Skip to content
Menu Search

Grupo Jaremar

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: November 2020
  • Next scheduled: November 2021

Show media reports (2) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    14,904 hectares
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:

Company assessment: Grupo Jaremar – November 2020

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 35.8% 65.49 / 183
  • Organisation: 9 / 37 24.3%
  • Policy: 31.5 / 75 42%
  • Practice: 25 / 71 35.2%
  • Self-reported: 2.8 / 71 3.9%
  • External: 13 / 71 18.3%
  • Certified: 9.2 / 71 13%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    2 / 11 18.2%
    • Organisation: 0 / 6 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 2 100%
    • Practice: 0 / 3 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company has a comprehensive sustainability policy which covers both environmental and social issues.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports in its comprehensive sustainability policy that this policy applies to 'all suppliers or customers of oil or any other interested party with whom the company has a business relationship'.

    • N
      0 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • N
      0 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

    • N
      0 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • N
      0 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • N
      0 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    6 / 25 24%
    • Organisation: 6 / 15 40%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 8 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      14,904 - Information is available in ACOP 2019.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      12,498 - Information is available in ACOP 2019. This data includes the infrastructure area.

    • 15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from scheme/plasma smallholders.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      2,357 - Information is available in ACOP 2019.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      49 - The company reports 'other conservation area set aside excluding HCV areas' in its ACOP 2019.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      18. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company declares in its ACOP 2019 that it has submitted maps of its concessions to the RSPO and no new concession has been acquired since the submission of maps. Maps of concessions are available on GeoRSPO.

    • 19. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from scheme/plasma smallholders.

    • N
      0 / 1

      20. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      21. Number of company-owned mills?

      2 - Information is available in ACOP 2019.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      22. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

      The company reports two mills in ACOP 2018, but a map for only one mill is available on the GeoRSPO.

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and/or third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and/or third-parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      25. Number of third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      26. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      27. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and/or third party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      28. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      29. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      30. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      31. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      33. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      34. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      35. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      36. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    7.29 / 12 60.8%
    • Organisation: 2 / 2 100%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 4.3 / 8 53.6%
    • Self-reported: 2.3 / 8 28.6%
    • External: 2 / 8 25%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      37. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      [Externally verified] 2011 - The company is a member of RSPO at the group level.

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      39. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      ACOP 2019 is available.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      40. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      The company states it operates in Honduras.

    • P
      0.84 / 1

      41. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

      83.86% - Information is available in ACOP 2019.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      42. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      100% - The ACOP 2019 states that the company operates two mills, and both of them are RSPO certified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      The company reports a target of 2016 however it is unclear if this target has been met.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      44. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

      The information available in ACOP 2019 states that the target was achieved in 2016.

    • 45. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from scheme/plasma smallholders.

    • 46. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has no scheme/plasma/associated smallholders or outgrowers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • P
      0.45 / 1

      48. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

      44.9% - The company reports 44.90% of palm oil and oil palm products as RSPO certified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • 50. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Indonesia.

    • 51. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      52. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

      [Externally verified] The company is certified under ISCC.

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    9.34 / 17 54.9%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 5.5 / 9 61.1%
    • Practice: 3.8 / 6 64%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Certified: 1.8 / 6 30.7%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      53. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company's sustainability policy reports it promotes its commitment to prohibit the development of new projects in high carbon areas, high conservation value areas, peat soils, and/or forests of high, medium, low category, and young regenerated forests with native vegetation. It also states reaffirming no to deforestation in order to create awareness to protect forests.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      54. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

      The commitment to no deforestation or to not develop on HCV, HCS, and peatland is available in the sustainability policy of the company, which applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      55. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      HCV, HCS, forests of high, medium, low category, and young regenerated forests with native vegetation.

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Evidence of monitoring deforestation in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      62. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      [Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      63. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

      The company reports in its sustainability policy that it is committed to working on the transformation of its supply chain by the promotion of conservation of forests, biodiversity, and high-value areas of conservation.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      64. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment to biodiversity conservation in its sustainability policy, which is applicable to all its suppliers.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.84 / 1

      65. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      66. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      [Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      67. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      The company mentions prohibition of hunting only in relation to the protection and conservation of forests, high-value areas of conservation and peat soils.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      68. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

      The company mentions the prohibition of hunting only in relation to the protection and conservation of forests, high-value areas of conservation and peat soils. This commitment is available in its sustainability policy which is applicable to all of the company's suppliers.

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    4 / 14 28.6%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 4 / 8 50%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      69. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      74. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      77. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      80. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    6.84 / 20 34.2%
    • Organisation: 1 / 5 20%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 8 43.8%
    • Practice: 2.3 / 7 33.4%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1.8 / 7 26.3%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      83. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also reports its commitment to no planting on peat in its sustainability policy.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      84. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

      The sustainability policy of the company which applies to all suppliers, reports the commitment of the company to no planting on peat. The depth of peatland is not reported by the company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.84 / 1

      89. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      90. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company reports prohibiting the use of fire in preparing the soil for new plantings, replants, or any other activity, in its sustainability policy.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      91. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment to prohibit the use of fire in preparing the soil for new plantings, replants, or any other activity, in its sustainability policy, which is applicable to all its suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 2

      92. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

    • N
      0 / 1

      93. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      95. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      96. GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports the average GHG footprint by hectare for certified management units as -1.02 (tCO2e/ha) and for all certified management units per tonne of crude palm oil as 0.07 (tCO2e/tCPO).

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      97. GHG emissions from land use change?

      The company reports land-use change emission figures only for Agrotor / Jaremar Group Extraction Plant.

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      100. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

      The company reports in its ACOP 2018 that 'the Jaremar group has methane gas capture and generation of energy through methane and replacement of Bunker'. But the company only reports itself as a crusher in the ACOP 2018, thus it is unclear if this information covers all of the company's processing activities.

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    8.52 / 25 34.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 11 18.2%
    • Practice: 6.5 / 12 54.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 12 0%
    • External: 1 / 12 8.3%
    • Certified: 5.5 / 12 46%
    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      103. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      105. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.84 / 1

      106. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      107. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.84 / 1

      109. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      110. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      111. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      112. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      113. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      114. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

      The sustainability policy of the company reports the commitment of the company to no use of WHO class 1A and 1B pesticides.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      115. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

      The commitment to no use of WHO 1A and 1B pesticides is reported by the company in its sustainability policy, which applies to all of the company's suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      116. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      118. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • N
      0 / 2

      119. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.84 / 1

      120. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      121. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      [Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    19 / 36 52.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 13 / 22 59.1%
    • Practice: 6 / 9 66.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 9 0%
    • External: 6 / 9 66.7%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      122. Commitment to human rights?

      The company reports a commitment to human rights but does not reference the UN declaration of human rights.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      123. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment to human rights without referencing the UN declaration of human rights in its sustainability policy, which applies to all of the company's suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      124. Progress on human rights commitment?

      [Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      125. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company reports its commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights but does not reference the UN Declaration/ILO Convention.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      126. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights but does not reference the UN Declaration/ILO Convention. This commitment is reported in the sustainability policy of the company, which applies to all of the company's suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      127. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      The company reports a commitment only to respect the customary land tenure rights of indigenous and local communities.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      128. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports a commitment only to respect the customary land tenure rights of indigenous and local communities in its sustainability policy, which applies to all of the company's suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      129. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also reports its commitment to FPIC through its sustainability policy.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

      The sustainability policy of the company, which applies to all of the company's suppliers, reports the commitment of the company to FPIC.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain guidance and requirements on the process to conduct free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's commitments under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • N
      0 / 1

      132. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

    • N
      0 / 1

      133. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      134. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • N
      0 / 1

      135. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      137. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1

      138. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      139. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      [Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank. The company also reports on its website about different services it provides to the Honduras community in concern of education, medical aid, housing projects, etc.

    • N
      0 / 1

      140. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      141. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company reports a commitment to all fundamental ILO conventions except minimum age and worst form of child labor.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      142. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports a commitment to all fundamental ILO conventions except minimum age and worst form of child labor in its sustainability policy, which applies to all of the company's suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      143. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      [Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      144. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company reports its commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment in its sustainability policy.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      145. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment in its sustainability policy, which applies to all of the company's suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      146. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      [Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      147. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • N
      0 / 1

      148. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      149. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

      The company reports its commitment to pay at least minimum wage in its sustainability policy.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      150. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports its commitment to pay at least minimum wage in its sustainability policy, which applies to all of the company's suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      151. Progress on commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

      [Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      153. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company reports a commitment to address occupational health and safety in its sustainability policy.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      154. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

      The company reports a commitment to address occupational health and safety in its sustainability policy, which applies to all of company's suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      155. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      [Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      156. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1

      157. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    1 / 16 6.3%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 6 0%
    • Practice: 1 / 10 10%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 10 0%
    • External: 1 / 10 10%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      158. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      159. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      160. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      161. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

      [Externally verified] The company provides support obtaining RSPO certification, as well as financial support, supply of materials, and training on best agronomic practices. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      162. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      163. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      168. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      169. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      170. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      172. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      173. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    1.5 / 7 21.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 5 10%
    • Practice: 1 / 2 50%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 1 / 2 50%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      174. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      176. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      [Externally verified] Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      177. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      178. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      179. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company reports a commitment to complaint and conflict resolution where it provides employees with mechanisms for transparent handling of complaints, respecting the anonymity of the complainants. Details of this system are not provided and is only applicable to the internal employees.

    • N
      0 / 1

      180. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Grupo Jaremar

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Palm oil media reports (2) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

0


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)