Bakrie Sumatera Plantations Tbk PT
Natural rubber assessment- Latest update: March 2024
- Next scheduled: March 2025
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the natural rubber supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Parent company:Bakrie & Brothers Tbk PT
-
Landbank18,813 hectares
-
Market cap:17,692,863 USD
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:UNSP.JK
-
Bloomberg ticker:UNSP IJ Equity
-
Activities:Natural rubber cultivation and processing
-
Locations:Indonesia (Sumatra, Bengkulu, Lampung)
-
Headquarters:Indonesia
-
Related companies:The company is assessed on SPOTT Palm Oil Bakrie Sumatera Plantations Tbk PT.
-
Parent website:
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Bakrie Sumatera Plantations Tbk PT – March 2024
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 15.5 / 30 51.7%
- Policy: 11 / 43 25.6%
- Practice: 7 / 49 14.3%
- Self-reported: 7 / 49 14.3%
- External: 0 / 49 0%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership4.5 / 10 45%
- Organisation: 4.5 / 6 75%
- Policy: 0 / 1 0%
- Practice: 0 / 3 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
-
0 / 1
1. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment for all its operations?
-
2. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
QHSE & Sustainability Department Head.
-
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
The company reports that its Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners periodically supervise and evaluate the company's sustainability performance.
-
5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?
8.62% - The company reports that a total of 58 employees occupied positions at the senior management level in 2022, consisting of 53 male employees and 5 female employees.
-
6. Percentage or number of women board members?
0% - The company does not directly report the gender balance of the Board of Directors, only profiles are available. As per the profiles, all members of the board of directors are male.
-
0 / 1
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?
-
0 / 1
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company's latest sustainability report was published in 2023, covering the year 2022.
-
0 / 1
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
-
0 / 1
11. Climate risks assessment available?
-
Landbank, maps and traceability5.5 / 12 45.8%
- Organisation: 5.5 / 11 50%
- Policy: 0 / 0 0%
- Practice: 0 / 1 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 1 0%
- External: 0 / 1 0%
-
12. Lists countries and operations?
Plantations and processing (Indonesia).
-
13. Lists countries sourcing from?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
14. Total land area managed/controlled for natural rubber (ha)?
18813 - The figure represents planted, plantable, and unplantable natural rubber areas as of Q4 2022.
-
15. Total natural rubber planted area (ha)?
15399 - Data as of 2022. The figure excludes scheme smallholder areas.
-
16. Scheme smallholders/outgrowers planted area (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
17. Unplanted area (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?
1068 - Figures as of Q4 2022.
-
18. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
3 - The company reports a total conservation area of 63 ha and a total HCV area of 3,303 ha. However, it is unclear if these figures are reported in relation to the natural rubber operations of the company.
-
0 / 1
19. Maps of estates/management units?
-
0 / 1
20. Management plans for natural rubber production are available for all estates/management units?
-
0 / 1
21. Monitoring of management plan implementation available for all estates/management units?
-
22. Maps of all scheme/outgrower smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
23. Maps of all third-party supplying industrial estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
24. List of jurisdictions where sourcing from smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
25. Number of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?
The company reports it operates three natural rubber processing factories.
-
26. Maps of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?
The company reports the names of two subsidiaries that manage processing facilities, however, no addresses are disclosed for the subsidiaries and it is not clear where the three processing facilities are located.
-
0 / 1
27. Number (or percentage) of company-owned processing facilities that source from company-owned operations and third parties?
-
0 / 1
28. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned processing facilities that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
-
(NEW: not scored this year)
29. Number of company owned natural rubber manufacturing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.
-
(NEW: not scored this year)
30. Maps of manufacturing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.
-
31. Number of third party supplying processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
32. Maps of all third party supplying processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
33. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying processing facilities that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
34. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying processing facilities that come from the supplying facilities' own operations and third parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
35. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for manufacturing that comes from intermediary traders rather than directly from processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.
-
36. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to processing facility level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
37. Percentage of supply traceable to processing facility level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
38. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to industrial plantation level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
39. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
40. Percentage of supply from third-party processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
41. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to jurisdictional level for smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
42. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to smallholder at jurisdictional level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
43. Percentage of supply from third party processing facilities traceable to smallholders at jurisdictional level?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives0 / 7 0%
- Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
- Policy: 0 / 2 0%
- Practice: 0 / 4 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
- External: 0 / 4 0%
-
0 / 1
44. Member of the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR)?
-
0 / 1
45. Submitted self-declaration form for the Sustainable Natural Rubber Initiative (SNR-i)?
-
0 / 1
46. Percentage area (ha) FSC certified?
-
0 / 1
47. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC FM certification of estates/management units?
-
48. Percentage of scheme/outgrower smallholders (ha) FSC-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
49. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC certification of scheme/outgrower smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
50. Percentage of natural rubber supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party natural rubber suppliers that is FSC-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
51. Percentage of all natural rubber products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is FSC-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
52. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?
-
53. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?
The company has ISO 14001 certification for one of its operations (Sumut 1) which has natural rubber operations besides palm oil. However, the certificate expired in April 2023.
-
0 / 1
54. Commitment to become 100% certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?
-
Deforestation and biodiversity0.75 / 15 5%
- Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
- Policy: 0 / 7 0%
- Practice: 0.8 / 7 10.7%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 7 10.7%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
-
0 / 1
55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
-
56. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
57. Commitment to zero deforestation?
-
58. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
-
60. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
61. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
-
62. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
63. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
-
64. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
65. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?
-
66. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
67. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
-
0 / 1
68. Biodiversity policy?
-
69. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
70. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
The company has identified species of conservation concern, referencing the IUCN Red List. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
0 / 2
71. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
-
0 / 1
72. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
-
73. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
74. Commitment to protect areas from illegal activities?
-
75. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 2
76. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments1 / 6 16.7%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 1 / 3 33.3%
- Practice: 0 / 3 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
-
77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
The company commits to conduct HCV assessments.
-
78. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
79. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports to have not planted new rubber plantations since April 2019.
-
80. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports to have not planted new rubber plantations since April 2019.
-
0 / 1
81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
-
82. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
83. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
-
0 / 1
84. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
-
0 / 1
85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
-
86. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
87. Social and environmental impact assessment (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions4.25 / 17 25%
- Organisation: 1.5 / 4 37.5%
- Policy: 1.5 / 6 25%
- Practice: 1.3 / 7 17.9%
- Self-reported: 1.3 / 7 17.9%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
-
88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
The company commits to no development on peat that is more than 3 m deep. However, a clear commitment to no planting on peat of any depth is not reported by the company.
-
89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
90. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
-
0 / 1
91. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
0 / 1
92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
-
93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 2
94. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
-
0 / 1
95. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices?
-
96. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
97. Evidence of best/sustainable tapping practices?
-
98. Commitment to zero burning?
The company commits to zero burning.
-
99. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0.75 / 2
100. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
The company reports it has developed field fire prevention and handling systems. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
1 / 1
101. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates/management units?
The company reports until the end of 2022, there were no land fires occurring in the company's operational areas.
-
102. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations/jurisdictions?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
103. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions?
-
104. GHG emissions?
The company reports the GHG emissions (Scope 1) for its rubber plants as 1.945,91 tons CO2eq. However, the figures reported do not include Scope 2 emissions.
-
0 / 1
105. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?
-
(NEW: not scored this year)
106. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
107. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions?
The company reports the GHG emissions (Scope 1) for its rubber plants, however, the emissions have increased in 2022 (1.945,91 tons CO2eq) as compared to 2021 (1.079,96 tons CO2eq). Also, the figures reported do not include Scope 2 emissions.
-
0 / 1
108. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
-
Water, chemical and pest management4.25 / 19 22.4%
- Organisation: 0.5 / 2 25%
- Policy: 1 / 7 14.3%
- Practice: 2.8 / 10 27.5%
- Self-reported: 2.8 / 10 27.5%
- External: 0 / 10 0%
-
0 / 1
109. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
-
110. Water use intensity?
12.52 - The company reports the water use intensity as 12.52 m3/tons in 2022. However, the figures reported are not specific to the company's natural rubber operations.
-
111. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
The company reports water use intensity increased from 10.56 m3/tons in 2021 to 12.52 m3/tons in 2022. Also, the figures reported are not specific to the company's natural rubber operations.
-
112. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?
The company's BOD and COD levels are within legal limits as of 2022.
-
0.75 / 1
113. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?
The company's BOD (27.88) and COD (94.64) levels are within legal limits (BOD- 60 mg/L and COD- 200 mg/L) as of 2022. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
114. Treatment of effluents from processing facilities?
The company states it treats effluents from natural rubber processing facilities via treatment ponds. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
115. Treatment of effluents from manufacturing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate manufacturing facilities.
-
0 / 1
116. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
-
0 / 2
117. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
-
0 / 1
118. Reducing odours from natural rubber processing or manufacuring facilities?
-
0 / 1
119. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
-
120. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
121. Commitment to no use of paraquat?
-
122. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
123. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
-
124. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
125. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
-
126. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
127. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
-
0 / 2
128. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?
-
129. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
The company reports that in order to reduce the use of paraquat and pesticides, it controls plantation pests naturally/biologically. The biological control utilises Turnera ulmifolia and Turnera subulate as hosts for all caterpillar pest predators (Setothosea asigna), and captive owls (Tytoalba) as predators for rat pests. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
Community, land and labour rights11.25 / 30 37.5%
- Organisation: 3.5 / 5 70%
- Policy: 5.5 / 13 42.3%
- Practice: 2.3 / 12 18.8%
- Self-reported: 2.3 / 12 18.8%
- External: 0 / 12 0%
-
130. Commitment to human rights?
The company commits to respect human rights but does not refer to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
-
131. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
132. Progress on human rights commitment?
-
0 / 1
133. Commitment to respect Indigenous and local communities' rights?
-
134. Commitment to Indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
-
136. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
The company commits to respecting FPIC.
-
138. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
139. Details on Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
-
140. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
The company reports only limited examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts, which includes supporting government policies related to the provision of land for the community in the areas close to the plantations through partnership programs and other empowerment programs.
-
0 / 1
141. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
-
0 / 1
142. Supports the inclusion of women across natural rubber operations, including addressing barriers faced?
-
0 / 1
143. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
-
0 / 1
144. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
-
145. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
The company commits to provide essential community services and facilities.
-
146. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
The company reports it has a flagship program called the PERKASA Program for the empowerment of communities through which it provides services and facilities in the fields of education, health, economy, etc. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
147. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
The company reports providing work opportunities for local communities.
-
0 / 1
148. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
-
149. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 2
150. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
-
151. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company reports providing equal opportunities to every employee in a transparent manner that is free from discrimination and harassment. However, a clear commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regard to employment is not reported.
-
152. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
153. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
-
154. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
The figure represents day workers (BHL) as of 2022. However, contradictory information is reported on the total non-staff workers in the company's sustainability and annual report.
-
155. Percentage or number of women employees?
The company reports the number of women employees in 2022 as 405 in its sustainability report and 708 in its annual report. Contradictory figures are reported for the same time period.
-
156. Commitment to pay a living wage?
The company only commits to paying minimum wage to its employees.
-
157. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
158. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
The company only provides information on the Basic Salary at the Lowest level (IDR) paid to its employees against the Provincial Minimum Wage (UMP) standards, which is 100%.
-
159. Reporting of salary by gender?
The company reports that its male and female employees have the same normative rights and the remuneration provided by the company is in accordance with the applicable provisions and regulations concerning the Provincial Minimum Wage (UMP) standards in significant locations of the company operations. However, this information is not split for each employee category.
-
160. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.
-
161. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
162. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
The company only reports providing personal protective equipment during the harvesting of rubber latex. The company has not reported information on the provision of related training.
-
163. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
The company reports the frequency rate as 7.09 in 2022 for its rubber operations.
-
164. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
The company reports zero fatalities in 2022 in its rubber operations.
-
Smallholders and suppliers0 / 0 0%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 0 / 0 0%
- Practice: 0 / 0 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 0 0%
- External: 0 / 0 0%
-
165. Commitment to support smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
166. Percentage of supply from smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
167. Programme to support scheme smallholders/outgrowers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
168. Percentage of scheme smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
169. Programme to support independent smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
170. Percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
171. Process used to engage smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
172. Number or percentage of smallholder suppliers engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
173. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
174. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
175. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers. .
-
176. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with natural rubber sourcing commitments?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
(NEW: not scored this year)
177. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF)?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
178. Percentage of supply coming from agroforestry?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
Governance and grievances2 / 6 33.3%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2 / 4 50%
- Practice: 0 / 2 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
-
179. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.
-
180. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it does not have any suppliers, including smallholder suppliers.
-
0 / 1
181. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
-
0 / 1
182. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
-
183. Whistleblowing procedure?
The company reports it has a 'Violations Reporting and Handling System' in place for whistleblowing and states it protects whistleblowers. However, the details of the procedure are not available.
-
184. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company has a grievance system that is open to all stakeholders. However, the details of the system are not reported by the company.
-
0 / 1
185. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
Media monitor: Bakrie Sumatera Plantations Tbk PT
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
March 2024
Disnakertrans Minta PT Air Muring dan SPSI Tampung Keluhan Karyawan dan Sampaikan Laporan Jika Dirugikan (Disnakertrans Asks PT Air Muring and SPSI to Accommodate Employee Complaints and Submit Reports If Harmed)
October 2020
Tuntut Haknya, Ratusan Karyawan Bakrie Gelar Demonstrasi (Demanding Their Rights, Hundreds of Bakrie Employees Hold Demonstrations)
April 2019
Warga Kecamatan Merdeka dan Desa Gongsol Minta Tanah Ulayat Mereka Dikembalikan (Residents of Merdeka Subdistrict and Gongsol Village Ask for Their Land to be Returned)
April 2019
Perjuangkan Tanah Leluhur, Warga Dua Desa Duduki Aset PT Bakrie Sumatera Plantations (Fighting for Ancestral Land, Residents of Two Villages Seize Assets of PT Bakrie Sumatera Plantations)
March 2019
Diduga Salahi Prosedur, WTR Asahan Tempuh Jalur Hukum (Allegedly Wrong Procedure, WTR Asahan Travel Legal Path)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
Media monitor: Bakrie Sumatera Plantations Tbk PT
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.
Download as CSV