Skip to content
Menu Search

Glenealy Plantations Sdn Bhd

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: November 2020
  • Next scheduled: November 2021

Show media reports (10) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • About this company:

    Malaysia based producer Glenealy Plantations operates palm oil

  • Parent company:
    Samling Global Ltd, via subsidiary Lingui Development Sdn Bhd
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    51,302 hectares
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private
  • RSPO member?
    No
  • Website:

Company assessment: Glenealy Plantations Sdn Bhd – November 2020

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 39.3% 64.5 / 164
  • Organisation: 16 / 31 51.6%
  • Policy: 38 / 72 52.8%
  • Practice: 10.5 / 61 17.2%
  • Self-reported: 4.5 / 61 7.4%
  • External: 1.8 / 61 2.9%
  • Certified: 4.3 / 61 7%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    2.5 / 9 27.8%
    • Organisation: 1 / 4 25%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 2 75%
    • Practice: 0 / 3 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company has a sustainability policy but unclear if includes all the suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • 4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not have a Board of Directors.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      The company reports that there are three women in management (Estate - two and in Mills - one).

    • 6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not have a Board of Directors.

    • N
      0 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • N
      0 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • N
      0 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    10 / 15 66.7%
    • Organisation: 8 / 12 66.7%
    • Policy: 1 / 1 100%
    • Practice: 1 / 2 50%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 1 / 2 50%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      51,302

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      39,447 - The company states that 39,447 ha is the total oil palm planted area. It does not include smallholders.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      1,293

    • N
      0 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      18. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company has some concessions mapped on GFW, listed under its parent company Samling, but it is unclear to if this represents 100% of the company's palm oil concessions.

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      20. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

      The company provides coordinates of third-party supplier plantations, but not estate boundaries.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      21. Number of company-owned mills?

      4 - The company on the webpage states that it has four mills.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      22. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

      The company states that it has four mills and has provided the coordinates for the same.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      23. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and/or third parties?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      24. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and/or third-parties?

      FFB from own plantation 48,2201 mton, FFB from others 65,357 mton.

    • 25. Number of third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 26. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 27. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and/or third party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 28. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 29. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • 30. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 31. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

      The company has already achieved 100% traceability to plantation level.

    • Y
      1 / 2

      33. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • 34. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 35. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • 36. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own palm kernel crushing facilities.

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    1 / 14 7.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 1 / 10 10%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 10 0%
    • External: 1 / 10 10%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      37. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • N
      0 / 1

      39. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      41. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

    • 44. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a grower or miller.

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • 48. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a grower or miller.

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • N
      0 / 1

      50. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      51. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      52. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    3 / 17 17.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 9 27.8%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      53. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company has an NDPE Policy, however it was only put in place in April 2020.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      54. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

      The company has an NDPE Policy, however it was only put in place in April 2020.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      55. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      The company is committed to no deforestation and states that there will be no deforestation in the area identified as HCV and HCS. The policy was put in place in April 2020.

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Evidence of monitoring deforestation in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      63. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

      The company states that it is committed to enhancing biodiversity. However, biodiversity conservation is not mentioned explicitly.

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      65. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      66. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company reports limited evidence including putting up signage which prohibits hunting in HCV areas and appplication of chemicals near buffer zones.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      67. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      The company prohibits hunting in HCV areas.

    • N
      0 / 1

      68. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    5 / 14 35.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 5 / 8 62.5%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      69. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      70. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      74. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company states "the HCV and HCSA identification procedure will be guided by HCVRN Common Guidance and HCSA Toolkits" but does not clearly commit to use of ALS assessors.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      75. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

      The company states "the HCV and HCSA identification procedure will be guided by HCVRN Common Guidance and HCSA Toolkits" but does not clearly commit to use of ALS assessors. The policy applies to its suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      77. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      78. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    9.75 / 19 51.3%
    • Organisation: 2 / 5 40%
    • Policy: 6.5 / 8 81.3%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 6 20.8%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0.8 / 6 12.5%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      83. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      84. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      85. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      0 (0%) - The company states that currently there is no planting on peat and commits to no new development in peat areas of any depth.

    • 86. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company states it has no landbank on peat.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      87. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      88. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to best management practices for peat only. And the same applies to suppliers.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      89. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      90. Commitment to zero burning?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      91. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to no open deforestation in any new development or replanting and the same applies to suppliers.

    • N
      0 / 2

      92. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

    • N
      0 / 1

      93. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      95. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

      The company commits to reduce GHG emissions but this is not time-bound.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      96. GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports the GHG emissions intesnity for each of its four mills.

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      99. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      100. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

      The company states that one of its mills has a bio composting plant.

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    10 / 24 41.7%
    • Organisation: 2 / 2 100%
    • Policy: 4 / 11 36.4%
    • Practice: 4 / 11 36.4%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 11 13.6%
    • External: 0 / 11 0%
    • Certified: 2.5 / 11 22.7%
    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      102. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      103. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      104. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company commits to treat POME to ensure BOD levels remain within legal limits.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      105. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company reports its BOD levels in 2018/19 and 2019/20 are within legal limits of 20ppm.

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      106. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

    • 107. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      108. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      109. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The company provides limited evidence of having buffer zones in place.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      110. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      111. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      112. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      113. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      114. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1

      115. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      116. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      118. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      119. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

      The company reports the establishment of a composting plant to utilise the Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB) as fertiliser.

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      120. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      The company reports its IPM approach but the data is more than two years old.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      121. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      The company is trying to reduce waste in plantation and milling operations and prohibits the burning of domestic waste. Also, all the scheduled waste is disposed of by a licensed contractor.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    20.25 / 35 57.9%
    • Organisation: 3 / 4 75%
    • Policy: 14.5 / 22 65.9%
    • Practice: 2.8 / 9 30.6%
    • Self-reported: 2 / 9 22.2%
    • External: 0.8 / 9 8.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      122. Commitment to human rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      123. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      124. Progress on human rights commitment?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      125. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company commits to respect the human rights of local communities, but does not commit to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or to the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (no. 169).

    • N
      0 / 1

      126. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      127. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      The company commits to respect legal rights through FPIC, but does not mention customary land rights.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      128. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to respect legal rights through FPIC, but does not mention customary land rights.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      129. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      131. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      132. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company states it conducts regular engagement with local communities to prevent conflict, but limited details are given.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      133. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      The company states that any land conflict raised will be resolved through a functional unbiased grievance mechanism. Detailed procedure for addressing land conflicts is not reported by the company.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      134. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

      The company is committed to providing and creating opportunities for the development of women's leadership at all levels. However, programs to support are not reported.

    • N
      0 / 1

      135. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      137. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      138. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company is working to bring a positive impact on the socio-economic status and economic empowerment of local communities. However, commitment to providing essential community services and facilities is unclear.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      139. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      [Externally verified] The company has started an initiative to set up Community Learning Centres (CLC) for children of the Indonesian workers for providing basic education and has repaired the roads at Rh. Jeranding and Rh. Awan near Jelalong plantation.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      140. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

      The company has an unclear commitment to provide work opportunities for local communities.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      141. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company states it's committed all the fundamental ILO conventions by referring to the same language as the title.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      142. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      143. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      144. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      145. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

      The company's NDPE policy, which applies to suppliers, makes a commitment to gender equality, but not a clear commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      146. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company has a gender policy which states the company will "Establish a specific complaints and grievance procedure and mechanism, acceptable by all parties, to address gender-based issues", however no further details on if this has been implemented are given.

    • 147. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has no temporary employees.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      148. Percentage or number of women employees?

      The company reports the total number of women in the estate is 1,709 and in mills is 57.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      149. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      150. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      151. Progress on commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      153. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      154. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      155. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company mentions provision of PPE in its Safety and Health policy and provides a photograph, but no futher evidence could be found.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      156. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      5.9

    • Y
      1 / 1

      157. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      0 - The company reports one and zero fatalities in 2018 and 2019, respectively.

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    0 / 10 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 4 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      158. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      159. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      160. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      161. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      162. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      163. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

    • 168. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 169. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 170. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 171. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 172. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 173. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    3 / 7 42.9%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3 / 5 60%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      174. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      176. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1

      177. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      178. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has a Whistle Blower Policy, which includes protection of whistleblowers, however no details on the steps taken are provided.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      179. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company states it has a grievance mechanism open to employees and local communities, but no further information could be found.

    • N
      0 / 1

      180. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Glenealy Plantations Sdn Bhd

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Palm oil media reports (10) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

4

1

1

9

5

3

2

5

1

0


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)