Skip to content
Menu Search

Austindo Nusantara Jaya Tbk PT

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: October 2019
  • Next scheduled: October 2020

Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores
  • About this company:

    Indonesian producer Austindo, established 1993, is primarily involved

  • Parent company:
    Austindo Nusantara Jaya Tbk PT
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    157,681 hectares
  • Palm cultivation revenue:
    99%
  • Market cap:
    194,885,052 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    ANJT.JK
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    ANJT IJ
  • ISIN:
    ID1000270002
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:

Company assessment: Austindo Nusantara Jaya Tbk PT – October 2019

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 66.6% 118.55 / 178
  • Organisation: 24 / 35 68.6%
  • Policy: 60 / 75 80%
  • Practice: 34.6 / 68 50.8%
  • Self-reported: 8.5 / 68 12.5%
  • External: 10.5 / 68 15.4%
  • Certified: 15.6 / 68 22.9%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    7.5 / 11 68.2%
    • Organisation: 4 / 6 66.7%
    • Policy: 2 / 2 100%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 3 50%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • External: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Sustainability Director

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      Sustainability Director sits on the board

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      1 (20%) - The company has one woman in a team of five senior management members. The figure is not directly reported by the company

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      0 (0%) - The company has no women on its board of directors. The information is not directly reported by the company

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      PONGO Alliance.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company states it collaborates with a number of key stakeholders and partners including the Nature Conservation Agency, a government agency under the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Conservation International and International Animal Rescue.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

      GRI. In the company's 2017 sustainability report, it is mentioned that it is in accordance with GRI standards 2016 but is not updated on GRI website

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    9.5 / 16 59.4%
    • Organisation: 9.5 / 13 73.1%
    • Policy: 0 / 1 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      157,681

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      54,518 - Figures include plasma areas

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      4,527

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      28,091.9 - The company also reports approximately 35,000 ha plantable area not yet planted in its Annual Report 2018

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      72,420.8

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

      Concession boundaries have been made available to the RSPO in 2018 and the company declares these represent 100% of its concession sites

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      20. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

      Map image available in the company presentation 2018 showing all the estates with plasma landbank

    • N
      0 / 1

      21. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      22. Number of company-owned mills?

      4

    • Y
      1 / 1

      23. Names and coordinates of company-owned mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      25. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

      The company provides palm oil production data produced from own estates and bought from third parties

    • 26. Number of supplier mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not source from supplier mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • 27. Names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not source from supplier mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • 28. Number (or percentage) of third-party supplier mills that source from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not source from supplier mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • 29. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplier mills that come from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not source from supplier mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • 30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not source from supplier mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • 31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not source from supplier mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • 32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not source from supplier mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • N
      0 / 1

      33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 2
      No source

      34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level?

    • 35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not source from supplier mills. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • 36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it is not a refiner. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

    • 37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not own crushing facilities. Please note that ZSL has been unable to confirm this

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    9.9 / 18 55%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 6 / 9 66.7%
    • Practice: 3.9 / 7 55.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
    • External: 1 / 7 14.3%
    • Certified: 2.4 / 7 34.3%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      38. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company's 2019 policy states "We will not clear any areas with High Conservation Values (HCV) or High Carbon Stock (HCS) forest on lndonesian islands with less than 50% forest cover". Its 2017 sustainability report refers to a commitment to zero net deforestation and the company states in its 2018 annual report that it lost a customer who had adopted a "no deforestation" commitment

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      39. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

      The company has an unclear deforestation commitment however it applies to all suppliers

    • Y
      1 / 1

      40. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      HCV and HCS on lndonesian islands with less than 50% forest cover, and peat.The company's policy is effective immediately (as of 5 July 2019)

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      41. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      The company mentions patrolling in HCV areas

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      44. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      46. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      47. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      48. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      49. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      50. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company is working with Yayasan Inisiasi Alam Rehabilitasi Indonesia (YIARI) and The Nature Conservancy (TNC) on the management of conservation forest and research on orangutans in West Kalimantan. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      51. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      52. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    10 / 14 71.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 6 / 8 75%
    • Practice: 4 / 6 66.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 4 / 6 66.7%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      53. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      54. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      55. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

      There is public availability of the following HCV assessments:
      1) PT. Putera Manunggal Perkasa
      2) PT. Permata Putera Mandiri
      3) PT. Galempa Sejahtera Bersama
      4) PT. Kayung Agro Lestari

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      56. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

      [Externally verified] There is public availability of an HCV assessment in Belitung: Smallholder partnership programme for PT Sahabat Mewah dan Makmur. There is also an unsatisfactory HCV assessment (2018) on the HCVRN for PT. Austindo Nusantara Jaya Tbk (previously known as PT. Pusaka Agro Makmur) in West Papua Province and HCV assessment (2019) with first submission result as Unsatisfactory

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      57. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

      [Externally verified] There is only public availability of an HCV management plan for the Smallholder partnership programme for PT Sahabat Mewah dan Makmur

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      58. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company mention the use of a licensed HCV assessor but not specifically ALS

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      59. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

      The company's commitment to use licensed HCV assessor applies to all suppliers

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      60. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

      A satisfactory report for unit PT Galempa Sejahtera Bersama is available on HCVRN website. The HCV assessment for PT ANJ Agri Kebun Kemitraan Binanga has been declared unsatisfactory and the HCV assessment for PT. Austindo Nusantara Jaya Tbk (Previously known as PT. Pusaka Agro Makmur) declared unsatisfactory. The HCV Assessment (Oct. 2018) for PT. Austindo Nusantara Jaya Tbk (Previously known as PT. Pusaka Agro Makmur) is still under review

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      61. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company commits to maintaining areas with High Carbon Stock (HCS), but does not reference the HCS Approach

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      62. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to maintaining areas with High Carbon Stock (HCS), but does not reference the HCS Approach. The commitment applies to all suppliers

    • N
      0 / 1

      63. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      64. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      65. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      66. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    14.7 / 20 73.5%
    • Organisation: 5 / 5 100%
    • Policy: 6 / 8 75%
    • Practice: 3.7 / 7 52.9%
    • Self-reported: 2.5 / 7 35.7%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 1.2 / 7 17.1%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      67. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company has a policy of no development on peatlands however it does not specify of any depth

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      68. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

      The company has a policy of no development on peatlands however it does not specify of any depth. The commitment applies to all suppliers

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      69. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company reports no change in its landbank on peat since last year

    • Y
      1 / 1

      70. Landbank or planted area on peat?

      11,075.8

    • Y
      1 / 1

      71. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      72. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      73. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      74. Commitment to zero burning?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      75. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      76. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company has provided information about its monitoring and management of fires which includes fire towers for warning, emergency response, fire fighting and patrol teams

    • Y
      1 / 1

      77. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

      0

    • Y
      1 / 1

      78. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

      The company reports one fire that affected 30 hectares of land outside the KAL estate, namely 20 hectares in Palansi, Kuala Satong, and 10 hectares in Laman Satong

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      79. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      80. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      RSPO PalmGHG Calculator

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      81. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports a redcution in GHG intensity but it does not cover all of its operations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      82. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

      1 - The company has a methane capture facility at one of its palm oil mills, on Belitung Island. This facility began operation in 2013.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      83. GHG emissions intensity?

      1,509 - tCO2e/ha

    • Y
      1 / 1

      84. GHG emissions from land use change?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    13.35 / 22 60.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 9 / 11 81.8%
    • Practice: 4.4 / 9 48.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 9 8.3%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 3.6 / 9 40%
    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      85. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      86. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      87. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      90. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and/or palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      POME produced by the ANJA. SMM and KAL estates are treated and no information available for its fourth estate ANJAS

    • Y
      1 / 1

      91. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      92. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      93. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      94. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      95. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

      The company tries to minimise the usage of fertiliser and pesticides but no figures available. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      96. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      97. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      98. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      99. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      100. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      101. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      102. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      103. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    34.7 / 46 75.4%
    • Organisation: 3.5 / 5 70%
    • Policy: 22.5 / 25 90%
    • Practice: 8.7 / 16 54.4%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 16 9.4%
    • External: 0 / 16 0%
    • Certified: 7.2 / 16 45%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      104. Commitment to human rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      105. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      106. Progress on human rights commitment?

      The company in its 2018 sustainability report states it mitigates negative impacts on human rights through various policies. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      107. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      108. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      109. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      110. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company commits to respect local community rights but no mention of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, or ILO 169 could be found

    • N
      0 / 1

      111. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      112. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      113. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      114. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      115. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      The company is a member of RSPO and commits under RSPO NPP

    • Y
      1 / 1

      116. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      117. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced, applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      118. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      119. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      120. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      121. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      122. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      123. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      124. Commitment to respect all workers' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      125. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • Y
      1 / 1

      126. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      127. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

      The company's policy which applies to all suppliers only refers to some of the ILO conventions

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      129. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      830 (10.38%) - Contract workers

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Percentage or number of women employees?

      1,561 (19.52%)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      132. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      133. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      134. Progress on commitment to pay minimum wage?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      135. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      136. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      137. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      138. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company mentions that there was an increase in overall accident rate

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      139. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company only reports lost time injury and days lost for all subsidiaries, but does not report a rate

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      140. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      The company reports zero fatalities in 2018

    • Y
      1 / 1

      141. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      0 - The company reports zero fatalities in 2017

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      142. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company provides personal protective equipment (PPE) and related training in relation to palm oil operations. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    6.45 / 13 49.6%
    • Organisation: 2 / 2 100%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 3.5 / 9 38.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 9 5.6%
    • External: 3 / 9 32.8%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      143. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      2,007 - The company's subsidiary PT. Austindo Nusantara Jaya Agri is a member, which covers all of the company's palm oil operations

    • N
      0 / 1

      144. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010 for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      2011

    • Y
      1 / 1

      145. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      146. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      The company's subsidiary Austindo Nusantara Jaya Agri states all the countries and regions in which the company operates: Indonesia (Bangka Belitung,North Sumatra, South Sumatra, West Kalimantan, West Papua). The same information is available on its website

    • Y
      1 / 1

      147. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within five years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      2024

    • P
      0.2 / 1

      148. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

      31,392.2 (20.25%)

    • N
      0 / 1

      149. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

      0 (0%)

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      150. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

      [Externally verified] 3 (75%)

    • N
      0 / 1

      151. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/ associated smallholders and outgrowers within five years or target already achieved?

      2025 - Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of Scheme/Plasma/Associated smallholders and Outgrowers is over five years

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/ outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

      0 (0%)

    • 153. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not own processing facilities

    • 154. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/ processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company's reporting broadly suggests that it does not own processing facilities

    • N
      0 / 1

      155. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      156. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      Out of eight estates, four producing estates are certified

    • 157. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia

    • Y
      1 / 1

      158. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB, etc.)?

      The company states that Belitung and North Sumatra I plantations are its only producing plantations eligible to apply for International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISCC), and achieved certification in 2016

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    5.75 / 10 57.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3 / 4 75%
    • Practice: 2.8 / 6 45.8%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 6 12.5%
    • External: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      159. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      160. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      The company has programme to support smallholders but not specifically plasma smallholders. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1

      161. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      162. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

      Assisting on FFB productivity and ensuring smallholders follow RSPO requirements. Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      163. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      164. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company states that it will review the contract of partners who fail to comply and that it will provide training sessions for its suppliers on its sustaiability policy

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      165. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

      173

    • 166. Time-bound plan to engage with all high-risk mills within three years?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • 167. Programme to support high-risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • 168. Regularly engages with a subset of high-risk mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • 169. Procedures in place to assess all own and third-party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • 170. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • 171. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from mills

    • Y
      1 / 1

      172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      The company states that it will review the contract of partners which fail to comply and that it shall continue to engage with suppliers to take remedial actions "unless there has been a significant violation that indicates bad intentions or which will endanger our overall business practices or the environment"

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1
      No source

      174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    6.7 / 8 83.8%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 4.5 / 5 90%
    • Practice: 2.2 / 3 73.3%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 1.2 / 3 40%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      +
      1 / 1
      0.2 / 1

      177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      Points for external verification have been awarded on the basis of the company's RSPO certified landbank/volume

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

      The company only provides limited details on tax strategy

    • Y
      1 / 1

      179. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Austindo Nusantara Jaya Tbk PT

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: Austindo Nusantara Jaya Tbk PT

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 181 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)