Skip to content
Menu Search

Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: November 2020
  • Next scheduled: November 2021

Show media reports (16) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • About this company:

    Founded in 1973, Tunas Baru Lampung operates under

  • Parent company:
    Sungai Budi Group
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    78,171 hectares
  • Market cap:
    204,678,120 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    TBLA.JK
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    TBLA IJ
  • ISIN:
    ID1000076706
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:

Company assessment: Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT – November 2020

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 14.2% 26.5 / 187
  • Organisation: 7 / 38 18.4%
  • Policy: 13 / 76 17.1%
  • Practice: 6.5 / 73 8.9%
  • Self-reported: 3.8 / 73 5.1%
  • External: 0 / 73 0%
  • Certified: 2.8 / 73 3.8%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    2 / 11 18.2%
    • Organisation: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 0 / 3 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company makes this commitment on its Social Responsibility Policy webpage.

    • N
      0 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company has a Sustainability Team that reports to the plantation director. Partial points have been awarded as it is not clear which position takes responsibility for sustainability within this team.

    • N
      0 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 (9%) - The gender balance is not directly reported, but profiles of the board of directors and board of comissioners are avaliable. There is one woman on the board of directors and no women on the board of commissioners (total 11 individuals).

    • N
      0 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • N
      0 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • N
      0 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company's 2019 Annual Report contains a sustainability chapter but it mostly repeats contents of various policies and does not provide sufficient information.

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    6 / 27 22.2%
    • Organisation: 6 / 17 35.3%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 8 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      78,171 - The company reports a total landbank for palm oil, of 78,171 ha. The information is dated 30th June 2020.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      58,775 - The company reports 58,775 ha on its website. The information is dated 30th June 2020.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      12,472 - The company reports 12,472 ha on its website. The information is dated 30th June 2020.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      19,396 - The amount of unplanted land is not reported, but can be calculated from the total (78,171 ha) and the planted area (58,775). The unplanted land is therefore 19,396 ha, however it is not clear if this land is designated for future planting or not. The information is dated 30th June 2020.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      548.77 - This figure is reported in the 2017 ACOP. It is likely that this only covers the company's operations in Lampung and South Sumatra and not elsewhere. Partial points have been awarded as this does not cover all operations and the data is between two and five years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      18. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company stated in its 2018 ACOP that it submitted its maps to the RSPO. However, ZSL is currently unable to ascertain if the maps disclosed constitute 100% of the company's palm oil estates.

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      20. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      21. Number of company-owned mills?

      3 - The company has reported three mills in its 2017 ACOP. The 2019 Annual Report reports seven mills in total but only three of these are CPO mills (four are other commodity mills).

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      22. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

      One of the three mills reported in the 2019 Annual Report is available on Global Forest Watch (PKS Tunas Baru Lampung).

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and/or third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and/or third-parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      25. Number of third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      26. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      27. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and/or third party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      28. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      29. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      30. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      31. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      33. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      34. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      35. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      36. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    0.5 / 15 3.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 3 0%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 10 5%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 10 5%
    • External: 0 / 10 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      37. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      The company was a member of RSPO, but resigned in 2020.

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • N
      0 / 1

      39. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      41. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      44. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      50. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      The company reports that it has obtained ISPO certificates for four plantations and three mills, which completed their audits in 2018. No certificates could be found.

    • 51. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.

    • N
      0 / 1

      52. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    1.5 / 17 8.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 9 11.1%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      53. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company only states it limits clearing in areas of High Conservation Value. This is not a sufficient commitment to score points.

    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      55. Criteria for defining deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Evidence of monitoring deforestation in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      63. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

      The company commits to biodiversity conservation in its Social Responsibility Policy and 2019 Annual Report.

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      65. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      66. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company reports that it continues to monitor natural vegetation within HCV areas and monitoring the natural flora in HCV areas. Partial points have been awarded as details of habitat conservation are limited and not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      67. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • N
      0 / 1

      68. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    0.5 / 14 3.6%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 8 6.3%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      69. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company commits to preservation of areas marked as HCV, but does not commit to conducting assessments or make clear how they will be identified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      74. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • N
      0 / 1

      77. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    3.75 / 20 18.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 8 31.3%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 7 17.9%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1.3 / 7 17.9%
    • N
      0 / 1

      83. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company reports that it is committed to 'Protection of the utilization of primary natural forests and peatlands' through ISPO certification. This is not sufficient for points.

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      87. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company commits to BMP for soils, but not peat.

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      89. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company shows some evidence of soil management. Partial points have been awarded as the information is limited and is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      90. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company commits to implementing a 'zero burning technique' in it Social Responsibility Policy.

    • N
      0 / 1

      91. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      92. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company provides examples of fire monitoring and management, including having an Emergency Response Team (TKTD) to lead on this.

    • N
      0 / 1

      93. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      95. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      99. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      PalmGHG Calculator, ISCC, PLN (Indonesia).

    • N
      0 / 1

      100. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    3 / 25 12%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 11 9.1%
    • Practice: 2 / 12 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 12 4.2%
    • External: 0 / 12 0%
    • Certified: 1.5 / 12 12.5%
    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      103. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      105. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 2

      106. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      107. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      108. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The company is committed to maintaining riparian reserves to minimise erosion.

    • N
      0 / 2

      109. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      110. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company commits to reducing the usage of chemicals in the field through adopting integrated pest management, but does not commit to reduced fertiliser use.

    • N
      0 / 1

      111. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      112. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      113. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      114. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1

      115. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      116. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      118. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      The company reports this in 2014. The data is over five years old so no points have been awarded.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      119. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

      The company reports recycling organic waste (e.g. empty fruit bunches) as fertiliser. Partial points have been awarded as the information is not externally verified.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      120. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      The company implements an IPM approach. Partial points have been awarded as the information is not externally verified.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      121. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      The company provides limited details on its waste management system for solid and liquid waste.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    5.75 / 35 16.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 4 0%
    • Policy: 4 / 22 18.2%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 9 19.4%
    • Self-reported: 1.8 / 9 19.4%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      122. Commitment to human rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      123. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      124. Progress on human rights commitment?

    • N
      0 / 1

      125. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      126. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      127. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      128. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      129. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      130. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      131. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      132. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company works with stakeholders through its CSR programme. Partial points have been awarded as the information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      133. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      134. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

      The company commits to providing equal opportunities, regardless of gender. However it does not explicitly support the inclusion of women or address the barriers faced.

    • N
      0 / 1

      135. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      137. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      138. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company commits through its CSR programme to support and provide services in the following areas: economy, education, healthcare and environmental protection.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      139. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company provides examples of interventions to provide essential community services and facilities. Partial points have been awarded as the information is limited and it is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      140. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      141. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company does not reference all the fundamental ILO conventions - only refers to forced labour, child labour, minimum age, no discrimination and remuneration regardless of gender, but not collective bargaining and freedom of association.

    • N
      0 / 1

      142. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      143. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      144. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company commits to be non-discriminatory specifically on gender in employment.

    • N
      0 / 1

      145. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      146. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • 147. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has no temporary employees.

    • N
      0 / 1

      148. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      149. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

      The company states that it seeks to ensure that wages are in line with minimum wage standards, particularly in the plantation sector. The commitment is unclear and so partial points have been awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      150. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      151. Progress on commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      153. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • N
      0 / 1

      154. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      155. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company provides employees with personal protective equipment, but does not mention any related training.

    • N
      0 / 1

      156. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1

      157. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    1 / 16 6.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 10 5%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 10 5%
    • External: 0 / 10 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      158. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company states that it is committed to supporting smallholders. However, the commitment does not specify what kind of smallholders it refers to and is not clear in which ways it will support them.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      159. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      The company refers to its plasma partnership model, but limited details are given and the information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      160. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

      The company reports that it works with 10,000/6,000 smallholders in its 2019 Annual Report/Social Responsibility Policy (respectively). However, it is unclear what kind of smallholders these are and what percentage of these are supported.

    • N
      0 / 1

      161. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      162. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      The company reports that it works with 10,000/6,000 smallholders in its 2019 Annual Report/Social Responsibility Policy (respectively). However, it is unclear what kind of smallholders these are and what percentage of these are supported.

    • N
      0 / 1

      163. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      168. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      169. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      170. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      172. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      173. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    2.5 / 7 35.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 5 50%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      174. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company commits to this through its Code of Conduct.

    • N
      0 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      The company's Code Of Conduct applies to employees only.

    • N
      0 / 1

      176. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1

      177. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      178. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company details a whistleblowing procedure on its website.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      179. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company only states that it has a complaints system but no additional detail is available.

    • N
      0 / 1

      180. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Palm oil media reports (16) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

7

6

2

13

3

5

8

3

6

2


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)