Skip to content
Menu Search

TSH Resources Bhd

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: October 2019
  • Next scheduled: October 2020

Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores
  • About this company:

    Established in 1986, TSH Resources is engaged in

  • Landbank (oil palm)
    121,088 hectares
  • Palm cultivation revenue:
    85%
  • Market cap:
    296,613,061 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    TSHR.KL
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    TSH MK
  • ISIN:
    MYL9059OO006
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:

Company assessment: TSH Resources Bhd – October 2019

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 33.1% 62.58 / 189
  • Organisation: 16 / 38 42.1%
  • Policy: 22 / 79 27.8%
  • Practice: 24.6 / 72 34.1%
  • Self-reported: 4 / 72 5.6%
  • External: 6.3 / 72 8.7%
  • Certified: 14.3 / 72 19.9%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    4 / 11 36.4%
    • Organisation: 3 / 6 50%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company only outlines its approach to sustainability. In addition, it lists "Policy Statements" covering various environmental and sustainability issues but these are not publicly available

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Head of Sustainability Department

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      2 (20%)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company works with local and international NGOs and the Sabah Forestry Department on sustainable management of the forests surrounding its estates. However, this is not clearly focused on reducing negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company has a sustainability statement within its Annual Report 2018

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    7.5 / 25 30%
    • Organisation: 7.5 / 17 44.1%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      121,088

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      42,056

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      4,370

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      57,467

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      17,195 - Sum of HCV areas and other conservation areas reported in the 2018 RSPO ACOP. This has decreased from a previously reported figure of 24,190 ha

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company uploaded its estate location concession maps with its ACOP 2018 and declared that the map data submission represented 100% of its concession sites (both RSPO certified and uncertified)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      20. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      21. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      22. Number of company-owned mills?

      7

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      23. Names and coordinates of company-owned mills?

      One of the company's mills is available on GFW

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      25. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      26. Number of supplier mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      28. Number (or percentage) of third-party supplier mills that source from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      29. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplier mills that come from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • 30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it is not a refiner

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level?

    • 36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it is not a refiner

    • 37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own crushing facilities

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    3.2 / 18 17.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 9 0%
    • Practice: 3.2 / 7 45.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 1 / 7 14.3%
    • Certified: 2.2 / 7 31.4%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      38. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      39. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      40. Criteria for defining deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      41. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      46. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

      The company only states it has put in place practices to mitigate its impact on biodiversity

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      48. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      49. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      50. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      51. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    2.5 / 10 25%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 8 31.3%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      53. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • 56. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it has not undertaken any new planting since January 2015

    • 57. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it has not undertaken any new planting since January 2015

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      58. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company does not have an explicit commitment itself, but commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • 60. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it has not undertaken any new planting since January 2015

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      61. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company does not have an explicit commitment itself, but commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • 63. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it has not undertaken any new planting since January 2016

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      64. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      Company states it conducts EIAs prior to any new development, and mentions SIAs, but does not clearly state that both SIAs and EIAs are conducted prior to new planting

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      66. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

      The company states that it has conducted EIAs for all its Indonesian plantations and Sabah estates that were established after September 1999, but no publicly available reports could be found

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    6.6 / 20 33%
    • Organisation: 1.5 / 5 30%
    • Policy: 2 / 8 25%
    • Practice: 3.1 / 7 44.3%
    • Self-reported: 2 / 7 28.6%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1.1 / 7 15.7%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      67. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company does not have an explicit commitment itself, but commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      68. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      69. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. Landbank or planted area on peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      72. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      73. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      74. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company has a zero burning policy for all its operations but it is unclear if this applies to all new development

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      75. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      76. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company mentions fire patrols and fire fighting equipment

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      77. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      79. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      80. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      PalmGHG

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      81. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports an improvement in GHG emissions, from 7.92 tCO2/ha and 4.96 tCO2/tCPO in 2017 to 3.4 tCO2/ha and 0.97 tCO2/tCPO in 2018

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      82. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

      Some of the company's mills are equipped with methane/biogas capture, but it is unclear how many

    • Y
      1 / 1

      83. GHG emissions intensity?

      3.4 - 3.4 tCO2/ha and 0.97 tCO2/tCPO

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      84. GHG emissions from land use change?

      The company has submitted a Palm GHG report that includes emissions from land use change but that does not cover the whole scope of the company's operations

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    8.3 / 22 37.7%
    • Organisation: 1 / 2 50%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 11 22.7%
    • Practice: 4.8 / 9 53.3%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 9 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 3.3 / 9 36.7%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      85. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      86. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company reports an improvement in water use intensity, from 1.18 m3 per mT of FFB produced in 2017 to 1.16 m3 per mT of FFB produced in 2018

    • Y
      1 / 1

      87. Water use intensity?

      1.16 - m3 per mT of FFB produced (2018)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      88. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      90. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and/or palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      91. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      92. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      93. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company only commits to minimise the use of pesticides

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      95. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      96. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      97. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      98. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      99. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      100. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      101. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      102. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      103. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume. In addition, the company states that it has adopted an integrated pest management programme

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    16.1 / 45 35.8%
    • Organisation: 1 / 4 25%
    • Policy: 8.5 / 25 34%
    • Practice: 6.6 / 16 41.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 16 0%
    • External: 0 / 16 0%
    • Certified: 6.6 / 16 41.3%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      104. Commitment to human rights?

      The company commits to human rights, but does not reference the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      105. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to human rights throughout its supply chain, but does not reference the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      106. Progress on human rights commitment?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      107. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      109. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      The company provides a document on conflict resolution that includes issues related to land in its 2015 ACOP but no updated version is available

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      110. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      111. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      112. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      113. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      The company does not have an explicit commitment itself, but commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      114. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      115. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain guidance and requirements on the process to conduct free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's commitments under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      116. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      117. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      118. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      119. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      120. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      121. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      122. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      123. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      The company states that it respects labour regulations but does not specify whether all employees are included

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      124. Commitment to respect all workers' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment to respect labour regulations applies to scheme smallholders only

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      125. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      126. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company commits to six of the eight Fundamental ILO Conventions: it does not mention Minimum Age and Equal Remuneration

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to fewer than four of the eight fundamental ILO conventions for its suppliers (No Forced Labour and no Child Labour)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      129. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation applies to all suppliers?

    • 130. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not have any temporary employees

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Percentage or number of women employees?

      2,392 (28.92%)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      132. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      133. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      134. Progress on commitment to pay minimum wage?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      135. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      136. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      137. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      138. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      139. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      140. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      141. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      142. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume. In addition, the company mentions training and protective clothing for workers who handle pesticides

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    9.28 / 16 58%
    • Organisation: 2 / 2 100%
    • Policy: 3 / 3 100%
    • Practice: 4.3 / 11 38.9%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 11 0%
    • External: 4.3 / 11 38.9%
    • Certified: 0 / 11 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      143. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      2,014

    • Y
      1 / 1

      144. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010 for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      2016

    • Y
      1 / 1

      145. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      146. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      Indonesia (West Sumatra, Central Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, North Kalimantan), Malaysia (Sabah)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      147. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within five years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      2021

    • P
      0.1 / 1

      148. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

      11,780 (10%)

    • N
      0 / 1

      149. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • P
      0.43 / 1

      150. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      3 (42.86%)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      151. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/ associated smallholders and outgrowers within five years or target already achieved?

      2023

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/ outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

      0 - The company reports in its latest ACOP that 0 tonnes of FFB supplied by independent third-party suppliers is RSPO certified

    • Y
      1 / 1

      153. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

      2021

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      154. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/ processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      155. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

      Mass Balance

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      156. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      [Externally verified] Some of the company's operations are ISPO certified

    • Y
      1 / 1

      157. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      158. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB, etc.)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    2 / 14 14.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Practice: 1 / 8 12.5%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 1 / 8 12.5%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      159. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company mentions its objective to assist scheme smallholders through services as part of the Plasma Scheme, and provides details on its role within the scheme. However, this doesn't constitute a clear commitment to support smallholders

    • Y
      1 / 1

      160. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume. In addition, the company states that it supports plasma smallholders through providing advice, seed stock, financial support, fertilisers and pesticides

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      161. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

    • 162. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not source from independent smallholders or outgrowers

    • 163. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not source from independent smallholders or outgrowers

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      164. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company only states that it performs audits on its suppliers' compliance with local environmental regulations

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      165. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      166. Time-bound plan to engage with all high-risk mills within three years?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      167. Programme to support high-risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      168. Regularly engages with a subset of high-risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      169. Procedures in place to assess all own and third-party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      170. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      171. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    3.1 / 8 38.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 5 40%
    • Practice: 1.1 / 3 36.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 1.1 / 3 36.7%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.1 / 1

      177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      179. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has a whistleblowing procedure but no details are given on the steps taken and on how whistleblowers are protected

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company allows for grievances to be reported but no details are given on the steps taken

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: TSH Resources Bhd

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: TSH Resources Bhd

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 181 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)