Palmas Group
Palm oil assessment- Latest update: November 2024
- Next scheduled: November 2025
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the palm oil supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Parent company:Grupo Romero
-
Landbank (oil palm)37,909 hectares
-
Bloomberg ticker:BBG00BDZSTQ1 Equity
-
LEI:No LEI
-
RSPO member?Yes
-
Activities:Oil palm cultivation, milling, palm kernel crushing, palm oil refining
-
Locations:Peru (Loreto, San Martin, Ucayali, Lima)
-
Headquarters:Peru
-
Parent website:
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Palmas Group – November 2021
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 11 / 37 29.7%
- Policy: 36 / 75 48%
- Practice: 9.3 / 73 12.7%
- Self-reported: 5.8 / 73 7.9%
- External: 2 / 73 2.7%
- Certified: 1.5 / 73 2.1%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership
4 / 11 36.4%- Organisation: 1 / 6 16.7%
- Policy: 2 / 2 100%
- Practice: 1 / 3 33.3%
- Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
- Certified: 0 / 3 0%
-
1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?
The company reports to have a sustainable palm oil policy.
-
2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
The company reports sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers.
-
0 / 1
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
-
0 / 1
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
-
0 / 1
5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?
-
0 / 1
6. Percentage or number of women board members?
-
0 / 1
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?
-
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?
The company is working with Solidaridad on the implementation of RSPO in Peru amongst smallholders (funded by the government) and Earthworm Foundation.
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company reports to publish Fourth Progress Report on Implementation of Sustainability Policy April 2020-April 2021.
-
0 / 1
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
-
11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?
This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.
-
0 / 1
12. Climate risks assessment available?
-
Landbank, maps and traceability
11.25 / 25 45%- Organisation: 8 / 15 53.3%
- Policy: 1 / 2 50%
- Practice: 2.3 / 8 28.1%
- Self-reported: 1.3 / 8 15.6%
- External: 0 / 8 0%
- Certified: 1 / 8 12.5%
-
13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?
32872.4 - The company reports total land area controlled and managed associated to palm oil in RSPO ACOP.
-
14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?
25720 - The company report total land managed for oil palm cultivation including infrastructure.
-
15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.
-
16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?
0 - The company reports to have no unplanted land designated for future planting.
-
17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
7152.44 - The company reports total land designated and managed as HCV areas and Other conservation land set aside.
-
18. Maps of estates/management units?
The company reports to submit concession maps to the RSPO in ACOP cycles and has not acquired any new concession sites in 2020.
-
19. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.
-
0 / 1
20. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?
-
21. Number of company-owned mills?
3 - The company reports to own three palm oil mills in RSPO ACOP 2020.
-
22. Names and locations of company-owned mills?
The company reports all the company owned mill location on their website.
-
23. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and/or third parties?
The company reports three mills sourcing from their own plantations and third party plantations.
-
24. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and/or third-parties?
The company reports the percentage of FFB supplied from its own and third-party plantation.
-
0 / 1
25. Number of third party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
26. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
27. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and/or third party plantations?
-
0 / 1
28. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?
-
0 / 1
29. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?
-
0 / 1
30. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?
-
0 / 2
31. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?
-
32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?
The company reports to have achieved 100% traceability to plantation level.
-
33. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?
The company reports percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supplied to own mills traceable to plantation level.
-
0 / 2
34. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?
-
35. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?
The company reports complete supply chain traceability to plantation at refinery level. But the information found is not externally verified, hence partial score is awarded.
-
36. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?
The company reports complete traceability of palm kernel crushed for only one refinery, Palmawasi Refinery. But according to RSPO ACOP 2020 company has two crushers.
-
Certification standards
6.02 / 13 46.3%- Organisation: 2 / 2 100%
- Policy: 2 / 2 100%
- Practice: 2 / 9 22.4%
- Self-reported: 0 / 9 0.2%
- External: 2 / 9 22.2%
- Certified: 0 / 9 0%
-
37. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?
[Externally verified] 2016 - The company reports to be RSPO member.
-
38. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?
[Externally verified] 2021 - The company reports to achieve its first RSPO P&C certification.
-
39. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?
The company reports to submit RSPO ACOP in 2020.
-
40. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?
The company reports to operate in Peru.
-
41. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?
The company reports to have no land RSPO certified.
-
42. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?
The company reports to have no mills RSPO certified.
-
43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?
2025 - The company reports plan to achieve 100% RSPO certification for all its estates and mills in RSPO ACOP 2020.
-
44. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?
2025 - The company plans to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities in RSPO ACOP 2020.
-
45. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?
This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.
-
46. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?
This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.
-
47. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?
The company reports zero tonnes of certified FFB volume supplied by independent smallholders.
-
48. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?
2.03% - The company reports palm oil and oil palm products processed to be mass balance RSPO-certified.
-
0 / 1
49. Sells RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?
-
0 / 1
50. Processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?
-
51. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?
This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.
-
52. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?
This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.
-
0 / 1
53. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?
-
Deforestation and biodiversity
3.75 / 18 20.8%- Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
- Policy: 3 / 10 30%
- Practice: 0.8 / 6 12.5%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 6 12.5%
- External: 0 / 6 0%
- Certified: 0 / 6 0%
-
0 / 1
54. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
-
55. Commitment to zero deforestation?
The company commits to ""no deforestation"" of HCV areas and HCS forests in all its own operations and in its supply chain.
-
56. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
The company commits to ""no deforestation"" of HCV areas and HCS forests applies to all suppliers.
-
57. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation?
The company only reports the criteria or areas that are not to be deforested but no information on a cut-off date.
-
0 / 1
58. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?
-
0 / 1
59. Evidence of monitoring deforestation in supplier operations?
-
0 / 1
60. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?
-
0 / 1
61. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?
-
0 / 1
62. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?
-
0 / 1
63. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?
-
64. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
The company reports environmental management and sustainable expansion in its Fourth Progress Report Implementation of Sustainability Policy highlighting implementation of landscape or jurisdictional level approach.
-
0 / 1
65. Biodiversity policy?
-
0 / 1
66. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 2
67. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
-
68. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
The company reports species monitoring and but provides no example or data.
-
69. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
The company commits to protect species and habitats, avoid damage or deterioration HCV areas by controlling hunting, fishing and other activities.
-
0 / 1
70. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments
6 / 15 40%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 6 / 8 75%
- Practice: 0 / 7 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
- Certified: 0 / 7 0%
-
71. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.
-
72. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
The company commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers.
-
0 / 1
73. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
0 / 1
74. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?
-
0 / 1
75. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?
-
76. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.
-
0 / 1
77. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
78. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?
-
79. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.
-
80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
The company commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers.
-
0 / 1
81. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
-
0 / 1
82. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
-
83. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.
-
0 / 1
84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
85. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
Peat, fire and GHG emissions
5 / 20 25%- Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
- Policy: 4.5 / 8 56.3%
- Practice: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
- Certified: 0 / 7 0%
-
86. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also reports to be committed not to develop plantation on peatlands.
-
87. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
The company commitment to no planting on peat any depth applies to all suppliers. The commitment does not clearly specify depths of peatland.
-
0 / 1
88. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
-
0 / 1
89. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
90. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
The company commits to best management practices for soils only and not peat.
-
91. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
The company commits to best management practices for soils applies to all suppliers only. The commitment does not cover peat.
-
0 / 2
92. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
-
1 / 1
93. Commitment to zero burning?
The company is committed to zero burning.
-
94. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
The company commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers.
-
0 / 2
95. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
-
0 / 1
96. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?
-
0 / 1
97. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?
-
98. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
The company reports not to have any time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity.
-
99. GHG emissions intensity?
The company does not report GHG emissions intensity.
-
100. GHG emissions from land use change?
The company does not report GHG emissions from land use change.
-
0 / 1
101. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
102. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
-
103. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?
The company reports that Palmawasi extractor/mill converts the methane gas generated in effluent treatment plants into electrical energy.
-
Water, chemical and pest management
2.5 / 25 10%- Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
- Policy: 2 / 11 18.2%
- Practice: 0.5 / 12 4.2%
- Self-reported: 0 / 12 0%
- External: 0 / 12 0%
- Certified: 0.5 / 12 4.2%
-
0 / 1
104. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
105. Water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
106. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
107. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?
-
0 / 1
108. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?
-
0 / 2
109. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?
-
0 / 1
110. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?
-
0 / 1
111. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
-
0 / 2
112. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
-
0 / 1
113. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
-
0 / 1
114. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
-
115. Commitment to no use of paraquat?
The company is committed not to paraquat.
-
116. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?
The company commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers.
-
0 / 1
117. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
-
0 / 1
118. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
119. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
-
0 / 1
120. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
121. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
-
0 / 2
122. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?
-
123. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
The company reports to use Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques to manage pests, diseases, weeds, and invasive species.
-
0 / 1
124. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?
-
Community, land and labour rights
12 / 35 34.3%- Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
- Policy: 11.5 / 21 54.8%
- Practice: 0.5 / 9 5.6%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 9 5.6%
- External: 0 / 9 0%
- Certified: 0 / 9 0%
-
125. Commitment to human rights?
The company only commits to human rights in relation to its employees.
-
126. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commitment to respect human rights applies to suppliers but no reference to UN Declaration on Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights. Hence partial point is awarded.
-
0 / 1
127. Progress on human rights commitment?
-
128. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?
The company commits to respect indigenous and local communities' rights. The company reports ILO as its ""legal base"" for its forced labor policy but does not make an explicit commitment to it.
-
129. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers but but does not reference the UN Declaration/ILO.
-
130. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
The company reports to respect legal and customary land tenure rights but only customary rights in relation to FPIC.
-
131. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
The company reports to respect legal and customary land tenure rights but only customary rights in relation to FPIC applies to all suppliers.
-
132. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company commits to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC).
-
133. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
The company commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers.
-
134. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain guidance and requirements on the process to conduct free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's commitments under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.
-
0 / 1
135. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
-
136. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
The company reports limited details of land conflict resolution process.
-
0 / 1
137. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?
-
0 / 1
138. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
-
0 / 1
139. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
-
0 / 1
140. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
-
0 / 1
141. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
-
0 / 1
142. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
-
143. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company refers to five out of eight Fundamental ILO Conventions.
-
144. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
The company commitment to five out of eight Fundamental ILO Conventions applies to all suppliers.
-
0 / 1
145. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
-
146. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company commits to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment.
-
147. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
The company commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers.
-
0 / 1
148. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
-
0 / 1
149. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
-
0 / 1
150. Percentage or number of women employees?
-
151. Commitment to pay a Decent Living wage?
The company reports that salaries and labor benefits will comply with Peruvian laws but does not mention to pay Decent or Minimum Living Wage.
-
0 / 1
152. Commitment to pay a Decent Living wage applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
153. Progress on commitment to pay a Decent Living wage?
-
0 / 1
154. Reporting of salary by gender?
-
155. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company commits to address occupational health and safety.
-
156. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
The company commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers.
-
157. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
The company reports to provide personal protective equipment (PPE) to workers but no information on related training.
-
0 / 1
158. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
-
0 / 1
159. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
-
Smallholders and suppliers
2.25 / 16 14.1%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 1.5 / 6 25%
- Practice: 0.8 / 10 7.5%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 10 7.5%
- External: 0 / 10 0%
- Certified: 0 / 10 0%
-
160. Commitment to support smallholders?
The company is committed to support smallholders.
-
161. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?
The company reports to develop technical and business capacities in the producer.
-
0 / 1
162. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?
-
0 / 1
163. Programme to support independent smallholders?
-
0 / 1
164. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?
-
165. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
The company reports to take timely steps to ensure strict compliance. But no details are provided on the process of ensuring compliance.
-
0 / 1
166. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
0 / 1
167. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
-
0 / 1
168. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?
-
0 / 1
169. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?
-
0 / 1
170. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?
-
0 / 1
171. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?
-
0 / 1
172. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?
-
0 / 1
173. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?
-
0 / 1
174. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
175. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?
-
Governance and grievances
3.5 / 7 50%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2.5 / 5 50%
- Practice: 1 / 2 50%
- Self-reported: 1 / 2 50%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
- Certified: 0 / 2 0%
-
176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company is committed to managing its operations with ethical conduct but does not mention prohibition corruption.
-
0 / 1
177. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
178. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
-
0 / 1
179. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
-
180. Whistleblowing procedure?
The company reports to have Complaints and Claims Attention System and Ethics Line.
-
181. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company reports complaints and claims attention system open to all stakeholders.
-
182. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
The company reports follow-up of complaints or claims.
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
No date
POLÍTICA DE SOSTENIBILIDAD DEL GRUPO PALMAS (SUSTAINABILITY POLICY PALMAS GROUP)
-
2019
RSPO ACOP 2019 Palmas Group
-
No date
Sustainability Policy - Palmas Group - WEBPAGE
-
April 2020
CUARTO REPORTE DE PROGRESO Implementación de Política de Sostenibilidad Abril 2020-Abril 2021 (FOURTH PROGRESS REPORT Implementation of Sustainability Policy April 2020-April 2021)
-
2020
RSPO ACOP 2020 Palmas Group
-
No date
Traceability - Palmas Group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
RSPO membership Palmas Group
-
2017
Primer Reporte de Progreso Implementación Política de Sostenibilidad Abril 2017- Abril 2018 (First Progress Report Implementation of Sustainability Policy April 2017- April 2018)
-
No date
Sustainable Development - Palmas group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
HR Directives
-
January 2017
Política de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (Occupational Health and Safety Policy)
-
No date
Productive chains - Palmas Group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Palmas is listening to you - Palmas Group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Complaints and Claims Attention System - Palmas Group - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Follow-up of Complaints and / or Claims - Palmas Group - WEBPAGE
Media monitor: Palmas Group
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
December 2018
RSPO Complaint filed Jul 2017 - Palmas del Espino S.A.(status: Investigation)
September 2018
Indigenous coalition challenges Peruvian government for environmental destruction
August 2018
Hay un nuevo detenido por la causa de los cuadernos (There is a new detainee for the cause of the notebooks)
May 2018
Así arrasan con el bosque amazónico los cultivos de palma aceitera (This is how the oil palm crops wipe out the Amazon forest)
September 2017
Grupo Romero deja sin agua al Valle del Shanusi (GRUPO ROMERO LEAVES THE SHANUSI VALLEY WITHOUT WATER)
April 2017
Grupo Palmas: First Peruvian NDPE Policy Creates Business Opportunities But Strands Land
March 2016
The African palm oil frontier expands deeper into the Peruvian Amazon, impacting indigenous communities? territories
October 2015
MAAP #16: OIL PALM-DRIVEN DEFORESTATION IN THE PERUVIAN AMAZON (PART 2: SHANUSI)
April 2015
Supplies likely to be carcinogenic are included by Grupo Romero in EIA
March 2015
Palm oil firms in Peru plan to clear 23,000 hectares of primary forest
0
4
1
9
7
1
3
4
4
4
Media monitor: Palmas Group
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

