Skip to content
Menu Search
  • Latest update: October 2019
  • Next scheduled: October 2020

Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores

Company assessment: SIFCA Group – October 2019

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 13.6% 26.75 / 197
  • Organisation: 6.5 / 40 16.3%
  • Policy: 11.5 / 79 14.6%
  • Practice: 8.8 / 78 11.2%
  • Self-reported: 7.8 / 78 9.9%
  • External: 1 / 78 1.3%
  • Certified: 0 / 78 0%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    3 / 11 27.3%
    • Organisation: 1.5 / 6 25%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company published a sustainability policy which applies to all operations and subsidiaries

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 (14%) - The company's board counts one woman, figure was not reported directly

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company had a partnership with a national institution to train young people and rural women in agro pastoral practices

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      Sustainability report 2017

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    3 / 28 10.7%
    • Organisation: 3 / 18 16.7%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 8 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      The company only specifies the number of hectares planted and mature – it is unclear whether the company is excluding unplanted areas

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      194,004

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      153,489

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      543.46 - As stated in 2018 annual report for Palmci and MOPP (palm oil subsidiaries only)

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

      A static map is available on the website but is undated

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      20. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      21. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      22. Number of company-owned mills?

      At least 10 mills for Palmci, this may not cover the company's known scope of operations

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      23. Names and coordinates of company-owned mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      25. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      26. Number of supplier mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      28. Number (or percentage) of third-party supplier mills that source from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      29. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplier mills that come from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    3 / 18 16.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 9 27.8%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      38. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company has a zero deforestation commitment

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      39. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      40. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      HCV, HCS. No cut-off date given

    • N
      0 / 2

      41. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      The company only reports forest monitoring in the context of the activities of its corporate foundation with SODEFOR, rather than in the context of its own operations

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      46. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      47. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

      The company has a commitment to biodiversity conservation

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      48. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      49. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      50. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company only mentions the reforestation of an area controlled by subsidiary Palmci

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      51. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    3 / 14 21.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 8 18.8%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 6 25%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • External: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      53. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company states that it identifies, maintains and protects HCS and HCV areas

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      56. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

      One HCV assessment availalble for BOPP in Ghana. New planting procedure for this was submitted to the RSPO by Wilmar. Unclear whether other assessments should be available

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      57. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      58. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      60. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

      The only assessment on the HCVRN website (BOPP) was deemed satisfactory

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      61. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company states that it identifies, maintains and protects HCS areas but does not refer to the HCS Approach specifically

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      63. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      64. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      66. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    0.5 / 20 2.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 8 0%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      67. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      68. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      69. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      70. Landbank or planted area on peat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      71. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      72. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      73. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company reports several best management practices for soil, but not for peat and the data is more than two years old

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      74. Commitment to zero burning?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      75. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      76. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company has only been providing training in firefighting in a refinery

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      77. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

      The company only has a vague commitment to reduce GHG emissions

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      80. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      82. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      83. GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      84. GHG emissions from land use change?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    0.5 / 22 2.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 11 0%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 9 5.6%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 9 5.6%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      The company only has a vague commitment to reduce water use

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company only mentions that the reusing of water has gone up

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      87. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      88. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      90. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and/or palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      The company only mentions ponds (lagoons) in relation to wastewater, does not refer to POME or PORE

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      91. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      92. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      93. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      95. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      96. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      97. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      98. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      99. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      100. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      101. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      102. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      103. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    11.25 / 46 24.5%
    • Organisation: 2 / 5 40%
    • Policy: 5.5 / 25 22%
    • Practice: 3.8 / 16 23.4%
    • Self-reported: 3.8 / 16 23.4%
    • External: 0 / 16 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 16 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      104. Commitment to human rights?

      The company has a commitment to respect human rights but does not refer to UN Declaration or Ruggie guiding principles

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      105. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment applies to all group subsidiaries but it is not clear whether it applies to suppliers

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      106. Progress on human rights commitment?

      The company distributed a code of conduct to all subsidiairies and set up ethics commitees in each of them. No extra detail regarding contents or activities

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      107. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      109. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      110. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      111. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      112. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company states that it seeks to prevent conflict "through a platform called Permanent Framework for Dialogue with Communities (CPD). The permanent framework of dialogue aims to structure and consolidate the relationship between the Integrated Agricultural Units (UAI) of subsidiaries and neighboring communities."

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      113. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      114. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      115. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      116. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

      The company does not have a commitment but has set up a number of empowerment projects for women through its foundation: "These projects aim to strengthen financial inclusion rural women, by creating and / or supporting their income generating activities"

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      117. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced, applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      118. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company has a commitment to food security, which is supported by the activities of its foundation

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      119. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

      Scope of commitment is unclear

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      120. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company provides subsidised meals, agricultural training, funding for canteens

    • Y
      1 / 1

      121. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company has a commitment to provide essential community services, adopting "a strong and continuous dialogue with local communities and deploy actions to improve their health, education and income" (reporting of actions carried out through its foundation specifically mention its objective to provide basic services)

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      122. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company has built schools, canteens, hospitals, water pumps

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      123. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      The company mentions that it is commited to respecting all workers' rights but the scope is not defined

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      124. Commitment to respect all workers' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      125. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      The company organises regular meetings with representatives and set up a social barometer to monitor employee well being

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      126. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company mentions that it is commited to respecting rights in accordance to ILO principles and refers to specific conventions but does not commit to respecting all core conventions

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

      Scope of commitment is unclear

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

      The company has a commitment to not discriminate on the basis of gender with regards to fairly paid jobs and opportunities. Some of the subsidiaries also report activities to prevent gender based discrimination in the workplace

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      129. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      16,168 (48.5%) - The company reports having 33,346 employees including 17,178 permanent staff

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      131. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      132. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      133. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      134. Progress on commitment to pay minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      135. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      136. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company has a commitment to occupational health and safety

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      137. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      138. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company reports an accident frequency rate which went up from 2017 to 2018

    • Y
      1 / 1

      139. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company reported a reduction in its accident gravity rate of 0.38 (lost days x 1000/hours worked) which went down from 2017 to 2018

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      140. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      141. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      142. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company only reports that it provides PPE but not training

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    0 / 14 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 3 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 9 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 9 0%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      143. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      144. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010 for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      145. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      146. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      147. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within five years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      148. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      149. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      150. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      151. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/ associated smallholders and outgrowers within five years or target already achieved?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      152. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/ outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      153. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      154. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/ processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      155. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • 156. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Indonesia

    • 157. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      158. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB, etc.)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    2.5 / 16 15.6%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 10 15%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 10 15%
    • External: 0 / 10 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      159. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      160. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      161. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      162. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

      The company supports independant smallholders ("private smallholders")

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      163. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      120,000 - The company report it supports 120,000 "private outgrowers"

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      164. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      165. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      166. Time-bound plan to engage with all high-risk mills within three years?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      167. Programme to support high-risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      168. Regularly engages with a subset of high-risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      169. Procedures in place to assess all own and third-party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      170. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      171. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    0 / 8 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 5 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 3 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      179. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: SIFCA Group

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: SIFCA Group

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 181 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)