Kirana Megatara

1. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment for all its operations?

The company has published a sustainable natural rubber policy that aligns with the GPSNR Policy Components.

2. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

The company has published a sustainable natural rubber policy which applies to all suppliers.

3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

The company reports that the 'Chief Corporate Sustainability & Community Development Officer' occupies a senior position with responsibility for managing sustainability initiatives.

4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

The company reports that the 'Chief Corporate Sustainability & Community Development Officer' reports to the president director, who is a member of the Board of Directors.

5. Reports gender balance of senior management team?

15% - The company reports that women make up 15% of its senior management team in 2024.

6. Reports gender balance of board members?

20% - The company reports 20% of the board is a female in 2024.

7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?

[Externally verified] The company is only a member of the 'Partnership for Indonesian Sustainable Agriculture (PISAgro)'.

8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?

The company has trained 5,000 farmers in partnership with GPSNR and Koltiva on traceability and farming best practice.

9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

The company's latest sustainability report was published in 2024, covering the year 2023.

10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

11. Climate risks assessment available?

12. Lists countries and operations?

Plantations (Indonesia), processing facilities (Indonesia).

13. Lists countries sourcing from?

The company sources natural rubber from Indonesia.

14. Total land area managed/controlled for natural rubber (ha)?

4 - The company reports the total landbank managed for natural rubber as 4,140 ha in 2023.

15. Total natural rubber planted area (ha)?

2616 - The company reports a total planted area of 2,616 ha in 2023.

16. Scheme smallholders/outgrowers planted area (ha)?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from scheme/outgrower smallholder suppliers.

17. Unplanted area (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

3 - The company reports the unplanted area as 3,986 ha in 2022. As evidence is between two and five years old only partial points can be awarded.

18. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

852.67 - The company reports its conservation set-aside area, including the HCV area as 852.67 ha in 2023.

19. Maps of estates/management units?

A static map is available for one estate, PKP. Single points for PT Putra Katingan Pratama, PT Anugerah Alam Persada, and PT Kilau Getah Kemuning are available through details provided in the annual report. The company has not disclosed maps clearly showing estate boundaries.

20. Management plans for natural rubber production are available for all estates/management units?

21. Monitoring of management plan implementation available for all estates/management units?

22. Maps of all scheme/outgrower smallholders?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from scheme/outgrower smallholder suppliers.

23. Maps of all third-party supplying industrial estates/management units?

24. List of jurisdictions where sourcing from smallholders?

The company provides a list of provinces where it is sourcing from smallholders. However, it is not reported if the list covers all sourcing, i.e. that from traders also.

25. Number of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?

16 - The company reports that it has 16 natural rubber processing facilities.

26. Maps of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?

The company reports the names and addresses of all company-owned natural rubber processing facilities.

27. Number (or percentage) of company-owned processing facilities that source from company-owned operations and third parties?

The company's plantations only supply the New Kalbar processing facility in West Kalimantan. However, it is unclear if the New Kalbar factory also processes rubber from third parties. Information is not reported for the 15 other processing facilities owned by the company.

28. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned processing facilities that come from company's own operations and third-parties?

In 2023, the company's own plantations supplied 0.2% of all rubber to processing facilities.

29. Number of company owned natural rubber manufacturing facilities?

This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.

30. Maps of manufacturing facilities?

This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.

31. Number of third party supplying processing facilities?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any third-party processing facility suppliers.

32. Maps of all third party supplying processing facilities?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any third-party processing facility suppliers.

33. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying processing facilities that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party industrial plantations.

34. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying processing facilities that come from the supplying facilities' own operations and third parties?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from third-party industrial plantations.

35. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for manufacturing that comes from intermediary traders rather than directly from processing facilities?

This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.

36. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to processing facility level?

This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.

37. Percentage of supply traceable to processing facility level?

This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.

38. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to industrial plantation level?

The company has reported 100% of its supply from industrial plantations was traceable to plantation level in 2023.

39. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?

The company reports 100% of supply from industrial plantations is traceable to the plantation as of 2023. Evidence is not externally verified.

40. Percentage of supply from third-party processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any third-party processing facility suppliers.

41. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to jurisdictional level for smallholders?

The company reported 100% of its supply from traders was traceable to district level and supply from smallholder groups was traceable to farm level in 2023.

42. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to smallholder at jurisdictional level?

The company reported 100% of its supply from traders was traceable to district level and supply from smallholder groups was traceable to farm level in 2023. Evidence is not externally verified.

43. Percentage of supply from third party processing facilities traceable to smallholders at jurisdictional level?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any third-party processing facility suppliers.

44. Member of the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR)?

[Externally verified] The company is a member of GPSNR. This has been verified via the GPSNR website.

45. Percentage area (ha) FSC certified?

The company reports a total landbank of 4,140 ha, out of which 945.10 ha (22.82%) is FSC certified. Data as of 2023.

46. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC FM certification of estates/management units?

47. Percentage of scheme/outgrower smallholders (ha) FSC-certified?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from scheme/outgrower smallholder suppliers.

48. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC certification of scheme/outgrower smallholders?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from scheme/outgrower smallholder suppliers.

49. Percentage of natural rubber supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party natural rubber suppliers that is FSC-certified?

The company reports that FSC supply accounts for 4.49% of smallholder supply is FSC certified. However, it is not clear if this is supply to the whole company or just only factory. Additionally, this percentage does not cover supply from third party industrial plantations.

50. Percentage of all natural rubber products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is FSC-certified?

This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.

51. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

52. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?

[Externally verified] The company reports that all of its factories are certified against ISO 14001:2015 (Environmental Management System). Certificates are available on the company website. ISO criteria are not publicly available, therefore only partial points can be awarded.

53. Commitment to become 100% certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?

The company reports that it has already achieved 100% ISO 14001 certification. ISO criteria are not publicly available, therefore only partial points can be awarded.

54. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

56. Commitment to zero deforestation?

The company makes this commitment through the the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0) and the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership and alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits to zero deforestation in its own reporting.

57. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits all suppliers to zero deforestation in its own reporting.

58. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. GPSNR defines natural rubber sourced from deforested areas or where HCVs have been degraded after 1 April 2019 to be non-conformant with its policy. The company's own reporting defines deforestation as HCV and protected areas and specifies any deforestation/conversion past 1st April 2019 will not be accepted.

59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. GPSNR defines natural rubber sourced from deforested areas or where HCVs have been degraded after 1 April 2019 to be non-conformant with its policy. The company's own reporting defines deforestation for suppliers as HCV and protected areas and specifies any deforestation/conversion past 1st April 2019 will not be accepted.

60. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

The company reports security patrols to prevent illegal logging, however, it is not clear that all areas managed are monitored for deforestation and how often they are monitored. Information is not externally verified.

61. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

62. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?

The company reports no deforestation or conversion within its conservation areas in 2023. However, this figure does not cover the entire operational area and does not include data since the cut-off date.

63. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?

64. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company's own reporting states it will support landscape/jurisdictional programmes to restore forests and degraded landscapes. However, it is not clear if the company will restore all deforestation committed by itself or third parties within its operations.

65. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?

The company commits its suppliers to support landscape/jurisdictional programmes to restore forests and degraded landscapes. However, it is unclear if suppliers are required to restore deforestation/conversion within their own operations caused by themselves or third parties.

66. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.

67. Biodiversity policy?

68. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?

69. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company has identified several species of conservation concern, citing the IUCN. However, this information is not externally verified.

70. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC. The company also reports installing information boards about protected wildlife around its factories and plantations, implementing procedures to prevent harm to wildlife in these areas, and raising employee awareness about its wildlife protection program. However, the information is between two and five years old.

71. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company's own reporting states its commitment to sustainable hunting but does not specify if this applies to both employees and/or local communities.

72. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

The company commits its suppliers to sustainable hunting but does not specify if this applies to both employees and/or local communities.

73. Commitment to protect areas from illegal activities?

The company commits to protect the natural ecosystems and plantations under its management from illegal activities.

74. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to protect the natural ecosystems and plantations under their management from illegal activities.

75. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?

Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC. The company reports that it has established an emergency response team, conducts regular security patrols, and uses monitoring towers to prevent illegal activities, including logging, poaching, hunting, encroachment, and land conversion within its conservation areas.

76. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

The company makes this commitment through the the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0) and the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership and alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. However, the company's own reporting does not clearly commit to conducting HCV assessments.

77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. However, a clear commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments by suppliers is not reported.

78. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?

79. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?

80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

The company only commits to supporting the use of assessment tools based on HCS concepts. However, a clear commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach is not reported.

81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

The company only commits its suppliers to promote the use of assessment tools based on HCV and HCS concepts. However, a clear commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach is not reported.

82. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports to have not planted new rubber plantations since January 2015.

83. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports to have not planted new rubber plantations since January 2015.

84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

The company only reports commitment to conduct social impact assessments. However, a commitment to conduct environmental impact assessments is not reported.

85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

The company only commits its suppliers to conduct social impact assessments. However, a commitment to conduct environmental impact assessments is not reported.

86. Social and environmental impact assessment (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

87. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. However, the company's own reporting states a commitment to zero peatland use and prohibiting any form of exploitation of known peatland but the depth of peatland is not specified and a recognised definition is not referenced.

88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. However, the company's own reporting commits suppliers to zero peatland use and prohibits any form of exploitation of known peatland but the depth of peatland is not specified and a recognised definition is not referenced.

89. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

0 - The company reports that it has zero ha of planted area on peat. Data as of 2023.

90. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

This indicator is disabled as the company has reported in the last two years that it has no peat in its operations.

91. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

The company commits to good agricultural practices for soils. A commitment for peat is not required as the company has reported in the last two years that its landbank contains 0 ha of peat.

92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

The company commits its suppliers to best management practices for soil. However, a commitment to best management practices for peat is not reported.

93. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

The company reports that it does not have operations on peatland. Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC.

94. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices?

The company is committed to sustainable tapping practices, though this commitment appears to apply only to smallholders.

95. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices applies to all suppliers?

The company commits its suppliers to sustainable tapping practices but the commitment only seems to apply to smallholders.

96. Evidence of best/sustainable tapping practices?

The company reports that it conducts a tapping competition that covers the entire process, from preparing the exposed tree bark to tapping and collecting latex in a receptacle cup. The winner is chosen based on speed and "correct technique." However, it is unclear whether the company is implementing best or sustainable tapping practices, and the available information is between two and five years old.

97. Commitment to zero burning?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits to no burning in its own reporting.

98. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to no burning.

99. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

The company reports it has a fire response team and carries out training on forest and land fire management in collaboration with partners, including the Central Katingan Sector Police. It also provides adequate firefighting infrastructure and equipment for its fire management personnel, with hotspots regularly monitored via monitoring towers or satellite imagery. However, specific information on how the company manages or addresses reported fires is not available.

100. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates/management units?

7 - The company reports that seven hotspots were detected in 2023.

101. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations/jurisdictions?

102. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions?

The company commits to reducing greenhouse gas emission intensity by 10% from a 2023 baseline of 150 kgCO?e/ton by 2030. However, it is unclear whether this target includes both Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.

103. GHG emissions?

The company reports a GHG emissions intensity of 153.21 kgCO?e/ton in 2023. However, it is unclear if this figure applies specifically to its natural rubber operations.

104. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports to have not planted new rubber plantations since January 2015.

105. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?

106. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions?

The company reports an increase in GHG emissions intensity, rising from 141.36 kgCO?e/ton in 2022 to 153.21 kgCO?e/ton in 2023. It is also unclear if these figures apply specifically to the natural rubber operations.

107. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

108. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

The company commits to reduce water intensity by 10% by the year 2030.

109. Water use intensity?

25.57 - The company reports a water consumption intensity of 25.57 m³/ton for 2023.

110. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

The company reports a reduction in water consumption intensity, decreasing from 29.16 m³/ton in 2022 to 25.57 m³/ton in 2023.

111. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?

The company commits to reducing COD by 25% below the regulatory threshold by 2030.

112. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?

The company reports a reduction in average BOD and COD levels, with BOD decreasing from 60.38 in 2022 to 33.28 in 2023, and COD decreasing from 20.85 in 2022 to 13.09 in 2023. However, it is unclear if these figures apply specifically to the natural rubber operations.

113. Treatment of effluents from processing facilities?

The company reports that it has installed a Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) at all its factories, utilising activated sludge technology to break down organic materials in wastewater through aerobic bacteria. This process also removes complex organic compounds, such as colour and odour, as well as chemical elements that could harm soil and water.

114. Treatment of effluents from manufacturing facilities?

This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.

115. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

The company only commits to supporting the use of buffer zones. However, a clear commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones is not reported.

116. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC.

117. Reducing odours from natural rubber processing or manufacuring facilities?

The company reports that it undertakes periodic measurements every six months, in collaboration with an accredited third-party laboratory, to ensure that air emissions (odour) do not exceed the thresholds mandated by government regulations. In addition, it carries out certain activities such as planting trees and spraying deorub to help minimise odour emissions from its factories.

118. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

The company commits to minimise the use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides.

119. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to minimise the use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides.

120. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

121. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

122. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

The company commits to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.

123. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.

124. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

The company commits to not use Stockholm and Rotterdam Convention chemicals.

125. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to not use Stockholm and Rotterdam Convention chemicals.

126. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

The company provides a list of chemicals used in its plantation areas for 2023.

127. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?

Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC.

128. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percentage of company landbank certified by FSC. The company also commits to promoting the use of biological pest management in its own reporting. However, it does not provide details on how this has been implemented.

129. Commitment to human rights?

The company makes this commitment through the the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0) and the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership and alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company's own reporting also mentions its commitment to the UN Guiding Principles on Human Rights.

130. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights.

131. Progress on human rights commitment?

132. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights?

The company makes this commitment through the the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0) and the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership and alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company's own reporting references the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

133. Commitment to Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

The company commits suppliers to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

134. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company's own reporting only states its commitment to respect customary rights.

135. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to respect legal and customary land tenure rights.

136. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits to FPIC in its own reporting.

137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to respect FPIC.

138. Details on Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

The company has disclosed an FPIC process but it is limited in detail.

139. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria.

140. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

The company reports a basic land conflict resolution process.

141. Supports the inclusion of women across natural rubber operations, including addressing barriers faced?

142. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits to mitigate impacts on food security in its own reporting.

143. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

144. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits to providing essential services and facilities to local communities in its own reporting.

145. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC. The company reports its efforts to provide essential community services and facilities, including running a scholarship program for students from low-income households, renovating and managing local places of worship, and supplying public handwashing facilities, personal protective equipment, masks, and vitamins to the community.

146. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

The company commits to provide work opportunities for local communities.

147. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

The company makes this commitment through the the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0) and the GPSNR Policy Framework. Both policies do not reference the 2022 amendments to the ILO Conventions, therefore partial points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC certification/membership and alignment with GPSNR Policy Components. The company's own reporting only mentions a commitment to eight Fundamental ILO Conventions.

148. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to eight Fundamental ILO Conventions only.

149. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

Comprehensive, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC FM certification (FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2) as the requirements fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. Additional points have been awarded according to the percent of company landbank certified by FSC. The company also reports it makes provisions for minimum wages, holiday allowances, overtime, social security, health insurance, and maintaining a comfortable work environment. However, the information is between two and five years old.

150. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

The company commits to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.

151. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.

152. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

153. Reports gender balance of employees?

411 (9.76%) - The company reports that it has 411 (9.76%) temporary employees in 2023.

154. Percentage or number of women employees?

9% - The company reports that out of the total employees in 2022, 9% of its employees were female. As data is between two and five years old only partial points can be awarded.

155. Commitment to pay a living wage?

The company commits to pay the living wage to all workers.

156. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to pay the living wage to all workers.

157. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?

The company reports the salaries of new employees at each location in comparison to the regional minimum wage, demonstrating that it provides at least the minimum wage to its employees across all locations.

158. Reporting of salary by gender?

The company states its basic renumeration is 1:1 for male and female employees. However, disclosure does not split by category or location.

159. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.

160. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to address health and safety at work for all workers.

161. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

[Externally verified] Limited, externally verified points have been awarded on the basis of the company's FSC Chain of Custody certification (FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1) as the requirements do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also reports that it provides personal protective equipment to all workers, however, information about related training is not available.

162. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

2.53 - The company reports a frequency rate of 2.53 in 2023.

163. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

0 - The company reports that it recorded zero fatalities in 2023.

164. Commitment to support smallholders?

The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits to supporting smallholders in its own reporting.

165. Percentage of supply from smallholders?

The company reports that as of 2023, 43.7% of its raw material supply comes directly from smallholder groups.

166. Programme to support scheme smallholders/outgrowers?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from scheme/outgrower smallholder suppliers.

167. Percentage of scheme smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not source from scheme/outgrower smallholder suppliers.

168. Programme to support independent smallholders?

The company supports independent smallholders through its 'Smallholders Partnership Program', which focuses on improving livelihoods and creating a more efficient supply chain. Additionally, the company provides training in good agricultural and management practices to help smallholders enhance the quality of their rubber products and boost long-term productivity.

169. Percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?

8366 - The company reports that, in 2023, it supported 1,410 smallholders through the 'Smallholders Partnership Program' and provided training on good agricultural and management practices to 6,956 smallholders.

170. Process used to engage smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

The company uses Rubberway questionnaires and surveys to engage smallholder suppliers on compliance with the company's policies.

171. Number or percentage of smallholder suppliers engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

[Externally verified] 5110 - The company reports it interviewed 5,110 smallholders through the rubberway questionnaires in 2022. Evidence is externally verified by Rubberway. However, this figure does not cover all smallholders of the company.

172. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

173. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

The company reports that 22% of External Industrial Plantation and 7% of Trader network suppliers have signed the code of conduct.

174. Suspension or exclusion criteria for non-smallholder suppliers?

The company makes this commitment through the FSC Chain of Custody Certification Standard (FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1). Partial points have been awarded as the requirements do not full meet the SPOTT scoring criteria. The company also reports that suppliers are required to accept that any violation of the supplier code of ethics may lead to the termination of business relationships. However, the steps taken prior to termination are not disclosed.

175. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with natural rubber sourcing commitments?

The company has a timebound commitment to have 100% of suppliers comply with the Sustainable Natural Rubber Policy and the Supplier Code of Ethics by 2030. However, no KPIs/Milestones or detail on how this commitment will be actioned has been disclosed.

176. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF)?

177. Percentage of supply coming from agroforestry?

178. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

The company commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

179. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

The company commits all suppliers to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

180. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

The company reports that it provides training on its code of conduct, covering topics such as preventing corruption, conflicts of interest, and fraud. However, detailed information is limited.

181. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

182. Whistleblowing procedure?

The company has implemented a whistleblowing system that clearly outlines the steps for reporting unethical conduct and provides protections for whistleblowers.

183. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

The company uses its whistleblowing system as a grievance system which is open to all internal and external stakeholders.

184. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

The company has provided detailed information on the number and status of complaints received in 2023.