Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT
Palm oil assessment- Latest update: November 2024
- Next scheduled: November 2025
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the palm oil supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Parent company:Sungai Budi Group
-
Landbank (oil palm)79,424 hectares
-
Market cap:263,600,000 USD
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:TBLA.JK
-
Bloomberg ticker:TBLA IJ Equity
-
LEI:
-
RSPO member?No - The company was a member of RSPO, but resigned in 2020.
-
Other initiatives:Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO)
-
Activities:Oil palm cultivation, milling, palm kernel crushing, palm oil refining
-
Locations:Indonesia (South Sumatra, Lampung, Bengkulu, West Kalimantan)
-
Headquarters:Indonesia
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT – November 2024
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 12 / 41 29.3%
- Policy: 10.5 / 78 13.5%
- Practice: 9 / 75 12%
- Self-reported: 8 / 75 10.7%
- External: 1 / 75 1.3%
- Certified: 0 / 75 0%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership
4 / 11 36.4%- Organisation: 3 / 6 50%
- Policy: 1 / 2 50%
- Practice: 0 / 3 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
- Certified: 0 / 3 0%
-
1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?
The company has published a sustainable palm oil policy which covers all palm oil operations.
-
0 / 1
2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
The company reports having a sustainability team but it is not clear which position has high-level responsibility.
-
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
The company reports that the board has responsibility for sustainability.
-
0 / 1
5. Reports gender balance of senior management team?
-
6. Reports gender balance of board members?
0 (0%) - The company reports zero women in board members and gender is not directly reported but deduced from pictures and profiles.
-
0 / 1
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?
-
0 / 1
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company has published its 2023 sustainability report.
-
0 / 1
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
-
11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?
This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.
-
0 / 1
12. Climate risks assessment available?
-
Landbank, maps and traceability
7 / 29 24.1%- Organisation: 7 / 19 36.8%
- Policy: 0 / 2 0%
- Practice: 0 / 8 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
- External: 0 / 8 0%
- Certified: 0 / 8 0%
-
13. Lists countries and operations?
All of the company's operations (plantations, mills, refineries) are in Indonesia.
-
0 / 1
14. Lists countries sourcing from?
-
15. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?
79424 - The company reports that its total landbank for oil palm is 79,424 ha, as of December 2023, this includes nucleus and plasma plantations.
-
16. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?
64519 - The company reports 64,519 ha as of December 2023, this includes nucleus and plasma plantations.
-
17. Scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?
13619 - The company reports 13,619 ha of smallholder area as of December 2023.
-
18. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?
14905 - The company reports an unplanted area of 14,905 ha, but it is unclear if this is designated for future planting. This include 14,609 ha of nucleus area and 296 ha of plasma area.
-
19. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
599.6 - The company reports 599.6 ha of HCV area. It is unclear if this covers all conservation set-aside.
-
0 / 1
20. Maps of estates/management units?
-
0 / 1
21. Maps of all scheme smallholders?
-
0 / 1
22. Maps of all third-party supplying plantations?
-
23. Number of company-owned mills?
3 - The company reports three CPO mills in its Annual Report 2023.
-
24. Names and locations of company-owned mills?
Names, coordinates and referenced maps of all three mills are available on GFW.
-
0 / 1
25. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and third parties?
-
0 / 1
26. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and third-parties?
-
0 / 1
27. Number of third party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
28. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
29. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?
-
0 / 1
30. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?
-
0 / 1
31. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?
-
0 / 1
32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?
-
0 / 2
33. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?
-
0 / 1
34. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?
-
0 / 2
35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?
-
0 / 2
36. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?
-
0 / 1
37. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?
-
0 / 1
38. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?
-
Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives
1 / 15 6.7%- Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
- Policy: 0 / 3 0%
- Practice: 1 / 11 9.1%
- Self-reported: 0 / 11 0%
- External: 1 / 11 9.1%
- Certified: 0 / 11 0%
-
0 / 1
39. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?
-
0 / 1
40. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?
-
0 / 1
41. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?
-
0 / 1
42. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?
-
0 / 1
43. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?
-
0 / 1
44. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years?
-
0 / 1
45. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities within 5 years?
-
0 / 1
46. Percentage of scheme smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?
-
0 / 1
47. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?
-
0 / 1
48. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?
-
0 / 1
49. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?
-
0 / 1
50. Sells RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?
-
0 / 1
51. Processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?
-
0 / 1
52. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?
-
53. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.
-
54. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?
[Externally verified] The company have five ISCC certificates.
-
Deforestation and biodiversity
0.5 / 20 2.5%- Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
- Policy: 0 / 12 0%
- Practice: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
- External: 0 / 6 0%
- Certified: 0 / 6 0%
-
55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
The company reports limitation of clearing land in areas marked as High Conversation Value (HCV), including all natural habitats with some conversation value attached. This information does not meet the requirements of the indicator.
-
0 / 1
56. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
-
57. Commitment to zero deforestation?
The company only commits to "limitation of clearing land in areas marked as High Conversation Value (HCV)". This information does not meet the requirements of the indicator.
-
0 / 1
58. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
-
0 / 1
60. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
-
0 / 1
61. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
-
0 / 1
62. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
-
0 / 1
63. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
64. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
65. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
66. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?
-
0 / 1
67. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
-
68. Biodiversity policy?
The company commits to conservation of biodiversity, however does not report a policy or time-bound target.
-
0 / 1
69. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 2
70. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
-
71. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
The company reports it is committed to conserving habitat within the operational area by providing a managed environmental conservation area of 599.6 ha of the total area.
-
0 / 1
72. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
-
0 / 1
73. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments
0.5 / 15 3.3%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 0.5 / 8 6.3%
- Practice: 0 / 7 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
- Certified: 0 / 7 0%
-
74. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
The company reports the preservation of identified HCV areas but not a clear commitment to conduct HCV assessments.
-
0 / 1
75. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
76. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
0 / 1
77. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted/planned planting since January 2015?
-
0 / 1
78. High Conservation Value (HCV) or combined HCV/HCS management and monitoring plans for all estates planted/planned planting since January 2015?
-
0 / 1
79. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?
-
0 / 1
80. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
81. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?
-
0 / 1
82. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
-
0 / 1
83. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
84. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
-
0 / 1
85. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
-
0 / 1
86. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
-
0 / 1
87. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
88. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions
4 / 21 19.1%- Organisation: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
- Policy: 1.5 / 8 18.8%
- Practice: 2 / 7 28.6%
- Self-reported: 2 / 7 28.6%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
- Certified: 0 / 7 0%
-
0 / 1
89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
0 / 1
90. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
91. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
-
0 / 1
92. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
The company provides unclear commitment to best management practices for soil only. No commitment is made to peat.
-
0 / 1
94. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
-
95. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
The company reports land management practices using legume cover crops to reduce soil erosion and enhance soil chemicals by fixing atmospheric nitrogen. No information on peat management was provided and data is between two and five years old.
-
96. Commitment to zero burning?
The company commits to zero burning.
-
0 / 1
97. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
-
98. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
The company reports fire monitoring and management is conducted with firefighting teams, targeting high-risk areas in Sumatra and Kalimantan. Only one type of activity is mentioned.
-
0 / 1
99. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?
-
0 / 1
100. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?
-
0 / 1
101. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
-
102. GHG emissions intensity?
The company reports GHG emissions with methane capture of 33.413 Ton CO2e/Year for 2023. This is not an intensity figure and does not cover scope 1 and 2 emissions.
-
0 / 1
103. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?
-
0 / 1
104. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?
-
105. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
The company reports GHG emissions with Methane Capture of 35.108 Ton CO2e/Year and 33.413 Ton CO2e/Year for 2022 and 2023 respectively. These are not intensity figures and do not clearly cover scope 1 and 2 emissions.
-
0 / 1
106. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
-
107. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?
The company reports having two methane capture operating units at PT Tunas Baru Lampung PKS 1 and PKS 2. This covers two of its three mills.
-
Water, chemical and pest management
5.25 / 25 21%- Organisation: 0.5 / 2 25%
- Policy: 1 / 11 9.1%
- Practice: 3.8 / 12 31.3%
- Self-reported: 3.8 / 12 31.3%
- External: 0 / 12 0%
- Certified: 0 / 12 0%
-
0 / 1
108. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
-
109. Water use intensity?
1263230 - The company reports the water usage for 2023 as 1,263,234 MT. This is not an intensity figure and is for all of the company's operations, not just palm oil.
-
110. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
The company reports a reduction in water usage from 916,669 MT tonnes in 2022 and 1,263,234 in 2023. This is not an intensity figure and figures are not improving.
-
0 / 1
111. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?
-
0 / 1
112. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?
-
113. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?
The company reports the utilisation of POME (Palm Oil Mill Effluent) for Biogas power plants but does not report treating POME.
-
114. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?
The company reports the treatment of water waste but does not explicitly mention PORE.
-
115. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
The company reports that it conserves water and maintains water quality by prohibiting the use of chemicals in weed management in protected riparian areas, but no direct commitment is made.
-
0 / 2
116. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
-
117. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
The company reports that it reduced the use pesticides and chemical fertilisers but does not make a clear commitment.
-
0 / 1
118. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
119. Commitment to no use of paraquat?
-
0 / 1
120. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
121. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
-
0 / 1
122. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
123. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
-
0 / 1
124. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
125. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
-
126. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?
The company reports the conversion of organic waste into fertilisers as an alternative to inorganic fertilisers.
-
127. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
The company reports using the IPM approach to control pests, including utilising natural predators and planting cover crops to improve soil fertility.
-
128. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?
The company reports having a waste management system for solid and liquid wastes and follows the reduce, reuse, and recycle principles.
-
Community, land and labour rights
6 / 35 17.1%- Organisation: 1 / 5 20%
- Policy: 4 / 21 19.1%
- Practice: 1 / 9 11.1%
- Self-reported: 1 / 9 11.1%
- External: 0 / 9 0%
- Certified: 0 / 9 0%
-
0 / 1
129. Commitment to human rights?
-
0 / 1
130. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
131. Progress on human rights commitment?
-
0 / 1
132. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights?
-
0 / 1
133. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
134. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
-
0 / 1
135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
136. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
-
0 / 1
137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
138. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
-
0 / 1
139. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
-
0 / 1
140. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
-
0 / 1
141. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?
-
0 / 1
142. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
-
0 / 1
143. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
-
144. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
The company commits to contributing to and supporting the local community but does not make a clear commitment to providing essential community services and facilities.
-
145. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
The company reports that it supports SMEs and provides direct donations to local schools but does not provide details.
-
146. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
The company reports that it has a Plasma's Cooperation of Village Unit (KUD) for work partnerships with local communities, but does not report a clear commitment.
-
147. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company commits to no forced labour, child labour, minimum age, no discrimination and remuneration regardless of gender but does not refer to all ILO conventions.
-
0 / 1
148. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
149. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
-
150. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company commits to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.
-
0 / 1
151. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
152. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
-
153. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
34697 - The company has reported the total number of non-permanent members in the company.
-
0 / 1
154. Reports gender balance of employees?
-
155. Commitment to pay a living wage?
The company reports that the standard wage meets the Provincial/Regency Minimum Wage but does not commit to paying a Living Wage.
-
0 / 1
156. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
157. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
-
0 / 1
158. Reporting of salary by gender?
-
159. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.
-
0 / 1
160. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
-
161. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
The company reports providing PPE to employees but does not report providing any training.
-
0 / 1
162. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
-
0 / 1
163. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
-
Smallholders and suppliers
1.25 / 16 7.8%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
- Practice: 0.8 / 10 7.5%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 10 7.5%
- External: 0 / 10 0%
- Certified: 0 / 10 0%
-
164. Commitment to support smallholders?
The company commits to improving the quality of life of the surrounding community close to the operational area but does not specify the type of smallholders.
-
165. Programme to support scheme smallholders?
The company reports assisting Plasma smallholders to obtain bank loans through a Plasma Village Unit Cooperative (Koperasi Unit Desa (KUD)).
-
0 / 1
166. Percentage of scheme smallholders involved in programme?
-
0 / 1
167. Programme to support independent smallholders?
-
0 / 1
168. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?
-
0 / 1
169. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
0 / 1
170. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
0 / 1
171. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
-
0 / 1
172. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?
-
0 / 1
173. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF)?
-
0 / 1
174. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?
-
0 / 1
175. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?
-
0 / 1
176. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?
-
0 / 1
177. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?
-
0 / 1
178. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
179. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?
-
Governance and grievances
2 / 7 28.6%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2 / 5 40%
- Practice: 0 / 2 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
- Certified: 0 / 2 0%
-
180. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.
-
0 / 1
181. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
182. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
-
0 / 1
183. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
-
184. Whistleblowing procedure?
The company reports a whistleblowing procedure but does not provide a clear description of the steps. The company discloses how whistleblowers are protected.
-
185. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company reports prohibiting retaliation against individuals reporting violations, cooperating with investigations, or participating in the complaint process. However, it does not provide details on how stakeholders can report grievances.
-
0 / 1
186. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
No date
Social Responsibility Policy - PT Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk - WEBPAGE
-
2023
Sustainability Report 2023
-
2022
Organisational Structure - PT Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk - WEBPAGE
-
2023
Annual Report 2023
-
No date
Management - PT Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Plantation profile - PT Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Production Capacities - PT Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk - WEBPAGE
-
No date
GFW Universal Mill - GFW - WEBPAGE
-
No date
PT Tunas Baru Lampung - Mesuji Mill - ISCC
-
No date
PT Tunas Baru Lampung- Sukadana Mill - ISCC
-
February 2024
PT Tunas Baru Lampung- Sumudera - ISCC
-
November 2023
Tunas Baru Lampung - Banyuasin - ISCC
-
No date
Tunas Baru Lampung - Terbanggi Mill - ISCC
-
No date
Our Policy - PT Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk - WEBPAGE
-
2022
Annual Report 2022
-
No date
Code of Conduct - PT Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Whistleblowing System - PT Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk - WEBPAGE
Media monitor: Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
January 2025
Boycott Sinar Mas Products in Europe: 27 Companies Implicated in Indonesia's Cooking Oil Scandal
April 2024
PT Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk Digugat Dua Karyawan, Kuasa Hukum: Sekelas Perusahaan Tbk Tidak Mampu Bayar Pesangon (PT Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk Sued by Two Employees, Attorney: A Tbk Company Cannot Afford to Pay Severance Pay)
February 2020
The Chain: Repeat Offenders Continue to Clear Forests for Oil Palm in Southeast Asia
November 2019
Anggota RSPO dan Pemasok Pertamina Terlibat Kebakaran Lahan Agar Ditindak Tegas (RSPO Members and Pertamina Suppliers Involved in Land Fires To Be Firmly Treated)
November 2019
Makers of Oreos, KitKats among brands linked to Indonesia forest fires
February 2019
The Chain: NDPE Uptake Impacts List of Top 10 Deforesters in SE Asia
September 2018
The Final Countdown: Now or never to reform the palm oil industry
May 2018
The Financing of Leakage Refiners: Shareholders and Loan Issuers Include International Financial Institutions with Palm Oil Policies
March 2018
TBLA's clarification in response to Chain Reaction Research report 'Tunas Baru Lampung: Contested Land and Peat Clearing Could Drive Substantial Value Loss'
March 2018
TUNAS BARU LAMPUNG: CONTESTED LAND AND PEAT CLEARING COULD DRIVE SUBSTANTIAL VALUE LOSS
November 2017
Unsustainable Palm Oil Faces Increasing Market Access Risks: NDPE Sourcing Policies Cover 74 Percent of Southeast Asia?s Refining Capacity (Updated Version) [July 2018]
May 2017
Nordic Investment in Indonesia, Singapore Linked to Deforestation: Report
December 2016
Chain Reaction Research 2016 Sustainability Benchmark: Indonesian Palm Oil Growers
November 2016
Anak Usaha Tunas Baru Lampung Diduga Langgar Penggunaan HGU (Tunas Baru Lampung Subsidiary Suspected of Violating HGU use)
8
6
2
13
3
5
8
4
6
4
Media monitor: Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

