Skip to content
Login / Signup
Menu Search
Timber and pulp assessments
Timber and pulp producers
Agra BareksaAlpiAMCELAPP (Asia Pulp and Paper) GroupAPP China Group LtdAPRIL GroupAraucoBarito PacificBracellBumi Teknokultura Unggul Tbk (BTEK)Cameroon United Forests (CUF)CENIBRACikel GroupCompagnie des Bois du Gabon (CBG)Corà Domenico & FigliDuratex SAEldorado Brasil Celulose SAEmpresas CMPCGolden Pharos BhdGreenheart Group LtdGroupe Blattner ElwynGroupe SEFACInterholco AGKayu Lapis IndonesiaKlabin SAKorindoMaderera BozovichMarubeniOji HoldingsOlam International LtdPallisco-CIFMPrecious Woods Holding AGPriceworth InternationalRimbunan Hijau (RH) GroupRougier GroupSamling GroupShin YangSLJ Global TbkSociété Industrielle de Mbang (SIM)SODEFORSumitomo Forestry Co LtdSuzano Papel e Celulose SATA ANN Holdings BhdToba Pulp Lestari Tbk PTTranchivoireVeracelVicwood GroupWijmaWTK Holdings BhdYiHua Life

CENIBRA https://www.spott.org/timber-pulp/cenibra/

Founded in 1973, CENIBRA has forestry operations in Brazil, where it is headquartered. Engaged in

Score:  57.7%

Latest update: 18 Jul 2018
Next scheduled: July 2019
Download data (CSV)
Download page (PDF)
  • Parent company:
    Japan Brazil Paper and Pulp Resources Development Co., Ltd. (JBP)
  • Landbank (timber/pulp):
    131,021 hectares
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    Private company
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private company
  • Activities:
    Pulpwood production, pulp and paper production, trading and distribution
  • Locations:
    Brazil (Minas Gerais)
  • Headquarters:
    Brazil
  • Related companies:
    Subsidiary of Japan Brazil Paper and Pulp Resources Development Co., Ltd, of which Oji Holdings Corporation is the majority shareholder. Itochu Corporation (assessed on SPOTT Palm Oil) has investments in CENIBRA.
  • Parent website:
    http://www.jbp.co.jp
  • Website:
    https://www.cenibra.com.br
    Sustainability report (2016)

Company assessment: CENIBRA – July 2018

SPOTT assesses companies against over 100 indicators across ten categories. Click on the icons or bars below to expand each category for further details, scoring and links to reports and sources.

Download data
Expand all categories

Assessment date:

Total: 57.7% 58 / 100.5
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership 5 / 6 83.3%

    • Companies should publish sustainability policies or similar covering their entire supply chain — including third party suppliers — implemented and enforced through high-level leadership that engages with wider industry schemes.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to direct and third-party suppliers?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company's Industrial and Technical Director has responsibility for Environment and Quality. Executive Management receives strategic support from a Sustainability Committee and the company has a Quality and Environment Department

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      4. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      5. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?

      The company is a member of The Forests Dialogue (TFD) and the FSC

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      6. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?

      Agreements with the 8th and 12th Independent Companies for Traffic and Environment of the Military Police of Minas Gerais to improve the conditions for carrying out field patrols, intelligence, and environmental education and the development of joint environmental and wildlife preservation programs. The company is also working with the Federal University of Viçosa to develop a model for interconnecting native vegetation fragments

  • Landbank, FMUs and mills Landbank, FMUs and mills 10 / 11 90.9%

    • Companies should publicly report figures on their total landbank and details of different areas under their management. They should also disclose maps of their forest management units and provide forest management plans, as well as details on supplier pulp and paper mills.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      7. Lists countries and operations?

      Single pulp mill with two bleached short-fibre eucalyptus pulp production lines and three regional forest stewardship units in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      8. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      9. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      131,021 - Eucalyptus plantation. Area reported in 2018

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      10. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

      23,762.5

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      11. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

      90.6 - Figure relates to land available for plantation (2017). However, the company also reports 6,539.87 ha land as being on stand-by and it is unclear if this area should also be counted towards unplanted area

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      12. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?

      103,462 - Legal Reserves and Permanent Preservation areas. Area reported in 2018

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      13. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not have Intact Forest Landscape within its landbank

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      14. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

      3

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      15. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

      The company only provides a static map of its FMUs

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      16. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      17. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      18. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      1

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      19. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      20. Number of company owned sawmills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own sawmills

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      21. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own sawmills

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity 8.5 / 13 65.4%
    • 1 media report

      Companies should commit to address deforestation and to set aside areas for conservation. They should report on any activities to manage or restore habitat in their conservation areas, or monitor deforestation in their supply chains. They should also provide evidence of species conservation and biodiversity protection.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      22. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      23. Zero conversion commitment applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      24. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      25. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      26. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      The monitoring of forest extent and condition is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 129,074 ha (98.5% of total operational area)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Amount of deforestation recorded?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      28. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      29. Commitment to set aside areas for conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      30. Examples of habitat management and/or habitat restoration of set-aside areas?

      The management and restoration of habitat is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 129,074 ha (98.5% of total operational area)

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      31. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?

      The maintenance and restoration of appropriate landscape values, including environmental and economic resilience is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). However, this commitment does not extend to active engagement with stakeholders outside of the Forest Management Unit. Half points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 129,074 ha (98.5% of total operational area)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      32. Commitment to protect species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      33. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      34. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the introduction of genetically modified organisms in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      35. Commitment to only use alien species where impacts can be controlled?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      36. Examples of species conservation activities?

      The protection of rare, threatened and endangered species and their habitats, and the maintenance of ecological functions and values is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 129,074 ha (98.5% of total operational area)

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments 2 / 8 25%

    • Companies should commit to the High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) approaches, and to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They should develop and publish monitoring and management plans, and provide evidence through SEIA, HCV and HCS assessments, typically published in summary form due to the sensitive nature of certain sites.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      37. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company does not have a direct commitment to conduct HCV assessments across all of its operations. However, the company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of High Conservation Values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      38. HCV commitment applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of High Conservation Values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      39. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      40. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

      An HCV assessment is available for the companies FSC certified FMU. This does not cover the companies entire operational area

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      41. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

      An HCV assessment is available for the companies FSC certified FMU. This does not cover the companies entire operational area

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      43. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it hasn't expanded its plantation area since April 2015

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?

  • Soils, fire and GHG emissions Soils, fire and GHG emissions 3.5 / 10 35%

    • Companies should commit to protect peatland and undertake best management practices for soils and peat, as well as commit to reduced impact logging. They should also have policies on zero burning and to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies should report their GHG emissions, as well as any fires that occurred in or around their estates, along with plans for managing and monitoring fires.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      46. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?

      The company's land use guidelines stipulate measures to maintain and improve soil quality. The company has confirmed that it does not have operations on peatland

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      47. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      48. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not have landbank on peat

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      49. Commitment on peatland planting applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not have suppliers with landbank on peat

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      50. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not have landbank on peat

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      51. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?

      The company has confirmed that it does not have operations on peatland. The conservation of soils, including control of erosion and minimising damage during operations is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 129,074 ha (98.5% of total operational area)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. Commitment to zero burning?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      53. Commitment to zero burning applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      54. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

      Educational campaigns and activities; training and qualification; risk identification; maintenance of firebreaks; fire detection; forest fire brigades; climatologic stations; radio communication

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      56. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      57. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?

      CO2 Emissions (Carbon Dioxide) (kg/ADt) 3.014 (2015) 2.726 (2016) 3.116 (2017). The company does not have a GHG emissions target

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      58. Report GHG emissions from land use change?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Water, chemical and waste management Water, chemical and waste management 4.5 / 12 37.5%

    • Companies should commit to managing water use and water quality, providing evidence through time-bound reduction plans, policies on toxic chemical use, waste management and treatment of wastewater and mill effluents.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      60. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality?

      The company commits to monitor liquid effluents to ensure they are in compliance with legal limits (BOD target: 60 mg O2/l; COD target: 353 mg O2/l). However, these targets are not time-bound and monitoring frequency is not indicated

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      61. Progress towards commitment on water quality?

      Chemical Oxygen Demand (kg/ADt) 10.83 (2015) 9.90 (2016) 8.65 (2017). BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) (kg/ADt) 1.40 (2015) 1.11 (2016) 0.87 (2017).

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      62. Protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The company states to protect waterways through buffer zones in conservation areas however it is unclear if waterways are protected across all of the company's operations

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      63. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      64. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own sawmills

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Time-bound commitment to improve water use?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      66. Progress towards commitment on water use?

      Total water withdrawal by source: Surface water (rivers, lakes, wet areas, oceans), 55,268,037 (2014), 54,452,492 (2015), 50,158,893 (2016). No specific company commitment on water use could be identified

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      67. Commitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      68. Evidence of minimising or recycling solid waste produced during sawmilling processes?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own sawmills

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      69. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      71. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      72. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      73. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights 12 / 19.5 61.5%
    • 4 media reports

      Companies should commit to respect human rights, including those of indigenous peoples and local communities, consulted with free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Companies should respect the rights of workers, report relevant workforce data, and comply with health and safety legislation.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      74. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration of Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      75. Commitment to human rights applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      76. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses the rights of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples as established by the ILO Convention 169

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      77. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of traditional rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses customary rights. This policy does not reference legal rights and no reference to legal rights could be found in company sources

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      79. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      80. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      82. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company provides case studies related to food security, but has no specific policy in place

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      83. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN) require certified organisations to contribute to the social and economic development of local communities. Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 129,074 ha (98.5% of total operational area)

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      84. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      The company has a vague statement about respecting labour rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      85. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of any of the ILO Core Conventions. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004)

    • Yes
      0.5 / 0.5
      Source

      86. Total number of employees?

      4,197

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      87. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      3,243

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      88. Percentage or number of women employees?

      429 (10%) - Figures do not cover all employees

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      89. Commitment to pay minimum wage?

      Entry level wage: 1,064, Minimum wage: 937 (2017)

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      90. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?

      Does not reference ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      91. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      Industrial - Employees: 1; Industrial - Outsourced 1.42; Forestry - Employees 0.47; Forestry - Outsourced 1.18

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      92. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      93. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

  • Certification standards Certification standards 4 / 10 40%

    • Companies should be certified by credible certification standards, or have time-bound commitments to achieve 100% certification of both forest management units and outgrower schemes. They should also commit to only sourcing certified wood/wood fibre and ensuring that their supply is verified as being in legal compliance.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      94. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      95. Percentage wood/wood fibre supply verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      96. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      97. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      98. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

      98.5% - Percentage calculated based on plantation area

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      99. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      100. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers 4.5 / 5 90%
    • 1 media report

      Companies should report details of any programmes or schemes to support both schemed and independent smallholders, as well as criteria to assess suppliers on compliance with company policies, and in what cases suppliers should be suspended or excluded due to non-compliance.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      101. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?

      Technology transfer, financing lines, and provision of inputs, clone seedlings and expert support

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      102. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?

      The company reports that it's programme covers more than 1,000 partner farmers. Specific data could not be identified

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      103. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      Qualification process and annual audits

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      104. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      105. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

      89

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances 4 / 6 66.7%
    • 2 media reports

      Companies should operate in an ethical manner at all levels, providing accessible channels and clear procedures for both employees and external stakeholders to raise any grievance or complaint with the company, as well as allowing for whistleblowing.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      106. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      107. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company allows for whistleblowing but no details on the process given

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      108. Own grievance or complaints system?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      109. Grievance or complaints system is accessible to internal and external stakeholders?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 2
      Source

      110. Details of grievances disclosed?

      The company provides a summary on the grievances in 2017 and state their status

Media monitor: CENIBRA

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
Reset
Search:

October 2017

Entre a esperança e um novo horizonte (Between hope and a new horizon)

Visit external site

April 2017

Moradores fazem protesto e interditam BR-381 próximo a Belo Oriente (Residents protest and interdict BR-381 near Belo Oriente)

Visit external site

October 2016

Supremo marca para dia 9/11 julgamento sobre terceirização de atividade-fim (Supreme brand to 9/11 day trial on core business outsourcing)

Visit external site

December 2015

Grandes operações denunciaram mais de R$ 3 bilhões em fraudes no ES (Major operations reported more than R $ 3 billion in fraud in ES)

Visit external site

November 2014

Dragagem do Portocel afeta pesca em Barra do Sahy e Barra do Riacho (Portocel dredging affects fishing in Barra do Sahy and Barra do Riacho)

Visit external site
No article found for the selected categories.
About SPOTT and ZSL
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Contact the SPOTT team at ZSL
Disclaimer, cookies and privacy policy
SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)
Back to top

The Zoological Society of London (ZSL) is incorporated by Royal Charter. Registered Charity in England and Wales no. 208728. Principal Office: England - Company no. RC000749. Registered address: Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.

Please accept these Terms and Conditions to continue using the SPOTT Website

You are free to view and use the SPOTT Website and download SPOTT Data (i.e. all company assessment related data), including for commercial use under the following conditions:

Restrictions – you may not, under any circumstances, repost, redistribute, transmit or sub-license the data in any way, part or form, including in derivative products created by altering, transforming, or building upon the content or data.

Attribution – you must attribute the data in the manner specified by ZSL (but not in any way that suggests that ZSL endorses you or your use of the work).

Waiver – any of the above conditions can be waived if you get written permission from ZSL. Contact us here.

By clicking any link on this page, you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.