Sumitomo Rubber Industries
Natural rubber assessment- Latest update: March 2024
- Next scheduled: March 2025
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the natural rubber supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Market cap:3,044,974,436 USD
-
Bloomberg ticker:5110 JT Equity
-
LEI:
-
Activities:Natural rubber manufacturing
-
Locations:Brazil, China, Indonesia, Thailand, United States, Turkey, South Africa, Philippines, Malaysia, Slovenia, Switzerland, Viet Nam, Japan.
-
Headquarters:Japan
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Sumitomo Rubber Industries – March 2024
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 10.5 / 26 40.4%
- Policy: 26.5 / 51 52%
- Practice: 9 / 31 29%
- Self-reported: 6 / 31 19.4%
- External: 3 / 31 9.7%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership9.25 / 10 92.5%
- Organisation: 5.5 / 6 91.7%
- Policy: 1 / 1 100%
- Practice: 2.8 / 3 91.7%
- Self-reported: 1.8 / 3 58.3%
- External: 1 / 3 33.3%
-
1. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment for all its operations?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
2. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
The company has published a sustainable natural rubber policy which applies to all suppliers.
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
The company has a Sustainability Promotion Committee but it is not clear if there is a senior manager with sustainability responsibility (excluding board members).
-
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
The company reports it has a Sustainability Promotion Committee which is chaired by the Director in charge of ESG.
-
5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?
3.8% - In 2022, 3.8% of managers were women.
-
6. Percentage or number of women board members?
The company reports having 1 female director.
-
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?
[Externally verified] The company is a member of WBCSD, WBCSD Tire Industry Project, and IRSG.
-
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?
The company describes a project in collaboration with Halcyon Agri supporting smallholder suppliers and a project with Agridence to trace rubber supply. Both projects started in 2022 and are ongoing.
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company's latest integrated report was published in 2023, covering the year 2022.
-
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
The company has submitted its Forests, Water, and Climate 2023 CDP Questionnaires.
-
11. Climate risks assessment available?
The company has disclosed a comprehensive climate risk assessment and strategy.
-
Landbank, maps and traceability1 / 15 6.7%
- Organisation: 1 / 9 11.1%
- Policy: 0 / 3 0%
- Practice: 0 / 3 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
-
12. Lists countries and operations?
Manufacturing (Brazil, China, Indonesia, Thailand, The United States, Turkey, South Africa, Philippines, Malaysia, Slovenia, Switzerland, Viet Nam, Japan).
-
0 / 1
13. Lists countries sourcing from?
-
14. Total land area managed/controlled for natural rubber (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
15. Total natural rubber planted area (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
16. Scheme smallholders/outgrowers planted area (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
17. Unplanted area (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
18. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
19. Maps of estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
20. Management plans for natural rubber production are available for all estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
21. Monitoring of management plan implementation available for all estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
22. Maps of all scheme/outgrower smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
23. Maps of all third-party supplying industrial estates/management units?
-
0 / 1
24. List of jurisdictions where sourcing from smallholders?
-
25. Number of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
26. Maps of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
27. Number (or percentage) of company-owned processing facilities that source from company-owned operations and third parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
28. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned processing facilities that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
29. Number of company owned natural rubber manufacturing facilities?
The company reports it owns 19 natural rubber manufacturing facilities.
-
(NEW: not scored this year)-
30. Maps of manufacturing facilities?
-
0 / 1
31. Number of third party supplying processing facilities?
-
0 / 1
32. Maps of all third party supplying processing facilities?
-
0 / 1
33. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying processing facilities that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?
-
0 / 1
34. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying processing facilities that come from the supplying facilities' own operations and third parties?
-
0 / 1
35. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for manufacturing that comes from intermediary traders rather than directly from processing facilities?
-
0 / 1
36. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to processing facility level?
-
0 / 1
37. Percentage of supply traceable to processing facility level?
-
0 / 1
38. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to industrial plantation level?
-
39. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
40. Percentage of supply from third-party processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?
-
0 / 1
41. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to jurisdictional level for smallholders?
-
42. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to smallholder at jurisdictional level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
43. Percentage of supply from third party processing facilities traceable to smallholders at jurisdictional level?
-
Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives2.5 / 5 50%
- Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
- Policy: 0 / 1 0%
- Practice: 1.5 / 3 50%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
- External: 1 / 3 33.3%
-
44. Member of the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR)?
[Externally verified] The company is a member of GPSNR. This has been verified via the GPSNR website.
-
45. Submitted self-declaration form for the Sustainable Natural Rubber Initiative (SNR-i)?
The company has submitted a self-declaration form for SNR-i.
-
46. Percentage area (ha) FSC certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
47. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC FM certification of estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
48. Percentage of scheme/outgrower smallholders (ha) FSC-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
49. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC certification of scheme/outgrower smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
50. Percentage of natural rubber supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party natural rubber suppliers that is FSC-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations or processing facilities.
-
0 / 1
51. Percentage of all natural rubber products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is FSC-certified?
-
52. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
53. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?
The company reports to have obtained ISO 14001 Global Multi-Site Certification for its 36 bases in Japan and overseas. However, the certificates are not publicly available.
-
0 / 1
54. Commitment to become 100% certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?
-
Deforestation and biodiversity5 / 10 50%
- Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
- Policy: 4.5 / 7 64.3%
- Practice: 0.5 / 2 25%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 2 25%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
-
55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
56. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
The company commits to support the long-term protection of natural forests and other ecosystems. A clear commitment to no conversion of natural ecosystems could not be found.
-
57. Commitment to zero deforestation?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
58. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also reports its own commitment to zero deforestation for suppliers.
-
59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
60. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company's own reporting for suppliers defines deforestation as the degradation of HCV areas and specifies that any deforestation/conversion past 1st April 2019 will not be accepted.
-
61. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
62. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
-
63. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
64. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
-
65. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
66. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?
The company commits to support restoration of forests and natural ecosystems. However, it is unclear if suppliers are required to restore deforestation/conversion within their own operations caused by themselves or third parties.
-
67. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company commits to participate in and support multi-stakeholder planning and policy efforts that uphold the GPSNR principles at a landscape, jurisdictional or other spatial level in its own reporting, however no evidence of implementation was found.
-
68. Biodiversity policy?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
69. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
-
70. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
71. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
72. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
73. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to only allow sustainable hunting of species by local communities for subsistence purposes in their operations.
-
74. Commitment to protect areas from illegal activities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
75. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?
The company only commits suppliers to certain forms of illegal activities which include protecting wildlife, including rare, threatened, endangered, and critically endangered species, from poaching, overhunting, and habitat loss.
-
76. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments2 / 5 40%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2 / 4 50%
- Practice: 0 / 1 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 1 0%
- External: 0 / 1 0%
-
77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
78. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits suppliers to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments in its own reporting.
-
79. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
80. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
82. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to apply the HCS Approach, as defined by the HCS Approach Toolkit.
-
83. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
84. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
-
0 / 1
86. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
-
0 / 1
87. Social and environmental impact assessment (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions6 / 9 66.7%
- Organisation: 1 / 2 50%
- Policy: 4 / 6 66.7%
- Practice: 1 / 1 100%
- Self-reported: 0 / 1 0%
- External: 1 / 1 100%
-
88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits suppliers to no planting on peat of any depth in its own reporting.
-
90. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
91. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to protect soils and prevent erosion. No commitment to BMPs for soils and peat could be found.
-
94. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
95. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
96. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices applies to all suppliers?
-
97. Evidence of best/sustainable tapping practices?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
98. Commitment to zero burning?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
99. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to no burning.
-
100. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
101. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
102. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations/jurisdictions?
-
103. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions?
The company reports it has identified a target of halving its Scope 1 and 2 CO2 emissions by 2030 (compared with the 2017 level) and achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.
-
104. GHG emissions?
The company reports the GHG emissions (Scope 1 and 2) for all its operations. Data as of 2022.
-
105. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
(NEW: not scored this year)-
106. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?
-
107. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions?
[Externally verified] The company reports a 15% reduction in GHG emissions in 2022, compared with 2017. Evidence is externally verified by LRQA.
-
108. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
The company reports using the Japan Automobile Tyre Manufacturers Association (JATMA) Guideline Ver. 2.0.
-
Water, chemical and pest management1.75 / 11 15.9%
- Organisation: 0.5 / 1 50%
- Policy: 0 / 6 0%
- Practice: 1.3 / 4 31.3%
- Self-reported: 1.3 / 4 31.3%
- External: 0 / 4 0%
-
0 / 1
109. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
-
110. Water use intensity?
11318 - The company reports the water consumption volume (global environmental data of domestic and overseas factories) as 11,318 (1,000 m3) in 2022. However, the figures are not reported as intensity.
-
111. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
The company reports progress in water consumption in 2022 (11,318 (1,000 m3)) as compared to 2021 (12,875 (1,000 m3)). However, the figures are not reported as intensity.
-
0 / 1
112. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?
-
0 / 1
113. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?
-
114. Treatment of effluents from processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
115. Treatment of effluents from manufacturing facilities?
-
116. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
117. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
118. Reducing odours from natural rubber processing or manufacuring facilities?
The company reports developing novel deodorizing technologies while introducing Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO), with the aim of curbing odors arising from the rubber kneading and curing processes. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
119. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
120. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
-
121. Commitment to no use of paraquat?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
122. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?
-
123. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
124. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
-
125. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
126. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
-
127. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
128. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
129. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
Community, land and labour rights11.5 / 23 50%
- Organisation: 1.5 / 5 30%
- Policy: 10 / 13 76.9%
- Practice: 0.8 / 7 10.7%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 7 10.7%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
-
130. Commitment to human rights?
The company commits to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
-
131. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights.
-
132. Progress on human rights commitment?
The company reports that to assess the status of human rights assurance and prevent related issues and risks from materializing, it plans to establish a human rights management (human rights due diligence) structure by the end of 2024. In 2023, prior to establishing this structure, the company mentioned clarifying its stance by publishing the Sumitomo Rubber Group Human Rights Policy. All this information is the company's plan for the future, it is not clear what actions have been taken.
-
133. Commitment to respect Indigenous and local communities' rights?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
134. Commitment to Indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, however, the commitment is reported in relation to FPIC.
-
135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
136. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to recognise and protect the customary and traditional communal land tenure rights of indigenous peoples and local communities. However, the commitment is reported in relation to FPIC and doesn't cover legal rights.
-
137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
138. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to respect FPIC.
-
139. Details on Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
140. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
141. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
142. Supports the inclusion of women across natural rubber operations, including addressing barriers faced?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
143. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
144. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
145. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
146. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
147. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
148. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components. GPSNR does not reference all Fundamental ILO Conventions as amended in 2022 to include Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155) and the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187). The company's own reporting also only covers commitment to eight core ILO conventions.
-
149. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
The company only commits suppliers to eight core ILO conventions.
-
150. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
The company reports it has labor-management committees in place to discuss different aspects of labor rights. However, the information reported is not externally verified.
-
151. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company commits to respect ILO Convention 111 Discrimination (Employment and Occupation).
-
152. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to respect ILO Convention 111 Discrimination (Employment and Occupation).
-
0 / 1
153. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
-
0 / 1
154. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
-
155. Percentage or number of women employees?
12% - The company reports the ""ratio of female employees to the total number of employees (non-consolidated basis)"" as 12%. This information does not cover female employees in all countries.
-
156. Commitment to pay a living wage?
The company reports to ""support"" decent living wages. It is unclear if the company commits to paying all employees a living wage.
-
157. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?
The company commits its suppliers to ""support"" decent living wages. It is unclear if suppliers are committed to paying all employees a living wage.
-
0 / 1
158. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
-
0 / 1
159. Reporting of salary by gender?
-
160. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.
-
161. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to address health and safety at work for all workers.
-
0 / 1
162. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
-
0 / 1
163. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
-
164. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
The company reports it recorded a total of two accidents resulting in fatality at an overseas group company in 2022.
-
Smallholders and suppliers3 / 13 23.1%
- Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
- Policy: 2.5 / 5 50%
- Practice: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 7 7.1%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
-
165. Commitment to support smallholders?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also commits to supporting smallholders in its own reporting.
-
0 / 1
166. Percentage of supply from smallholders?
-
167. Programme to support scheme smallholders/outgrowers?
The company reports very limited detail on a smallholder programme. It is not clear if this relates to scheme or independent smallholders.
-
0 / 1
168. Percentage of scheme smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?
-
169. Programme to support independent smallholders?
The company reports very limited detail on a smallholder programme. It is not clear if this relates to scheme or independent smallholders.
-
0 / 1
170. Percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?
-
0 / 1
171. Process used to engage smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
0 / 1
172. Number or percentage of smallholder suppliers engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
173. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
The company reports to conduct independent CSR assessments through third-party auditing to assess the performance of suppliers in terms of four themes: Environment, Labour and Human Rights, Ethics, and Sustainable Procurement. These assessments allow for the rating of suppliers with respect to social and environmental risk in order to prioritise risk mitigation actions. However, the details of the process are not reported.
-
0 / 1
174. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
175. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
The company reports that if a supplier is found to be in violation of its sustainable rubber policy, the company's relationship with the supplier will be reviewed, which may result in the suspension of future business transactions with that supplier. However, the steps that will be taken and timeframes for action are not reported.
-
176. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with natural rubber sourcing commitments?
The company aims to procure 95% of tire raw materials on a purchase value basis from suppliers who earn scores of 45 or higher on EcoVadis by 2030. No detail is given.
-
(NEW: not scored this year)-
177. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF)?
-
0 / 1
178. Percentage of supply coming from agroforestry?
-
Governance and grievances3.25 / 7 46.4%
- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 2.5 / 5 50%
- Practice: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
-
179. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.
-
180. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
The company only commits all suppliers to the prohibition of corruption. However, a commitment to ethical conduct is not reported for suppliers.
-
181. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company reports to have Corporate Ethics Committee in place which identifies, analyses, and evaluates compliance risks throughout the group, plans and conducts training, ascertains the cause of violations, and proposes preventive measures. A Corporate Ethics Help Line has also been established by the company to allow employees to directly report and consult on any actions that are questionable in light of corporate ethics. However, the information is not externally verified.
-
182. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?
The company has published its tax policy, however, the governance body/executive level position which is responsible for the tax policy and its review is not reported.
-
0 / 1
183. Whistleblowing procedure?
-
184. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Partial points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that do not fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. However, ZSL could not find any information on the grievance procedure of the company.
-
0 / 1
185. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
August 2021
Sustainable Natural Rubber Policy
-
2023
Integrated Report 2023
-
No date
WORKPLACE ???????&???????? (WORKPLACE Diversity and Inclusion)
-
No date
Our Members - WBCSD - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Tire Industry Project - WBCSD - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Membership - IRSG - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Sumitomo Rubber Group Sustainable Natural Rubber (SNR) Policy - Sumitomo Rubber Industries - WEBPAGE
-
No date
CDP Response - CDP - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Responding to climate change - Sumitomo Rubber Industries - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Our Members - GPSNR - WEBPAGE
-
No date
List of Self-Declared Organisations - SNR-i - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Policy Framework - GPSNR - WEBPAGE
-
2022
Integrated Report 2022
-
November 2023
Sumitomo Rubber Group Human Rights Policy
Media monitor: Sumitomo Rubber Industries
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.
November 2023
Fishermen Sue Tire Manufacturers Over Toxic Chemicals They Say Are Harming Salmon And Trout
May 2023
Tyre manufacturer and workers reach a stalemate as illegal industrial action enters fourth week
May 2021
Sumitomo Rubber Industries "Fender" quality data falsified and apologized
April 2020
State AG looking into Sumitomo Dunlop after complaints of "unsafe working conditions"
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
1
Media monitor: Sumitomo Rubber Industries
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.
Download as CSV