Skip to content
Menu Search

Eagle High Plantations Tbk PT

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: October 2019
  • Next scheduled: October 2020

Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores
  • About this company:

    Indonesian producer Eagle High, established in 2000, is

  • Parent company:
    Rajawali Group (65.5%)
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    210,511 hectares
  • Palm cultivation revenue:
    8%
  • Market cap:
    265,201,707 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    BWPT.JK
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    BWPT IJ
  • ISIN:
    ID1000113202
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:

Company assessment: Eagle High Plantations Tbk PT – October 2019

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 45.8% 80.61 / 176
  • Organisation: 23 / 35 65.7%
  • Policy: 33.5 / 75 44.7%
  • Practice: 24.1 / 66 36.5%
  • Self-reported: 5 / 66 7.6%
  • External: 19.1 / 66 29%
  • Certified: 0 / 66 0%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    8.5 / 11 77.3%
    • Organisation: 6 / 6 100%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 3 50%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • External: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Head – Sustainability

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      Director of Sustainability

    • Y
      1 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      5 (0.06%)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      0 (0%) - The company reported six male and no female board members in 2017

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      One of the company's subsidiaries is a member of the Indonesia Global Compact Network (IGCN)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company reports that it is working with an NGO and government organisations on Project Amour, an orangutan conservation project

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • Y
      1 / 1
      No source

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

      GRI

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    10 / 16 62.5%
    • Organisation: 9.5 / 13 73.1%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 1 50%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      210,511

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      126,286 - This figure excludes the scheme smallholder area

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      19,793 - This figure is reported in the company's 2018 ACOP. However, the company reports 24,000 ha managed under the plasma scheme in its 2018 Sustainability Report

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      0

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      64,432

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company states that it has uploaded maps representing all concessions in its 2018 ACOP

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      20. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      21. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      22. Number of company-owned mills?

      9

    • Y
      1 / 1

      23. Names and coordinates of company-owned mills?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      25. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • 26. Number of supplier mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills

    • 27. Names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills

    • 28. Number (or percentage) of third-party supplier mills that source from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills

    • 29. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplier mills that come from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills

    • 30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it is not a refiner

    • 31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills

    • 32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

      The company commits to achieve 100% traceability to plantation for operations in Kalimantan, but this does not cover the full scope of the company's operations

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • 35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills

    • 36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it is not a refiner

    • 37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own crushing facilities

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    6.5 / 18 36.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 9 38.9%
    • Practice: 3 / 7 42.9%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 3 / 7 42.9%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      38. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      39. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      40. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      The company specifies criteria for defining deforestation as HCV, HCS, and peat, but does not specify a cut-off date beyond which deforestation would not be accepted

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      41. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      46. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      The company states that two wildlife conservation projects with subsidiaries and local communities demonstrates its commitment to the landscape approach, but only provides limited details. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      47. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      48. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      49. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      The company reports the IUCN status of several species found within its operational area. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      50. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company refers to two conservation projects, one involving setting up patrols to protect, monitor and manage an HCV area where orangutan nests have been found, the other conserving the wetland habitat of the proboscis monkey.Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      51. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    5.25 / 14 37.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 8 43.8%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 6 29.2%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 1.8 / 6 29.2%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      53. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

      The company reported planting 1,571 ha in its 2015 ACOP, but no HCV assessments corresponding to this could be found. It also reports having undertaken HCV assessments but no reports could be found

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      57. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      58. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company does not have an explicit commitment itself, but commits under the RSPO New Planting Procedures (NPP) as an RSPO member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      60. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      61. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      63. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      64. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      66. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

      [Externally verified] A brief summary of an EIA is available in an HCS summary report

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    8.5 / 20 42.5%
    • Organisation: 2 / 5 40%
    • Policy: 4 / 8 50%
    • Practice: 2.5 / 7 35.7%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 7 21.4%
    • External: 1 / 7 14.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      67. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      68. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      69. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      70. Landbank or planted area on peat?

      20,334 - Figure reported for area planted on peatland (ha) in 2018

    • Y
      1 / 1

      71. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      72. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      73. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company reports managing water levels for peat, and application of liquid and solid palm oil waste as a supplement and mulch to retain moisture. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      74. Commitment to zero burning?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      75. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      76. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company reports monitoring and managing fires by daily patrols, monitoring from a monitoring tower, conducting fire prevention activities with local authorities and fire brigade, conducting emergency response training, and responding to fire outbreak to successfully extinguish fire between July-September 2018

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      77. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

      The company reports that fires occurred in one operational area between July-September 2018, but further details are not provided

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

      The company states it is committed to actively pursue opportunities to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, but does not provide details and it is not a time-bound commitment

    • Y
      1 / 1

      80. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      The company states it "applies monitoring system based on the ISPO calculator adapted from the EU Directive calculator. The baseline year for calculating carbon emissions is 2016 which uses the ISPO GHG calculation tools."

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports emissions but not in intensity from POME, Scope 1 and Scope 2 for some of its subsidiaries, but not all show an improvement and this does not cover the full scope of the company's operations

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

      The company reports it is planning to construct a biogas plant but does not report that this is operational

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      83. GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports emissions but not in intensity from POME, Scope 1 and Scope 2 for some of its subsidiaries, but this does not cover the full scope of the company's operations

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      84. GHG emissions from land use change?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    7.75 / 22 35.2%
    • Organisation: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • Policy: 3 / 11 27.3%
    • Practice: 4.3 / 9 47.2%
    • Self-reported: 1.3 / 9 13.9%
    • External: 3 / 9 33.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      The company states it is committed to improving the intensity of water use, but does not refer to a time-bound target

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company reports some water use figures, but these are not reported in water use intensity, are not improving, and do not cover all operations

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Water use intensity?

      The company reports some water use figures, but these are not reported in water use intensity, are not improving, and do not cover all operations

    • Y
      1 / 1

      88. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company states it is committed to improving the quality of processed wastewater in its operations and ensuring the quality of processed wastewater complies with the quality standards set by the government

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      89. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company reports improving figures for BOD that are within legal limits for some of its operations

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      90. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and/or palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      The company reports it treats POME

    • Y
      1 / 1

      91. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      92. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      93. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      95. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      96. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      The company provides a list of chemicals and pesticides used, but it is not clear whether this covers all operations as details are only provided for some subsidiaries

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

      The company states it has a commitment to stop using paraquat, but does not specify that it has stopped, or provide a time-bound plan for phasing out use of paraquat

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      98. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

      The company states it has a commitment to stop using WHO Class 1A and 1B pesticides, but does not specify that it has stopped, or provide a time-bound plan for phasing out their use

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      100. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

      The company states it has a commitment to stop using chemicals listed under the Stockholm and Rotterdam Conventions, but does not specify that it has stopped, or provide a time-bound plan for phasing out their use

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      102. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      103. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      The company reports a range of natural pest control used for a number of pests, including using barn owls to control rats; pheromone application to control scarab beetle; using manual control, light traps and planting host plants for predatory species to control fire caterpillars. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    22.25 / 46 48.4%
    • Organisation: 3 / 5 60%
    • Policy: 12.5 / 25 50%
    • Practice: 6.8 / 16 42.2%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 16 4.7%
    • External: 6 / 16 37.5%
    • Certified: 0 / 16 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      104. Commitment to human rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      105. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      106. Progress on human rights commitment?

      The company states it conducts training on human rights but no further details are provided. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      107. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      109. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      110. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company states that it respects the right of its indigenous and local communities but does not reference the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or ILO 169

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      111. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      112. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      113. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      114. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      115. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      116. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      117. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      118. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      119. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      120. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company reports several examples including cultivation of horticulture crops, livestock, freshwater fisheries

    • Y
      1 / 1

      121. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      122. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      123. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      The company refers to protecting the rights of all employees, but does no explicitly state workers' or labour rights, or that this applies to both permanent and temporary employees

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      124. Commitment to respect all workers' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      125. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      126. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      129. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      16,837 (67%) - This figure includes contract and daily employees

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Percentage or number of women employees?

      1,012 (12%)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      132. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      133. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      134. Progress on commitment to pay minimum wage?

      The company states that all employees receive the provincial minimum wage in its 2018 sustainability report, and provides evidence of minimum wage paid and provincial minimum wages in its 2017 sustainability report. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      135. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      136. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      137. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      138. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      139. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1

      140. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      The company reports three fatalities in 2018, but this does not cover the full scope of the company's operations

    • Y
      1 / 1

      141. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      3

    • Y
      1 / 2

      142. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company provides examples of tasks for which it provides PPE and facilitates training: spraying oil palm trees with chemicals, harvesting FFB, operating heavy equipments, conducting activities in palm oil mill production processes. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    4.86 / 13 37.4%
    • Organisation: 2 / 2 100%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 1.9 / 9 20.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 9 0%
    • External: 1.9 / 9 20.7%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      143. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      2,008

    • N
      0 / 1

      144. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010 for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      The company achieved its first certification in 2019

    • Y
      1 / 1

      145. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      146. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      The company reports operational area in Sulawesi which is not stated in its 2018 ACOP, however this area is not yet operational

    • Y
      1 / 1

      147. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within five years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      2023

    • N
      0 / 1

      148. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

      8,262 - This figure relates to the company's certified area dated 2019, but a total landbank figure dated 2019 is not available in company reporting. A figure for "Plantations – total hectares" is available in a data appendix on the company website, but it is not clear that this refers to total landbank. The company reported 0 ha certified in the 2018 ACOP

    • N
      0 / 1

      149. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

      0 (0%)

    • P
      0.11 / 1

      150. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      1 (11%)

    • N
      0 / 1

      151. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/ associated smallholders and outgrowers within five years or target already achieved?

      2026 - The company states 2026 in its 2018 ACOP, and 2025 in its 2018 Sustainability Report

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/ outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

      0

    • 153. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own processing facilities

    • 154. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/ processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own processing facilities

    • N
      0 / 1

      155. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

      0

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      156. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      [Externally verified] The company reports five subsidiaries with ISPO certification, but only one certificate could be found via the ISPO website

    • 157. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      158. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB, etc.)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    3.5 / 8 43.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 4 50%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 4 37.5%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 4 12.5%
    • External: 1 / 4 25%
    • Certified: 0 / 4 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      159. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      160. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      The company reports it supports plasma smallholders including to increase yields and productivity, providing health and safety training, financial mnagement and good agricultural practices. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      161. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

      12,000 - The company reports it has established a strategic partnership with 12,000 plasma farmers but the percentage of smallholders supported by the company is unclear

    • 162. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not source from independent smallholders or outgrowers

    • 163. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not source from independent smallholders or outgrowers

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      164. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company states it records all suppliers to ensure compliance "with other needs and requirements" and states it does not buy FFB from suppliers who have violated laws relating to encroachment on forests, conservation areas, nature reserves and other prohibited areas, and regularly assesses suppliers, but does not provide further details

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      165. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

    • 166. Time-bound plan to engage with all high-risk mills within three years?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • 167. Programme to support high-risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • 168. Regularly engages with a subset of high-risk mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • 169. Procedures in place to assess all own and third-party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • 170. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • 171. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      The company states it records all suppliers to ensure compliance "with other needs and requirements" and states it does not buy FFB from suppliers who have violated laws relating to encroachment on forests, conservation areas, nature reserves and other prohibited areas, and regularly assesses suppliers, but does not provide further details

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    3.5 / 8 43.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 5 50%
    • Practice: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 2

      177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company reports it has disseminated its code of ethics to 46% of total employees, and code of ethics training has been conducted in all regions except Sumatra. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      179. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company states it has a community/environment complaint mechanism with a standard operating procedure for complaint handling but no further details given and it is not clear who the system is open to or how to access it

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Eagle High Plantations Tbk PT

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: Eagle High Plantations Tbk PT

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 181 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)