KPN Plantation (previously GAMA Plantation)
Palm oil assessment- Latest update: November 2024
- Next scheduled: November 2025
Download data (CSV)
Submit a media report
-
Parent company:KPN CORP
-
Landbank (oil palm)248,000 hectares
-
Bloomberg ticker:Private
-
LEI:No LEI
-
RSPO member?No
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: KPN Plantation (previously GAMA Plantation) – October 2019
Assessment date:
Score by disclosure type:
-
Sustainability policy and leadership
-
1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?
-
2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
The company states that the Deputy Executive Director has responsibility for the implementation of its NDPE policy.
-
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed.
-
0 / 1
5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?
-
6. Percentage or number of women board members?
This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed.
-
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?
The company states in its NDPE policy that it will apply for membership of the Fire-Free Alliance, but it does not yet appear to be a member.
-
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?
The company reports collaborations with the Peat Restoration Agency and other government departments, but very little detail is given.
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company published its first progress report on sustainability in February 2019. It states a comprehensive sustainability report will be published in Q1 2020.
-
0 / 1
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
-
11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?
This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.
-
0 / 1
12. Climate risks assessment available?
-
-
Landbank, maps and traceability
-
0 / 1
13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?
-
14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?
199690 - This is the total planted area reported by the company on its website, and includes 165,098 ha nucleus (company-owned) and 34,592 ha plasma (scheme smallholders). These figures are undated. However, the company's progress report from February 2019 appears to confirm the figures – it reports "nearly 200,000" ha in total, of which 34,592 ha are plasma.
-
15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?
34592
-
0 / 1
16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?
-
0 / 1
17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
-
0 / 1
18. Area for infrastructure (ha)?
-
0 / 1
19. Maps of estates/management units?
The company has a dedicated map page on its website, but this page was not working at the time of assessment.
-
20. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?
The company has a dedicated map page on its website, but this page was not working at the time of assessment.
-
0 / 1
21. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?
-
22. Number of company-owned mills?
20
-
23. Names and coordinates of company-owned mills?
The company has a dedicated map page on its website, but this page was not working at the time of assessment. Its February 2019 progress report has a static image of a map showing the locations of six mills, but not at a local scale which would allow the exact locations to be determined.
-
0 / 1
24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?
-
0 / 1
25. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?
-
0 / 1
26. Number of supplier mills?
-
0 / 1
27. Names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
28. Number (or percentage) of third-party supplier mills that source from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?
-
0 / 1
29. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplier mills that come from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?
-
0 / 1
30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?
-
31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?
The company commits to developing "enhanced systems to track and trace FFB supply to our mills in 2019", but does not have a time-bound commitment for achieving 100% traceability to mill.
-
0 / 2
32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?
-
0 / 1
33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?
-
0 / 2
34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level?
-
0 / 2
35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level?
-
0 / 1
36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?
-
0 / 1
37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?
-
-
Deforestation and biodiversity
-
38. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
-
39. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
-
40. Criteria for defining deforestation?
The company commits to no new development until HCV and HCS areas protected, and commits to no new development on peat of any depth. It reports it issued a "stop work order", effective as of 1 July 2018, to ensure compliance with this policy.
-
41. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?
The company reports that its landbank was monitored on a bi-weekly basis by third party Aidenvironment, through remote sensing. It is not clear from its report whether this monitoring is still ongoing, or for how long it might continue.
-
42. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?
Overall, for the period 2013-18 the company reports approximately 23,000 ha of non-compliant land development. The company reports non-compliant development in its landbank from 2014-18, broken down by "peat", "forest" and "peat forest". For 2018 it shows 332 ha of non-compliant forest development, though the company reports elsewhere that no "greenfield development" was detected between February and July 2018.
-
0 / 1
43. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?
-
44. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?
-
45. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 2
46. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
-
47. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?
-
0 / 1
48. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 2
49. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
-
0 / 1
50. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
-
0 / 1
51. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
-
0 / 1
52. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
-
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments
-
53. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
-
54. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
55. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
0 / 1
56. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?
-
0 / 1
57. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?
-
0 / 1
58. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?
-
0 / 1
59. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
60. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?
-
61. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
-
62. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
63. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?
-
0 / 1
64. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
-
0 / 1
65. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
66. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
-
Peat, fire and GHG emissions
-
67. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
-
68. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
-
69. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
The company reports a stop work order has been in place since July 2018, but it is not clear whether there was any planting on peat in 2018.
-
0 / 1
70. Landbank or planted area on peat?
-
71. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
The company commits to best management practices on peat, but does not have as clear a commitment for other soils.
-
72. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
The company commits to best management practices on peat, and this applies also to its suppliers. However, the company does not have as clear a commitment for other soils.
-
73. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
The company reports monitoring of groundwater levels for peat in its February 2019 progress report. On its website it reports activities to maintain soil nutrients, but this example is undated.
-
74. Commitment to zero burning?
-
75. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
-
76. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
-
77. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?
In a press release from September 2018 the company reports on multiple fires in its landbank, providing details of coordinates, the area burned, and the timeframe. However, it does not clearly cover all fires that occurred in the company's estates within a specified timeframe (e.g. total number of fires annually).
-
78. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?
In a press release from September 2018 the company reports on multiple fires in surrounding areas, providing details of coordinates, the area burned, and the timeframe. However, it does not clearly cover all fires that occurred in the surrounding landscape or smallholder operations within a specified timeframe (e.g. total number of fires annually).
-
79. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
The company states it will implement a plan within three years for a "significant reduction" in GHG emissions from all operations, but no target quantity/intensity is given.
-
0 / 1
80. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
-
0 / 1
81. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
82. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?
-
0 / 1
83. GHG emissions intensity?
-
0 / 1
84. GHG emissions from land use change?
-
-
Water, chemical and pest management
-
0 / 1
85. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
86. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
87. Water use intensity?
-
0 / 1
88. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?
-
0 / 1
89. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?
-
0 / 1
90. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and/or palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?
-
0 / 1
91. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
-
0 / 2
92. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
-
0 / 1
93. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
-
0 / 1
94. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 2
95. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?
-
0 / 1
96. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
-
97. Commitment to no use of paraquat?
The company commits in its sustainability policy (dated October 2018) to phasing out the use of paraquat within one year.
-
98. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?
The commitment to phase out paraquat use within one year applies to all sourcing.
-
99. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
The company only commits to "plan for" reducing or phasing out these pesticides, and no time-bound target is given.
-
0 / 1
100. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
101. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
-
0 / 1
102. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
-
103. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
The company states an intention to "expand" its IPM, and lists some IPM methods on its website, but it is not clear IPM is being implemented.
-
-
Community, land and labour rights
-
0 / 1
104. Commitment to human rights?
-
0 / 1
105. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 2
106. Progress on human rights commitment?
-
0 / 1
107. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
-
0 / 1
108. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
-
109. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
The company provides some examples of work that has been done to resolve land conflicts, including revising some of its boundaries to release contested land back to local communities. A clear and comprehensive procedure detailing how the company deals with all land conflicts was not found.
-
0 / 1
110. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?
-
0 / 1
111. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 2
112. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
-
113. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
-
114. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
115. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
-
0 / 1
116. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?
-
0 / 1
117. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced, applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
118. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
-
0 / 1
119. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?
-
120. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
The company reports supporting local communities to develop fish farming.
-
121. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
The company commits to provide facilities to its workers, but in relation to the wider local community it only explicitly commits to providing health insurance.
-
0 / 2
122. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
-
123. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?
-
124. Commitment to respect all workers' rights applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 2
125. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
-
0 / 1
126. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company only explicitly commits to no child labour, no discrimination, and the right of workers to join or form labour unions.
-
0 / 1
127. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
128. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?
-
0 / 1
129. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
130. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
-
0 / 1
131. Percentage or number of women employees?
-
132. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?
-
133. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 2
134. Progress on commitment to pay minimum wage?
-
0 / 1
135. Reporting of salary by gender?
-
136. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
-
0 / 1
137. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
138. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?
-
0 / 1
139. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
-
0 / 1
140. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
-
0 / 1
141. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
-
0 / 2
142. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
-
-
Certification standards
-
0 / 1
143. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?
-
0 / 1
144. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010 for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?
-
0 / 1
145. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?
-
0 / 1
146. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?
-
0 / 1
147. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within five years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?
-
0 / 1
148. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?
-
0 / 1
149. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?
-
0 / 1
150. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?
-
0 / 1
151. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/ associated smallholders and outgrowers within five years or target already achieved?
-
0 / 1
152. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/ outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?
-
0 / 1
153. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?
-
0 / 1
154. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/ processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?
-
0 / 1
155. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?
-
156. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?
The company states a commitment to have all plantations and mills ISPO-certified by 2020, but it is not clear if any of its operations yet have ISPO certification.
-
157. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.
-
0 / 1
158. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB, etc.)?
-
-
Smallholders and suppliers
-
159. Commitment to support smallholders?
The company makes a commitment to "Empower local independent farmers", but it is not clear if this refers to its own smallholder suppliers or not. It also commits to facilitating scheme smallholder access to its supply chain, but further details are not given.
-
0 / 1
160. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?
-
0 / 1
161. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?
-
0 / 1
162. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?
-
0 / 1
163. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?
-
0 / 1
164. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
0 / 1
165. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?
-
0 / 1
166. Time-bound plan to engage with all high-risk mills within three years?
-
0 / 1
167. Programme to support high-risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?
-
0 / 1
168. Regularly engages with a subset of high-risk mills?
-
0 / 1
169. Procedures in place to assess all own and third-party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?
-
0 / 1
170. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills?
-
0 / 1
171. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?
-
172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
The company states it will "Cease to procure produce from suppliers that are demonstrably involved in illegal activities, deforestation, new peatland development and socially abusive practices". However, clear timeframes for action or details of steps to be taken are not given.
-
0 / 1
173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?
-
0 / 1
174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?
-
-
Governance and grievances
-
0 / 1
175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
-
0 / 1
176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 2
177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
-
0 / 1
178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
-
0 / 1
179. Whistleblowing procedure?
-
180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company commits to have a grievance mechanism in its NDPE policy, and stated its intention to have one in place by Q1 2019 in its 2019 progress report, but at the time of assessment it is not clear whether this system is yet in place.
-
0 / 1
181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
-
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
2018
Group Sustainability Policy
-
February 2019
Towards NDPE Policy Compliance" - Progress Report
-
August 2018
GAMA Plantations and Aidenvironment Asia enter into collaborative agreement to develop and implement NDPE policy - press release
-
No date
Home page
-
No date
GeoGAMA Map
-
No date
Environmental Standards webpage
-
No date
Operational Practices webpage
-
September 2018
Gama Plantationsￜ Clarification on Media Coverage on the Recent Fires in Kubu Raya ￜ West Kalimantan
Media monitor: KPN Plantation (previously GAMA Plantation)
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
View all reports
Submit a media report
April 2025
Geram Jalan Rusak Tak Diperbaiki, Warga Pangean Blokir Armada Perusahaan (Angry at Unrepaired Damaged Road, Pangean Residents Block Company Fleet)
March 2025
Konflik Lahan Antara Dua Perusahaan Sawit di Kuansing Timbulkan Korban Jiwa (Land Conflict Between Two Palm Oil Companies in Kuansing Causes Fatalities)
March 2025
PT BSU Diduga Ilegal, Menteri LHK RI Cabut Izin Konsesi Sejak Tahun 2022 Lalu (PT BSU Allegedly Illegal, Indonesian Minister of Environment and Forestry Revokes Concession Permit Since 2022)
February 2025
Disinyalir Tidak Punya HGU, Lahan Sawit PT BSU Seluas 5.100 Ha, di Bahar Selatan Illegal (Allegedly Not Having HGU, PT BSU's 5,100 Ha Palm Oil Land in South Bahar is Illegal)
February 2025
317.253 Hektare Izin Kebun Sawit dalam Kawasan Hutan Ditolak Kemenhut (317,253 Hectares of Oil Palm Plantation Permits in Forest Areas Rejected by Ministry of Forestry)
December 2024
VIRAL : Ratusan Anggota KILL LPM Demo di PN Mempawah Gugatan Warga Terhadap PT Agro Alam Nusantara (VIRAL: Hundreds of KILL LPM Members Demonstrate at Mempawah District Court Residents' Lawsuit Against PT Agro Alam Nusantara_
November 2024
20 Unit Rumah Karyawan PT Jatim Jaya Perkasa Dilalap Api, Terjadi di Areal Perkebunan Sawit (20 Employee Housing Units of PT Jatim Jaya Perkasa Engulfed by Fire, Occurred in Palm Oil Plantation Area)
October 2024
Ratusan Masyarakat Kubu Dan Kuba Gelar Aksi, Zulpakar Juned Minta PT. JJP Respons Tuntutan Masyarkat (Hundreds of Kubu and Kuba Communities Hold Demonstration, Zulpakar Juned Asks PT. JJP to Respond to Community Demands)
October 2024
Gugat PT.BSU di Sinyalir Serobot Tanah Adat SAD Marga Lalan, Kuasa Hukum PT BSU Tidak Kuasai Materi (Suing PT.BSU Allegedly Grabbing Customary Land of SAD Marga Lalan, PT BSU's Legal Counsel Does Not Master the Material)
April 2024
Diduga Cemari Lawan Warga, PT AJP Dituntut Kompensasi Rp 10 Miliar (Allegedly Polluting Residents, PT AJP Sued for IDR 10 Billion Compensation)
March 2024
211.408 Ha Sawit Penerima Subsidi Biodiesel Ada di Kawasan Hutan (211,408 Ha of Palm Oil Receiving Biodiesel Subsidies Are in Forest Areas)
October 2022
(SAD 113's Conflict with Oil Palm Plantation Companies Will End Soon, What Causes It?)
August 2022
Terbukti Atas Kasus Karhutla, PT. PLD Wajib Bayar Kerugian Materi Lingkungan Hidup 199,5 Milyar (Proven for the case of forest and land fires, PT. PLD Must Pay Environmental Material Losses 199.5 billion)
November 2021
Ratusan Petani Bersenjata Tajam Geruduk Perusahaan Sawit (Hundreds of Sharp Armed Farmers Geruduk Palm Oil Companies)
September 2021
Connections to coal mining add to Indonesian palm oil sector's risk for buyers
April 2021
Greenpeace Beberkan Izin-izin Keluar di Hutan Alam Papua (Greenpeace Issues Exit Permits in Papua's Natural Forests)
January 2021
KLHK Gugat 29 Perusahaan Penyebab Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan (KLHK sues 29 companies for causing forest and land fires)
August 2020
FEATURE-Papuan tribes fear sacrifice of sago forests that stave off hunger
August 2020
Perusahaan Sawit Terbesar Tidak Punya Izin Usaha Perkebunan (The Largest Palm Oil Company Does Not Have A Plantation Business Permit)
13
8
27
3
5
29
25
3
6
10
Media monitor: KPN Plantation (previously GAMA Plantation)
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.
Download as CSV
