Skip to content
Menu Search

Eagle High Plantations Tbk PT

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: November 2020
  • Next scheduled: November 2021

Show media reports (26) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • About this company:

    Indonesian producer Eagle High, established in 2000, is

  • Parent company:
    Rajawali Group (65.5%)
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    219,965 hectares
  • Market cap:
    193,258,488 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    BWPT.JK
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    BWPT IJ
  • ISIN:
    ID1000113202
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:

Company assessment: Eagle High Plantations Tbk PT – November 2020

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 62.6% 104.6 / 167
  • Organisation: 25 / 34 73.5%
  • Policy: 49 / 72 68.1%
  • Practice: 30.6 / 61 50.2%
  • Self-reported: 4.9 / 61 8%
  • External: 18.5 / 61 30.3%
  • Certified: 7.2 / 61 11.8%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    10.25 / 11 93.2%
    • Organisation: 6 / 6 100%
    • Policy: 2 / 2 100%
    • Practice: 2.3 / 3 75%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 3 50%
    • External: 0.8 / 3 25%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company has its own sustainability policy which applies to all employees, contractors, and all third-party suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Head - Sustainability.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      CSO.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      4

    • Y
      1 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      0 (0%) - The company reported seven male and no female board members in 2019.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      [Externally verified] Some of the company's subsidiaries are members of the Indonesia Global Compact Network (IGCN).

    • Y
      1 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company reports that it is working with an NGO and government organisations on Project Amour, an orangutan conservation project.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

      GRI, CDP.

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

      A limited summary of risks and management strategy is available. This information has not been externally verified.

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    10.5 / 15 70%
    • Organisation: 10 / 12 83.3%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 1 50%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      219,965

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      124,218 - This figure excludes the scheme smallholder area.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      23,700

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      0

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      64,432 - The company only reports total land designated and managed as HCV areas.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      18. Maps of estates/management units?

      Concession boundaries have been made available to the RSPO in 2018 and the company declares no new concession acquisition or changes in the ownership of existing concessions were undertaken in 2019.

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      20. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      21. Number of company-owned mills?

      9

    • Y
      1 / 1

      22. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      23. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and/or third parties?

      The company has disclosed the supply bases for all its nine mills, two mills source 100% FFB from its own plantations, and seven mills source from own as well as third-party plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      24. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and/or third-parties?

      The company has disclosed the percentage of FFB supply from its own and third-party plantations for nine mills.

    • 25. Number of third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 26. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 27. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and/or third party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 28. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 29. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • 30. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 31. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

      The company commits to achieving 100% traceability to the plantation for operations in Kalimantan, but this does not cover the full scope of the company's operations.

    • N
      0 / 2

      33. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • 34. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from third-party supplying mills.

    • 35. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • 36. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own palm kernel crushing facilities.

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    4.65 / 13 35.8%
    • Organisation: 2 / 2 100%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 1.6 / 9 18.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.6 / 9 7.2%
    • External: 1 / 9 11.1%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      37. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      2008

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      The company achieved its first certification in 2019.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      39. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      40. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      Central Kalimantan, East Kalimantan, Papua, South Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, West Papua, West Sumatra.

    • P
      0.04 / 1

      41. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • P
      0.11 / 1

      42. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      2023

    • 44. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a grower or miller.

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

      2026

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • 48. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is only a grower or miller.

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      50. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      The company reports six subsidiaries with ISPO certification, but no certificates could be found.

    • 51. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.

    • N
      0 / 1

      52. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    12.04 / 17 70.8%
    • Organisation: 1 / 2 50%
    • Policy: 7 / 9 77.8%
    • Practice: 4 / 6 67.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 3 / 6 50%
    • Certified: 1 / 6 17.3%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      53. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company commits to preserving HCS, HSV, and peat. It makes a commitment to clearing no land on HCS and HCV. It also commits to no new development on peat.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      54. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

      The company specifies commitment to "no deforestation" which applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      55. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      The company specifies criteria for defining deforestation as HCV, HCS, and peat, but does not specify a cut-off date.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      56. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Evidence of monitoring deforestation in supplier operations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      58. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

      0

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      60. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

      The company states it seeks to restore non-compliant deforestation through remediation and compensation activities but does not specify a cut-off date.

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      62. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      63. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      64. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.04 / 1

      65. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      66. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      67. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      68. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    6.75 / 14 48.2%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 5 / 8 62.5%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 6 29.2%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 1.8 / 6 29.2%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      69. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      74. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      77. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      78. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits it suppliers to protection of HCS areas but does not specifically commit to apply the HCS Approach.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      79. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      80. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      81. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits suppliers to social impact assessments, but makes no specific reference to environmental impact assessments.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      82. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

      [Externally verified] A brief summary of an EIA is available in an HCS summary report.

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    11.79 / 20 59%
    • Organisation: 2 / 5 40%
    • Policy: 6.5 / 8 81.3%
    • Practice: 3.3 / 7 47%
    • Self-reported: 1.3 / 7 17.9%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 2 / 7 29.1%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      83. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company has its own commitment and also commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      84. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      85. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      20,334

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      86. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company specified that it has not conducted any new planting since 2017. However, the information found is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      87. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      88. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

      The company adopts BMPs for peat. No information is available for soil, but its policy does apply to all suppliers.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.04 / 1

      89. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      90. Commitment to zero burning?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      91. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      92. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      93. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

      The company reports that fires occurred in one operational area between July-August 2019, but further details are not provided.

    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      95. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

      The company states it is committed to actively pursue opportunities to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions but does not provide details and it is not a time-bound commitment.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      96. GHG emissions intensity?

      803.59 tCO2e/h.

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      98. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports progress but not as intensity figures also this does not cover all operations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      99. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      ISPO GHG calculation tools.

    • N
      0 / 1

      100. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

      The company states it ''carried out biogas project construction by utilizing POME from palm oil mills in South Kalimantan. The project is expected to operate in 2020''.

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    10.12 / 24 42.2%
    • Organisation: 1 / 2 50%
    • Policy: 3 / 11 27.3%
    • Practice: 6.1 / 11 55.6%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 11 9.1%
    • External: 1 / 11 9.1%
    • Certified: 4.1 / 11 37.5%
    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      The company states it is committed to improving the intensity of water use but does not refer to a time-bound target.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      102. Water use intensity?

      1,083,450 - The company reports some water use figures, but these are not reported in water use intensity and do not cover all operations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      103. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company reports a progress figure for three of its subsidiaries for the year 2019, 2018, and 2017 respectively: 1.083.453, 1.169.686, and 1.083.317. However, this does not cover the overall operation.

    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

      No time-bound commitment found to improve water quality.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      105. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company reports figures for BOD for the year 2019, 2018, and 2017 which does not cover the overall operations. Also, no progress found on water quality.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.04 / 1

      106. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • 107. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      108. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.04 / 1

      109. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      110. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      111. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      112. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

      The company states it has a commitment to stop using paraquat but does not specify that it has stopped, or provide a time-bound plan for phasing out the use of paraquat.

    • N
      0 / 1

      113. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

      The company states it has a commitment to stop using paraquat but does not specify that it has stopped, or provide a time-bound plan for phasing out the use of paraquat.

    • N
      0 / 1

      114. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

      The company states it has a commitment to stop using WHO Class 1A and 1B pesticides but does not specify that it has stopped, or provide a time-bound plan for phasing out their use.

    • N
      0 / 1

      115. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

      The company states it has a commitment to stop using WHO Class 1A and 1B pesticides but does not specify that it has stopped, or provide a time-bound plan for phasing out their use.

    • N
      0 / 1

      116. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

      The company states it has a commitment to stop using chemicals listed under the Stockholm and Rotterdam Conventions but does not specify that it has stopped, or provide a time-bound plan for phasing out their use.

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

      The company states it has a commitment to stop using chemicals listed under the Stockholm and Rotterdam Conventions but does not specify that it has stopped, or provide a time-bound plan for phasing out their use.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      118. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      The company provides a list of chemicals and pesticides used, but it is not clear whether this covers all operations as details are only provided for some subsidiaries.

    • Y
      1 / 2

      119. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.04 / 1

      120. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      121. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    29 / 36 80.6%
    • Organisation: 3 / 5 60%
    • Policy: 18 / 22 81.8%
    • Practice: 8 / 9 88.9%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 9 0%
    • External: 8 / 9 88.9%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      122. Commitment to human rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      123. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      124. Progress on human rights commitment?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      125. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company states that it respects the rights of its indigenous and local communities but does not reference the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or ILO 169.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      126. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company states that it respects the rights of its indigenous and local communities but does not reference the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or ILO 169. However, the policy applies to all suppliers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      127. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      129. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      The company has its own commitment and also commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      The RSPO Principles and Criteria 2018 contain guidance and requirements on the process to conduct free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's commitments under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member reporting as a grower. The company also provides steps in the FPIC process.

    • N
      0 / 1

      132. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      133. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      134. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      135. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      137. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      138. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      139. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      140. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      141. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      142. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      143. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      144. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      145. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      146. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      147. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      12,639

    • Y
      1 / 1

      148. Percentage or number of women employees?

      1,108

    • Y
      1 / 1

      149. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      150. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      151. Progress on commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      153. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      154. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      155. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      156. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      157. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      0

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    4.5 / 10 45%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 4 50%
    • Practice: 2.5 / 6 41.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • External: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      158. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      159. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      160. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

      12,000 - The company reports it has established a strategic partnership with 12,000 plasma farmers but the percentage of smallholders supported by the company is unclear.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      161. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • N
      0 / 1

      162. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      163. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company states it "carries out frequent evaluation of the suppliers/farmers to ensure that there is no violation of laws, land acquisition from forest encroachment, conservation areas, nature reserves, and other prohibited areas.'' However, only limited details are provided.

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      165. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      The company states it "carries out frequent evaluation of the suppliers/farmers to ensure that there is no violation of laws, land acquisition from forest encroachment, conservation areas, nature reserves, and other prohibited areas.'' However, only limited details are provided.

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

    • 168. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 169. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 170. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 171. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 172. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

    • 173. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills.

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    5 / 7 71.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 4 / 5 80%
    • Practice: 1 / 2 50%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 1 / 2 50%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      174. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      176. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO-certified landbank.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      177. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

      The company reports that it reviews its tax strategy annually and that the Chief Finance Officer is responsible for compliance. Full points cannot be awarded as the tax strategy is not publicly available.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      178. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      179. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company states it has a community/environment grievance mechanism with a standard operating procedure for complaint handling but no further details are given and it is not clear who the system is open to or how to access it.

    • N
      0 / 1

      180. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Eagle High Plantations Tbk PT

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Palm oil media reports (26) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

5

3

6

18

2

1

7

7

2

1


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)