Maps or addresses of supplier mills?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      32. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?

      Partial points based on the cmpany's FSC CoC certification which only covers traceability for the certified portion of all its supply

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      33. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?

      Partial points based on the cmpany's FSC CoC certification which only covers traceability for the certified portion of all its supply

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      34. Percentage of supply traceable to country level (above 80%)?

      Some of the company's supply is CoC certified which ensures that it is traceable. However, the percentage of supply traceable cannot be calculated

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      35. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level (above 75%)?

      Some of the company's supply is CoC certified which ensures that it is traceable. However, the percentage of supply traceable cannot be calculated

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity 4.5 / 10 45%
    • Companies should commit to address deforestation and to set aside areas for conservation. They should report on any activities to manage or restore habitat in their conservation areas, or monitor deforestation in their supply chains. They should also provide evidence of biodiversity conservation and species or habitat management.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      36. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      37. Zero conversion commitment applies to all sourcing?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      38. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      39. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

      The company's commitment covers HCV areas only

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      40. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      41. Amount of deforestation recorded?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      42. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      43. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      45. Identified species of conservation concern referencing international or national system of species classification?

      The company identified species of conservation concern within the operations of Forestal Mininco (CMPC forestry subsidiary in Chile), specifying their conservation status under the IUCN system of classification

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      46. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      47. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the introduction of genetically modified organisms in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004)

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments 2 / 8 25%
    • Companies should commit to the High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) approaches, and to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They should develop and publish summaries of assessments and monitoring and management plans.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      48. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company does not have a direct commitment to conduct HCV assessments across all of its operations. However, the company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of high conservation values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      49. HCV commitment applies to all sourcing?

      The company has committed not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of high conservation values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      50. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      This indicator is disabled until sufficient number of HCV ALS licensed assessors are available for the location where the company operates

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      51. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

      The company has published an HCV report covering only its forestry operations in Chile (Forestal Mininco) and only mentioning species diversity, ecosystems and habitats (HCV1, 2 and 3)

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      52. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

      The HCV report about HCV1, 2 and 3 in the company's operations in Chile (Forestal Mininco) includes management and monitoring summaries. Only half a point has been awarded because it only covers parts of the company's operations

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      53. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      56. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      57. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

  • Water, chemical and waste management Water, chemical and waste management 4 / 13 30.8%
    • Companies should commit to protect peatland and undertake best management practices for soils and peat, as well as commit to reduced impact logging. They should also have policies on zero burning and to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies should report their GHG emissions, as well as details on any fires that occurred in or around their estates, along with evidence for managing and monitoring fires.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      72. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      73. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company reports its BOD and COD from 2007 (2.42 kg/ton of final product) to 2015 (1.32kg/ton). The company does not report a specific target for reducing BOD or COD. Data is more than two years old. Half a point has been awarded

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      74. Commitment to protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      75. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      76. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      77. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      The company targets an annual reduction of 10% water intake against 2016 levels in all their productive areas. The target is not time-bound

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      78. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company published its total water consumtion in 2016, 2017 and 2018. However, water use intensity is not reported and there is no target in place. Half a point has been awarded

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      79. Commitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      80. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company mentions avoiding the use of chemicals in pest management

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      82. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      83. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      84. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

  • Soils, fire and GHGs Soils, fire and GHGs 5.5 / 10 55%
    • Companies should commit to managing water use and water quality, providing evidence through time-bound reduction plans, policies on toxic chemical use, waste management and treatment of wastewater and mill effluents.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      58. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      59. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      60. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't have landbank on peat. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      61. Commitment on peatland planting applies to all sourcing?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't have suppliers with landbank on peat. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      62. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't have landbank on peat. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      63. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      64. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company has a commitment for not using fire within HCVs and surrounding areas, but not clearly for all new development

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to zero burning applies to all sourcing?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      66. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      67. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?

      2,556 - The company reports the surface area that has been affected by wildland fires between June 2017 and May 2018 in the countries where it has forestry operations. Chile 1,199 ha; Brazil 1,339 ha; Argentina 18 ha

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      68. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company has a target to increase the energy efficiency of its wood pulp mills by 20% by 2020, however this does not cover all of the company's operations

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      69. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?

      0.318 - The company reports its GHG emissions for all its operations in 2018 (total emissions = 7,667,222 tCO2e in 2018 ; GHG emission intensity = 0.318 tCO2e/ton). However, there is no target in place. Half a point has been awarded

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. Report GHG emissions from land use change?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      71. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights 14 / 22 63.6%
    • Companies should commit to respect human rights, including those of indigenous peoples and local communities, and free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Companies should respect the rights of workers, report relevant workforce data, and address with health and safety issues.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      85. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration on Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      86. Commitment to human rights applies to all sourcing?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      87. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses the rights of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples as established by the ILO Convention 169

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      88. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of traditional rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses customary rights. This policy does not reference legal rights and no reference to legal rights could be found in company sources

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      89. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      90. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      91. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      92. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company reports organising meetings, workshops, field visits and cooperation projects with local communities and indigenous people

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      93. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      94. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?

      The company's commitment to promote the inclusion of women is not specific to forestry operations

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      95. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      96. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      97. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      98. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of any of the ILO Core Conventions. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      99. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      100. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      101. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      31,843 - The company reports a total of 31,843 contractors. Data as of 2017

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      102. Percentage or number of women employees?

      2,316 (13.7%) - The company reports the percentage of women employees among their direct workers. Data as of 2017

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      103. Payment of minimum wage?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      104. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      105. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?

      The company does not refer to the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      106. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      1.3% - During 2017 the overall CMPC accident rate was 1.3 losttime accidents for each 100 direct employees. This rate was 0.79 for its contractors

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      107. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      4 - The company reports four fatalities among its contractors in 2017

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      108. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company only mentions provision of training

  • Certification standards Certification standards 3 / 14 21.4%
    • Companies should be certified by credible certification standards, or have time-bound commitments to achieve 100% certification of forest management units. They should also ensure that their supply is verified as being in legal compliance and commit to sourcing certified wood/wood fibre.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      109. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      110. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      111. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      944,446 (90%) - The company has FSC FM certificates for Forestal Mininco, CMPC Pulp and CMPC Cellulose Riograndense LTDA, covering an area of 944,446 ha. The company reports a total landbank of 1,051,119 ha, therefore its certified area covers 90% of their operations

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      112. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      113. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs or achieved 100% FSC-certification of FMUs?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      114. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?

      The company has a commitment to supply its industrial processes with 100% certified or controlled wood from renewable plantations. However, it does not specify FSC Controlled Wood

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      115. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

      944,446 (90%) - The company has FSC FM certificates for Forestal Mininco, CMPC Pulp and CMPC Cellulose Riograndense LTDA, covering an area of 944,446 ha. The company reports a total landbank of 1,051,119 ha, therefore its certified area covers 90% of their operations

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      116. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      117. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed that are FSC certified (above 75%)?

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      118. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

      221,000 - The company has PEFC FM certification for Celulose Rio Grandense Ltda (221,000.76 ha) and CMPC PULP S.A. Esquema de Certificaci??n en Grupo. However the total area this covers is not provided and so an overall percentage cannot be calculated

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers 1.5 / 6 25%
    • Companies should report details of any programmes or schemes to support outgrower scheme smallholders, as well as criteria to assess suppliers on compliance with company policies, and in what cases suppliers should be suspended or excluded due to non-compliance.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      119. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      120. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      121. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      122. The company has a Due Diligence System (DDS)?

      The company mentions that its Service Contracts Department checks all potential suppliers on four criteria but limited details are given

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      123. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      124. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Companies should operate in an ethical manner at all levels, providing accessible channels and clear procedures for both employees and external stakeholders to raise any grievance or complaint with the company, as well as allowing for whistleblowing.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      125. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      126. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      128. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      129. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has a complaint line for reporting any violation of laws or of the Company's principles, values, or Code of Conduct. However, no process for protecting whistleblowers is detailed

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      130. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company reports that a grievance system has been in place since 2018, but no details are given

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      131. Details of grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Empresas CMPC

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.
SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)