Bumitama Agri Ltd
Palm oil assessment- Latest update: October 2025
- Next scheduled: November 2027
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the palm oil supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Parent company:Harita Group
-
Landbank (oil palm)238,644 hectares
-
Market cap:1,065,700,000 USD
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:BUMI.SI
-
Bloomberg ticker:BAL SP Equity
-
LEI:
-
RSPO member?Yes
-
Other initiatives:Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO), International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISCC)
-
Activities:Oil palm cultivation, milling
-
Locations:Indonesia (Central Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, Riau)
-
Headquarters:Singapore
-
Related companies:IOI Corporation has a 32.1% stake in Bumitama Agri
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Bumitama Agri Ltd – October 2025
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 30 / 36 83.3%
- Policy: 68.5 / 74 92.6%
- Practice: 46.9 / 62 75.7%
- Self-reported: 26.4 / 62 42.5%
- External: 8.3 / 62 13.3%
- Certified: 12.3 / 62 19.8%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership
9.75 / 11 88.6%- Organisation: 6 / 6 100%
- Policy: 2 / 2 100%
- Practice: 1.8 / 3 58.3%
- Self-reported: 1.8 / 3 58.3%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
- Certified: 0 / 3 0%
-
1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?
The company has published a sustainable palm oil policy which covers all palm oil operations.
-
2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
The company has published a sustainable palm oil policy which applies to all suppliers.
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
The company's Chief Sustainability Officer (Lim Sian Choo) is responsible for sustainability.
-
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
The company has a sustainability steering committee chaired by board member Mr Witjaksana Darmosarkoro.
-
5. Reports gender balance of senior management team?
6 (11.8%) - The company reports six (11.8%) female members in its senior management team. Data as of 2024.
-
6. Reports gender balance of board members?
2 (28.6%) - The company reports two (28.6%) female board members in 2024.
-
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?
The company reports that it is a member of the PONGO Alliance, however, the information cannot be verified through an external source, as the PONGO Alliance website is currently inaccessible.
-
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?
The company collaborates with IDH for sustainable palm oil and forest protection initiatives at the landscape level, with Earthqualizer for deforestation monitoring, and with YIARI for coordination and information exchange to protect the orangutan population in the landscape through joint patrolling and threat prevention efforts.
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company published its latest sustainability report for 2024.
-
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
The company's sustainability report 2024 has been prepared in accordance with the GRI 1: Foundation 2021.
-
11. Climate risks assessment available?
The company has published a detailed TCFD report that includes climate-related risks, such as the actual and potential impacts of climate change on the company, as well as the metrics, targets, processes used to assess or manage these risks, and the associated responsibilities. However, the information is not externally verified.
-
Landbank, maps and traceability
14.43 / 17 84.9%- Organisation: 11.5 / 14 82.1%
- Policy: 1 / 1 100%
- Practice: 1.9 / 2 96.5%
- Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
- Certified: 1.9 / 2 96.5%
-
12. Lists countries and operations?
Plantation and Mills - Indonesia (Central Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, and Riau).
-
13. Lists countries sourcing from?
The company sources only from Indonesia.
-
14. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?
238644 - The RSPO ACOP 2024 states that the company has 238,644 ha as the total land area managed for oil palm.
-
15. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?
187021 - The company reports 187,021 ha of total oil palm planted area. Data as of 2024.
-
16. Scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?
62613 - The company reports 62,613 ha of scheme smallholders planted area in its annual report 2024 and RSPO ACOP 2024.
-
17. Unplanted area (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?
8371.66 - The company reports 8,371.66 ha of unplanted area in its RSPO ACOP 2024.
-
18. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
36329 - The company reports 36,329 ha of total conservation set-aside area in its annual report 2024 and RSPO ACOP 2024.
-
19. Maps of estates/management units?
The company reports that its concession boundaries have been made available to the RSPO. Further, maps of some concessions are also available on the GFW database.
-
0 / 1
20. Maps of all scheme smallholders?
-
0 / 1
21. Maps of all third-party supplying plantations?
-
22. Number of company-owned mills?
17 - The company reports that it has 17 CPO mills in 2024.
-
23. Names and locations of company-owned mills?
The company reports that it has 17 mills, however, maps for only 14 mills are available on Global Forest Watch.
-
24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and third parties?
The company reports that six mills source FFB from its own plantations, while 11 mills source FFB from both its own plantations and third-party suppliers.
-
25. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and third-parties?
The company reports that 35% of its total FFB supply was sourced from third parties in 2024, and the remaining 65% was sourced from company-owned operations.
-
26. Number of third party supplying mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
27. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
28. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
29. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company sources only directly from mills.
-
31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?
The company commits to achieve 100% traceability to the plantation level by the year 2026.
-
34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?
The company reports that it has achieved 92.5% traceability of all FFB supplies to the plantation level. Additional points have been awarded as nine of the company mills have Identity Preserved certification.
-
35. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.
-
36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.
-
37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills.
-
Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives
6.61 / 12 55.1%- Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
- Policy: 2 / 2 100%
- Practice: 3.6 / 9 40.1%
- Self-reported: 2.1 / 9 23.4%
- External: 1.5 / 9 16.7%
- Certified: 0 / 9 0%
-
38. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?
2007 - The company became a member of the RSPO in 2007.
-
39. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?
2014 - The company became an RSPO member in 2007 and received its first RSPO certification in 2014, which is more than three years since the company became an RSPO member.
-
40. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?
The company has submitted its latest RSPO ACOP 2024.
-
41. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?
48.1% - The company reports 48.10% of RSPO-certified areas in its RSPO ACOP 2024.
-
42. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?
58.82% - The company reports that 10 out of its 17 mills are RSPO-certified in its RSPO ACOP 2024.
-
43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years?
2027 - The company commits to achieve 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills by 2027. This is within 5 years.
-
44. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities within 5 years?
This indicator is disabled as the company is only a grower or miller.
-
45. Percentage of scheme smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?
3.97% - The company reports that 3.97% of its scheme smallholders are RSPO-certified in its RSPO ACOP 2024.
-
46. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?
2027 - The company commits to achieve 100% RSPO certification of scheme/associated smallholders and outgrowers by 2027. This is within 5 years.
-
47. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?
0% - The company's RSPO ACOP 2024 states that 0% of FFB supply from independent smallholders, outgrowers, and third-party FFB suppliers are RSPO-certified.
-
48. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company is only a grower or miller.
-
49. Sells RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?
The company's RSPO ACOP 2024 reports that it sells 0% of RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains.
-
50. Processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?
This indicator is disabled as the company only reports a Grower ACOP.
-
51. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?
[Externally verified] The company reports that it has obtained six ISPO certifications and publishes the certificates. However, it does not cover the whole scope of operations.
-
52. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.
-
53. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?
[Externally verified] The company reports that two of its mills is certified under ISO 14001, it has published the certificates.
-
Deforestation and biodiversity
15.48 / 20 77.4%- Organisation: 0.5 / 2 25%
- Policy: 10 / 12 83.3%
- Practice: 5 / 6 83%
- Self-reported: 3.5 / 6 58.3%
- External: 0 / 6 0%
- Certified: 1.5 / 6 24.7%
-
54. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
The company commits to zero conversion of natural ecosystems.
-
55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to zero conversion of natural ecosystems.
-
56. Commitment to zero deforestation?
The company commits to zero deforestation. This commitment has been in place since 2015.
-
57. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to zero deforestation. This commitment has been in place since 2015.
-
58. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
The company defines deforestation as the removal of HCV areas, HCS areas, and/or peatland, and specifies any deforestation/conversion past August 2015 will not be accepted.
-
59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
The company defines deforestation as the removal of HCV areas, HCS areas, and/or peatland, and specifies any deforestation/conversion past August 2015 will not be accepted.
-
60. Cross-commodity zero deforestation commitment?
This indicator has been disabled as the company does not have operations in any other forest-risk commodities besides palm.
-
61. Cross-commodity zero deforestation commitment applies to all suppliers?
This indicator has been disabled as company does not source or purchase any other forest-risk commodities besides palm oil.
-
-
62. Target date to achieve zero deforestation?
-
-
63. Target date to achieve zero deforestation in supplier operations?
-
64. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it regularly monitors signs of deforestation within and around its concessions through the Earthqualizer platform and remote sensing technology to identify areas at risk of deforestation.
-
65. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
The company monitors deforestation in its supplier operations through a satellite-based system that covers over 140,000 ha, combining GIS and remote sensing tools to detect land cover changes every six months. However, this information is not externally verified.
-
66. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
203 - The company reports 203 ha (0.56%) of forest loss in its conservation areas in 2024. However, this is not a figure since the cut-off date in 2015.
-
0 / 1
67. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
-
68. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?
The company commits to restore ecosystems to their prior condition in cases of conversion within its own operations.
-
69. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?
The company commits to the restoration of deforestation/conversion in its sustainability policy and states that it works with independent smallholders to ensure it follows this policy.
-
70. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
The company reports active participation in multi-stakeholder initiatives such as IDH PPI Compact in Ketapang and partnerships with local government authorities on restoration programmes. It also reports that Bumitama Biodiversity and Community Project (BBCP) has become a model for integrated conservation within palm oil landscapes, covering 8,311 ha for reforestation and community engagement. Further, the company's work on the BBCP has been verified by an article from IDH (the company's collaborator).
-
71. Biodiversity policy?
The company states a general commitment to biodiversity protection with no detail given on the scope.
-
72. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
The company states a general commitment to biodiversity protection with no detail given on the scope, this applies to all suppliers.
-
73. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company has also identified several species of conservation concern such as sunda pangolin, Javan Myna, sambar deer, and sun bear, with reference to the international system of species classification (IUCN).
-
74. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
75. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
The company commits to no hunting of all species in its operations.
-
76. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to no hunting of all species in their operations.
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments
14.25 / 15 95%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 7.5 / 8 93.8%
- Practice: 6.8 / 7 96.4%
- Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
- External: 6.8 / 7 96.4%
- Certified: 0 / 7 0%
-
77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also commits to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments in its own reporting.
-
78. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to conduct HCV assessments.
-
79. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?
[Externally verified] High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for PT Ladang Sawit Mas, PT Nabatindo Karya Utama, PT Andalan Sukses Makmur, PT Gunajaya Karya Gemilang, and PT Gunajaya Ketapang Sentosa are available on the RSPO NPP website.
-
80. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted/planned planting since January 2015?
[Externally verified] High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015 are available on the RSPO NPP and HCVRN websites.
-
81. High Conservation Value (HCV) or combined HCV/HCS management and monitoring plans for all estates planted/planned planting since January 2015?
[Externally verified] High Conservation Value (HCV) or combined HCV/HCS management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015 are available on the RSPO NPP and HCVRN websites.
-
82. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also commits to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) in its own reporting.
-
83. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to only use licensed HCV assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's ALS.
-
84. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?
[Externally verified] Satisfactory reviews are available for some of the company's HCV assessments only.
-
85. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also commits to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach in its own reporting.
-
86. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to apply the HCS Approach, as defined by the HCS Approach Toolkit.
-
87. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
[Externally verified] HCSA assessment reports are publicly available on the HCS website.
-
88. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
[Externally verified] HCSA report of PT Agriplus, PT. Damai Agro Sejahtera, PT. Gemilang Makmur Subur and PT. Hungarindo Persada has been peer-reviewed and deemed satisfactory by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process.
-
89. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also commits to conduct social impact assessments (SIAs) in its own reporting.
-
90. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to conduct social impact assessments (SIAs) only.
-
91. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?
[Externally verified] SEIA reports are available on the RSPO NPP website.
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions
17.71 / 21 84.3%- Organisation: 5 / 6 83.3%
- Policy: 8 / 8 100%
- Practice: 4.7 / 7 67.3%
- Self-reported: 1.8 / 7 25%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
- Certified: 3 / 7 42.3%
-
92. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also commits to planting on peat of any depth.
-
93. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to no planting on peat of any depth.
-
94. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
8089 - The company reports that it has 8,089 ha of planted area on peat. Data as of 2024.
-
95. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
The company reports that its planted area on peat has remained the same from 2020 to 2024.
-
96. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
The company commits to best management practices for soils and peat.
-
97. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to best management practices for soils and peat.
-
98. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it uses remote sensing technologies to monitor peat and soil.
-
99. Commitment to zero burning?
The company commits to zero burning.
-
100. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to zero burning.
-
101. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company has also implemented innovative technologies and methods to prevent fires, including the use of near-real-time hotspot detection and drone surveillance system under the triple zero target programme. It also conducts fire preparedness drills and deploys trained firefighting teams.
-
102. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?
The company reports that 89 fires were identified within its concessions in 2024.
-
103. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?
129 - The company reports that 129 fires were identified outside its concession area in 2023 and a total of 278 ha were burned as a result.
-
-
104. Time-bound commitment to reduce absolute greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions?
-
105. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
The company commits to reduce GHG emissions intensity by 30% by the year 2030, which includes scope 1 and scope 2 emissions.
-
106. Absolute GHG emissions?
3328960 - The company reports total gross emissions of 3,328,958 MT CO2e in 2024.
-
107. GHG emissions intensity?
The company reports a GHG emissions intensity of 0.82 MT CO2e/MT CPO for scope 1 and 0.00 MT CO2e/MT CPO for scope 2 2024.
-
108. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?
The company reports 1,450,957 MT CO2e emissions from land clearing. Data as of 2024.
-
0 / 1
109. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?
-
110. Progress towards commitment to reduce absolute GHG emissions?
The company reports an increase in total gross emissions from 2023 (3,098,595 MT CO2e) to 2024 (3,328,958 MT CO2e).
-
111. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
The company reports an increase in GHG emissions intensity for scope 1 from 2023 (0.79 MT CO2e/MT CPO) to 2024 (0.82 MT CO2e/MT CPO), and stayed the same for scope 2 2023 (0.00 MT CO2e/MT CPO) to 2024 (0.00 MT CO2e/MT CPO).
-
112. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
The company uses the RSPO PalmGHG Calculator methodology to calculate GHG emissions.
-
113. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?
The company reports only one mill (5.88%) with a methane capture facility and plans to expand this to all mills in the future.
-
Water, chemical and pest management
20.92 / 24 87.2%- Organisation: 2 / 2 100%
- Policy: 10.5 / 11 95.5%
- Practice: 8.4 / 11 76.6%
- Self-reported: 2.5 / 11 22.7%
- External: 0 / 11 0%
- Certified: 5.9 / 11 53.8%
-
114. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
The company commits to reduce water-use intensity from mill production to 1.20 m³/MT FFB by 2025. No baseline was defined.
-
115. Water use intensity?
1.21 - The company reports its water use intensity as 1.21 m3/MT FFB in 2024.
-
116. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
The company reports a decrease in water use intensity from 2023 (1.29 M3/MT FFB) to 2024 (1.21 M3/MT FFB).
-
117. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?
The company commits to maintain the BOD level within legal limits.
-
118. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?
The company reports that it maintains a BOD level below the regulatory threshold of 5,000 parts per million (PPM).
-
119. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it treats palm oil mill effluent (POME) before discharging it into waterways.
-
120. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.
-
121. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
The company commits to protect natural waterways through buffer zones.
-
122. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
123. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
The company commits to minimise the use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides.
-
124. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to minimise the use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides.
-
125. Commitment to no use of paraquat?
The company commits to not use paraquat.
-
126. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to not use paraquat.
-
127. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
The company commits to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.
-
128. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.
-
129. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
The company commits to not use Stockholm and Rotterdam Convention chemicals.
-
130. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to not use Stockholm and Rotterdam Convention chemicals.
-
131. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
The company reports its toxicity units and inorganic fertiliser and pesticides usage per planted hectare from 2020 to 2024.
-
132. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it prioritises organic fertilisers to enhance soil quality, improve nutrient absorption, and reduce reliance on chemical inputs. It also reports that in 2024, inorganic fertiliser use increased to 1.07 tonnes/ha (a 28.9% rise from 2023) due to supply chain disruptions.
-
133. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also implements an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy that prioritises biological and mechanical pest control solutions, including the use of barn owls, biopesticides, and microbial pathogens. It reports that in 2024, 96% of all its estates achieved rodenticide-free status.
-
134. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company has also reported on different types of waste and its management methodologies.
-
Community, land and labour rights
32.25 / 35 92.1%- Organisation: 4 / 5 80%
- Policy: 19.5 / 21 92.9%
- Practice: 8.8 / 9 97.2%
- Self-reported: 8.8 / 9 97.2%
- External: 0 / 9 0%
- Certified: 0 / 9 0%
-
135. Commitment to human rights?
The company commits to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
-
136. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
-
137. Progress on human rights commitment?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
138. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights?
The company commits to the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (no. 169).
-
139. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (no. 169).
-
140. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
The company commits to respect legal and customary land tenure rights.
-
141. Commitment to respect legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to respect legal and customary land tenure rights, but only in relation to FPIC.
-
142. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also commits to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) in its own reporting.
-
143. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to respect FPIC.
-
144. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain guidance and requirements on the process to conduct free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's commitments under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.
-
145. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
The company reports various instances of engagement with local stakeholders to prevent conflicts, including community forums, surveys, keeping stakeholders informed through regular reports and communications, feedback channels, and the use of participatory social impact assessments to identify local community tenure. However, the information is not externally verified.
-
146. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
The company reports that it has a grievance procedure that addresses land conflicts. However, no separate process is provided.
-
147. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
148. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
The company commits to ensure food security for local communities through a range of local community livelihood and food security programmes.
-
149. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
150. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
The company commits to provide essential community services and facilities.
-
151. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it provides educational programmes and infrastructure, ranging from early childcare centres to vocational high schools.
-
152. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
The company commits to provide business and work opportunities for local communities.
-
153. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company commits to the ILO's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.
-
154. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to the ILO's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.
-
155. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.
-
156. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company commits to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.
-
157. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.
-
158. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company has also established gender committees across its estates to ensure fair and equitable treatment of women, protect reproductive rights, and eliminate potential discrimination cases.
-
159. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
192 (0.6%) - The company reports that it has 192 (0.6%) temporary employees in 2024.
-
160. Reports gender balance of employees?
9215 (29%) - The company reports that it has 9,215 (29%) women employees in 2024.
-
161. Commitment to pay a living wage?
The company commits to pay a Living Wage to all workers.
-
162. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?
The company only commits to paying above the minimum wage applies to all suppliers.
-
163. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports the ratio of entry-level wages to the legal minimum wage.
-
164. Reporting of salary by gender?
The company reports that all women and men are paid equal salaries according to their employment levels. However, no further details were provided.
-
165. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.
-
166. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to address health and safety at work for all workers.
-
167. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company reports that it provides all its employees with comprehensive training, regular check-ups, and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) to ensure safe handling of chemicals.
-
168. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
13.6 - The company recorded a lost time incident rate (LTIR) of 13.6 in 2024. Calculated as lost time incident x 1,000,000/total working hours.
-
169. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
3 - The company reports a total of three fatalities in 2024.
-
Smallholders and suppliers
8 / 10 80%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 4 / 4 100%
- Practice: 4 / 6 66.7%
- Self-reported: 4 / 6 66.7%
- External: 0 / 6 0%
- Certified: 0 / 6 0%
-
170. Commitment to support smallholders?
The company has published a commitment to support smallholders.
-
171. Programme to support scheme smallholders?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also supports all plasma smallholders to achieve RSPO certifications and reports that, in 2024, it facilitated certification of 2,483 ha of plasma, an increase from 1,899 ha in 2022, representing 4.0% of the total plasma planted area.
-
172. Percentage of scheme smallholders involved in programme?
The company reports that 4.0% of the total planted area under plasma smallholders has been RSPO certified as part of its programme.
-
173. Programme to support independent smallholders?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it has established dedicated smallholder programmers (the Klinik Berdaya Sawit programme) for independent smallholders supplying its mills in Central and West Kalimantan, with 898 smallholders enrolled in its programmes, and it has RSPO-certified groups in Kalimantan and Riau, covering 477 independent smallholders. It also assisted three independent smallholder groups in obtaining RSPO certification, covering a total area of 1,454 ha in 2024 and aims to certify 2,335 independent smallholders under the RSPO programme by 2029.
-
174. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?
898 (53.11%) - The company reports that 898 independent smallholders were enrolled in its programmes, and the RSPO-certified groups covered 477 of these smallholders (53.11%).
-
175. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
The company prioritises suppliers based on risk using mapping, questionnaires, and inspections, and conducts annual assessments in accordance with its policy commitments, and requires non-compliant suppliers to undergo a re-entry process or face exclusion.
-
176. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
100% - The company reports that it engaged with and assessed 100% of its known suppliers against its policy commitments in 2024.
-
177. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
The company reports that it ceases working with suppliers found to be non-compliant with its policy. Suppliers are typically given three to six months to demonstrate progress, however, those who fail to take remedial action or refuse to comply with the company's policy are excluded.
-
178. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?
The company reports that any confirmed breach identified through our assessments or monitoring triggers our supplier re-entry protocol. This entails a stop-work order, evidence of policy alignment, revised standard operating procedures, HCV-HCS assessments, and the implementation of restoration and reCO2ery plans for the impacted area. A timebound corrective action plan is then established alongside transparent progress updates. Suppliers are generally given three to six months to demonstrate their progress, although this may vary depending on the severity of the breach and responsiveness of the supplier. Reinstatement into the company's supply base is contingent upon the supplier's demonstrable commitment to improving. Conversely, suppliers who fail to engage or take remedial action are permanently excluded.
-
0 / 1
179. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF)?
-
180. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
181. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
182. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
183. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
184. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
185. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.
-
Governance and grievances
6 / 7 85.7%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 4 / 5 80%
- Practice: 2 / 2 100%
- Self-reported: 2 / 2 100%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
- Certified: 0 / 2 0%
-
186. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.
-
187. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.
-
188. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports that it conducts anti-corruption training and annual audits to identify corruption risks.
-
0 / 1
189. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
-
190. Whistleblowing procedure?
The company has its own whistleblowing procedure, including how whistleblowers can report unethical conduct and how they are protected.
-
191. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company has a grievance system open to all stakeholders.
-
192. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
The company reports a summary table of internal and external grievances, including issue; complainant category; actions taken; status.
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
2022
Sustainability Policy
-
2024
Annual Report 2024
-
2024
Sustainability Report 2024
-
2022
Sustainability Report 2022
-
2024
TCFD Aligned Strategy
-
No date
About Us - Bumitama Agri Ltd - WEBPAGE
-
2024
Bumitama Agri Ltd 2024 RSPO ACOP
-
December 2021
Oil Palm Concessions - GFW - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Universal Mill List - GFW - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Certified Companies (Principles and Criteria) - RSPO - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Responsible Sourcing - Bumitama Agri Ltd - WEBPAGE
-
2015
Sustainability Policy
-
2016
Sustainability Policy
-
No date
Environment - Bumitama Agri Ltd - WEBPAGE
-
2020
Sustainability Report 2020
-
2018
Sustainability Report 2018
-
2014
NPP Assessment Summary - PT Ladang Sawit Mas
-
2014
NPP Assessment Summary - PT Nabatindo Karya Utama
-
2014
Summary Report of EIA SIA and HCV Assessments - PT Andalan Sukses Makmur
-
2014
Summary Report of SEIA and HCV Assessments - PT Gunajaya Karya Gemilang
-
2014
Summary Report of SEIA and HCV Assessments - PT Gunajaya Ketapang Sentosa
-
No date
HCV-HCSA Integrated Assessment - PT Karya Makmur Langgeng
-
No date
HCV-HCSA Integrated Assessment - PT Lestari Gemilang Intisawit PT Nabati Agro Subur PT Agro Manunggal Sawitindo
-
2022
NPP Assessment Summary - PT Agriplus
-
2021
NPP Assessment Summary - PT Agro Manunggal Sawitindo
-
2022
NPP Assessment Summary - PT Damai Agro Sejahtera
-
2017
NPP Assessment Summary - PT Gemilang Makmur Subur
-
2024
NPP Assessment Summary - PT Karya Makmur Langgeng
-
2019
NPP Assessment Summary - PT Hungarindo Persada
-
2021
NPP Assessment Summary - PT Lestari Gemilang Intisawit
-
2021
NPP Assessment Summary - PT Tanah Tani Lestari
-
2016
Summary Report of SEIA and HCV Assessments - PT Investa Karya Bhakti
-
2016
Summary Report of SEIA and HCV Assessments - PT Karya Bakti Agro Sejahtera - 3
-
No date
HCV-HCSA Integrated Assessment - PT Tanah Tani Lestari
-
No date
High Carbon Stock Approach Assessment - PT Agriplus
-
No date
High Carbon Stock Approach Assessment - PT Damai Agro Sejahtera
-
No date
High Carbon Stock Approach Assessment - PT Gemilang Makmur Subur
-
No date
High Carbon Stock Approach Assessment - PT. Hungarindo Persada
-
2020
Peer Review Report - PT Agriplus
-
2019
Peer Review Report - PT. Damai Agro Sejahtera
-
2018
Peer Review Report - PT. Gemilang Makmur Subur
-
2019
Peer Review Report - PT. Hungarindo Persada
-
No date
Fire Management - Environment - Bumitama Agri Ltd - WEBPAGE
-
2018
Code of Conduct
-
2021
Whistleblower Policy
-
No date
Governance - Bumitama Agri Ltd - WEBPAGE
-
2024
List of Addressed Grievances
Media monitor: Bumitama Agri Ltd
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
August 2025
Jakarta's land crackdown clouds outlook for Singapore-listed plantation firms
July 2025
Indonesia's plantation crackdown raises regulatory risks for Malaysian firms — CIMB Securities
February 2025
317.253 Hektare Izin Kebun Sawit dalam Kawasan Hutan Ditolak Kemenhut (317,253 Hectares of Oil Palm Plantation Permits in Forest Areas Rejected by Ministry of Forestry)
February 2025
16 Perusahaan Tak Miliki HGU di Kotim Harus Segera Ditindak (16 Companies Without HGU in Kotim Must Be Prosecuted Immediately)
October 2024
Best Group Terbidik dalam Penggeledahan Kantor KLHK? (Best Group Targeted in KLHK Office Raid?)
October 2024
Bongkar Mafia Pemutihan Kebun Sawit di Kawasan Hutan Lindung (Uncovering the Palm Oil Plantation Whitening Mafia in Protected Forest Areas)
October 2024
Walhi Desak Kejagung Segera Periksa Swasta Termasuk Best Group soal Korupsi Tata Kelola Sawit (Walhi Urges Attorney General to Immediately Examine Private Sector Including Best Group Regarding Palm Oil Management Corruption)
August 2023
BANKS MUST RESPECT INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ LAND RIGHTS TO KEEP FORESTS STANDING
December 2022
The Chain: Bumitama Clarifies Sourcing Policies After Palm Oil from Deforestation-Linked PT Permata Sawit Mandiri Enters Its Mills
June 2022
RSPO: Centenar de quejas no detiene la huella del aceite de palma en los bosques tropicales (RSPO: Hundreds of complaints do not stop the footprint of palm oil in tropical forests)
November 2021
One in five hectares of palm oil in Indonesia is criminal, report shows
September 2021
Connections to coal mining add to Indonesian palm oil sector's risk for buyers
December 2018
RSPO Complaint filed Jul 2012 - PT Hati Prima Agro (Status: Reopen - Investigation)
November 2018
Oreo maker linked to destruction of orangutan habitat in Indonesia
November 2018
Has this Singapore-listed palm oil firm been concession laundering?
15
12
8
43
10
6
9
10
8
14
Media monitor: Bumitama Agri Ltd
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.