Skip to content
Menu Search
Show media reports (2) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • Media Monitor
    • ZSL's SPOTT team monitors international media for news on assessed companies, collecting articles about pertinent activities. They don't confirm the accuracy of the media coverage, but it can be leveraged by SPOTT users to gain insights into a company's operations and possible risks. To access this company's media reports, scroll down or click here.

Company assessment: Hartalega Holdings Bhd – March 2024

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 38.1% 37 / 97
  • Organisation: 12 / 24 50%
  • Policy: 16 / 48 33.3%
  • Practice: 9 / 25 36%
  • Self-reported: 8.3 / 25 33%
  • External: 0.8 / 25 3%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    7.75 / 10 77.5%
    • Organisation: 5.5 / 6 91.7%
    • Policy: 1 / 1 100%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 3 41.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0.8 / 3 25%
    • N

      1. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment for all its operations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      2. Sustainable natural rubber policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      The company has published a sustainable natural rubber policy which applies to all suppliers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Sustainability Working Committee (SWC) includes members of Senior Management from relevant departments. However, the single position of responsibility for sustainability outside of the Board is not reported by the company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      The company reports that its board provides oversight on the group's sustainability agenda and is assisted by the management who oversees the implementation of the group's sustainability measures.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      The company reports eight females positioned as general managers or above in FY2023.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      33% - The company reports three females as a part of its board in FY2023.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?

      [Externally verified] The company is a member of the Responsible Glove Alliance.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with natural rubber production?

      The company states it has collaborated with the Ministry of Human Resources and the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers to address the prevention of forced labour in Malaysia, and partnered with the ILO, academia, cross-sector industry participants and NGOs for the Decent Work Malaysia Project. However, it does not produce any information on the extent of its participation in projects or project outcomes.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company's latest sustainability report was published in 2023.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

      The company has submitted its Forest, Water and Climate 2023 CDP Questionnaire. The company references GRI but the report does not follow guidance set out in GRI 101: Foundation requirements.

    • N
      0 / 1

      11. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    1 / 12 8.3%
    • Organisation: 1 / 8 12.5%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      12. Lists countries and operations?

      Manufacturing (Malaysia).

    • N
      0 / 1

      13. Lists countries sourcing from?

    • N

      14. Total land area managed/controlled for natural rubber (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      15. Total natural rubber planted area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      16. Scheme smallholders/outgrowers planted area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      17. Unplanted area (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      18. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      20. Management plans for natural rubber production are available for all estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      21. Monitoring of management plan implementation available for all estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      22. Maps of all scheme/outgrower smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Maps of all third-party supplying industrial estates/management units?

    • N

      24. List of jurisdictions where sourcing from smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      25. Number of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      26. Maps of company owned natural rubber processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      27. Number (or percentage) of company-owned processing facilities that source from company-owned operations and third parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      28. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned processing facilities that come from company's own operations and third-parties?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • (NEW: not scored this year) Y
      -

      29. Number of company owned natural rubber manufacturing facilities?

      The company states it has 11 manufacturing facilities.

    • (NEW: not scored this year) N
      -

      30. Maps of manufacturing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      31. Number of third party supplying processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      32. Maps of all third party supplying processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      33. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying processing facilities that source from their own plantations and third party plantations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      34. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying processing facilities that come from the supplying facilities' own operations and third parties?

    • N
      0 / 1

      35. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for manufacturing that comes from intermediary traders rather than directly from processing facilities?

    • N
      0 / 1

      36. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to processing facility level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      37. Percentage of supply traceable to processing facility level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to industrial plantation level?

    • N

      39. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      40. Percentage of supply from third-party processing facilities traceable to industrial plantation level?

    • N

      41. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to jurisdictional level for smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      42. Percentage of supply from own processing facilities traceable to smallholder at jurisdictional level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      43. Percentage of supply from third party processing facilities traceable to smallholders at jurisdictional level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

  • Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives Certification standards/Sustainability initiatives
    1 / 5 20%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 1 50%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      44. Member of the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Submitted self-declaration form for the Sustainable Natural Rubber Initiative (SNR-i)?

    • N

      46. Percentage area (ha) FSC certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      47. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC FM certification of estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      48. Percentage of scheme/outgrower smallholders (ha) FSC-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      49. Time-bound plan for achieving FSC certification of scheme/outgrower smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      50. Percentage of natural rubber supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party natural rubber suppliers that is FSC-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations or processing facilities.

    • N
      0 / 1

      51. Percentage of all natural rubber products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is FSC-certified?

    • N

      52. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      53. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?

      Some of the company's manufacturing facilities are ISO 14001:2015 certified. However, the certificates are not publicly available.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      54. Commitment to become 100% certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme?

      The company only commits to becoming 100% ISO 14001:2015 certified. A higher score cannot be awarded as ISO criteria are not publicly available.

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    0 / 10 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 7 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • N

      55. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      57. Commitment to zero deforestation?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      59. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

    • N

      61. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Evidence of monitoring deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion in supplier operations?

    • N

      63. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in own operations since cut-off date?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Amount of deforestation and/or ecosystem conversion recorded in supplier operations since cut-off date?

    • N

      65. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in own operations since cut-off date?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      66. Commitment to restoration of deforestation/conversion in supplier operations since cut-off date?

    • N
      0 / 1

      67. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • N

      68. Biodiversity policy?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      70. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      71. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      72. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      73. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      74. Commitment to protect areas from illegal activities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      76. Evidence of protecting forest areas from illegal activities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    0 / 5 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 4 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 1 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 1 0%
    • External: 0 / 1 0%
    • N

      77. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      79. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      80. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available for all new plantings since 1st April 2019?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      81. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      83. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      84. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Social and environmental impact assessment (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Soils, fire and GHG emissions Soils, fire and GHG emissions
    3.25 / 9 36.1%
    • Organisation: 1 / 2 50%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 6 25%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 1 75%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 1 75%
    • External: 0 / 1 0%
    • N

      88. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      89. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      90. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      91. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      92. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      93. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      94. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      95. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. Commitment to best/sustainable tapping practices applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      97. Evidence of best/sustainable tapping practices?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      98. Commitment to zero burning?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      100. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      101. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates/management units?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. Details/number of hotspots/fires in suppliers operations/jurisdictions?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      103. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions?

      The company reports a target to reduce its carbon emission intensity by 25% by FY2026, using FY2023 as the baseline. However, the target reported does not specify if it includes both Scope 1 and 2 emissions.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      104. GHG emissions?

      The company reports the GHG emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2) in FY2023 as 498,018 (tonnes CO2) and the GHG emissions intensity as 0.023 (tonnes CO2/1,000 pcs gloves).

    • N

      105. GHG emissions from land use change in company's own operations (scope 1)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • (NEW: not scored this year) N
      -

      106. GHG emissions from land use change in supplier operations (scope 3)?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      107. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions?

      The company's GHG emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2) have decreased in FY2023 (498,018 (tonnes CO2)) as compared to FY2022 (658,386 (tonnes CO2)). However, the information reported is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      108. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      The company states the methodology used to calculate its GHG emissions, which is in accordance with the GHG protocol.

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    6 / 11 54.6%
    • Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
    • Policy: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Practice: 3 / 4 75%
    • Self-reported: 3 / 4 75%
    • External: 0 / 4 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      109. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      The company reports a 5% reduction target for water consumption intensity by FY2024, with FY2021 as a baseline.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      110. Water use intensity?

      0.118 - The company reports its water consumption intensity (m3/1,000 pcs gloves) as 0.118 in FY 2023.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      111. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      The company's water consumption intensity (m3/1,000 pcs gloves) decreased from 0.169 in FY2022 to 0.118 in FY2023. However, the information reported is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      112. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD or COD)?

      The company's BOD and COD levels are already within legal limits.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      113. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD or COD)?

      The company's BOD and COD levels are within the legal limits. However, the information reported is not externally verified.

    • N

      114. Treatment of effluents from processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      115. Treatment of effluents from manufacturing facilities?

      The company reports that all of its effluent discharge is processed at a treatment plant before being discharged. However, the information reported is not externally verified.

    • N

      116. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      117. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      118. Reducing odours from natural rubber processing or manufacuring facilities?

      The company reports that it undertakes air emissions monitoring on an annual basis, with periodical analysis for total particulate matter (PM), sulfur oxides (SOX), nitrogen oxides (NOX), chlorine (Cl2), and ammonia (NH3) levels. The company also states having the necessary scrubber system in place to mitigate odours, in accordance with the EQA 1974. However, the information reported is not externally verified.

    • N

      119. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      120. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      121. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      122. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      123. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      124. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      125. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      126. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      127. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      128. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser usage?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      129. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    11.5 / 23 50%
    • Organisation: 3.5 / 5 70%
    • Policy: 6.5 / 13 50%
    • Practice: 2.8 / 7 39.3%
    • Self-reported: 2.8 / 7 39.3%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Commitment to human rights?

      The company commits to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human rights.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      131. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits its suppliers to safeguard human rights, however, the commitment does not reference the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or its equivalent.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      132. Progress on human rights commitment?

      The company reports the governance of human rights are overseen by its CEO, with the support of the Chief of Social Compliance. The company also conducts regular risk-based assessments and audits which include human rights. In FY2023, the company's employees recorded a total of 3,190 participation hours of human rights and social compliance training via its e-learning modules. Information reported is not externally verified.

    • N

      133. Commitment to respect Indigenous and local communities' rights?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      134. Commitment to Indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      135. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      137. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      138. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N

      139. Details on Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      140. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      141. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      142. Supports the inclusion of women across natural rubber operations, including addressing barriers faced?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      143. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      144. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      145. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      146. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      147. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N
      0 / 1

      148. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • N
      0 / 1

      149. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      150. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      The company reports it implements best labour practices which include measures to prohibit child labour, forced labour, representation of workers, regulation of working hours, advocating of equal opportunities, prevention of sexual harassment, etc. The company also states its Social Compliance Task Force which is led by the CEO undertakes engagements with key stakeholders on labour practices. Information reported is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      151. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company commits to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      152. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to prevent employment-related discrimination based on gender.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      153. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      In FY2023, there were zero recorded incidents of discrimination. The company also has a Sexual Harassment Procedure which aims to provide an effective mechanism to eradicate any forms of sexual harassment and instil a zero-tolerance mindset against sexual harassment at the workplace. Information reported is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      154. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      60.68% - The company reports the number of temporary employees in FY2023 as 4589.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      155. Percentage or number of women employees?

      19.87% - The company reports the number of women employees in FY2023 as 1503.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      156. Commitment to pay a living wage?

      The company only commits to paying minimum wage.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      157. Commitment to pay a living wage applies to all suppliers?

      The company only commits suppliers to paying minimum wage.

    • N
      0 / 1

      158. Progress on commitment to pay a living wage?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      159. Reporting of salary by gender?

      The company reports a 1:1 ratio of basic salary and renumeration for male and female employees at all job levels. However, reporting does not adhere to GRI reporting requirements which state the ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men should be broken down for each employee category and by significant locations of operation.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      160. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company commits to address health and safety at work for all workers.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      161. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to address health and safety at work for all workers.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      162. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company reports that all employees involved in hazard and chemical management must undergo comprehensive training and wear the mandatory PPE. However, there are no published examples of this is being implemented.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      163. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company reports a Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate of 0.47 in FY2023.

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    1 / 5 20%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • N

      165. Commitment to support smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      166. Percentage of supply from smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      167. Programme to support scheme smallholders/outgrowers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      168. Percentage of scheme smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      169. Programme to support independent smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      170. Percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      171. Process used to engage smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • N

      172. Number or percentage of smallholder suppliers engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate rubber plantations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      173. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage non-smallholder suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company's approach to supply chain management is two-fold, entailing pre-assessment and continuous assessment. Upon engagement, the company's Social Compliance & ESG Policy and Supplier Code of Conduct must be signed by all suppliers. The company also conducts periodical reviews to monitor the performance of key suppliers. Supplier surveys on ESG are also conducted to assess their readiness to incorporate ESG practices.

    • N
      0 / 1

      174. Number or percentage of non-smallholder suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      175. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      176. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with natural rubber sourcing commitments?

    • (NEW: not scored this year) N
      -

      177. Proportion of supply from suppliers that is verified as deforestation- and/or conversion-free (DCF)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      178. Percentage of supply coming from agroforestry?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    4.25 / 7 60.7%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 5 70%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      179. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company commits to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      180. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      The company commits all suppliers to ethical conduct and the prohibition of corruption.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      181. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company states it conducts risk assessments to identify and assess potential bribery and corruption risks in all departments across its operations. The company also states that all employees undergo regular training on its ABC Policy and there were zero reported cases of bribery or corruption in FY2023. Information reported is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      182. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      183. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has published a detailed whistleblowing procedure.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      184. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company reports it has a robust grievance mechanism that provides multiple channels for employees to voice their grievances confidentially. However, the process is only for employees and the details of the process are not reported.

    • N
      0 / 1

      185. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Hartalega Holdings Bhd

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground. The media monitor undergoes a full update at the time of publishing an assessment round, with ad-hoc updates throughout the year. This is not an exhaustive list of all media reports relevant to the company.

Show media reports
Last media reports:
Are we missing a story? Submit a media report
No article found for the selected categories.

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)