Kirana Megatara
Natural rubber assessment- Latest update: March 2025
- Next scheduled: March 2026
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the natural rubber supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Parent company:HSF (S) Pte Ltd
-
Landbank4,140 hectares
-
Market cap:161,923,729 USD
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:KMTR.JK
-
Bloomberg ticker:KMTR IJ Equity
-
Activities:Natural rubber cultivation and processing
-
Locations:Indonesia (Sumatra, Jambi, Riau, Lampung, Bangka Belitung, Kalimantan)
-
Headquarters:Indonesia
-
Related companies:The company is partly owned by PT Triputra Persada Megatara which is also the parent company of Triputra Agro Persada Group PT assessed on SPOTT Palm Oil.
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Kirana Megatara – November 2019
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 9.5 / 29 32.8%
- Policy: 8.5 / 48 17.7%
- Practice: 7.8 / 43 18%
- Self-reported: 5.8 / 43 13.4%
- External: 2 / 43 4.7%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership
2.5 / 10 25%- Organisation: 1.5 / 5 30%
- Policy: 0 / 2 0%
- Practice: 1 / 3 33.3%
- Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
- External: 1 / 3 33.3%
-
1. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment for all its operations?
The company only has a Corporate Social Responsibility programme.
-
0 / 1
2. Sustainability natural rubber policy or commitment applies to all sourcing excluding smallholders?
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
Chief of Sustainability and Community Development.
-
0 / 1
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
-
5. Percentage or number of women board members?
2 (13.3%) - The company does not explicitly report the number of women board members. Figure represents Board of Commissioners (1/8) and Board of Directors (1/5).
-
0 / 1
6. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?
-
0 / 1
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?
-
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?
[Externally verified] The company has a collaboration with SNV and Earthworm for promoting "sustainable natural rubber production by supporting productivity improvement, quality of natural rubber, forest conservation, water management and human rights & labor.".
-
0 / 1
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
-
0 / 1
10. Climate risks assessment available?
-
Landbank, maps and traceability
5 / 11 45.5%- Organisation: 5 / 10 50%
- Policy: 0 / 1 0%
- Practice: 0 / 0 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 0 0%
- External: 0 / 0 0%
-
11. Lists countries and operations?
Indonesia (plantations, processing).
-
12. Total land area managed/controlled for natural rubber (ha)?
20434.4
-
13. Total natural rubber planted area (ha)?
3074
-
0 / 1
14. Scheme smallholders/outgrowers planted area (ha)?
-
0 / 1
15. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?
-
0 / 1
16. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
-
0 / 1
17. Maps of estates/management units?
-
18. Number of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?
15
-
19. Names and coordinates of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?
-
0 / 1
20. Management plans for natural rubber production are available for all estates/management units?
-
0 / 1
21. Commitment to traceability of the whole supply chain?
-
Deforestation and biodiversity
0.5 / 10 5%- Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
- Policy: 0 / 5 0%
- Practice: 0.5 / 4 12.5%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 4 12.5%
- External: 0 / 4 0%
-
0 / 1
22. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
-
0 / 1
23. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all sourcing excluding smallholders?
-
0 / 1
24. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?
-
0 / 1
25. Amount of illegal/non-complaint deforestation recorded in own operations?
-
0 / 1
26. Implementing a landscape or juridictional level approach?
-
0 / 1
27. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?
-
0 / 1
28. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
-
29. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
The company only mentions tree planting and reforestation activities around processing facilities however no details are provided.
-
0 / 1
30. Commitment to protect areas from illegal activities?
-
0 / 1
31. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments
0 / 6 0%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 0 / 3 0%
- Practice: 0 / 3 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
-
0 / 1
32. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
-
0 / 1
33. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?
-
0 / 1
34. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?
-
0 / 1
35. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach?
-
0 / 1
36. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
-
0 / 1
37. Social and environmental impact assessment (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions
0.5 / 15 3.3%- Organisation: 0 / 4 0%
- Policy: 0 / 6 0%
- Practice: 0.5 / 5 10%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 5 10%
- External: 0 / 5 0%
-
0 / 1
38. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
0 / 1
39. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
-
0 / 1
40. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
0 / 1
41. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
-
0 / 1
42. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
-
0 / 1
43. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices?
-
0 / 1
44. Evidence of best/sustainable tapping practices?
-
0 / 1
45. Commitment to zero burning?
-
46. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?
The company only mentions training employees on fire prevention and fire fighting.
-
0 / 1
47. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates/management units?
-
0 / 1
48. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
49. GHG emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
50. Report GHG emissions from land use change?
-
0 / 1
51. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
-
0 / 1
52. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
-
Water, chemical and pest management
1.25 / 17 7.4%- Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
- Policy: 0 / 6 0%
- Practice: 1.3 / 9 13.9%
- Self-reported: 1.3 / 9 13.9%
- External: 0 / 9 0%
-
0 / 1
53. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?
-
0 / 1
54. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?
-
55. Treatment of effluents from processing facilities?
The company treats effluents from processing facilities.
-
56. Percentage of processing facilities with closed-loop water treatment system (100%)?
The company states it recycles water to reduce water use however it is unclear how many facilities have closed-loop systems.
-
0 / 1
57. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
58. Water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
59. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
60. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
-
0 / 1
61. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
-
0 / 1
62. Reducing odours from natural rubber processing facilities?
-
0 / 1
63. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
-
0 / 1
64. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
-
0 / 1
65. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
-
0 / 1
66. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?
-
0 / 1
67. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
-
0 / 1
68. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
-
69. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?
The company only has a waste management system for hazardous waste.
-
Community, land and labour rights
8 / 29 27.6%- Organisation: 1 / 5 20%
- Policy: 5 / 17 29.4%
- Practice: 2 / 7 28.6%
- Self-reported: 2 / 7 28.6%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
-
0 / 1
70. Commitment to human rights?
-
0 / 1
71. Commitment to human rights applies to all sourcing excluding smallholders?
-
0 / 1
72. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?
-
0 / 1
73. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
-
0 / 1
74. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
-
0 / 1
75. FPIC commitment applies to all sourcing excluding smallholders?
-
0 / 1
76. Details on Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
-
0 / 1
77. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
-
0 / 1
78. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
-
0 / 1
79. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across natural rubber operations, including addressing barriers faced?
-
0 / 1
80. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
-
0 / 1
81. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
-
82. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
-
83. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
The company provides multiple examples of facilities and services provided to communities including education, health and religious facilities.
-
84. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
-
0 / 1
85. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?
-
86. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company only commits to Freedom of Association and No Discrimination.
-
87. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?
-
0 / 1
88. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
-
0 / 1
89. Percentage or number of women employees?
-
90. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?
-
0 / 1
91. Progress on commitment to pay at least minimum wage?
-
0 / 1
92. Reporting of salary by gender?
-
93. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
-
94. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
0.31 - Accident Frequency Rate.
-
95. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?
The company states that the Accident Frequency Rate decreased from 0.53 (2017) to 0.31 (2018).
-
0 / 1
96. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
-
0 / 1
97. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
-
98. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
The company only states that it provides PPE however it does not mention related training.
-
Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives
2 / 5 40%- Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
- Policy: 0 / 1 0%
- Practice: 1 / 3 33.3%
- Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
- External: 1 / 3 33.3%
-
1 / 1
99. Member of the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR)?
-
1 / 1
100. Submitted self-declaration form for the Sustainable Natural Rubber Initiative (SNR-i)?
-
0 / 1
101. Commitment to become 100% certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?
-
102. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?
The company states that it will get certified by ISO 14001 in 2019.
-
0 / 1
103. Percentage area (ha) FSC certified?
-
Smallholders and suppliers
2.75 / 12 22.9%- Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
- Policy: 1 / 4 25%
- Practice: 0.8 / 7 10.7%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 7 10.7%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
-
104. Commitment to support smallholders?
-
0 / 1
105. Programme to support scheme smallholders / outgrowers?
-
0 / 1
106. Percentage of scheme smallholders / outgrowers involved in programme?
-
107. Programme to support independent smallholders?
The company has a programme to support smallholders including providing seeds, training and micro-finance.
-
0 / 1
108. Percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?
-
109. Percentage of supply from smallholders?
20% - The company states that currently 20% of its supply comes from smallholders and it aims to increase this to 30%.
-
0 / 1
110. Percentage of supply coming from agroforestry?
-
0 / 1
111. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
0 / 1
112. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
0 / 1
113. Suspension or exclusion criteria for non-smallholder suppliers?
-
0 / 1
114. Process used to engage smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
0 / 1
115. Number or percentage of smallholder suppliers engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
Governance and grievances
3.25 / 5 65%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2.5 / 3 83.3%
- Practice: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
-
116. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company commits to ethical conduct however no commitment to prohibition of corruption/fraud found.
-
117. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company provides information on how its implementing anti-bribery and corruption policies.
-
118. Whistleblowing procedure?
-
119. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
-
0 / 1
120. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
Media monitor: Kirana Megatara
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Media monitor: Kirana Megatara
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

