Pirelli & C
Natural rubber assessment- Latest update: March 2023
- Next scheduled: March 2024
ESG scores:
The following scores are based on the totals of all environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators. Some indicators apply to more than one E, S or G issue.
Supply chain scores:
The following scores are based on ESG indicators relevant to specific segments of the natural rubber supply chain.
Some indicators apply to multiple segments. Please refer to the scoring criteria for further details.
-
Parent company:ChemChina
-
Market cap:5,294,240,000 USD
-
Bloomberg ticker:PIRC IM Equity
-
Activities:Natural rubber manufacturing
-
Locations:Argentina (Merlo), Brazil (Campinas, Fiera de Santana, Gravatai), China (Yanzhou, Jiaozou, Shenzhou), Italy (Milan, Bollate, Settimo Torinese), Indonesia (Subang), Germany (Breuberg), Mexico (Silao), Romania (Slatina), Russia (Kirov, Voronezh), Turkey (Izmit), United Kingdom (Burton, Carlisle), United States of America (Rome)
-
Headquarters:Italy
-
Parent website:
-
Website:
-
Media Monitor
- ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.
Company assessment: Pirelli & C – March 2023
Assessment date:
- Organisation: 13.5 / 26 51.9%
- Policy: 37.5 / 51 73.5%
- Practice: 15 / 30 50%
- Self-reported: 9.5 / 30 31.7%
- External: 5.5 / 30 18.3%
-
Sustainability policy and leadership
9 / 10 90%- Organisation: 5.5 / 6 91.7%
- Policy: 1 / 1 100%
- Practice: 2.5 / 3 83.3%
- Self-reported: 1.5 / 3 50%
- External: 1 / 3 33.3%
-
1. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment for all its operations?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
2. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?
The company has published a sustainable natural rubber policy which applies to all suppliers.
-
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
The company has Sustainability Strategic Committee, however, it is unclear which position has high-level responsibility excluding the board.
-
4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?
The CEO has responsibility for sustainability within the board.
-
5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?
11.3% - The company reports 11.3% of women in the senior management team.
-
6. Percentage or number of women board members?
20% - The company reports 20% of the Board members are female and the remaining 80% are male.
-
7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?
[Externally verified] The company is a member of UNGP and WBCSD.
-
8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?
The company collaborates with stakeholders across multiple projects including working with Birdlife International and BMW to promote deforestation-free natural rubber production, with FSC to produce the world's first certified tyre, and a supplier to study diseases affecting rubber trees, and contributing to three GPSNR working groups. Also, the company has collaborated with a rubber producer to provide scholarships to help secure the future of rubber farming.
-
9. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company's latest Integrated annual report was published in 2021.
-
10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?
The company has submitted its CDP questionnaire for 2021 and also prepared its report according to GRI comprehensive standards.
-
11. Climate risks assessment available?
The company only provides a summary of its climate risk assessment. The information is not externally verified.
-
Landbank, maps and traceability
4 / 15 26.7%- Organisation: 1 / 9 11.1%
- Policy: 2 / 3 66.7%
- Practice: 1 / 3 33.3%
- Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
- External: 0 / 3 0%
-
12. Lists countries and operations?
Manufacturing (Argentina, Brazil, China, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Mexico,Romania, Russian Federation, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States).
-
0 / 1
13. Lists countries sourcing from?
-
14. Total land area managed/controlled for natural rubber (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
15. Total natural rubber planted area (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
16. Scheme smallholders/outgrowers planted area (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
17. Unplanted area (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
18. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
19. Maps of estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
20. Management plans for natural rubber production are available for all estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
21. Monitoring of management plan implementation available for all estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
22. Maps of scheme/outgrower smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
23. Names and locations of all third-party supplying industrial estates/management units?
-
0 / 1
24. List of jurisdictions where sourcing from smallholders?
-
25. Number of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
26. Names and locations of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
27. Number (or percentage) of company-owned processing facilities that source from company-owned operations and third parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
28. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned processing facilities that come from company's own operations and third-parties?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
29. Number of third party supplying processing facilities?
-
0 / 1
30. Names and locations of all third party supplying processing facilities?
-
0 / 1
31. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying processing facilities that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?
-
0 / 1
32. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying processing facilities that come from the supplying facilities' own operations and third parties?
-
0 / 1
33. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for manufacturing that comes from intermediary traders rather than directly from processing facilities?
-
34. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to processing facility level?
The company reported 100% of its natural rubber supply was traceable to processing facility level in 2021.
-
35. Percentage of supply traceable to processing facility level?
The company reports 100% of its procurement from tier 1 suppliers are traceable.
-
36. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to industrial plantation level?
The company provides a commitment to achieve full traceability to its direct and indirect suppliers, however, the commitment is not time-bound.
-
37. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
38. Percentage of supply from third-party processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?
-
39. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to jurisdictional level for smallholders?
The company commits to achieve 100% traceability by 2025 to jurisdiction for tier-n, however, it is not clear if the commitment includes smallholder suppliers.
-
40. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to smallholder at jurisdictional level?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
41. Percentage of supply from third party processing facilities traceable to smallholders at jurisdictional level?
-
Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives
3 / 5 60%- Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
- Policy: 0.5 / 1 50%
- Practice: 1.5 / 3 50%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
- External: 1 / 3 33.3%
-
42. Member of the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR)?
[Externally verified] The company is a member of GPSNR. This has been verified via the GPSNR website.
-
43. Submitted self-declaration form for the Sustainable Natural Rubber Initiative (SNR-i)?
The company has submitted a self-declaration form for SNR-i.
-
44. Percentage area (ha) FSC certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
45. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC FM certification of estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
46. Percentage of scheme/outgrower smallholders (ha) FSC-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
47. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC certification of scheme/outgrower smallholders?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
48. Percentage of natural rubber supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party natural rubber suppliers that is FSC-certified?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
49. Percentage of all natural rubber products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is FSC-certified?
-
50. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
51. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?
The company is ISO 14001 certified, however, this has not been verified by the external website.
-
52. Commitment to become 100% certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?
All facilities are ISO 14001 certified. As the standard for ISO is not publicly available a higher score cannot be awarded.
-
Deforestation and biodiversity
4 / 10 40%- Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
- Policy: 2.5 / 7 35.7%
- Practice: 1.5 / 2 75%
- Self-reported: 0.5 / 2 25%
- External: 1 / 2 50%
-
53. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
54. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?
The company only commits all suppliers to avoid environmental impacts on ecosystems.
-
55. Commitment to zero deforestation?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
56. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company commits all suppliers to no deforestation.
-
57. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
58. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation in supplier operations?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. GPSNR defines natural rubber sourced from deforested areas or where HCVs have been degraded after 1 April 2019 to be non-conformant with its policy. In its own reporting, the company has also defined forests as HCV and HCS areas and specifies any deforestation/conversion past 1 April 2019 will not be accepted.
-
59. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
60. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?
The company trialed a satellite monitoring system to monitor deforestation hotspots in Indonesia. However, the information is over two years and is not externally verified.
-
61. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
62. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?
-
63. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
64. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to restore ecosystems in their operations to their prior condition. The cut-off date beyond which deforestation/conversion is not accepted, and therefore will be restored, is 1 April 2019. However, it is unclear if suppliers are required to restore deforestation/conversion within their own operations caused by themselves or third parties.
-
65. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?
[Externally verified] The company is collaborating on a project with BMW and Birdlife to improve rubber cultivation practices, empower women and protect forests in Indonesia. Evidence has been externally verified by quotes in the evidence from external parties.
-
66. Biodiversity policy?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
67. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to protect biodiversity but detail is limited and the commitment is only in relation to HCV/HCS/conservation set-asides.
-
68. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
69. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
70. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
71. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?
-
72. Commitment to protect areas from illegal activities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
73. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?
-
74. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments
3.5 / 5 70%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 3.5 / 4 87.5%
- Practice: 0 / 1 0%
- Self-reported: 0 / 1 0%
- External: 0 / 1 0%
-
75. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
76. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company also includes this in its own reporting.
-
77. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
78. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
79. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to apply the HCS Approach, as defined by the HCS Approach Toolkit.
-
81. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
82. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
83. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
The company only commits to conduct environmental impact assessments for all its operations.
-
84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to conduct SEIAs.
-
0 / 1
85. Social and environmental impact assessment (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions
6.75 / 9 75%- Organisation: 1 / 2 50%
- Policy: 5 / 6 83.3%
- Practice: 0.8 / 1 75%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 1 75%
- External: 0 / 1 0%
-
86. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
87. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. In its own reporting, the company commits all suppliers to no planting on peat of any depth.
-
88. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
89. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
90. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
91. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to best management practices for peat, but for mineral soils suppliers are only committed to conduct impact assessments and identifying methods of reducing impacts on soil. As a clear best management practice commitment for mineral soils could not be found full points cannot be awarded.
-
92. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
93. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
94. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to review practices in order to increase yield and mentions improving tree selection and trimming. As this is a limited selection of practices full points cannot be awarded.
-
95. Evidence of best/sustainable tapping practices?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
96. Commitment to zero burning?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
97. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to zero burning.
-
98. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
99. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates/management units?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
100. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations/jurisdictions?
-
101. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?
The company commits to reduce GHG emissions intensity by 25% by the year 2025.
-
102. GHG emissions intensity?
The company reports a GHG intensity of 0.824 ton CO2 per ton finished product for 2021.
-
103. GHG emissions from land use change?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
104. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
The company reports GHG emissions intensity decrease from 1.04 ton CO2 per ton finished product in 2020 to 0.824 in 2021. Information is not externally verified.
-
105. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
GHG Protocol.
-
Water, chemical and pest management
5.5 / 11 50%- Organisation: 0.5 / 1 50%
- Policy: 3 / 6 50%
- Practice: 2 / 4 50%
- Self-reported: 1.3 / 4 31.3%
- External: 0.8 / 4 18.8%
-
106. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?
The company aims to reduce water withdrawal by 43% by 2025 compared to a 2015 baseline. As the commitment is not in intensity full points cannot be awarded.
-
107. Water use intensity?
8.5 - The company reports water withdrawal as 8.5 m3 per ton finished product in 2021.
-
108. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?
The company reports a decrease in water withdrawal from 9.5 m3 per ton finished product in 2020 to 8.5 m3 per ton finished product in 2021. Information is not externally verified.
-
0 / 1
109. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?
-
0.75 / 1
110. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?
[Externally verified] The company reports an increase in water quality (BOD & COD). The information is not externally verified.
-
111. Treatment of effluents from processing facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
112. Treatment of effluents from manufacturing facilities?
The company states it treats wastewater before discharging it in surface water bodies. However, only limited information is given and is not externally verified.
-
113. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
114. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
115. Reducing odours from natural rubber processing or manufacuring facilities?
-
116. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
117. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?
The company only mentions reducing chemical use, no mention of pesticides or fertilisers was found.
-
118. Commitment to no use of paraquat?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
119. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to not use paraquat.
-
120. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
121. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to not use World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides.
-
122. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
0 / 1
123. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?
-
124. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
125. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
126. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
Community, land and labour rights
17.75 / 23 77.2%- Organisation: 4.5 / 5 90%
- Policy: 12 / 13 92.3%
- Practice: 2.5 / 7 35.7%
- Self-reported: 2.5 / 7 35.7%
- External: 0 / 7 0%
-
127. Commitment to human rights?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. The company commits to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
-
128. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights.
-
129. Progress on human rights commitment ?
The company has started an awareness and training program for its employees and the company's sustainability department handles human rights management processes. The information is not externally verified.
-
130. Commitment to respect Indigenous and local communities' rights?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
131. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits suppliers to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
-
132. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
133. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to respect legal and customary land tenure rights.
-
134. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
135. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to respect FPIC.
-
136. Details on Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
137. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
138. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
139. Supports the inclusion of women across natural rubber operations, including addressing barriers faced?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
140. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
141. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
142. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
143. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
144. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
145. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. In its own reporting, the company commits to the ILO's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.
-
146. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to the ILO's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.
-
147. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?
In 2021, the company updated its analysis of risk for violations of human and workers' rights; the survey was conducted in the company's own operations and its value chain. The information is not externally verified.
-
148. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company commits all suppliers to prevent occupation-related discrimination based on gender.
-
149. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.
-
150. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?
The company has a grievance channel in place to address discrimination-related cases. The information is not externally verified.
-
151. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
4.7% - The company reports its total number of temporary employees in its Annual report 2021.
-
152. Percentage or number of women employees?
14.4% - The company reports a total of 14.4% of women in its workforce.
-
153. Commitment to pay a living wage?
The company is committed to pay minimum wage to its employees.
-
154. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to pay the minimum wage to all workers.
-
0 / 1
155. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?
-
156. Reporting of salary by gender?
The company reports the gender pay gap across multiple countries in which it operates. However, the ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men for each employee category, by significant locations of operation (in line with GRI reporting) was not reported.
-
157. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?
The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.
-
158. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to address health and safety at work for all workers.
-
159. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
The company provides safety training to its all employees and only mentions providing PPE with reference to COVID-19. The information is not externally verified.
-
160. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
The company reports the Lost Time Index Frequency Rate for 2021.
-
161. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
0 - The company reports zero fatalities for its whole operation.
-
Smallholders and suppliers
5.5 / 12 45.8%- Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
- Policy: 3 / 5 60%
- Practice: 2.5 / 6 41.7%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 6 12.5%
- External: 1.8 / 6 29.2%
-
162. Commitment to support smallholders?
The company makes this commitment through the GPSNR Policy Framework. Full points have therefore been awarded on the basis of the company's alignment with GPSNR Policy Components that fully meet the SPOTT indicator criteria. In its own reporting, the company commits to support smallholders.
-
0 / 1
163. Percentage of supply from smallholders?
-
164. Programme to support scheme smallholders/outgrowers?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
165. Percentage of scheme smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.
-
166. Programme to support independent smallholders?
[Externally verified] In 2021, the company launched a project in Indonesia to train rubber smallholders in Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs). Information is verified by quotes from collaborators, BMW and Birdlife.
-
167. Percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?
[Externally verified] The company included 36 farmers in a study on preventing diseases affecting rubber trees in 2019. The study was in collaboration with the Earthworm Foundation and the study is over two years old.
-
0 / 1
168. Process used to engage smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
0 / 1
169. Number or percentage of smallholder suppliers engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
-
170. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
The company has internal and external third-party audits for its suppliers to prioritise, assess and engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with the company's policy.
-
171. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
The company engaged all tier 1 suppliers in 2021, however, the information is not externally verified.
-
172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for non-smallholder suppliers?
The company has a due diligence process based on the "OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct". However, the timeframe for action is not defined.
-
173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with natural rubber sourcing commitments?
The company publishes a plan to improve compliance across the supply chain but there is no target for all suppliers (inclusive of indirect suppliers) to be in compliance.
-
0 / 1
174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply from third-parties that comes from natural rubber plantations which are compliant with natural rubber sourcing policies?
-
0 / 1
175. Percentage of supply coming from agroforestry?
-
Governance and grievances
5.75 / 7 82.1%- Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
- Policy: 5 / 5 100%
- Practice: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
- Self-reported: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
- External: 0 / 2 0%
-
176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.
-
177. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?
The company commits all suppliers to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.
-
178. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
The company provides anti-corruption training to its employees and also has a dedicated team for the implementation of the policy. The information is not externally verified.
-
179. Disclosure of the companyâs management approach to tax and payments to governments?
The company only discloses its tax strategy, the board is responsible for its review.
-
180. Whistleblowing procedure?
The company has a whistleblowing policy for reporting unethical conduct.
-
181. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?
The company has its own grievance system open to all stakeholders.
-
182. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?
The company only reports the total number of cases recorded by the company.
SPOTT scores are based on the presence of external evidence made available by the company or third-parties.
-
December 2021
SUSTAINABLE NATURAL RUBBER POLICY
-
2018
Sustainable Natural Rubber Policy Implementation Manual
-
2021
Annual Report
-
No date
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE - Pirelli and C - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Toyo Tire Corporation - WBCSD - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Pirelli and C. S.p.A. - UNGC - WEBPAGE
-
No date
PIRELLI PRODUCES THE WORLD'S FIRST FSC-CERTIFIED TYRE - Pirelli and C - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Pirelli CDP Responses - CDP - WEBPAGE
-
No date
PIRELLI IN THE WORLD - Pirelli and C - WEBPAGE
-
2022
Roadmap and Key Performance Indicators 2022-2025
-
No date
Sustainable natural rubber policy - Pirelli and C - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Our Members - GPSNR - WEBPAGE
-
No date
List of Self-Declared Organisations - Sustainable Natural Rubber Initiative (SNR-i) - WEBPAGE
-
No date
GPSNR POLICY FRAMEWORK - GPSNR - WEBPAGE
-
2019
Pirelli implementation Plan and Performances 2019
-
October 2021
PIRELLI AND THE BMW GROUP TOGETHER WITH BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL INITIATE PROJECT TO CONTRIBUTE TO SAFEGUARDING INDONESIA'S NATURAL ECOSYSTEM - Pirelli and C - WEBPAGE
-
2016
Global Human Rights
-
No date
HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT POLICY
-
2021
Pirelli implementation Plan and Performance 2021
-
December 2019
Drill Down Study
-
July 2020
Supplier Handbook
-
No date
SUPPLIER CODE OF CONDUCT
-
No date
Sustainable Natural Rubber Policy Implementation Roadmap 2019-2021
-
2019
Anti-Corruption Compliance Program
-
2018
Global Tax Policy - Pirelli and C - WEBPAGE
-
No date
Tax Overview - Pirelli and C - WEBPAGE
-
2020
WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY
-
No date
MAIN PERFORMANCE INDICATORS - Pirelli and C - WEBPAGE
Media monitor: Pirelli & C
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.
June 2023
Labor complaint against Goodyear casts doubt on Pirelli and Michelin employment contracts
July 2022
Rubber used by leading European tire makers linked to forest loss in Africa: Report
July 2021
Lobby group representing Michelin, Goodyear and Continental pressures EU Commission to exclude rubber from deforestation law
September 2018
Pirelli factory in Carlisle fined £500,000 for serious health and safety breaches
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
Media monitor: Pirelli & C
SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

