Skip to content
Menu Search
  • Media Monitor
    • ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.

Company assessment: AMCEL – July 2018

Assessment date:

Total: 21.4% 23 / 107.5
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    1 / 6 16.7%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to direct and third-party suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company does not report having a sustainability committee of its own. The parent company, Nippon Paper Group, has an Environmental Committee, chaired by an executive officer, but this is not reported by AMCEL.

    • N
      0 / 1

      4. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The parent company, Nippon Paper Group, produced a sustainability report in 2017 which made references to AMCEL's operations, but no sustainability reports could be found from AMCEL itself.

    • N
      0 / 1

      5. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?

    • N
      0 / 1

      6. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?

  • Landbank, FMUs and mills Landbank, FMUs and mills
    4.5 / 13 34.6%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      7. Lists countries and operations?

      The company has forestry operations in 7 municipalities within Amapá state, Brazil.

    • N
      0 / 1

      8. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      180000 - The company reports having 180,000 hectares of 'native forest', but this figure is undated and does not clearly match figures reported in its FSC audit report.

    • N
      0 / 1

      9. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      130000 - The company reports having 130,000 hectares of plantation, but this figure is undated and does not clearly match figures reported in its FSC audit report.

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      11. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      12. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?

      105888 - A figure for total conservation area, which includes 19,448 ha designated as HCV 1, is listed in the FSC audit report. However, this does not cover all of the company's operations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      13. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      14. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      15. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

      The company only has a static image indicating the locations of its FMUs.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      16. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

      The company provides a general summary management plan, but it is not clear whether it covers specific FMUs or all FMUs.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      17. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?

      The company discusses various monitoring activities, but it is unclear if these relate to specific management objectives, and whether the management plan covers all FMUs.

    • N

      18. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.

    • N

      19. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      20. Number of company owned sawmills?

      1

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      21. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?

      The company has a static image of a map which indicates the location of the mill.

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    6.5 / 15 43.3%
    • N
      0 / 1

      22. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Zero conversion commitment applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?

    • N
      0 / 1

      25. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      26. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      The monitoring of forest extent and condition is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 214,004.28 ha (it is unclear what percentage of the total operational area this accounts for).

    • N
      0 / 1

      27. Amount of deforestation recorded?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      28. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      29. Commitment to set aside areas for conservation?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      30. Examples of habitat management and/or habitat restoration of set-aside areas?

      The management and restoration of habitat is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 214,004.28 ha (it is unclear what percentage of the total operational area this accounts for).

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      31. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?

      The maintenance and restoration of appropriate landscape values, including environmental and economic resilience is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). However, this commitment does not extend to active engagement with stakeholders outside of the Forest Management Unit. Half points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 214,004.28 ha (it is unclear what percentage of the total operational area this accounts for).

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Commitment to protect species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • N
      0 / 1

      33. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      34. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the introduction of genetically modified organisms in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004).

    • N
      0 / 1

      35. Commitment to only use alien species where impacts can be controlled?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      36. Examples of species conservation activities?

      The protection of rare, threatened and endangered species and their habitats, and the maintenance of ecological functions and values is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 214,004.28 ha (it is unclear what percentage of the total operational area this accounts for).

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    1.5 / 9 16.7%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      37. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company does not have a direct commitment to conduct HCV assessments across all of its operations. However, the company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of High Conservation Values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      38. HCV commitment applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the destruction of High Conservation Values in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004). For this half points are awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      39. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      41. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      44. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company refers to conducting assessments on its environmental and social impacts, but there is not a clear commitment to conduct these before all new development.

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?

  • Soils, fire and GHG emissions Soils, fire and GHG emissions
    1.5 / 14 10.7%
    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Commitment on peatland planting applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      50. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      51. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?

      The conservation of soils, including control of erosion and minimising damage during operations is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). However, specific provisions are not set out for peatland operations. Half points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 214,004.28 ha (it is unclear what percentage of the total operational area this accounts for).

    • N
      0 / 1

      52. Commitment to zero burning?

    • N
      0 / 1

      53. Commitment to zero burning applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      54. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

    • N
      0 / 1

      55. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Report GHG emissions from land use change?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Water, chemical and waste management Water, chemical and waste management
    0 / 10 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Progress towards commitment on water quality?

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N

      63. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

    • N

      65. Time-bound commitment to improve water use?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.

    • N

      66. Progress towards commitment on water use?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.

    • N

      67. Commitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not own pulp or paper mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this.

    • N
      0 / 1

      68. Evidence of minimising or recycling solid waste produced during sawmilling processes?

    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    8 / 19.5 41%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      74. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration of Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      75. Commitment to human rights applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      76. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses the rights of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples as established by the ILO Convention 169.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      77. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of traditional rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004), which encompasses customary rights. The company has also made an explicit commitment to 'recognise and respect the legal rights of traditional communities to own, use and manage their lands, territories and resources'.

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      81. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      The company refers to a procedure for conflict resolution, but very few details are given and its purpose and scope are unclear.

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      83. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN) require certified organisations to contribute to the social and economic development of local communities. Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 214,004.28 ha (it is unclear what percentage of the total operational area this accounts for).

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      85. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of any of the ILO Core Conventions. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004).

    • N
      0 / 0.5

      86. Total number of employees?

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      88. Percentage or number of women employees?

      70 - The company reports this for one FMU.

    • N
      0 / 1

      89. Commitment to pay minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      90. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      91. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      9.2 - The company reports this accident frequency rate for the period May 2016-17 for one FMU. For the same FMU it also reports an accident severity rate of 744.58, but does not clarify the units for this figure.

    • N
      0 / 1

      92. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      93. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company provides relevant training to its employees, but it is not clear if personal protective equipment is provided.

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    0 / 10 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      The company has some FSC and CERFLOR certification but it is not clear what percentage of its landbank this covers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      95. Percentage wood/wood fibre supply verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs?

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?

    • N
      0 / 2

      98. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

      214004 - The company's FSC certified landbank stands at 214,004.28 ha, but it is unclear what percentage of the total operational area this accounts for.

    • N
      0 / 2

      99. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?

    • N
      0 / 2

      100. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified?

      214004 - The company's CERFLOR (PEFC-endorsed standard in Brazil) certified landbank stands at 214,004.28 ha, but it is unclear what percentage of the total operational area this accounts for.

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    0 / 5 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      103. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      105. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    0 / 6 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      106. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1

      107. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Own grievance or complaints system?

    • N
      0 / 1

      109. Grievance or complaints system is accessible to internal and external stakeholders?

    • N
      0 / 2

      110. Details of grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: AMCEL

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.

Show media reports
Last media reports:
Are we missing a story? Submit a media report
No article found for the selected categories.

0

1

8

1

0

1

5

2

0

3


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)