Skip to content
Menu Search

Established in 1989, Singapore based commodity producer and trader Olam International operates forestry concessions in

  • Landbank (timber/pulp):
    2,200,000 hectares
  • Palm cultivation revenue:
    3359540000%
  • Market cap:
    4,659,893,427 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    OLAM.SI
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    OLAM:SP
  • ISIN:
    SG1Q75923504
  • Activities:
    Timber production, timber processing and manufacturing, trading and distribution
  • Locations:
    Republic of Congo (Brazzaville), Myanmar
  • Headquarters:
    Singapore
  • Website:

Company assessment: Olam International Ltd – July 2019

SPOTT assesses companies against over 100 indicators across ten categories. Click on the icons or bars below to expand each category for further details, scoring and links to reports and sources.

Assessment date:

Total: 78.3% 88.5 / 113
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership 9 / 11 81.8%
    • Companies should publish sustainability policies or similar commitments covering their entire supply chain — including third party suppliers — implemented and enforced through high-level leadership that engages with wider industry schemes.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company has a Living Landscapes Policy, as well as a Plantations, Concessions and Farms Code that applies to upstream operations and joint ventures, and an Environmental Sustainability Policy. It has a separate Supplier Code that applies to any entity that sell goods or services to the company

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to all sourcing?

      The company's Living Landscape Policy applies to all the company's agricultural commodity businesses, including upstream production and third-party sourcing.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Head of Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      4. One or more board members have responsibility for sustainability?

      Four members of the Board are part of the company's Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Committee

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      5. Percentage or number of women board members?

      10%

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      6. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      0 (0%) - The company does not explicitly report number or percentage of women in senior management team

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      7. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      Sustainability sections included in 2018 annual report. Stand alone sustainability report last published in 2015

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      8. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?

      FSC, PEFC, UNGC, Natural Capital Coalition, CDP, GRI, ATIBT, Congo Basin Forest Partnership (CBFP), European Coalition for Sustainable Tropical Timber (STTC), WBCSD, TFA 2020, HCVRN

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      9. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?

      The company has a REDD+ partnership with the Republic of Congo government in the Congo Basin

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      10. Climate risks assessment available?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      11. Natural capital assessment available?

      The company has published a natural capital assessment but it does not follow the Natural Capital Protocol

  • Landbank, mills and traceability Landbank, mills and traceability 17 / 19 89.5%
    • Companies should publicly report figures on their total landbank and details of different areas under their management. They should also disclose maps of their forest management units and provide forest management plans, as well as details on mills.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      12. Lists countries and operations?

      Republic of Congo (forest concessions and production facilities), Myanmar (production facility)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      13. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?

      2,200,000 - This is an approximate figure excluding area preserved under REED+ program

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      14. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      15. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't use outgrower schemes for wood/wood fibre production

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      17. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?

      433,699 - The company publishes the area for conservation (serie de conservation, total of 47,253 ha) and for protection (série de protection, total of 386,446 ha) for each FMU in the summaries of the management plans. However, only one of these documents is dated. Half a point has been awarded for the area covered by this document (93,300 ha)

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      18. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?

      177,000 - Partial points on the basis of IFL assessment for one FMU Mimbeli Ibenga

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      19. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?

      4

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      20. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      21. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      22. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?

      Monitoring results of the implementation of Kabo, Pokola and Loundoungou Forest Management Plans are only publicly available upon request

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      23. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on use rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      100% - Score of CIB in this OTP category.
      Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      24. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on forest management (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      93.3% - Score of CIB in this OTP category.
      Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      25. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on timber harvesting (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      50% - Score of CIB in this OTP category.
      Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      26. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      27. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      28. Number of company owned sawmills?

      5 - The company owns and operates four sawmills in the Republic of Congo and one in Myanmar

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      29. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?

    • n/a
      -
      Source

      30. Number of supplier mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company only sources from one supplier which does not have mills

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      31. Maps or addresses of supplier mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company only sources from one supplier which does not have mills

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      32. Procedures to trace raw materials to country of harvest?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      33. Procedures to trace raw materials to FMU level?

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      34. Percentage of supply traceable to country level (above 80%)?

      100%

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      35. Percentage of supply traceable to FMU level (above 75%)?

      100%

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity 10.5 / 11 95.5%
    • Companies should commit to address deforestation and to set aside areas for conservation. They should report on any activities to manage or restore habitat in their conservation areas, or monitor deforestation in their supply chains. They should also provide evidence of biodiversity conservation and species or habitat management.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      36. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?

      The company states that it will allow no conversion or degradation of critical habitats such as High Conservation Value (HCV) areas and other nationally-recognised conservation priorities; plus no conversion or degradation of other natural habitats with high levels of organic carbon such as High Carbon Stock (HCS) forests. These committments are to be fulfilled in a time-bound manner

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      37. Zero conversion commitment applies to all sourcing?

      The company states that its requirements for eliminating unacceptable land use practices applies to all of its suppliers

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      38. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?

      The company details how it minimises the impact of logging roads in all forest management plans and in the company's approach to HCVF

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      39. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      40. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

      The monitoring of forest extent and condition is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 1,251,050 ha (61% of total operational area)

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      41. Amount of deforestation recorded?

      1.25% - The company only reports the amount of deforestation resulting from road construction (1.25% of the company's operational area)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      42. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      43. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The management and restoration of habitat is covered by FSC Principles and Criteria (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN). Full points have therefore been awarded for this indicator on the basis of the company's FSC certified landbank, which stands at 1,251,050 ha (57% of total operational area)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      44. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      45. Identified species of conservation concern referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      46. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      47. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments 7 / 7 100%
    • Companies should commit to the High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) approaches, and to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They should develop and publish summaries of assessments and monitoring and management plans.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      48. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      49. HCV commitment applies to all sourcing?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      50. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      This indicator is disabled until sufficient number of HCV ALS licensed assessors are available for the location where the company operates

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      51. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      52. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      53. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      54. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      55. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      56. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      57. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on impact assessments (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      90% - Score of CIB in this OTP category.
      Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link

  • Water, chemical and waste management Water, chemical and waste management 4.5 / 9 50%
    • Companies should commit to protect peatland and undertake best management practices for soils and peat, as well as commit to reduced impact logging. They should also have policies on zero burning and to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies should report their GHG emissions, as well as details on any fires that occurred in or around their estates, along with evidence for managing and monitoring fires.

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      72. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company only has a target to achieve 100% compliance with wastewater discharge limits by 2020

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      73. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      74. Commitment to protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      75. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      76. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?

    • n/a
      -
      Source

      77. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      78. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      79. Commitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't own pulp or paper mills

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      80. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      81. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      82. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      83. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      The company mentions integrated pest management training but unclear if using IPM within forestry operations

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      84. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

  • Soils, fire and GHGs Soils, fire and GHGs 7.5 / 8 93.8%
    • Companies should commit to managing water use and water quality, providing evidence through time-bound reduction plans, policies on toxic chemical use, waste management and treatment of wastewater and mill effluents.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      58. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?

      The company states that it takes measures to minimise the risk of erosion and soil degradation, and to maintain or enhance soil fertility and that it follows international best practice to identify and conserve forests and other natural habitats with high levels of biomass or organic carbon

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      59. Commitment to reduced impact logging?

      The company commits to reduced impact logging techniques within the forest management plans of all its FMUs

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      60. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests and that it does not have landbank on peat

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      61. Commitment on peatland planting applies to all sourcing?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      62. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't have landbank on peat

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      63. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?

      The conservation of soils including soil health, erosion control, water regulation, soil fertility is covered by a Living Landscape Policy and the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't have landbank on peat

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      64. Commitment to zero burning?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      65. Commitment to zero burning applies to all sourcing?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      66. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      67. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?

      The company published information on the risks and potential causes of fire within their concessions but the total number of fires over a specified time frame is not specified. Half a point has been awarded

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      68. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      2,030 (50%) - The company had a target to achieve a 10% reduction in GHG intensity (MTCO2e/MT) by 2020 that it has already met. The company has set a new target to reduce GHGs by 50% by 2030 both in its own operations and in its supply chain

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      69. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?

      The company achieved its original target of a 10% reduction in GHG intensity by 2020

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      70. Report GHG emissions from land use change?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it only produces wood/wood fibre from natural forests

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      71. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights 21 / 24 87.5%
    • Companies should commit to respect human rights, including those of indigenous peoples and local communities, and free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Companies should respect the rights of workers, report relevant workforce data, and address with health and safety issues.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      85. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration on Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      86. Commitment to human rights applies to all sourcing?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of human rights in forestry operations. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN), which defines human rights as those established through the UN Declaration of Human Rights

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      87. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      88. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      89. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      90. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      91. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

      The company states it follows the UN REDD FPIC guidelines but no details provided on how these guidelines are implemented

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      92. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      93. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      94. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across forestry operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      95. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      96. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on population rights (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      60% - Score of CIB in this OTP category.
      Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      97. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      98. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?

      The company has committed to not be directly or indirectly involved in the violation of any of the ILO Core Conventions. This commitment is made through the FSC Policy for Association (FSC-POL-01-004 V2-0 EN)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      99. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      100. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on labour regulations (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      71.43% - Score of CIB in this OTP category.
      Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      101. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      36,500 (48.99%) - The company refers to seasonal, casual and temporary, and all contract workers

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      102. Percentage or number of women employees?

      29% - The company reports that 29% of its workforce are women

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      103. Payment of minimum wage?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      104. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      105. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?

      The ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work is not referenced

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      106. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      0.29 - Lost Time Injury Frequency rate

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      107. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      12

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      108. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

  • Certification standards Certification standards 3.5 / 12 29.2%
    • Companies should be certified by credible certification standards, or have time-bound commitments to achieve 100% certification of forest management units. They should also ensure that their supply is verified as being in legal compliance and commit to sourcing certified wood/wood fibre.

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      109. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% third-party legality verification of FMUs or achieved?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      110. Time-bound plan to source only wood/wood fibre that is in legal compliance verified by a third party?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      111. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      1,920,640 (87%) - FSC certified

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      112. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?

      100% - The company only has one supplier in Myanmar.
      Legality verification standard: Myanmar timber legal assurance system (MTLAS)

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      113. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs or achieved 100% FSC-certification of FMUs?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      114. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?

    • Partial
      1.5 / 2
      Source

      115. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?

      1,251,050 (57%) - 1,251,050 ha (57%)

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      116. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      117. Percentage of all wood/wood fibre supply traded/processed that are FSC certified (above 75%)?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      118. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified (excluding FSC certified area)?

      This indicator is disabled as the company reports that it doesn't operate in a country with a PEFC-endorsed SFM standard

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers 1.5 / 4 37.5%
    • Companies should report details of any programmes or schemes to support outgrower scheme smallholders, as well as criteria to assess suppliers on compliance with company policies, and in what cases suppliers should be suspended or excluded due to non-compliance.

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      119. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't use outgrower schemes for wood/wood fibre production

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      120. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it doesn't use outgrower schemes for wood/wood fibre production

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      121. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      122. The company has a Due Diligence System (DDS)?

      Company states to have a DDS for sourcing timber but no details given

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      123. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      The company is developing a mechanism for addressing non-compliance but no further details are given

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      124. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances 7 / 8 87.5%
    • Companies should operate in an ethical manner at all levels, providing accessible channels and clear procedures for both employees and external stakeholders to raise any grievance or complaint with the company, as well as allowing for whistleblowing.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      125. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      126. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on legal registration (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      100% - Score of CIB in this OTP category.
      Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      127. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      128. Company has provided valid legal documents to Open Timber Portal on taxes, fees and royalties (at the time of SPOTT assessments)?

      92.31% - Score of CIB in this OTP category.
      Please note: Company scores on Open Timber Portal are updated daily. Visit the OTP website to review the company's current performance by clicking on the source link

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      129. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      130. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      131. Details of grievances disclosed?

      The company published a grievance log covering four grievances received between 2011 and 2019 and including the date, issue, source, action taken, and status

Media monitor: Olam International Ltd

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.
SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)