Skip to content
Menu Search

Biopalma da Amazônia S.A.

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: November 2020
  • Next scheduled: November 2021

Show media reports (7) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting

Company assessment: Biopalma da Amazônia S.A. – November 2020

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 13.6% 25 / 184
  • Organisation: 5 / 38 13.2%
  • Policy: 12.5 / 76 16.5%
  • Practice: 7.5 / 70 10.7%
  • Self-reported: 4.8 / 70 6.8%
  • External: 0 / 70 0%
  • Certified: 2.8 / 70 3.9%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    2.5 / 11 22.7%
    • Organisation: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      Sustainable Development Policy is included in Sustainability Report 2016, which includes human development, growth, economic diversification, strengthening of local institutions, supporting public institutions responsible for planning an adequate infrastructure, and contributing to the conservation of the region's ecosystems, biodiversity, and cultural heritage.

    • N
      0 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Director of Sustainability.

    • N
      0 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • N
      0 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

    • N
      0 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company works with the local and federal government on various palm oil-related issues such as the National Bioenergy Plan, agroecological zoning of palm plantations to avoid deforestation, and the creation of a Brazilian palm oil certification program. However, the information is more than two years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    2.5 / 25 10%
    • Organisation: 2.5 / 16 15.6%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 7 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      156,536 - The data available is more than two years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      56,487 - The data available is more than two years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      6,500 - The data available is more than two years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      93,462 - The data available is more than two years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      18. Maps of estates/management units?

      Static images available are not dated.

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      20. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      21. Number of company-owned mills?

      2 - The data available is more than two years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      22. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and/or third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and/or third-parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      25. Number of third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      26. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      27. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and/or third party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      28. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?

    • 29. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • N
      0 / 1

      30. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      31. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      33. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2

      34. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

    • 35. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • N
      0 / 1

      36. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    0 / 14 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 3 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 9 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 9 0%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      37. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      The company's 2016 Sustainability report stated that it was planning to have approximately 30,000 hectares and a plant certified by 2018 but was still not a member at the time of assessment.

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • N
      0 / 1

      39. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      41. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      44. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • 50. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Indonesia.

    • 51. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.

    • N
      0 / 1

      52. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    4 / 17 23.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 9 27.8%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 6 25%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      53. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company only states that it is "convinced that the expansion of the oil palm crop should not be established on areas of forests, areas of high biodiversity and permanent preservation".

    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      55. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      The company only discloses about the areas that are not to be deforested as high biodiversity and permanent preservation areas, however, no information found regarding the cut-off date beyond which no deforestation or conversion would be accepted.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      56. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      The company mentions that regular safeguarding is carried out through field inspections by the corporate security team seeking to prevent logging, hunting, fishing, and land invasions. However, the information found is more than two years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Evidence of monitoring deforestation in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      63. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      65. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      The company has identified a number of animal species, including birds, but does not refer to an appropriate classification system.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      66. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company only provides limited details on its species conservation activities. Also, the information found is more than two years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      67. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      The company states it prohibits hunting only in conservation set-aside areas.

    • N
      0 / 1

      68. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    0 / 14 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 8 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      74. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • N
      0 / 1

      77. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    1 / 20 5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 8 0%
    • Practice: 1 / 7 14.3%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1 / 7 14.3%
    • N
      0 / 1

      83. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      89. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company provides examples of best management practices for soils but not for peat.

    • N
      0 / 1

      90. Commitment to zero burning?

    • N
      0 / 1

      91. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      92. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company implemented Emergency Assistance Plans (PAEs) for fire events. However, no fire monitoring activities could be found for the same. Also the information found is more than two years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      93. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      95. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

    • N
      0 / 1

      100. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    3.75 / 24 15.6%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 11 13.6%
    • Practice: 2.3 / 11 20.5%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 11 9.1%
    • External: 0 / 11 0%
    • Certified: 1.3 / 11 11.4%
    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. Water use intensity?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      103. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company reports a figure of 0.615 m³ per ton of CFF, but it is not progress as it mentions in the sustainability report-2015 a figure of 0.43 m3/tons. Also, the data available is more than two years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      105. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      106. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

      The company seeks to achieve efficient management of water resources and industrial effluents.

    • 107. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own refineries.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      108. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 2

      109. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      110. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company only mentions using effluents and residual plant material as fertiliser, reducing the need to purchase inorganic fertilisers in the production process.

    • N
      0 / 1

      111. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      112. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      113. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      114. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1

      115. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      116. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      118. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • N
      0 / 2

      119. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      120. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      The company only describes Biological Pest Control as a guiding principle for Technological Innovation. It is unclear if it is implementing IPM techniques. Also, the information available is more than two years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      121. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      The company discusses a waste management system, however, implementation of the system is unclear, also the information found is more than two years old.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    7.5 / 36 20.8%
    • Organisation: 1.5 / 5 30%
    • Policy: 5 / 22 22.7%
    • Practice: 1 / 9 11.1%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 9 11.1%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      122. Commitment to human rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      123. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      124. Progress on human rights commitment?

    • N
      0 / 1

      125. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      126. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      127. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      128. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      129. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      130. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      131. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      132. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

    • N
      0 / 1

      133. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      134. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      135. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      137. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company gives multiple examples but the data available is more than two years old.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      138. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      139. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      140. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      141. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company only refers to five Fundamental Conventions: No. 138 (Minimum age) and 29 (No Forced Labour) by number and separately mentions no discrimination (No. 111), Freedom of Association (No. 87) and Child Labour (No. 182).

    • N
      0 / 1

      142. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      143. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      144. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • N
      0 / 1

      145. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      146. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • N
      0 / 1

      147. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      148. Percentage or number of women employees?

      34 (52%) - The company only provides information about the 66 young apprentices it hired in 2016 (34 female). Also the data available is more than two years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      149. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

      The company is only committed to safe, fair and decent work; complying with Brazilian labor legislation.

    • N
      0 / 1

      150. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      151. Progress on commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      153. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • N
      0 / 1

      154. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      155. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company states it uses PPE but it is not clear if relevant training on the safe use of pesticides is provided. The data available is more than two years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      156. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company provides a graph on progress regarding Accidents Frequency Rate, however, it is not possible to establish the exact rate for 2016. The information available is more than two years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      157. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      The company reports a decrease in an accident rate, however, the available data is more than two years old.

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    2.25 / 16 14.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 10 12.5%
    • Self-reported: 1.3 / 10 12.5%
    • External: 0 / 10 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 10 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      158. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      159. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      The company reports providing technical support, productivity, capacity building, and entrepreneurial skills. This seems to be for scheme smallholders.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      160. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

      667 - The company reports a total of 667 partner families participating in the program, promoting the responsible use of natural resources. However, the data available is more than two years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      161. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      162. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      163. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      168. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      169. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      170. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      172. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      173. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    1.5 / 7 21.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 5 30%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      174. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      176. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1

      177. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      178. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      179. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company's code of ethical conduct, available on the intranet, addresses topics such as diversity, equal opportunities, etc in relation to customers, suppliers, the government, and regulators. However, detailed information could not be found for the same.

    • N
      0 / 1

      180. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Biopalma da Amazônia S.A.

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Palm oil media reports (7) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

0

0

0

0

0

1

3

5

0

1


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)