Skip to content
Menu Search
  • Latest update: October 2019
  • Next scheduled: October 2020

Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores
  • About this company:

    Danec SA is a company that engages in

  • Landbank (oil palm)
    30,221 hectares
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:

Company assessment: Danec S.A. – October 2019

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 23.1% 43.66 / 189
  • Organisation: 8 / 36 22.2%
  • Policy: 21.5 / 78 27.6%
  • Practice: 14.2 / 75 18.9%
  • Self-reported: 2.5 / 75 3.3%
  • External: 2.8 / 75 3.7%
  • Certified: 8.9 / 75 11.9%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    3.5 / 9 38.9%
    • Organisation: 1 / 4 25%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 2 75%
    • Practice: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company states its Sustainability Policy will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • 4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • 6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    5.5 / 26 21.2%
    • Organisation: 5.5 / 16 34.4%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 8 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      30,221 - Data as of 2017

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

    • 15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from plasma/scheme smallholders

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      0 - Data as of 2017

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      4,907 - Data as of 2017

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company has geo-referenced maps of three subsidiaries as a part of its RSPO audits, but this does not cover all of the company's operations

    • 20. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from plasma/scheme smallholders

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      21. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      22. Number of company-owned mills?

      4 - The company's 2017 ACOP reports that the company has three mills. However, the company's website, dated 2017, lists four mills

    • Y
      1 / 1

      23. Names and coordinates of company-owned mills?

      The company's RSPO audits give the names and coordinates for three mills. The fourth mill is identifiable on GFW

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      25. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      26. Number of supplier mills?

      In the company's 2016 Sustainability Report, a flowchart shows that its refineries do source from other mills or "extractora" – however, the names of these mills are not provided

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      28. Number (or percentage) of third-party supplier mills that source from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      29. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplier mills that come from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    4.77 / 18 26.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 9 38.9%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 7 18.1%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1.3 / 7 18.1%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      38. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      39. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

      The company has a zero deforestation policy. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      40. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      The company commits to protect HCV, HCS and peat. No cut-off date is given

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      41. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.27 / 1

      46. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      The company reports extensive interactions with government ministries, NGOs and other palm companies in order to bring a jurisdictional RSPO standard to Ecuador. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      47. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

      The company claims in its 2016 Sustainability Report that undertakes "activities with the aim of achieving ecosystems that maintain their diversity and productive with time", but does not make an explicit commitment

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      48. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      49. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      50. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      51. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      52. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

      The company has a commitment to no hunting. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    0 / 14 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 8 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      53. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      56. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      57. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      58. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      60. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      61. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      63. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      64. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      65. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      66. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    4.75 / 20 23.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 4 / 8 50%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 7 10.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 7 10.7%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      67. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company commits to not planting on peatland, but does not explicitly state this applies to peatland of any depth

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      68. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

      The company has a commitment to no planting on peat, although it does not specify a depth. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      69. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company has not done any new planting according to its 2106 and 2017 ACOPs

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. Landbank or planted area on peat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      71. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      72. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to Best Agricultural Practices, but does not specify for peatland

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      73. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      74. Commitment to zero burning?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      75. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

      The company has a commitment to no burning. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      76. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      77. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      79. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      80. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      RSPO PalmGHG Calculator

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      82. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      83. GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      84. GHG emissions from land use change?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    0.75 / 22 3.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 11 0%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 9 8.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 9 0%
    • External: 0.8 / 9 8.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      85. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      86. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company reports a reduction in "water captured from the river", but does not give any figures, nor is it a measure of water intensity

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      87. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      88. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      90. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and/or palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      [Externally verified] The company's external RSPO audits show that its mills treat POME, but there is no evidence that the company treats PORE

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      91. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      92. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      93. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      94. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      95. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      96. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      97. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      98. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      99. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      100. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      101. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      102. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      103. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    17.85 / 46 38.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 11.5 / 25 46%
    • Practice: 6.4 / 16 39.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 16 0%
    • External: 0 / 16 0%
    • Certified: 6.4 / 16 39.7%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      104. Commitment to human rights?

      The company commits to respect human rights, but does not reference the UN Declaration or the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      105. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to respect human rights, but does not reference the UN Declaration or the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.27 / 1

      106. Progress on human rights commitment?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      107. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      108. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company refers to property rights and customary ownership of land by indigenous peoples. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • Y
      1 / 1

      109. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      110. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company references the rights of indigenous peoples, specifically the right to self-determination, but only in relation to FPIC

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      111. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company references the rights of indigenous peoples, specifically the right to self-determination, but only in relation to FPIC. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.27 / 1

      112. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      113. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      114. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

      The company makes a commitment to respect FPIC. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      115. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      116. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      117. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      118. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      119. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      120. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      121. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      122. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      123. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      The company has a section in its Sustainability Policy regarding "respect and recognition of worker's rights", but this focuses exclusively on foreign and temporary workers

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      124. Commitment to respect all workers' rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company has a section in its Sustainability Policy regarding "respect and recognition of worker's rights", but this focuses exclusively on foreign and temporary workers. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.27 / 1

      125. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      126. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      129. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation applies to all suppliers?

      The company has a commitment to prevent gender discrimination. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      130. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      131. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      132. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      133. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

      The company makes a commitment to pay all its workers an equal and dignified wage. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.27 / 1

      134. Progress on commitment to pay minimum wage?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      135. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      136. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      137. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

      The company has a commitment to address health and safety at work. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      138. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      139. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      140. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      141. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.27 / 1

      142. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    3.52 / 12 29.3%
    • Organisation: 1.5 / 2 75%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 2 / 8 25.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 2 / 8 25.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      143. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      2,010

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      144. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010 for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      The company received its first certification in October 2018

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      145. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      The company should provide both a Processor/Trader and Grower ACOPs to the RSPO, but only provided a Processor/Trader ACOP in 2018

    • Y
      1 / 1

      146. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      This information is from the company's 2017 ACOP. The company did not submit a 2018 Grower ACOP. The company only has plantations in Ecuador

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      147. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within five years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      The company's 2017 ACOP aimed to have all estates and mills certified in 2018. A proportion of the company's estates and three of its mills were certified in October 2018, but ZSL has been unable to establish whether this constitutes 100% of its estates and mills

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      148. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • 149. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from plasma/scheme smallholders

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      150. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      [Externally verified] 3 (75%) - The company has three mills certified. However, the company provides contradictory information about how many mills it owns. ZSL has calculated the percentage using the higher number

    • 151. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/ associated smallholders and outgrowers within five years or target already achieved?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from plasma/scheme smallholders or outgrowers

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      152. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/ outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      153. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

      2018 - The company specifies that all of its processing facilities would be certified in 2018. Three units were certified in 2018, but ZSL has been unable to confirm whether this constitutes the entirety of the company's facilities

    • P
      0.27 / 1

      154. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/ processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

      71,002 (26.507%) - Data as of 2018

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      155. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • 156. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Indonesia

    • 157. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      158. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB, etc.)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    0.75 / 14 5.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 6 0%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 8 9.4%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 8 9.4%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      159. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • 160. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from plasma/scheme smallholders

    • 161. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from plasma/scheme smallholders

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      162. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      163. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      164. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      165. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      166. Time-bound plan to engage with all high-risk mills within three years?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      167. Programme to support high-risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      168. Regularly engages with a subset of high-risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      169. Procedures in place to assess all own and third-party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      170. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      171. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    2.27 / 8 28.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 5 20%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 3 42.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 1.3 / 3 42.3%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company has a Code of Ethics that asks employees to adhere to transparency, but does not cover anti-corruption or fraud

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      The company's Sustainability Policy commits to conducting business in an ethical manner. It states that the commitment will be disseminated to its suppliers, but does not state that suppliers are expected to comply with the company's policies

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.27 / 1

      177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      179. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • N
      0 / 1

      180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Danec S.A.

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: Danec S.A.

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 181 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)