Skip to content
Menu Search

CENIBRA https://www.spott.org/timber-pulp/cenibra/

Founded in 1973, CENIBRA has forestry operations in Brazil, where it is headquartered. Engaged in

Score:  56.2%

Latest update: 19 Jul 2019
Next scheduled: July 2020
Download data (CSV)
Download page (PDF)
  • Parent company:
    Japan Brazil Paper, Pulp Resources Development Co., Ltd. (JBP)
  • Landbank (timber/pulp):
    131,021 hectares
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    Private company
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private company
  • Activities:
    Pulpwood production, pulp production
  • Locations:
    Brazil (Minas Gerais)
  • Headquarters:
    Brazil
  • Related companies:
    Subsidiary of Japan Brazil Paper and Pulp Resources Development Co., Ltd, of which Oji Holdings Corporation is the majority shareholder. Itochu Corporation (assessed on SPOTT Palm Oil) has investments in CENIBRA.
  • Parent website:
    http://www.jbp.co.jp
  • Website:
    http://www.cenibra.com.br
    Sustainability report (2017)

Company assessment: CENIBRA – July 2019

SPOTT assesses companies against over 100 indicators across ten categories. Click on the icons or bars below to expand each category for further details, scoring and links to reports and sources.

Download data
Expand all categories

Assessment date:

Total: 56.2% 63.5 / 113
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership 6 / 9 66.7%

    • Companies should publish sustainability policies or similar commitments covering their entire supply chain — including third party suppliers — implemented and enforced through high-level leadership that engages with wider industry schemes.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to all sourcing?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company's Industrial and Technical Director has responsibility for Environment and Quality. Executive Management receives strategic support from a Sustainability Committee and the company has a Quality and Environment Department

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      4. One or more board members have responsibility for sustainability?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      5. Percentage or number of women board members?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      6. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      0 (0%)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      7. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      2,017

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      8. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?

      The company is a member of The Forests Dialogue (TFD) and the FSC

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      9. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?

      Agreements with the 8th and 12th Independent Companies for Traffic and Environment of the Military Police of Minas Gerais to improve the conditions for carrying out field patrols, intelligence, and environmental education and the development of joint environmental and wildlife preservation programs. The company is also working with the Federal University of Vicosa to develop a model for interconnecting native vegetation fragments

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Climate risks assessment available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      11. Natural capital assessment available?

  • Landbank, mills and traceability Landbank, mills and traceability 16 / 19 84.2%
    • 2 media reports

      Companies should publicly report figures on their total landbank and details of different areas under their management. They should also disclose maps of their forest management units and provide forest management plans, as well as details on mills.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      12. Lists countries and operations?

      Single pulp mill with two bleached short-fibre eucalyptus pulp production lines and three regional forest stewardship units in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      13. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      14. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      131,021 - Eucalyptus plantation. Area reported in 2018

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      15. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

      23,762.5

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

      90.6 - Figure relates to land available for plantation (2017). However, the company also reports 6,539.87 ha land as being on stand-by and it is unclear if this area should also be counted towards unplanted area

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      17. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?

      103,462 - Legal Reserves and Permanent Preservation areas. Area reported in 2018

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      18. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't have any Intact Forest Landscapes within its landbank

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      19. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

      3

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      20. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

      The company only provides a static map of its FMUs

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      21. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      22. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      23. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      24. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      25. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      26. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      1

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      27. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      28. Number of company owned sawmills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own sawmills

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      29. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own sawmills

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      30. Number of supplier mills?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Maps or addresses of supplier mills?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      32. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      33. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      34. Percentage of supply traceable to country level (above 80%)?

      100% - The company states that all of its supply comes from Minas Gerais, Brazil therefore supply is traced back to country level

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      35. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level (above 75%)?

      100% - The company states that 81% of its supply comes from own plantations and the remaining 19% can be traced back to source

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity 5.5 / 10 55%
    • 1 media report

      Companies should commit to address deforestation and to set aside areas for conservation. They should report on any activities to manage or restore habitat in their conservation areas, or monitor deforestation in their supply chains. They should also provide evidence of biodiversity conservation and species or habitat management.

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      36. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      37. Zero conversion commitment applies to all sourcing?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      38. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      39. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      40. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      41. Amount of deforestation recorded?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      42. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      43. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      44. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?

      The company only mentions landscape-level issues

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      45. Identified species of conservation concern referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      46. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      47. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the introduction of genetically modified organisms in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004)

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments 2.5 / 7 35.7%

    • Companies should commit to the High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) approaches, and to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They should develop and publish summaries of assessments and monitoring and management plans.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      48. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company does not have a direct commitment to conduct HCV assessments across all of its operations. However, the company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of High Conservation Values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      49. HCV commitment applies to all sourcing?

      The company has a commitment to only source wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements which includes not sourcing wood from forests with a high conservation value

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      50. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      This indicator is disabled until sufficient number of HCV ALS licensed assessors are available for the location where the company operates

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      51. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

      An HCV assessment is available for the companies FSC certified FMU. This does not cover the company's entire operational area

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      52. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

      An HCV assessment is available for the companies FSC certified FMU. This does not cover the company's entire operational area

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      53. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      54. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it hasn't expanded its plantation area since April 2015

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      55. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      56. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      57. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

  • Water, chemical and waste management Water, chemical and waste management 5 / 12 41.7%

    • Companies should commit to protect peatland and undertake best management practices for soils and peat, as well as commit to reduced impact logging. They should also have policies on zero burning and to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies should report their GHG emissions, as well as details on any fires that occurred in or around their estates, along with evidence for managing and monitoring fires.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      72. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company commits to monitor liquid effluents to ensure they are in compliance with legal limits (BOD target: 60 mg O2/l; COD target: 353 mg O2/l). However, these targets are not time-bound and monitoring frequency is not indicated

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      73. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

      Chemical Oxygen Demand (kg/ADt) 10.83 (2015) 9.90 (2016) 8.65 (2017). BOD5 (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) (kg/ADt) 1.40 (2015) 1.11 (2016) 0.87 (2017).

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      74. Commitment to protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The company states it protects waterways through buffer zones in conservation areas however it is unclear if waterways are protected across all of the company's operations

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      75. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      76. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own sawmills

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      77. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      78. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      50,158,900 - Total water withdrawal by source: Surface water (rivers, lakes, wet areas, oceans), 55,268,037 (2014), 54,452,492 (2015), 50,158,893 (2016). No specific company commitment on water use could be identified

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      79. Commitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      80. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      82. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      83. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      84. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      Company has provided information for sodium hydroxide and quicklime used in the pulp mill therefore these does not cover company's entire operations

  • Soils, fire and GHGs Soils, fire and GHGs 3 / 10 30%

    • Companies should commit to managing water use and water quality, providing evidence through time-bound reduction plans, policies on toxic chemical use, waste management and treatment of wastewater and mill effluents.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      58. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?

      The company's land use guidelines stipulate measures to maintain and improve soil quality. The company has confirmed that it does not have operations on peatland

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      59. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from plantation forests

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      60. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't have landbank on peat

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      61. Commitment on peatland planting applies to all sourcing?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't have suppliers with landbank on peat

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      62. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't have landbank on peat

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      63. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?

      Company has TEESP program resulting in reduced erosion, reduced entrainment into water bodies however, this does not cover company's entire operations

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      64. Commitment to zero burning?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to zero burning applies to all sourcing?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      66. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

      Educational campaigns and activities; training and qualification; risk identification; maintenance of firebreaks; fire detection; forest fire brigades; climatologic stations; radio communication

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      67. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      68. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      69. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?

      3.116 - CO2 Emissions (Carbon Dioxide) (kg/ADt) 3.014 (2015) 2.726 (2016) 3.116 (2017). The company does not have a GHG emissions target

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. Report GHG emissions from land use change?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      71. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights 11 / 21 52.4%
    • 4 media reports

      Companies should commit to respect human rights, including those of indigenous peoples and local communities, and free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Companies should respect the rights of workers, report relevant workforce data, and address with health and safety issues.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      85. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration on Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      86. Commitment to human rights applies to all sourcing?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      87. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses the rights of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples as established by the ILO Convention 169

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      88. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of traditional rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses customary rights. This policy does not reference legal rights and no reference to legal rights could be found in company sources

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      90. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it has no independent suppliers of wood/wood fibre

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      91. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      92. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      93. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      95. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      96. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      97. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      The company has a vague statement about respecting labour rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      98. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of any of the ILO Core Conventions. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      99. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      100. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      101. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      3,243

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      102. Percentage or number of women employees?

      429 (10%) - Figures do not cover all employees

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      103. Payment of minimum wage?

      Entry level wage: 1,064, Minimum wage: 937 (2017). Not clear if this figure covers all workers of the company

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      104. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      105. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?

      Does not reference ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health at Work

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      106. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      LTI Rate:
      Industrial - Employees: 1;
      Industrial - Outsourced 1.42;
      Forestry - Employees 0.47;
      Forestry - Outsourced 1.18

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      107. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      108. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

  • Certification standards Certification standards 7 / 14 50%

    • Companies should be certified by credible certification standards, or have time-bound commitments to achieve 100% certification of forest management units. They should also ensure that their supply is verified as being in legal compliance and commit to sourcing certified wood/wood fibre.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      109. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      110. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      111. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      98.5 - FSC certification

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      112. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      79.8% - The company states that 81% of its supply comes from own plantations which are 98.5% FSC certified therefore percentage of supply that is legality verified can be calculated (81 x 0.985 = 79.8%)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      113. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs or achieved 100% FSC-certification of FMUs?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      114. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      115. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

      98.5% - Percentage calculated based on plantation area

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      116. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      117. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed that are FSC certified (above 75%)?

      79.8% - The company states that 81% of its supply comes from own plantations which are 98.5% FSC certified therefore percentage of supply that is FSC certified can be calculated (81 x 0.985 = 79.8%)

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      118. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers 4.5 / 5 90%
    • 2 media reports

      Companies should report details of any programmes or schemes to support outgrower scheme smallholders, as well as criteria to assess suppliers on compliance with company policies, and in what cases suppliers should be suspended or excluded due to non-compliance.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      119. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?

      Technology transfer, financing lines, and provision of inputs, clone seedlings and expert support

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      120. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?

      1,000 - The company reports that it's programme covers more than 1,000 partner farmers. Specific data could not be identified

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      121. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      Qualification process and annual audits

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      122. The company has a Due Diligence System (DDS)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not trade wood/wood fibre

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      123. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      124. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

      89

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances 3 / 6 50%
    • 3 media reports

      Companies should operate in an ethical manner at all levels, providing accessible channels and clear procedures for both employees and external stakeholders to raise any grievance or complaint with the company, as well as allowing for whistleblowing.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      125. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      126. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      128. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it doesn't operate in a geography currently covered by Open Timber Portal. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      129. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company allows for whistleblowing but no details on the process given

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      130. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 2
      Source

      131. Details of grievances disclosed?

      The company provides a summary on the grievances in 2017 and states their status

Media monitor: CENIBRA

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
Reset
Search:

May 2019

Jambreiro project Pre-Feasibility Study gets underway

Visit external site

November 2018

Uma tragédia esquecida(A forgotten tragedy)

Visit external site

August 2018

STF julga nesta quinta se todos os serviços de uma empresa podem ser terceirizados(STF judges this Thursday whether all services of a company can be outsourced)

Visit external site

October 2017

Entre a esperança e um novo horizonte (Between hope and a new horizon)

Visit external site

April 2017

Moradores fazem protesto e interditam BR-381 próximo a Belo Oriente (Residents protest and interdict BR-381 near Belo Oriente)

Visit external site

October 2016

Supremo marca para dia 9/11 julgamento sobre terceirização de atividade-fim (Supreme brand to 9/11 day trial on core business outsourcing)

Visit external site

December 2015

Grandes operações denunciaram mais de R$ 3 bilhões em fraudes no ES (Major operations reported more than R $ 3 billion in fraud in ES)

Visit external site

November 2014

Dragagem do Portocel afeta pesca em Barra do Sahy e Barra do Riacho (Portocel dredging affects fishing in Barra do Sahy and Barra do Riacho)

Visit external site
No article found for the selected categories.
About SPOTT and ZSL
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Contact the SPOTT team at ZSL
Terms and conditions
SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)
Back to top

The Zoological Society of London (ZSL) is incorporated by Royal Charter. Registered Charity in England and Wales no. 208728. Principal Office: England - Company no. RC000749. Registered address: Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.

Please accept these Terms and Conditions to continue using the SPOTT Website

You are free to view and use the SPOTT Website and download SPOTT Data (i.e. all company assessment related data), including for commercial use under the following conditions:

Restrictions – you may not, under any circumstances, repost, redistribute, transmit or sub-license the data in any way, part or form, including in derivative products created by altering, transforming, or building upon the content or data.

Attribution – you must attribute the data in the manner specified by ZSL (but not in any way that suggests that ZSL endorses you or your use of the work).

Waiver – any of the above conditions can be waived if you get written permission from ZSL. Contact us here.

By clicking any link on this page, you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.