Skip to content
Menu Search
  • Latest update: November 2021
  • Next scheduled: November 2022

Show media reports (2) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting

Company assessment: SIFCA Group – November 2021

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 16.5% 31.25 / 189
  • Organisation: 4.5 / 39 11.5%
  • Policy: 18 / 76 23.7%
  • Practice: 8.8 / 74 11.8%
  • Self-reported: 7.3 / 74 9.8%
  • External: 0 / 74 0%
  • Certified: 1.5 / 74 2%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    3 / 11 27.3%
    • Organisation: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • Policy: 2 / 2 100%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company states that its Sustainability Policy covers all its operations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company states that its Sustainability Policy covers all its suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 - The company has one woman as its board member. Partial point awarded since gender balance is not directly reported by the company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company has collaborated with civil authorities to reduce negative social outcomes, however this information is between two and five years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    3 / 27 11.1%
    • Organisation: 3 / 17 17.7%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 8 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      The company only specifies the number of hectares planted and mature ? it is unclear whether the company is excluding unplanted areas.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      197,791 - The company reports the total area planted with oil palm, including both estates and smallholder areas as 197,791 ha.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      157,496 - The company reports its outgrowers planted areas as 157,496 ha.

    • N
      0 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      18. Maps of estates/management units?

      A static map is available on the website but is undated.

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      20. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      21. Number of company-owned mills?

      23 - The company owns 23 mills, out of this its subsidiary PAMCI owns 10 mills.

    • N
      0 / 1

      22. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and/or third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and/or third-parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      25. Number of third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      26. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      27. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and/or third party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      28. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      29. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      30. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      31. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      33. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      34. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      35. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      36. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    0 / 15 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 3 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 10 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 10 0%
    • External: 0 / 10 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      37. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • N
      0 / 1

      39. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      41. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      44. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Sells RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • N
      0 / 1

      50. Processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • 51. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 52. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      53. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    2 / 18 11.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 10 15%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      55. Commitment to zero deforestation?

      The company specifies a commitment to zero deforestation.

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      57. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation?

      The company only specifies the criteria/types of areas that are not to be deforested. No cut-off date found.

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Evidence of monitoring deforestation in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      63. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      65. Biodiversity policy?

    • N
      0 / 1

      66. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      67. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      68. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company only mentions one example of species, also data between two and five years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    2 / 15 13.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 8 25%
    • Practice: 0 / 7 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      71. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company is committed to conducting High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments.

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      74. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      77. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      79. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company states that it identifies, maintains and protects HCS areas but does not refer to the HCS Approach specifically but another high carbon stock assessment.

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      83. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company reports a commitment to conduct SEIAs in the case of "new acquisitions". As this does not cover all operations, only partial points can be awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    1.5 / 20 7.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 8 6.3%
    • Practice: 1 / 7 14.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1 / 7 14.3%
    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      89. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      90. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company only commits to best management practices for soils.

    • N
      0 / 1

      91. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      92. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company reports several best management practices for soil, but not for peat and the data is more than two years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      93. Commitment to zero burning?

    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      95. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The Sustainability Report 2017 specifies only one type of activity also data is between two and five years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      100. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

    • N
      0 / 1

      103. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    2.5 / 25 10%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 11 9.1%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 12 12.5%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 12 8.3%
    • External: 0 / 12 0%
    • Certified: 0.5 / 12 4.2%
    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      105. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      106. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      107. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      109. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

      The company only mentions ponds (lagoons) in relation to wastewater, does not refer to POME.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      110. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      The company only mentions ponds (lagoons) in relation to wastewater, does not refer to PORE.

    • N
      0 / 1

      111. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 2

      112. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      113. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company commits to minimise the use of chemicals, it is not clear whether this includes pesticides and/or fertilisers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      114. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to minimise the use of chemicals, it is not clear whether this includes pesticides and/or fertilisers. This commitment applies to all suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      115. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      116. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1

      118. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      119. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      120. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      121. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • N
      0 / 2

      122. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

    • N
      0 / 2

      123. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      124. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      The company provides only one aspect of waste management, also data is between two and five years old.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    13.25 / 35 37.9%
    • Organisation: 1 / 5 20%
    • Policy: 9 / 21 42.9%
    • Practice: 3.3 / 9 36.1%
    • Self-reported: 3.3 / 9 36.1%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      125. Commitment to human rights?

      The company commits to the UN Declaration on Human Rights.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      126. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment to the UN Declaration on Human Rights applies to all its suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      127. Progress on human rights commitment?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      128. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company only mentions local communities and indigenous rights in relation to land tenure or FPIC.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      129. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company only mentions local communities and indigenous rights in relation to FPIC. This commitment applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      130. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      The company only mentions respect of legal and customary land tenure rights in relation to FPIC.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      131. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company only mentions respect of legal and customary land tenure rights in relation to FPIC. This commitment applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      132. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      The company reports to respect "indigenous populations and local communities to give or refuse their free and prior informed consent (FPIC) to all operations affecting the land or resources over which they have legal, community or customary rights". Partial points have been awarded as this is an unclear commitment.

    • N
      0 / 1

      133. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      134. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      135. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company states that it seeks to prevent conflict ""through a platform called Permanent Framework for Dialogue with Communities. The framework aims to structure and consolidate the relationship between the Integrated Agricultural Units (UAI) of subsidiaries and neighbouring communities."". Partial points have been awarded as this information is self-reported and between two and five years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      137. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      138. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company provides commitment to ""guarantee the food security of communities"".

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      139. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company stated in its 2018 Annual Report that it has trained over 10,000 women on agricultural methods and revenue generation in the Grand-Ouest Region. This information is self-reported and between two and five years old, therefore points awarded are partial.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      140. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company has a commitment to provide essential community services, adopting "a strong and continuous dialogue with local communities and deploy actions to improve their health, education and income".

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      141. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company's 2017 Sustainability Report lists numerous projects in education and health. Data found is between two and five years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      142. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

      The company commits to improving employment for people in rural areas, but does not specifically commit to employing local people at their company.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      143. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company mentions that it is committed to respecting rights in accordance to ILO principles and refers to specific conventions but does not commit to respecting all core conventions.

    • N
      0 / 1

      144. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      145. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      The company states actions taken to implement its workers' rights policies, partial points have been awarded as the data is between two and five years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      146. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company reports that it provides "productive work, properly compensated and devoid of gender-based discrimination", this is an unclear commitment and therefore partial points have been awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      147. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      148. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      149. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      16,168 (48.5%) - The company's Annual Report 2018 having 33,346 employees including 17,178 permanent staff, partial points have been awarded as data is between two and five years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      150. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • N
      0 / 1

      151. Commitment to pay a Decent Living wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Commitment to pay a Decent Living wage applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      153. Progress on commitment to pay a Decent Living wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      154. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      155. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company specifies a commitment to address occupational health and safety.

    • N
      0 / 1

      156. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      157. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company provides evidence of PPE and related training. The data between two and five years.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      158. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      0.38 - The company reports an accident gravity rate of 0.38 (lost days x 1000/hours worked). The company does not report the data between two and five years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      159. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    2.5 / 16 15.6%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 10 15%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 10 15%
    • External: 0 / 10 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      160. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company provides a commitment to support smallholders with the aim to ""help those out growers develop their plantations and improve their quality of life though a variety of tools and services"".

    • N
      0 / 1

      161. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      162. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      163. Programme to support independent smallholders?

      The company has programme to support independent smallholders and provides details on types of support.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      164. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      157,496 - The company states 157,496 independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme, partial points has been provided as the data is self-reported.

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      168. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      169. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      170. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      172. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      173. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      174. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      175. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    1.5 / 7 21.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 5 20%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company provides a commitment to both ethical/fair conduct and prohibition of corruption.

    • N
      0 / 1

      177. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      178. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company states limited information, reporting that "Ethics committees have been set up since 2016 within each subsidiary and at the holding company".

    • N
      0 / 1

      179. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      180. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • N
      0 / 1

      181. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      182. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: SIFCA Group

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Palm oil media reports (2) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

1

1


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)