Skip to content
Menu Search
Show media reports (2) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • Media Monitor
    • ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.

Company assessment: IFFCO – November 2024

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 55.1% 62.23 / 113
  • Organisation: 12.5 / 24 52.1%
  • Policy: 37.5 / 50 75%
  • Practice: 12.2 / 39 31.4%
  • Self-reported: 6.6 / 39 17%
  • External: 3.8 / 39 9.6%
  • Certified: 1.8 / 39 4.7%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    4 / 10 40%
    • Organisation: 3 / 6 50%
    • Policy: 1 / 1 100%
    • Practice: 0 / 3 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • N

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company has published a sustainable palm oil policy which applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company reports having a Head of Sustainability.

    • N
      0 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      5. Reports gender balance of senior management team?

    • N
      0 / 1

      6. Reports gender balance of board members?

    • N
      0 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • N
      0 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company published its inaugural ESG report for the year 2022.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

      The company has compiled its ESG report with reference to the Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Standards and also submitted CDP forests questionnaire in 2023.

    • N

      11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    9.09 / 15 60.6%
    • Organisation: 3.5 / 8 43.8%
    • Policy: 2 / 2 100%
    • Practice: 3.6 / 5 71.8%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 5 20%
    • External: 0.8 / 5 15%
    • Certified: 1.8 / 5 36.8%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Lists countries and operations?

      The company operates refineries in UAE, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Indonesia.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Lists countries sourcing from?

      All of the company's refineries source from Malaysia and Indonesia.

    • N

      15. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      16. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      17. Scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      18. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      19. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      20. Maps of estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      21. Maps of all scheme smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N
      0 / 1

      22. Maps of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • N

      23. Number of company-owned mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills.

    • N

      24. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills.

    • N

      25. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and third parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills.

    • N

      26. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and third-parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      27. Number of third party supplying mills?

      The company has published the list of third-party supplying mills for each of its refineries.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      28. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

      The company has published the names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills.

    • N
      0 / 1

      29. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      30. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      31. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      The company has already achieved 100% traceability to mill level.

    • Y
      1 / 2

      33. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

      The company reports 100% traceability to mill level.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      34. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

      The company commits to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level by the year 2027.

    • N

      35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills.

    • P
      +
      0.84 / 1
      1 / 1

      36. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

      The company reports its overall traceability to plantation is 85% as reported in ESG report 2022.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      37. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      [Externally verified] The company publishes an overall percentage of supply traceable to plantation but not per refinery level for all refineries.

    • N

      38. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own palm kernel crushing facilities.

  • Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives
    4.14 / 8 51.8%
    • Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
    • Policy: 1 / 1 100%
    • Practice: 2.1 / 6 35.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.1 / 6 2.3%
    • External: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      39. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      [Externally verified] 2011 - The company is a member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) since October, 2011.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      40. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      [Externally verified] 2013 - The company first achieved its RSPO certification in 2013, two years after joining the RSPO.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      41. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      The company has submitted its 2023 RSPO ACOP.

    • N

      42. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      43. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills.

    • N

      44. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      45. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities within 5 years?

      2019 - The company reports the target to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities by 2019. Target already met.

    • N

      46. Percentage of scheme smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      47. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      48. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • P
      0.1 / 1

      49. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

      9.71% - The company reports the percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified.

    • N

      50. Sells RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • P
      0.04 / 1

      51. Processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

      Total CSPO, CSPK = 47,850 Certified under SG = 2.000. Percentage certified = 4.2%.

    • N

      52. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N
      0 / 1

      53. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    4 / 9 44.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 6 58.3%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • N

      55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      57. Commitment to zero deforestation?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      58. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to zero deforestation.

    • N

      59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      60. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

      The company defines deforestation for suppliers as removal of HCV and HCS areas and specifies any deforestation/conversion past January 2019 will not be accepted in supplier operations.

    • N

      61. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      62. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

      In 2022, the company appointed a technical expert to conduct geospatial analysis based on satellite imagery to map, assess and monitor deforestation-risks in the supply base of its Indonesia-based refinery.

    • N

      63. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?

    • N

      65. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      66. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?

      The company commits suppliers to restore ecosystems to their prior condition in cases of conversion post-31 December 2015 within their own operations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      67. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • N

      68. Biodiversity policy?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      70. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      71. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      72. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      73. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

      The company only commits to no hunting of endangered species.

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    3 / 6 50%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3 / 5 60%
    • Practice: 0 / 1 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 1 0%
    • External: 0 / 1 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 1 0%
    • N

      74. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      75. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits suppliers to ensure protection of High Conservation Value (HCV) areas, but does not make a clear commitment to conduct assessments.

    • N

      76. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      77. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted/planned planting since January 2015?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      78. High Conservation Value (HCV) or combined HCV/HCS management and monitoring plans for all estates planted/planned planting since January 2015?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      79. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      81. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      82. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      83. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

      The company only commits its suppliers to ensure no development of palm oil in High Conservation Value (HCV) areas and High Carbon Stock (HCS) forests, protection of set aside HCV and HCS areas, conduct social and environmental impact assessment and establish its associated management and monitoring plans. It does not specify HCS Approach.

    • N

      84. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      85. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      86. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company commits to conduct social and environmental impact assessments.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      87. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to conduct social and environmental impact assessments.

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Soils, fire and GHG emissions Soils, fire and GHG emissions
    6 / 8 75%
    • Organisation: 1 / 2 50%
    • Policy: 4.5 / 5 90%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 1 50%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 1 50%
    • External: 0 / 1 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 1 0%
    • N

      89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      90. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to no planting on peat of any depth.

    • N

      91. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      92. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      94. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to best management practices for soils and peat.

    • N

      95. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      96. Commitment to zero burning?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      97. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to no burning.

    • N

      98. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      99. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      100. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      101. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

      The company committed to reduce 17% in Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 2025 compared to 2021 baseline. However, the target is not intensity-based.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      102. GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports the GHG emission intensity for its three refineries as PT SON (0.09), Delmon (0.17), Egypt (0.28), ERCO (0.11) and Pakistan (0.25). Figures do not clearly cover both scope 1 and 2 emissions and no overall figure is reported.

    • N

      103. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      104. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?

      The company reported that LUC emissions accounted for 47% of the total 9.9 million t of CO2e in 2022.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      105. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports its Scope 1 and 2 emissions progress for 2021 and 2022, but not in intensity-based.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      106. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      The company uses the GHG Protocol methodology to calculate GHG emissions.

    • N

      107. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    5.5 / 11 50%
    • Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
    • Policy: 3 / 6 50%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 4 37.5%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 4 37.5%
    • External: 0 / 4 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 4 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      109. Water use intensity?

      1.251 - The company reports water use intensity as 1.251 l/kg in 2024.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      110. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company reports a 13% reduction in water use intensity from 1.430 l/kg in 2022 to 1.251 l/kg in 2023.

    • N
      0 / 1

      111. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      112. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N

      113. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills.

    • N
      0 / 1

      114. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

    • N

      115. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      116. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      117. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      118. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to minimise the use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides.

    • N

      119. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N
      0 / 1

      120. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to work towards phasing out of use of paraquat that is not time-bound.

    • N

      121. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      122. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.

    • N

      123. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      124. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits suppliers to not use Stockholm and Rotterdam Convention chemicals.

    • N

      125. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      126. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      127. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      128. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      The company only reports a commitment to implement responsible waste management practices including waste reduction, reuse and recycling as well as adoption of circular economy approach.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    16.5 / 23 71.7%
    • Organisation: 3 / 5 60%
    • Policy: 12.5 / 13 96.2%
    • Practice: 1 / 5 20%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 5 20%
    • External: 0 / 5 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 5 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      129. Commitment to human rights?

      The company commits to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits suppliers to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights.

    • N
      0 / 1

      131. Progress on human rights commitment?

    • N

      132. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      133. Commitment to respect Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits its suppliers to respect the formal and customary rights (including land rights) of indigenous and local communities, including their right to give or withhold their Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) to developments on land over which they hold legal, communal or customary rights and does not reference the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (no. 169).

    • N

      134. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits suppliers to respect legal and customary land tenure rights.

    • N

      136. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to respect FPIC.

    • N

      138. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      139. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      140. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      141. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      142. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      143. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      144. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      145. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • N

      146. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor or trader.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      147. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company commits to all Fundamental ILO Conventions.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      148. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to all Fundamental ILO Conventions.

    • N
      0 / 1

      149. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      150. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company commits to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      151. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      152. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company reported that it signed an MoU with NAMA Women Advancement to support its effort in driving equality for women. However, no further details on the actions taken are available.

    • N
      0 / 1

      153. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      154. Reports gender balance of employees?

      9% - The company reports that 9% of employees are women.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      155. Commitment to pay a living wage?

      The company commits to pay a Decent Living Wage to all workers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      156. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to pay a Decent Living Wage to all workers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      157. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      158. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      159. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      160. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to address health and safety at work for all workers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      161. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company reports that it provides PPE, but not does not report related training activities.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      162. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      0.86 - The company reports its rate of recordable work-related injuries is 0.86.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      163. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      0 - The company reports no fatality as a result of work-related injury.

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    4.25 / 16 26.6%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3 / 6 50%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 10 12.5%
    • Self-reported: 1.3 / 10 12.5%
    • External: 0 / 10 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      164. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company has published a commitment to support smallholders.

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Programme to support scheme smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Percentage of scheme smallholders involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Programme to support independent smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      168. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      169. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company reports that it used NDPE IRF to assess progress of its suppliers towards NDPE compliance.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      170. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      93% - The company reports that 93% tier 1 palm supplier refineries using the NDPE IRF in 2023, up from 63% in 2022.

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      172. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

      The company states that it aims to achieve a 100% NDPE delivering supply chain by 2030 including its suppliers. The company aimed to work towards full traceability to plantation for palm oil that it indirectly source by end of 2027. No KPIs are provided and it is not clear how compliance is assessed.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      173. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF)?

      The company reported percentage of volumes of palm oil according to the NDPE IRF framework but not the proportion of supply from third parties that are verified deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF).

    • N
      0 / 1

      174. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      175. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      176. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      177. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

      The company reported that it appointed a technical expert to conduct geospatial analysis based on satellite imagery to map, assess and monitor deforestation-risk in the supply base of its Indonesia-based refinery. However, it is unclear whether this includes all third-party supplying mills.

    • N
      0 / 1

      178. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      179. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    5.75 / 7 82.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 4 / 5 80%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 2 87.5%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • External: 1 / 2 50%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      180. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      181. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      182. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company reports that 618 employees completed awareness training of its Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy in 2022. The company also has an Ethical & Compliance Committee (ECC) to handle business ethical issues.

    • N
      0 / 1

      183. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      184. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has a whistleblowing policy in place with clear description of steps taken by the company, including how whistleblowers can report unethical conduct and how they are protected.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      185. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company reports that it has issue handling procedures in place for its direct suppliers. The procedures for employees to raise grievances are detailed under Whistle Blower Policy.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      186. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

      [Externally verified] The company has a supplier issues register in place, where details of all complaints are disclosed.

Media monitor: IFFCO

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.

Show media reports
Last media reports:
Are we missing a story? Submit a media report
No article found for the selected categories.

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

2

0


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)