Skip to content
Menu Search

Sri Trang Agro-Industry Public Company Ltd

Natural rubber assessment
  • Latest update: March 2022
  • Next scheduled: March 2023

Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting

Company assessment: Sri Trang Agro-Industry Public Company Ltd – March 2022

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 14.2% 25.75 / 181
  • Organisation: 10.5 / 43 24.4%
  • Policy: 9.5 / 80 11.9%
  • Practice: 5.8 / 58 9.9%
  • Self-reported: 5.8 / 58 9.9%
  • External: 0 / 58 0%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    3.5 / 11 31.8%
    • Organisation: 3 / 6 50%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      1. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company only has a corporate social responsibility (CSR) policy, this does not include a natural rubber policy or clear commitment to multiple dimensions of sustainability and therefore no points can be awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      2. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • N
      0 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      1 (33.3%) - The company reports profiles of the senior management team. Gender is not directly reported but from the titles and pronouns used it has been deduced that there is one female senior manager and two males.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      1 (8.3%) - The company reports profiles of the board members. Gender is not directly reported but from the titles and pronouns used it has been deduced that there is one female board member and 11 males.

    • N
      0 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?

      The company self-reports to be a member of SNR-i but is not listed on the SNR-i website and therefore no points can be awarded.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?

      The company describes delivering sludge from its wastewater treatments systems to the Pattani Provincial Agriculture Office which is then used by local farmers as organic fertiliser. This reduces waste to landfill which is a negative environmental impact associated with rubber production. This is the only example found and therefore partial points have been awarded. Information is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company's latest sustainability report was published in 2020.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

      The company states that its sustainability report has been prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards: Core option.

    • N
      0 / 1

      11. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    3 / 30 10%
    • Organisation: 3 / 21 14.3%
    • Policy: 0 / 3 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      12. Lists countries and operations?

      The company states that it it has plantations in Thailand, processing facilities in Thailand, Indonesia, and Myanmar, as well as manufacturing facilities in Thailand.

    • N
      0 / 1

      13. Lists countries sourcing from?

      The company only reports that its own plantations are located in Thailand but it is unclear if the company has suppliers and where this natural rubber is sourced from.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total land area managed/controlled for natural rubber (ha)?

      7,200 - The company reports a landbank of 7,200 ha for natural rubber.

    • N
      0 / 1

      15. Total natural rubber planted area (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      16. Scheme smallholders/outgrowers planted area (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      17. Unplanted area (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      18. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

    • N
      0 / 1

      20. Management plans for natural rubber production are available for all estates/management units?

    • N
      0 / 1

      21. Monitoring of management plan implementation available for all estates/management units?

    • N
      0 / 1

      22. Maps of scheme/outgrower smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Names and locations of all third-party supplying industrial estates/management units?

    • N
      0 / 1

      24. List of jurisdictions where sourcing from smallholders?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      25. Number of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?

      36 - The company reports to have 36 processing facilities.

    • N
      0 / 1

      26. Names and locations of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      27. Number (or percentage) of company-owned processing facilities that source from company-owned operations and/or third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      28. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned processing facilities that come from company's own operations and/or third-parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      29. Number of third party supplying processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      30. Names and locations of all third party supplying processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      31. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying processing facilities that source from their own plantations and/or third party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying processing facilities that come from the supplying facilities' own operations and/or third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      33. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for manufacturing that comes from intermediary traders rather than directly from processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      34. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to processing facility level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      35. Percentage of supply traceable to processing facility level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      36. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to industrial plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      37. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. Percentage of supply from third-party processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      39. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to jurisdictional level for smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to smallholder at jurisdictional level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      41. Percentage of supply from third party processing facilities traceable to smallholders at jurisdictional level?

  • Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives
    1 / 11 9.1%
    • Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
    • Policy: 0 / 3 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 7 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Member of the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      43. Submitted self-declaration form for the Sustainable Natural Rubber Initiative (SNR-i)?

      The company has submitted a self-declaration form for SNR-i.

    • N
      0 / 1

      44. Percentage area (ha) FSC certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC FM certification of estates/management units?

    • N
      0 / 1

      46. Percentage of scheme/outgrower smallholders (ha) FSC-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      47. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC certification of scheme/outgrower smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Percentage of natural rubber supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party natural rubber suppliers that is FSC-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Percentage of all natural rubber products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is FSC-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      50. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      51. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      52. Commitment to become 100% certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    0 / 21 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 13 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 6 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 0 / 6 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      53. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      55. Commitment to zero deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?

    • N
      0 / 1

      61. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      63. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      The company reports multiple examples of community activities but they are not multi-stakeholder planning and policy efforts, hence no points.

    • N
      0 / 1

      65. Biodiversity policy?

    • N
      0 / 1

      66. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      67. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • N
      0 / 1

      68. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. Commitment to protect areas from illegal activities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    0 / 11 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 6 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 5 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
    • External: 0 / 5 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      74. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?

    • N
      0 / 1

      77. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      83. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. Social and environmental impact assessment (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Soils, fire and GHG emissions Soils, fire and GHG emissions
    2.5 / 20 12.5%
    • Organisation: 1 / 5 20%
    • Policy: 1 / 10 10%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 5 10%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 5 10%
    • External: 0 / 5 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      89. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      90. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      91. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      92. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices?

    • N
      0 / 1

      93. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Evidence of best/sustainable tapping practices?

    • N
      0 / 1

      95. Commitment to zero burning?

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates/management units?

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations/jurisdictions?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      100. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

      The company commits to reduce GHG emissions intensity by 5% by the year 2024 compared to the 2019 baseline of 0.12 tCO2-eq/ Ton.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      101. GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports a total GHG emissions intensity of 0.12 tCO2-eq/ Ton for natural rubber products for scope 1 and 2.

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      103. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      The company reports that in both 2019 and 2020 the GHG emission intensity was 0.12 tCO2-eq/ Ton. As this has not improved over time, only partial points have been awarded. Information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    3.75 / 21 17.9%
    • Organisation: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 11 4.6%
    • Practice: 2.8 / 8 34.4%
    • Self-reported: 2.8 / 8 34.4%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      105. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      The company reports to "set goals for the annual increase in water efficiency", however no time-bound targets could be found and water use intensity is not referenced, hence no points.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      106. Water use intensity?

      The company reports water figures but not intensity figures. The company reports to have used 2,015,520 M3/year of water. It is unclear if this is for natural rubber operations only.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      107. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company reports a reduction in water use from 2,133,144 M3/year in 2019 to 2,015,520 M3/year in 2020, however these figures are not intensity based and it is unclear if this is for natural rubber operations only. Information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?

      The company only states "adequate water supply and suitable water quality must be provided", no time-bound commitment to water quality, BOD or COD could be found, hence no points.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      109. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?

      The company reports BOD and COD levels for each location but no overall figures. Most locations' BOD and COD levels decreased 2018 - 2019 but then increased in 2020 hence partial scoring. Information is not externally verified.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      110. Treatment of effluents from processing facilities?

      The company reports to treat effluents but does not specify if this is in processing facilities hence partial scoring. Information is not externally verified.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      111. Treatment of effluents from manufacturing facilities?

      The company reports to treat effluents but does not specify if this is in manufacturing facilities hence partial scoring. Information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      112. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 1

      113. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      114. Reducing odours from natural rubber processing or manufacuring facilities?

      The company reports to have installed an air pollution treatment system for its block rubber factory to reduce odours from processing and manufacturing natural rubber products. Information is not externally verified.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      115. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company commits to reduce chemical use. It is unclear if the commitment requires the company to minimise chemical fertiliser and pesticide use.

    • N
      0 / 1

      116. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      118. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      119. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1

      120. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      121. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      122. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      123. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • N
      0 / 1

      124. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      125. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    8.25 / 35 23.6%
    • Organisation: 2 / 5 40%
    • Policy: 5 / 22 22.7%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 8 15.6%
    • Self-reported: 1.3 / 8 15.6%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      126. Commitment to human rights?

      The company reports "respect and promote human rights" and to have "held the human right principles and non-discrimination practices, embedded in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations, in high regard". As this is not a clear commitment to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations, only partial points can be awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      127. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company only states that it implements human rights principles, but does not commit to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights, hence no points.

    • N
      0 / 1

      128. Progress on human rights commitment?

    • N
      0 / 1

      129. Commitment to respect Indigenous and local communities' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      130. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      131. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      132. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      133. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      134. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      135. Details on Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

    • N
      0 / 1

      137. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      138. Supports the inclusion of women across natural rubber operations, including addressing barriers faced?

      The company reports to have implemented a 'Female Power Project' with the aim to "strengthen communities by increase career paths and enhancing income for the community". Limited details are provided about the project and the company does not specifically state that this is to address barriers faced by women across natural rubber operations, hence partial scoring.

    • N
      0 / 1

      139. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      140. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company mentions that it has provided food and other essentials for local communities in relation to COVID-19. The company does not make reference to food security and no other examples were found, hence partial scoring. Information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      141. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      142. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company provides examples including: maintaining a 'Community Learning Center' which support children to develop skills in STEM subjects, funding sports and providing equipment, and building ponds for local people to fish in. Information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      143. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

      The company reports to provide business opportunities for local communities through a policy which promotes purchasing items such as "drinking water, broom, wood smoke liquid, New year baskets souvenirs of important events and service support". As this is not a commitment to provide job opportunities directly through the company, no points can be awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      144. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • N
      0 / 1

      145. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      146. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      147. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company commits to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      148. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.

    • N
      0 / 1

      149. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • N
      0 / 1

      150. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      151. Percentage or number of women employees?

      32% - The company reports that 32% of employees are female.

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Commitment to pay a living wage?

      The company only makes reference to minimum wage in relation to a project to employ prisoners. As this commitment is not made to all other employees, no points can be awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      153. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      154. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      155. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      156. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      157. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      158. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company only mentions PPE in relation to suppliers, therefore no points can be awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      159. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company reports a percentage of "accident with lost time" of 1.37% but no time lost due to work-based injuries, hence no points.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      160. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      0 - The company reports 0 fatalities as a result of work-based accidents.

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    0 / 14 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 5 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 8 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      161. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      162. Percentage of supply from smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      163. Programme to support scheme smallholders/outgrowers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Percentage of scheme smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Programme to support independent smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Process used to engage smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      168. Number or percentage of smallholder suppliers engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      169. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      170. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Suspension or exclusion criteria for non-smallholder suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      172. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with natural rubber sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      173. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from natural rubber plantations which are compliant with natural rubber sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      174. Percentage of supply coming from agroforestry?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    3.75 / 7 53.6%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3 / 5 60%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company commits to the prohibition of corruption but not to ethical conduct, hence partial scoring.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company reports to have conducted training on good corporate governance in relation to anti-corruption. The company also reports to have conducted an internal assessment to "define the internal control to prevent anti-corruption", limited details of this process are provided. Information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      178. Disclosure of the company’s management approach to tax and payments to governments?

      The company has a tax policy but it does not include disclosure of its management approach to tax/payments or a governance body/executive level position which is responsible for the tax strategy/policy and its review, hence no points have been awarded.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      179. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company reports a step-by-step whistleblowing process as well as information on how the whistletblower is protected.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company reports to "provide the complaints center for the customer and general public", however no other details of the system are provided.

    • N
      0 / 1

      181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)