Skip to content
Menu Search

Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: November 2022
  • Next scheduled: November 2023

Show media reports (17) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • About this company:

    Founded in 1973, Tunas Baru Lampung operates under

  • Parent company:
    Sungai Budi Group
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    79,365 hectares
  • Market cap:
    247,200,000 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    TBLA.JK
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    TBLA IJ Equity
  • ISIN:
    ID1000076706
  • RSPO member?
    No - The company was a member of RSPO, but resigned in 2020.
  • Website:

Company assessment: Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT – November 2022

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 15.6% 30 / 192
  • Organisation: 10 / 40 25%
  • Policy: 11.5 / 77 14.9%
  • Practice: 8.5 / 75 11.3%
  • Self-reported: 4.3 / 75 5.7%
  • External: 0.8 / 75 1%
  • Certified: 3.5 / 75 4.7%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    3.5 / 11 31.8%
    • Organisation: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company has published a sustainable palm oil policy which covers all palm oil operations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company has a sustainability team but it is not clear who has the position of responsibility for sustainability within the team.

    • N
      0 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 (14.28%) - There is only one woman present on the board of directors. Gender balance is directly reported by the company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company has started a social investment program for local communities to reduce negative social impacts but nothing has been mentioned about environmental impact.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company has published its 2021 sustainability report.

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    6 / 29 20.7%
    • Organisation: 6 / 19 31.6%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 8 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      13. Lists countries and operations?

      The company has provided a list of areas and the nature of operations within those areas. However, this information only pertains to Indonesia.

    • N
      0 / 1

      14. Lists countries sourcing from?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      79365 - The company reports that its total landbank for palm oil is 79,365 ha, as of December 2021.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      61852 - The company reports 61,852 ha on its website.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      12472 - The company reports 12,862 ha on its website as of December 2021.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      18. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      17513 - The company has not reported the unplanted area but it can be calculated by subtracting the total area (79365 ha) from planted area (61852 ha).

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      20. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company provides a static map image file showing locations of all estates on its webpage. However, no geo-referenced maps are available.

    • N
      0 / 1

      21. Maps of scheme smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      22. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      23. Number of company-owned mills?

      3 - The company reports 3 CPO mills in its current Annual Report 2021.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      24. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

      A map of only one mill (PKS Tunas Baru Lampung) is available on the GFW website.

    • N
      0 / 1

      25. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      26. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and third-parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      27. Number of third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      28. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      29. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      30. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      31. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      33. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      34. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      36. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      37. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    0.75 / 15 5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 3 0%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 11 6.8%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 11 0%
    • External: 0.8 / 11 6.8%
    • Certified: 0 / 11 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      39. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      The company was the member of RSPO, but resigned in 2020.

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • N
      0 / 1

      41. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      44. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities within 5 years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Percentage of scheme smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      50. Sells RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • N
      0 / 1

      51. Processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      52. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      [Externally verified] The company reports that it has obtained ISPO certificates for 75% of its total estates and 83% of its CPO mills. This does not cover the company's whole operations.

    • 53. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.

    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    0.5 / 19 2.6%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 11 0%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Commitment to zero deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?

    • N
      0 / 1

      63. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      65. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      66. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      67. Biodiversity policy?

      The company commits to protecting biodiversity, however no policy found.

    • N
      0 / 1

      68. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      69. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      70. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company reports that it monitors natural vegetation and natural flora within HCV areas. However, limited details provided for conservation.

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    0.5 / 15 3.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 8 6.3%
    • Practice: 0 / 7 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      73. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company reports the preservation of areas marked as HCV but its commitment to conduct HCV assessments is unclear.

    • N
      0 / 1

      74. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      77. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      83. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    4.25 / 20 21.3%
    • Organisation: 0.5 / 5 10%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 8 31.3%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 7 17.9%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1.3 / 7 17.9%
    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company only commits to the protection of peatland. Hence, no points awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      90. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      91. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company only commits to BPM for soil.

    • N
      0 / 1

      93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      94. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company has provided evidence of BPM for soil, but not peat. This information is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      95. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company commits to zero burning.

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      97. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company monitors and manages fire with the help of a special firefighting team. Prevention and control efforts are focused on high risk areas within and around Sumatra and Kalimantan. However, the information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      100. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      101. GHG emissions intensity?

      The company has reported the GHG emissions intensity as 29340.38 Ton CO2e/Th. However, the information is not specifically for palm oil.

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • N
      0 / 1

      103. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company has reported the GHG emissions intensity. However, the figures are not improving.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      104. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      The company uses the PalmGHG Calculator, ISCC, PLN Indonesia methodology to calculate GHG emissions.

    • N
      0 / 1

      105. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    5 / 25 20%
    • Organisation: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • Policy: 1 / 11 9.1%
    • Practice: 3.5 / 12 29.2%
    • Self-reported: 1.3 / 12 10.4%
    • External: 0 / 12 0%
    • Certified: 2.3 / 12 18.8%
    • N
      0 / 1

      106. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      107. Water use intensity?

      826800 - The company has reported the water use value, however no intensity figures have been reported and this information is not specifically about palm oil operations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company has reported the water use value but no intensity figures reported.

    • N
      0 / 1

      109. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      110. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      111. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

      The company has reported the treatment of POME in its sustainability report. Data not externally verified.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      112. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      The company has only mentioned the treatment of water waste and does not explicitly mention PORE.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      113. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The company commits to maintaining riparian reserves to minimize erosion. However, the commitment is unclear.

    • N
      0 / 2

      114. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      115. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company commits to minimizing the use of chemical pesticides only.

    • N
      0 / 1

      116. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      118. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      119. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1

      120. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      121. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      122. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      123. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      124. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

      The company has reported the conversion of organic waste into fertilizers. However, the information is not externally verified.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      125. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      The company states that it uses an IPM approach but only partial points can be awarded as this information is not externally verified.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      126. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      The company has a waste management system in place for solid and liquid wastes. However, this information is not externally verified.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    6.5 / 35 18.6%
    • Organisation: 1 / 5 20%
    • Policy: 4 / 21 19.1%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 9 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 9 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      127. Commitment to human rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      128. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      129. Progress on human rights commitment?

    • N
      0 / 1

      130. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      131. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      132. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      133. Commitment to respect legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      134. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      135. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      137. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company has reported that it works with stakeholders through its CSR program but the details of engagement are unclear. The information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      138. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      139. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • N
      0 / 1

      140. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1

      141. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      142. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company commits to provide essential community services and facilities.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      143. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company has reported only some examples of interventions to provide essential community services and facilities and the information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      144. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      145. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company does not refer to all ILO conventions only refers to forced labor, child labor, minimum age, no discrimination, and remuneration regardless of gender.

    • N
      0 / 1

      146. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      147. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      148. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company commits to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.

    • N
      0 / 1

      149. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      150. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      151. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      30000 (91.35%) - The company has reported the total number of non-permanent members in the company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      153. Commitment to pay a Decent Living wage?

      The company has only reported that the wages are paid in line with the minimum wage standard.

    • N
      0 / 1

      154. Commitment to pay a Decent Living wage applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      155. Progress on commitment to pay a Decent Living wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      156. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      157. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      158. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      159. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company has reported that it provides PPE to employees. However, nothing has been mentioned regarding training.

    • N
      0 / 1

      160. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1

      161. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    1 / 16 6.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 10 5%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 10 5%
    • External: 0 / 10 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      162. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company only commits to supporting smallholders but does not specify what kind of smallholder it refers to.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      163. Programme to support scheme smallholders?

      The company only refers to the plasma partnership model and the details are unclear. The information is also not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Percentage of scheme smallholders involved in programme?

      The company reports that it works with 10,000/6,000 smallholders in its 2020 Annual Report/Social Responsibility Policy (respectively). However, the type of smallholders is unclear.

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Programme to support independent smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      The company reports that it works with 10,000/6,000 smallholders in its 2020 Annual Report/Social Responsibility Policy (respectively). However, the type of smallholders is unclear.

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      168. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      169. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      170. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      172. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      173. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      174. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      175. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      176. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      177. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    2 / 7 28.6%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 5 40%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      178. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

    • N
      0 / 1

      179. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      180. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1

      181. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      182. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has reported a whistleblowing procedure on its website. However, no flowchart or clear description of steps taken by the company.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      183. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company only states that it has a grievance system but no additional details are provided.

    • N
      0 / 1

      184. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Palm oil media reports (17) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

7

6

2

13

3

5

8

3

6

3


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)