Skip to content
Menu Search

Gozco Plantations Tbk PT

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: November 2023
  • Next scheduled: November 2024

Show media reports (4) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    17,189 hectares
  • Market cap:
    45,500,000 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    GZCO.JK
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    GZCO IJ Equity
  • LEI:
    No LEI
  • RSPO member?
    No
  • Website:
  • Media Monitor
    • ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.

Company assessment: Gozco Plantations Tbk PT – November 2023

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 12.6% 21.5 / 171
  • Organisation: 8 / 35 22.9%
  • Policy: 8 / 74 10.8%
  • Practice: 5.5 / 62 8.9%
  • Self-reported: 5.5 / 62 8.9%
  • External: 0 / 62 0%
  • Certified: 0 / 62 0%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    1.5 / 11 13.6%
    • Organisation: 1.5 / 6 25%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 3 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      0 (0%) - The company has not reported the gender ratio directly. However, biographies are provided which show all board of directors are male.

    • N
      0 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • N
      0 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company integrated the sustainability report into their Annual Report in 2022.

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    5 / 17 29.4%
    • Organisation: 5 / 14 35.7%
    • Policy: 0 / 1 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Lists countries and operations?

      The company operates in South Sumatra, Indonesia.

    • N
      0 / 1

      14. Lists countries sourcing from?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      17189 - The company has a total land area of 17,189 ha.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      12917 - The company has a total oil palm planted area of 12,917 ha.

    • N
      0 / 1

      17. Scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      18. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      20. Maps of estates/management units?

    • N
      0 / 1

      21. Maps of all scheme smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      22. Maps of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      23. Number of company-owned mills?

      2 - The company has 2 mills on GFW but it is unclear if this covers all of the company's operations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      24. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

      The name and locations of the mills are available on GFW, but it is unclear if this covers all company's operations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      25. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and third parties?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      26. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and third-parties?

      The company has reported a total volume of processed FFB sourced internally (176,779 tons) and externally (plasma and third party) (34,068 tons).

    • 27. Number of third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 28. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 29. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 30. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and third parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 31. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • 32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 33. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • N
      0 / 1

      34. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • 36. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 37. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • 38. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own palm kernel crushing facilities.

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    0.5 / 13 3.9%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 10 5%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 10 5%
    • External: 0 / 10 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      39. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • N
      0 / 1

      41. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      44. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years?

    • 45. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities within 5 years?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a grower or miller.

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Percentage of scheme smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • 49. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a grower or miller.

    • N
      0 / 1

      50. Sells RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • N
      0 / 1

      51. Processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      52. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      The company reported to be certified with ISPO in 2017. However, it is unclear whether this covers all of company's operations and no externally verified evidence could be found.

    • 53. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.

    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    0.5 / 20 2.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 12 4.2%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Commitment to zero deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      63. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?

    • N
      0 / 1

      65. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?

    • N
      0 / 1

      66. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?

    • N
      0 / 1

      67. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      68. Biodiversity policy?

    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      70. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      72. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      The company states a commitment to prohibiting hunting of rare flora and fauna and that it carries out routine patrols to avoid poaching of wild animals in the Company's areas but does not have a clear commitment to no hunting of all species.

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    0 / 15 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 8 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 7 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      74. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      77. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted/planned planting since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. High Conservation Value (HCV) or combined HCV/HCS management and monitoring plans for all estates planted/planned planting since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      83. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    2 / 20 10%
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 8 12.5%
    • Practice: 1 / 7 14.3%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 7 14.3%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      90. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      91. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      92. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      95. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. Commitment to zero burning?

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      98. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company reported on employees training on management of fires taking place in forests and plantations. However, no details are given.

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      100. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      103. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?

    • (NEW: not scored this year) N
      -

      104. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      105. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company states that GHG emission intensity has increased by 0.03 tons CO2/ton FFB in 2022 compared to 2021.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      106. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      The company states to calculate GHG emission using ISPO v.9.1 (2016) calculator template.

    • N
      0 / 1

      107. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    2.75 / 24 11.5%
    • Organisation: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • Policy: 0 / 11 0%
    • Practice: 2.3 / 11 20.5%
    • Self-reported: 2.3 / 11 20.5%
    • External: 0 / 11 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 11 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      109. Water use intensity?

      320.441 - The company reports a water usage figure for 2022 in m3.

    • N
      0 / 1

      110. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      111. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      112. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      113. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

      The company reported on wastewater treatment in the mill operations.

    • 114. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • N
      0 / 1

      115. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 2

      116. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      118. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      119. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      120. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      121. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1

      122. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      123. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      124. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      125. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      126. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

      The company reported to recycle factory wastewater into liquid organic fertiliser.

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      127. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      The company reported to use natural predators and planting beneficial plants to reduce GHG emissions from pesticide ingredients.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      128. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      The company reported on the waste management system for hazardous and toxic waste, as well as liquid and solid waste management.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    6.25 / 35 17.9%
    • Organisation: 1 / 5 20%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 21 16.7%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 9 19.4%
    • Self-reported: 1.8 / 9 19.4%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      129. Commitment to human rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      130. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      131. Progress on human rights commitment?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      132. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company reported to have sustainability programs adjusted to conditions and needs of the local community. However, no further details explained.

    • N
      0 / 1

      133. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      134. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      138. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      139. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company reported on stakeholder approach through meetings and discussions with the community/associations and public.

    • N
      0 / 1

      140. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      141. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • N
      0 / 1

      142. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1

      143. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      144. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company provides essential community services and facilities.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      145. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company lists various essential community services and facilities.

    • N
      0 / 1

      146. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      147. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • N
      0 / 1

      148. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      149. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      150. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • N
      0 / 1

      151. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      153. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      1446 (63.95%) - The company reported on the contract workers and daily workers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      154. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      155. Commitment to pay a Living Wage?

      The company reported that the company and all of its subsidiaries provide minimum employee wage in accordance with applicable Regency Minimum Wage.

    • N
      0 / 1

      156. Commitment to pay a Living Wage applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      157. Progress on commitment to pay a Living Wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      158. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      159. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company has implemented occupational health and safety management system.

    • N
      0 / 1

      160. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      161. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company mentioned to provide and regulate the use of PPE in every work activity.

    • N
      0 / 1

      162. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1

      163. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    0.5 / 9 5.6%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 4 12.5%
    • Practice: 0 / 5 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
    • External: 0 / 5 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 5 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      164. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company only mentioned on expanding smallholders oil palm program.

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Programme to support scheme smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Percentage of scheme smallholders involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Programme to support independent smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      168. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      169. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      170. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      172. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • (NEW: not scored this year) N
      -

      173. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF)?

    • 174. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 175. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 176. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 177. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 178. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 179. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    2.5 / 7 35.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 5 50%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      180. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company provides details on code of ethics and anti-corruption policy.

    • N
      0 / 1

      181. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      182. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      183. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

      The company reports that it has a finance and tax manager who looks for all tax issues.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      184. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company reported to not have a whistleblowing system in place. However, the company investigates via internal audit division.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      185. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company has a Complaints SOP for community and workers covering social and environmental issues in company's operational areas.

    • N
      0 / 1

      186. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Gozco Plantations Tbk PT

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Palm oil media reports (4) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

2


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)