Skip to content
Menu Search

Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: October 2019
  • Next scheduled: October 2020

Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores
  • About this company:

    Founded in 1973, Tunas Baru Lampung operates under

  • Parent company:
    Sungai Budi Group
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    92,365 hectares
  • Palm cultivation revenue:
    60%
  • Market cap:
    352,280,710 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    TBLA.JK
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    TBLA IJ
  • ISIN:
    ID1000076706
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:

Company assessment: Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT – October 2019

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 23.5% 46.57 / 198
  • Organisation: 9 / 40 22.5%
  • Policy: 18.5 / 79 23.4%
  • Practice: 19.1 / 79 24.1%
  • Self-reported: 1.3 / 79 1.6%
  • External: 11.8 / 79 14.9%
  • Certified: 6.1 / 79 7.7%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    2 / 11 18.2%
    • Organisation: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 0 / 3 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company has a policy

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company has a Sustainability team that reports to the plantation director

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 (9%) - The company counts one woman in its board of directors. This is not directly reported as a figure by the company, ZSL is unable to verify this information

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      2018 - The company's annual report contains a sustainability chapter but it mostly repeats contents of various policies and does not provide sufficient information

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

      The company recognises the risk that climate may pose on its crops but does not mention having had a climate risk assessment conducted

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    5.5 / 28 19.6%
    • Organisation: 5.5 / 18 30.6%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 8 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      92,365 - Figure includes plasma. The company also gives a figure of 23,370 ha in its 2017 ACOP however it is likely that this only covers the company's operations in Lampung and South Sumatra and not elsewhere. The company also reports undated figures on its website. No updated information in the 2018 ACOP

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      54,997 - The company also gives a figure of 22,826.3 ha in its 2017 ACOP however it is likely that this only covers the company's operations in Lampung and South Sumatra and not elsewhere. The company also reports undated figures on its website. No updated information in the 2018 ACOP

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      12,688 - The company reports a total area of 12,688 under plasma. The company reports in its 2017 ACOP that it only has independent smallholders, however it is likely that this only covers the company's operations in Lampung and South Sumatra and not elsewhere. No updated information in the 2018 ACOP

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      0 - The company reports a figure of 0 ha in its 2017 ACOP however it is likely that this only covers the company's operations in Lampung and South Sumatra and not elsewhere. No updated information in the 2018 ACOP

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      548.77 - HCV area. It is likely that this only covers the company's operations in Lampung and South Sumatra and not elsewhere. No updated information in the 2018 ACOP

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company stated in its 2018 ACOP that it submitted its maps to the RSPO. However, ZSL is currently unable to ascertain if the maps disclosed constitute 100% of the company's palm oil estates

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      20. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      21. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      22. Number of company-owned mills?

      7 - The company reports seven mills in its 2018 annual report. It also reports three mills in its 2017 ACOP, however it is likely that this only covers the company's operations in Lampung and South Sumatra and not elsewhere. Mill names could not be found. No updated information in the 2018 ACOP

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      23. Names and coordinates of company-owned mills?

      Only three mills are available through GFW (Pt Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk; Serbahuta Jaya; Tunas Baru Lampung-Pks 8)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      25. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      26. Number of supplier mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      28. Number (or percentage) of third-party supplier mills that source from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      29. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplier mills that come from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    4.51 / 18 25.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 9 16.7%
    • Practice: 3 / 7 43%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 2 / 7 28.6%
    • Certified: 1 / 7 14.4%
    • N
      0 / 1

      38. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company only states it limits clearing in areas of High Conservation Value

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      39. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      40. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      HCV

    • N
      0 / 2

      41. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      The company only states it monitors the natural vegetation in High Conservation Value areas. Method, extent of areas and timeframe are not specified. No points awarded

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      46. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      47. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      48. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.01 / 1

      49. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      50. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company states: "we continue to monitor natural vegetation within HCV area by analyzing samples of vegetations, protecting the conversation area through preventive actions, and monitoring the natural flora in HCV areas." Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      51. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    2 / 14 14.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 8 25%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      53. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company only states: "We apply principles of sustainable plantation business, among others through limitation of clearing land in areas marked as High Conversation Value (HCV). Such areas include all natural habitats with some conversation value attached". The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      56. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      57. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      58. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company does not have an explicit commitment itself, but commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      60. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      61. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company does not have an explicit commitment itself, but commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      63. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      64. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company does not have an explicit commitment itself, but commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      66. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    4.26 / 20 21.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 8 31.3%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 7 25.1%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 7 10.7%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1 / 7 14.4%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      67. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company does not have an explicit commitment itself, but commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      68. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      69. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. Landbank or planted area on peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company is only committed to good agricultural practices for soil, but does not mention best management practices for peat

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      72. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.01 / 1

      73. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company only details best management practices for soils. The information available is more than two years old.Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      74. Commitment to zero burning?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      75. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      76. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company provides several examples of activies used for managing and monitoring fires

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      77. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      79. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      80. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      PalmGHG Calculator, ISCC, PLN (Indonesia)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      82. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      83. GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. GHG emissions from land use change?

      Data available is more than five years old

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    5.03 / 22 22.9%
    • Organisation: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • Policy: 1 / 11 9.1%
    • Practice: 3.5 / 9 39.2%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 9 5.6%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 3 / 9 33.7%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      85. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      86. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      87. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      88. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      90. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and/or palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      The company states that it ensures that "all waste and effluent is disposed of in a safe and responsible manner."

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      91. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The company commits to maintain riparian reserves but it is unclear if this covers all of its operations

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.01 / 1

      92. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      93. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company commits to reducing the usage of chemicals in the field, and mentions reduced use of pesticides through integrated pest management, but does not commit to reduced fertiliser use

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.01 / 1

      95. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      96. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      The company lists fertiliser and pesticides used, but the data is from 2014

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      97. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      98. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      99. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      100. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      101. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      102. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.01 / 1

      103. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      The company implements an Integrated Pest Management approach. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    14.01 / 46 30.5%
    • Organisation: 1 / 5 20%
    • Policy: 7 / 25 28%
    • Practice: 6 / 16 37.6%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 16 0%
    • External: 5 / 16 31.3%
    • Certified: 1 / 16 6.3%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      104. Commitment to human rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      105. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      106. Progress on human rights commitment?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      107. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      109. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      The company provides a document on conflict resolution in its 2015 ACOP

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      110. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      111. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      112. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company communicates with local stakeholders via its CSR program, with the explicit goal to prevent conflict. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      113. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      This company does not have an explicit commitment itself, but commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      114. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      115. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain guidance and requirements on the process to conduct free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's commitments under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      116. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      117. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      118. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      119. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      120. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      121. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.01 / 1

      122. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      123. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      124. Commitment to respect all workers' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      125. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      126. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company does not reference all the fundamental ILO conventions – only refers to forced labour, child labour, minimum age, no discrimination and remuneration regardless of gender, but not collective bargaining and freedom of association

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      129. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      30,000 (89%) - 30,000 out of 33,578 employees are referred to as "non permanent employees and daily workers"

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      131. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      132. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

      The company states that wages are in line with minimum wage standards but does not give evidence of wages provided

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      133. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      134. Progress on commitment to pay minimum wage?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      135. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      136. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      137. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      138. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      139. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      140. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      141. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      142. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company states it provides personal protective equipment but does not mention training on pesticides.Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    3.76 / 15 25.1%
    • Organisation: 1 / 2 50%
    • Policy: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 10 17.6%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 10 0%
    • External: 1.8 / 10 17.6%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      143. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      2,006 - Member since 2006

    • N
      0 / 1

      144. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010 for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      2013

    • Y
      1 / 1

      145. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      Note: The ACOP submitted for 2018 contains very little information (fields filled as N/A)

    • N
      0 / 1

      146. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      The company only states that it operates in Lampung and South Sumatra in Indonesia. It does not state that it operates in other provinces of Indonesia (West Kalimantan and Bengkulu)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      147. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within five years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      2020

    • P
      0.01 / 1

      148. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

      955.77 (1%)

    • N
      0 / 1

      149. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

      0

    • N
      0 / 1

      150. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      1 - According to the company's 2017 ACOP one of the company's mills is RSPO certified, but the percentage this covers is unclear

    • N
      0 / 1

      151. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/ associated smallholders and outgrowers within five years or target already achieved?

      2025 - The company extended the target from 2021 to 2025. The target is not within five years

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/ outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      153. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      154. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/ processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      155. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      156. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      [Externally verified] The company states it has obtained an ISPO certificate for its plantation in South Sumatra. Three estates and one mill completed their audits in 2017

    • 157. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      158. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB, etc.)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    2 / 16 12.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 6 0%
    • Practice: 2 / 10 20%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 10 0%
    • External: 2 / 10 20%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      159. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      160. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      The company stated in its 2017 annual report that it provided technical assistance to smallholders (type of smallholders unspecified) and other community groups but does not give any details about this and this is part of a CSR project. In its 2017 ACOP the company stated that it had no programme to support smallholders and was not planning on developing one. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1

      161. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

      The company only states that it works with around 10,000 smallholders, but it is unclear how manyare directly supported

    • Y
      1 / 1

      162. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      163. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      164. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      165. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      166. Time-bound plan to engage with all high-risk mills within three years?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      167. Programme to support high-risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      168. Regularly engages with a subset of high-risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      169. Procedures in place to assess all own and third-party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      170. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      171. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    3.5 / 8 43.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 5 50%
    • Practice: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      179. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company only states that it has a complaints system but no additional detail is available

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: Tunas Baru Lampung Tbk PT

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 181 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)