Skip to content
SPOTT
  • About
    • About SPOTT
    • SPOTT team
    • Supporter Network
    • Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
  • Assessments
    • Palm oil
    • Timber and pulp
    • Natural rubber
    • SPOTT Methodologies
  • News
  • Resources
    • Training Hub
    • Data Visualised
    • Analytical Reports
    • SPOTT Annual Reports
  • MY SPOTT
    • Login and registration
    • Dashboard and bookmarks
    • Modify score weighting
    • Compare the companies
    • Download assessment data
    • Trends and score changes
    • Other data
  • Donate
Menu Search
  • About
    • About SPOTT
    • SPOTT team
    • Supporter Network
    • Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
  • Assessments
    • Palm oil
    • Timber and pulp
    • Natural rubber
    • SPOTT Methodologies
  • News
  • Resources
    • Training Hub
    • Data Visualised
    • Analytical Reports
    • SPOTT Annual Reports
  • MY SPOTT
    • Login and registration
    • Dashboard and bookmarks
    • Modify score weighting
    • Compare the companies
    • Download assessment data
    • Trends and score changes
    • Other data
  • Donate

Palm oil assessment summary – November 2018

Michael Guindon and Annabelle Dodson | 06 Nov 2018 | Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia

SPOTT assesses 70 palm oil producers and traders on the public disclosure of their policies, operations and commitments related to environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues.

We encourage stakeholders to engage with producers and traders, as company policies and commitments may not always translate into effective implementation on the ground.

23 / 70
companies
score
< 33%

22 / 70
companies
score
33-66%

25 / 70
companies
score
> 66%

 

Indicator categories:

SPOTT scores palm oil producers and traders using up to 119 ESG indicators across 10 categories. Click on the categories below to find out more about the companies, and visit their pages to view full assessments.

  • Transparency
    score ranges:
  • lower
    < 33%
  • moderate
    33-66%
  • higher
    > 66%
47.9% Average score:
Download PDF
Expand all categories
Expand all companies
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership 58.4%
    • 48 companies have put in place clear sustainability policies that apply to all their operations.
      • 31 companies extend their sustainability policies to all their suppliers.
        • 45 companies are full members of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), but only 17 are members of other external industry schemes.
        • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability 54.2%
          • 51 companies report a planted area, totalling over nine million hectares (ha).
            • 30 companies have made at least some of their estate maps available.
              • 22 companies have made all their estate maps available.
                • 42 companies report their areas set aside for conservation or High Conservation Values (HCV) areas, totalling over one million hectares.
                  • 18 companies with trading operations achieved more than 80% traceability to mill level.
                    • 22 companies have achieved more than 75% traceability to plantation for their own mills.
                      • Two companies have achieved more than 75% traceability to plantation for supplier mills.
                      • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity 53.0%
                        • 46 companies have clear commitments to zero deforestation.
                          • Three companies have unclear zero (net) deforestation commitments.
                            • 26 companies extend their zero deforestation commitments to all suppliers.
                              • 31 companies report habitat management/restoration activities.
                                • 19 companies provide strong evidence of monitoring deforestation.
                                  • Five companies provide some evidence of monitoring deforestation, but they lack clear methodologies or timeframes.
                                  • HCV, HCS and impact assessment HCV, HCS and impact assessment 47.5%
                                    • 44 companies commit fully to the High Conservation Value (HCV) approach.
                                      • 24 companies extend their HCV commitment to smallholders and/or suppliers.
                                        • 34 companies commit fully to conducting High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments and to applying the HCS Approach for all assessments.
                                          • 25 companies have no HCS-related commitments in place to date.
                                            • 11 companies have unclear HCS-related commitments that may not apply to all new planting and development or are another assessment methodology, not clearly the HCS Approach.
                                              • 17 companies have made HCS assessments publicly available to date.
                                                • 33 companies have made social and/or environmental impact (SEIA) assessments publicly available to date.
                                                • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions 43.8%
                                                  • 34 companies have a commitment to no planting on peat of any depth.
                                                    • 16 companies have weak or unclear commitments that fail to specify all depths of peat.
                                                      • 20 companies have no commitment prohibiting development on peat.
                                                        • 48 companies have a clear commitment to zero burning.
                                                          • 28 companies extend their no burning commitment to smallholders and/or suppliers.
                                                            • 33 companies disclose data relating to monitoring/managing fires.
                                                              • Nine companies have a time-bound plan to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
                                                                • 11 companies report progress on reducing GHG emissions over time.
                                                                • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management 40.3%
                                                                  • 11 companies have clear time-bound commitments to improve water use per tonne of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) processed.
                                                                    • 12 companies have weak or unclear commitments to improve water use.
                                                                      • 47 companies are clearly implementing an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach.
                                                                        • 27 companies no longer use paraquat.
                                                                          • Three companies have a time-bound plan to phase out paraquat.
                                                                          • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights 55.7%
                                                                            • 15 companies do not have a public commitment to respect human rights.
                                                                              • 45 companies commit to the principle of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC).
                                                                                • 32 companies clearly commit to all eight fundamental International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles.
                                                                                  • 12 companies have provided evidence that they are paying the minimum wage.
                                                                                  • Certification standards Certification standards 35.8%
                                                                                    • 45 companies are full members of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) certification scheme.
                                                                                      • 4 companies are not full members but own subsidiaries that are RSPO members.
                                                                                        • 21 companies are currently not RSPO members.
                                                                                          • 16 companies have RSPO-certified more than 75% of their mills.
                                                                                            • Nine companies have RSPO-certified more than 75% of their estates.
                                                                                              • 32 companies are certified under other voluntary certification schemes, including organic certification, International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISSC), Sustainable Agriculture Network (SAN), Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials (RSB), RSPO NEXT, etc.
                                                                                              • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers 37.2%
                                                                                                • 27 companies report a clear process for prioritising, assessing and/or engaging suppliers on compliance with their policy and/or legal requirements.
                                                                                                  • Seven companies follow a weak or unclear process for prioritising, assessing and/or engaging suppliers on compliance with their policy and/or legal requirements.
                                                                                                    • Nine companies disclose clear suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers.
                                                                                                      • Nine other companies publish unclear criteria for suspending or excluding suppliers, with no timeframes for action or steps taken.
                                                                                                      • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances 51.9%
                                                                                                        • 53 companies have commitments to both ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption.
                                                                                                          • 10 companies have no commitment to ethical conduct nor prohibition of corruption.
                                                                                                            • 32 companies recognise whistleblowers and have relevant procedures on whistleblowing.
                                                                                                              • 17 companies allow whistleblowing but provide no procedures.
                                                                                                                • 21 companies publish no information on whistleblowing.
                                                                                                                  • 19 companies report details of grievances publicly.
                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                  Download summary
                                                                                                                  Download PDF summary

                                                                                                                  Key findings:

                                                                                                                  • The average score of 70 palm oil producers and traders is 47.9% in November 2018, compared to 50.4% during the last assessment of 50 palm oil companies in November 2017.
                                                                                                                  • 25 companies have an overall score of at least 66% (higher transparency), compared to 17 companies in November 2017.
                                                                                                                  • 23 companies have a score below 33% (lower transparency), compared to 14 in the last assessment round.
                                                                                                                  • 34/50 companies assessed in 2017 saw an increase in their scores in 2018 – the average change in score was +6%.
                                                                                                                  • 14/50 companies assessed in 2017 saw a decrease in their scores in 2018 – the average change in score was -3%.
                                                                                                                  • Companies perform best in the categories Sustainability policy and leadership (average score: 58.4%) and Community, land and labour rights (55.7%).
                                                                                                                  • There is room for improvement in Certification standards (35.8%) and Smallholders and suppliers (37.2%).
                                                                                                                  • The average score of 45 Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) members, including companies with subsidiary RSPO members, is 60% vs. 20% for 21 non-RSPO members.
                                                                                                                   

                                                                                                                  Check the company scores table to rank all 70 palm oil companies and access their full assessments.

                                                                                                                  See all companies and rank them by score

                                                                                                                  Download a printable summary of the November 2018 assessments of 70 palm oil producers and traders.

                                                                                                                  Download 2018 PDF assessment summary
                                                                                                                  Palm oil scores table

                                                                                                                  Assessment scores

                                                                                                                  How transparent are all 70 palm oil companies in the latest SPOTT assessments?

                                                                                                                  Assessment scores
                                                                                                                  Download the data

                                                                                                                  Download the data

                                                                                                                  Access the SPOTT Dashboard to download CSV data on company assessments

                                                                                                                  Download the data
                                                                                                                  Nominate companies

                                                                                                                  Nominate companies

                                                                                                                  Are we missing companies that interest you? Please nominate them for future assessment

                                                                                                                  Nominate producers
                                                                                                                  Palm oil indicators and scoring criteria

                                                                                                                  Scoring criteria

                                                                                                                  View the full list of indicators and scoring criteria that inform SPOTT assessments

                                                                                                                  Scoring criteria
                                                                                                                  About SPOTT and ZSL
                                                                                                                  Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
                                                                                                                  Contact us Share LinkedIn Twitter
                                                                                                                  Contact the SPOTT team at ZSL
                                                                                                                  Terms and conditions
                                                                                                                  SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
                                                                                                                  Zoological Society of London (ZSL)
                                                                                                                  Back to top

                                                                                                                  The Zoological Society of London (ZSL) is incorporated by Royal Charter. Registered Charity in England and Wales no. 208728. Principal Office: England - Company no. RC000749. Registered address: Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.

                                                                                                                  Please accept these Terms and Conditions to continue using the SPOTT Website

                                                                                                                  You are free to view and use the SPOTT Website and download SPOTT Data (i.e. all company assessment related data), including for commercial use under the following conditions:

                                                                                                                  Restrictions – you may not, under any circumstances, repost, redistribute, transmit or sub-license the data in any way, part or form, including in derivative products created by altering, transforming, or building upon the content or data.

                                                                                                                  Attribution – you must attribute the data in the manner specified by ZSL (but not in any way that suggests that ZSL endorses you or your use of the work).

                                                                                                                  Waiver – any of the above conditions can be waived if you get written permission from ZSL. Contact us here.

                                                                                                                  By clicking any link on this page, you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.