Skip to content
Menu Search
  • Latest update: October 2019
  • Next scheduled: October 2020

Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores

Company assessment: ENI SpA – October 2019

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 28.3% 34.5 / 122
  • Organisation: 9 / 21 42.9%
  • Policy: 19 / 58 32.8%
  • Practice: 6.5 / 43 15.1%
  • Self-reported: 5.5 / 43 12.8%
  • External: 1 / 43 2.3%
  • Certified: 0 / 43 0%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    5.5 / 10 55%
    • Organisation: 3 / 6 50%
    • Policy: 1 / 1 100%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 3 50%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • 1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • Y
      1 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      The company's Board of Directors has a "Sustainability and Scenarios Committee"

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      0 - The company does not directly report the number or percentage of women in its senior management team, but pictures and names on its website (undated) suggest there are no women

    • Y
      1 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      33%

    • Y
      1 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      UN Global Compact, GRI, WBCSD

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company has a sustainability report but it does not cover palm oil operations. Some social and environmental issues are covered in the company's annual report, but they are not specific to palm oil

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

      The last company’s reports verified by GRI are more than two years old. The company submitted a response to CDP in the Climate Change and Water Security categories, but not in the Forests category

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

      The company has published a summary of its climate change risks assessment

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    0 / 13 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 6 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 5 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
    • External: 0 / 5 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 5 0%
    • 13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 18. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 19. Maps of estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 20. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      21. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • 22. Number of company-owned mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills

    • 23. Names and coordinates of company-owned mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills

    • 24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills

    • 25. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      26. Number of supplier mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      28. Number (or percentage) of third-party supplier mills that source from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      29. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplier mills that come from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • 34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

    • 37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own crushing facilities

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    1.5 / 10 15%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 5 30%
    • Practice: 0 / 4 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 4 0%
    • External: 0 / 4 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 4 0%
    • 38. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • Y
      1 / 1

      39. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      40. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      High Carbon Stock forests

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      41. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • 42. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • 44. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      46. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • 47. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      48. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • 49. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 50. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 51. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    1 / 6 16.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 5 20%
    • Practice: 0 / 1 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 1 0%
    • External: 0 / 1 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 1 0%
    • 53. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • 55. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 56. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 57. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 58. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • 60. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 61. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • 63. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • Y
      1 / 1

      64. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      66. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

      SEIAs are available but they don't cover the company's palm oil operations

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    2.25 / 7 32.1%
    • Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 5 10%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 1 75%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 1 75%
    • External: 0 / 1 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 1 0%
    • 67. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      68. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • 69. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 70. Landbank or planted area on peat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 71. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      72. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • 73. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 74. Commitment to zero burning?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      75. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • 76. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 77. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 78. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      79. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

      The company's time-bound commitment to reduce GHG intensity (23% by 2025 compared to 2014) covers its upstream operations so does not cover its palm oil operations

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      80. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      81. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The figures that show a reduction in GHG intensity over time relate to all of the company's refineries, not only the ones that process palm oil

    • 82. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills

    • Y
      1 / 1

      83. GHG emissions intensity?

      253 - Tonnes CO2 eq/kT of products (crude oil and semifinished) processed in refineries. This figure relates to all of the company's refineries, not only the ones that process palm oil

    • 84. GHG emissions from land use change?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    0 / 10 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 6 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 3 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      85. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      86. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      87. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      88. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      90. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and/or palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

    • 91. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 92. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 93. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • 95. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 96. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 97. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      98. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • 99. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      100. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • 101. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      102. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • 103. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    17.75 / 40 44.4%
    • Organisation: 5 / 5 100%
    • Policy: 10.5 / 23 45.7%
    • Practice: 2.3 / 12 18.8%
    • Self-reported: 2.3 / 12 18.8%
    • External: 0 / 12 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 12 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      104. Commitment to human rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      105. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      106. Progress on human rights commitment?

      Actions include training program to employees on human rights, suppliers assessment on human rights issues

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      107. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      109. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      The company reports that it has a process for addressing land conflicts but limited details are given

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      110. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company commits to respect indigenous rights but does not reference the UN Declaration or the ILO Convention 169 specifically

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      111. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to respect the rights of local and indigenous population for its suppliers but does not reference the UN Declaration or the ILO Convention

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      112. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      113. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      The company only states that it promotes a free, prior and informed consultation

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      114. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      115. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      116. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      117. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced, applies to all suppliers?

    • 118. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      119. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • 120. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 121. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 122. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • Y
      1 / 1

      123. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      124. Commitment to respect all workers' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company has a commitment to respect workers' rights that applies to all suppliers but does not specify whether it covers all types of employees, including permanent and temporary

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      125. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      126. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      129. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      767 (2.48%)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Percentage or number of women employees?

      7,307 (23.6%)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      132. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      133. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      134. Progress on commitment to pay minimum wage?

      The company only reports wage ratios using market (not legal) minimum wage, and this does not cover all employees

    • Y
      1 / 1

      135. Reporting of salary by gender?

      98%

    • Y
      1 / 1

      136. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      137. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      138. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The total recordable injury rate has increased between 2017 and 2018 and is equal in 2018 to the 2016 rate

    • Y
      1 / 1

      139. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      0.35 - Total recordable injuries/worked hours x 1,000,000 for 2018

    • N
      0 / 1

      140. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      The number of fatalities in 2018 is not zero and has increased compared to the two previous years

    • Y
      1 / 1

      141. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      5 - In 2018, for the whole company

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      142. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    0 / 7 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 1 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 5 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
    • External: 0 / 5 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 5 0%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      143. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      144. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010 for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      145. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • 146. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 147. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within five years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 148. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 149. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 150. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own mills

    • 151. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/ associated smallholders and outgrowers within five years or target already achieved?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 152. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/ outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      153. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      154. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/ processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      155. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • 156. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 157. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      158. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB, etc.)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    2.25 / 11 20.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 5 20%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 6 20.8%
    • Self-reported: 1.3 / 6 20.8%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • 159. Commitment to support smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from smallholders

    • 160. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 161. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 162. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • 163. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a processor

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      164. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company states that it engages and assesses its suppliers to ensure compliance with its requirements and to improve the sustainability of the palm oil supply chain. However, details are only given in relation to compliance with human rights issues

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      165. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

      5,055 - The figure covers the year 2017. It only refers to supplier assessments on human rights issues and it is unclear whether the figure covers all palm oil operations

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      166. Time-bound plan to engage with all high-risk mills within three years?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      167. Programme to support high-risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      168. Regularly engages with a subset of high-risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      169. Procedures in place to assess all own and third-party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      170. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      171. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      There is evidence that the company has suspended suppliers, but it is unclear what the criteria, steps and/or timeframes are

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

      The company reports that 100% of its supply is certified by schemes recognised by the European Union, ensuring it is compliant with the company's requirement

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    4.25 / 8 53.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 5 70%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 3 25%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 3 25%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      179. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company has a grievance mechanism that clearly applies to external stakeholders, but it is unclear whether it applies to internal stakeholders as well, and the steps to be taken by stakeholders are not very clear

    • N
      0 / 1

      181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

      The company only publishes a summary table with number of grievances per category

Media monitor: ENI SpA

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: ENI SpA

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 181 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)