- AMCEL: 21.4%
- Priceworth International: 7.4%
- Rougier Group: 48.7%
- Agra Bareksa: 0%
- Alpi: 9.2%
- Groupe Blattner Elwyn (timber): 9%
- Wijma: 15.7%
- Tranchivoire: 7.9%
- SODEFOR: 13.3%
- APP China Group Ltd: 36.4%
- Cameroon United Forests (CUF): 21.9%
- Marubeni: 38%
- Suzano Papel e Celulose SA: 64.3%
- WTK Holdings Bhd: 8.4%
- Rimbunan Hijau (RH) Group: 4.2%
- Duratex SA: 59.8%
- YiHua Life: 7%
- Precious Woods Holding AG: 73.5%
- Eldorado Brasil Celulose SA: 51.7%
- Corà Domenico & Figli: 12.1%
- Korindo (timber and pulp): 34.3%
- SLJ Global Tbk: 17.6%
- CENIBRA: 57.7%
- Kayu Lapis Indonesia: 6.2%
- Greenheart Group Ltd: 21.9%
- Arauco: 32.4%
- Sumitomo Forestry Co Ltd: 39.3%
- Samling Group: 20.7%
- APRIL Group: 67%
- APP (Asia Pulp and Paper) Group: 69.4%
- Bumi Teknokultura Unggul Tbk (BTEK): 4.7%
- Groupe SEFAC: 18%
- Golden Pharos Bhd: 27%
- Société Industrielle de Mbang (SIM): 1.6%
- Olam International Ltd (timber): 60.3%
- Interholco AG: 93.4%
- Maderera Bozovich: 22.8%
- Cikel Group: 19.1%
- Bracell: 55%
- Shin Yang: 22.3%
- Barito Pacific: 5.1%
- Klabin SA: 69.8%
- Vicwood Group: 7.2%
- Compagnie des Bois du Gabon (CBG): 56.1%
- TA ANN Holdings Bhd: 20%
- Toba Pulp Lestari Tbk PT: 35.7%
- Pallisco-CIFM: 49.1%
- Empresas CMPC: 41.8%
- Oji Holdings: 28.9%
- Veracel: 38.9%
APRIL Group https://www.spott.org/timber-pulp/april-group/
Founded under the RGE Group in 1973, Singapore based producer APRIL Group owns pulp and... Read more.
-
Parent company:RGE Group
-
Landbank (timber/pulp):478,938 hectares
-
Thomson Reuters ticker:Private company
-
Bloomberg ticker:Private company
-
Activities:Pulpwood production, pulp and paper production
-
Locations:Indonesia (Sumatra)
-
Headquarters:Singapore
-
Related companies:Sister company of Bracell and Asian Agri (SPOTT palm oil company)
-
Parent website:
-
Website:
Company assessment: APRIL Group – July 2018
SPOTT assesses companies against over 100 indicators across ten categories. Click on the icons or bars below to expand each category for further details, scoring and links to reports and sources.
-
Sustainability policy and leadership
6 / 6
100%
-
Companies should publish sustainability policies or similar covering their entire supply chain — including third party suppliers — implemented and enforced through high-level leadership that engages with wider industry schemes.
-
1 / 1Source1. Sustainable forestry policy or commitment for all its operations?
Sustainable Forest Management Policy 2.0
-
1 / 1Source
2. Sustainability policy or commitment applies to direct and third-party suppliers?
-
1 / 1Source
3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?
Sustainability Director
-
1 / 1Source
4. Sustainability report published within last two years?
The company's latest sustainability report covers 2015/16
-
1 / 1Source
5. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve forest management or transparency?
Fire Free Alliance, TFA 2020, WBCSD, UNGC, PEFC
-
1 / 1Source
6. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve the sustainability of forest products?
Stakeholder Advisory Committee, Rainforest Alliance, Independent Peat Expert Working Group
-
-
Landbank, FMUs and mills
7.5 / 12
62.5%
-
Companies should publicly report figures on their total landbank and details of different areas under their management. They should also disclose maps of their forest management units and provide forest management plans, as well as details on supplier pulp and paper mills.
-
1 / 1Source
7. Lists countries and operations?
Indonesia (plantation, pulp and paper mill)
-
-No source
8. Total area of natural forest designated for wood/wood fibre production (ha)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests
-
1 / 1Source
9. Total area of forest plantation (ha)?
478,938 - 211,268 ha controlled by the APRIL subsidiary PT Riau Andalan Pulp & Paper. A further 255,169 ha is controlled by long term suppliers and 12,501 ha by community fibre plantations. Data as of June 2016
-
0.5 / 1Source10. Area of plantation/natural forest within outgrower schemes (ha)?
45,600 - The company and its supply partners implement outgrower programs such as livelihood plantation or Tanaman Kehidupan (approximately 37,000 ha) and community tree farming (approximately 8,600 ha). Precise figures are not available
-
0 / 1Source11. Unplanted (areas designated for future development as plantation forest) (ha)?
0 - The company report that they completed the establishment of plantations in their concessions in 2014. This information is from an undated source and so it is not possible to determine whether this is presently the case
-
1 / 1Source
12. Conservation set-aside and/or HCV area (ha)?
421,646 - PT. RAPP (87,940 ha), long-term suppliers (182,854 ha), ecosystem restoration (150,852 ha). Data as of June 2016
-
0 / 1No source
13. Area of Intact Forest Landscape (ha)?
-
1 / 1Source
14. Number of Forest Management Units (FMUs)?
12 - PT RAPP Teluk Meranti consists of two entities: PT RAPP Meranti East and PT RAPP Meranti West
-
1 / 1Source
15. Maps of forest management units (FMUs)?
-
0 / 1No source
16. Forest management plans available for all FMUs?
-
0 / 1No source
17. Monitoring of forest management plan implementation?
-
1 / 1Source
18. Number of company owned pulp and paper mills?
1 - Kerinci mill, Riau Province, central Sumatra
-
1 / 1Source
19. Maps or addresses of company owned pulp and paper mills?
-
-No source
20. Number of company owned sawmills?
This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own sawmills
-
-No source
21. Maps or addresses of company owned sawmills?
This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own sawmills
-
-
Deforestation and biodiversity
9.5 / 13
73.1%
-
Companies should commit to address deforestation and to set aside areas for conservation. They should report on any activities to manage or restore habitat in their conservation areas, or monitor deforestation in their supply chains. They should also provide evidence of species conservation and biodiversity protection.
-
1 / 1Source
22. Commitment to zero conversion of natural forest?
The company and its suppliers commit to only develop areas that are not forested, as identified through independent peer-reviewed High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments
-
1 / 1Source
23. Zero conversion commitment applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?
The company and its suppliers commit to only develop areas that are not forested, as identified through independent peer-reviewed High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments
-
-No source
24. Commitment to minimise the impact of logging roads?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests
-
1 / 1Source
25. Commitment to protect forest areas from illegal activities?
Fire teams patrol company concession areas, monitoring the landscape for fires as well as other unauthorised activities, including illegal logging
-
0.5 / 1Source
26. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?
The company has implemented a Land Cover Change (LCC) monitoring system which is based on analysis of Landsat imagery for changes in land cover across all fibre supply concessions. Further details of the monitoring methodology, including monitoring time-frames are not available
-
0 / 1No source
27. Amount of deforestation recorded?
-
1 / 1Source
28. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?
-
1 / 1Source
29. Commitment to set aside areas for conservation?
-
1 / 1Source
30. Examples of habitat management and/or habitat restoration of set-aside areas?
Restorasi Ekosistem Riau (RER) project focused on the comprehensive ecosystem restoration of ecologically important peat forest areas on the Kampar Peninsula
-
1 / 1Source
31. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?
-
0 / 1No source
32. Commitment to protect species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?
-
-No source
33. Commitment to sustainably manage the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests
-
1 / 1Source
34. Commitment not to use genetically modified organisms?
-
0 / 1Source
35. Commitment to only use alien species where impacts can be controlled?
The company uses Acacia mangium, Eucalyptus and Acacia crassicarpa. These species are not native to Indonesia
-
1 / 1Source
36. Examples of species conservation activities?
Restorasi Ekosistem Riau (RER) project, Sumatran Elephant conservation project
-
-
HCV, HCS and impact assessments
4.5 / 8
56.3%
-
Companies should commit to the High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) approaches, and to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They should develop and publish monitoring and management plans, and provide evidence through SEIA, HCV and HCS assessments, typically published in summary form due to the sensitive nature of certain sites.
-
1 / 1Source
37. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?
The company will only develop areas that are not forested, as identified through independent peer-reviewed HCV and HCS assessments
-
1 / 1Source
38. HCV commitment applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?
The companies commitment to only develop areas that are not forested, as identified through independent peer-reviewed HCV and HCS assessments. This commitment is said to apply to all current and future wood suppliers as well as any future acquisitions or partnerships
-
1 / 1Source
39. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?
The company states that it will use licenced assessors from the HCV Resource Network (HCVRN). When such assessors are not available, the company will seek an assessor recommended by its Stakeholder Advisory Committee. This commitment also applies to the companies suppliers
-
0 / 1No source
40. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments available?
-
0 / 1No source
41. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans available?
-
1 / 1Source
42. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?
The company and its suppliers will only develop areas that are not forested, as identified through independent peer-reviewed HCV and HCS assessments. The company will follow the HCS Approach as prescribed by the HCS Approach Steering Group
-
-No source
43. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?
This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it hasn't expanded its plantation area since April 2015
-
0.5 / 1Source
44. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?
The company states that forest plantation areas have undergone Environmental Impact Assessments. No reference to Social Impact Assessments could be identified
-
0 / 1No source
45. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available?
-
-
Soils, fire and GHG emissions
8.5 / 13
65.4%
-
Companies should commit to protect peatland and undertake best management practices for soils and peat, as well as commit to reduced impact logging. They should also have policies on zero burning and to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies should report their GHG emissions, as well as any fires that occurred in or around their estates, along with plans for managing and monitoring fires.
-
0.5 / 1Source
46. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?
The company has a commitment to best management practices for peat. No equivalent commitment could be identified for other soil types
-
-No source
47. Commitment to reduced impact logging?
This indicator is disabled as the company does not produce wood/wood fibre from natural forests
-
0.5 / 1Source
48. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?
The company has a commitment not to develop forested peatlands, but this does not extend to non-forested peatlands. The company states that its Peat Expert Working Group will be used to provide inputs and recommendations on the development of non-forested peatland
-
0.5 / 1Source
49. Commitment on peatland planting applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?
The company has a commitment not to develop forested peatlands that applies to all current and future wood suppliers, as well as any future acquisitions or partnerships. This commitment does not extend to non-forested peatlands
-
1 / 1Source
50. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?
265,873 - Figure calculated by adding PT RAPP's (110,160 ha), community fibre plantations' (10,326 ha) and long-term suppliers' (145,386 ha) landbank on peat
-
0.5 / 1Source
51. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?
The company provides evidence of best management practices for peat (management of water levels) and has commissioned an Independent Peat Expert Working Group. No best management practices could be identified for other soils
-
1 / 1Source
52. Commitment to zero burning?
-
1 / 1Source
53. Commitment to zero burning applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?
-
1 / 1Source
54. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?
Community and education-based prevention initiatives; regular land, air and water patrols. Suppression capabilities include helicopters equipped with fire crews, water bombing, fire trucks, and airboats
-
1 / 1Source
55. Details/number of hotspots/fires in FMUs controlled by the company?
246 - Seven instances of fire caused by third parties on PT. RAPP concessions and a total of 239 instances of fires caused by third parties on supply partner concessions. Data for period July 2016 to March 2017
-
0 / 1Source
56. Time-bound commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?
The company states that it commits to continuous reduction of its carbon footprint. However, no specific target on GHG intensity could be identified
-
0.5 / 1Source
57. Progress towards reducing GHG emission intensity?
Mill tonnes of GHG / tonne of paper: 0.75 metric ton CO2eq/ton paper (2015); 0.99 metric ton CO2eq/ton paper (2016). The company has not set a target for reducing GHG intensity
-
0 / 1Source
58. Report GHG emissions from land use change?
The company states that research is underway to establish land use emissions and sequestration associated with forestry operations
-
1 / 1Source
59. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?
International Council of Forest and Paper Associations (ICFPA) and the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) methodology
-
-
Water, chemical and waste management
6.5 / 12
54.2%
-
Companies should commit to managing water use and water quality, providing evidence through time-bound reduction plans, policies on toxic chemical use, waste management and treatment of wastewater and mill effluents.
-
0 / 1Source
60. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality?
The company has a commitment to address water quality impacts associated with its pulp and paper making processes. However, no specific targets relating to BOD or COD could be identified
-
0.5 / 1Source
61. Progress towards commitment on water quality?
COD Treated Waste Water: 6.8 m3/adt (2013), 8.3 (2014), 7.5 (2015), 5.45 (2016); BOD5 Treated Waste Water: 0.61 measured kg/adt (2013), 0.55 (2014), 0.60 (2015), 0.70 (2016)
-
0.5 / 1Source
62. Protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?
Commitment covers the provision of buffer zones in conservation areas only
-
1 / 1Source
63. Evidence of treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent?
-
-No source
64. Evidence of sawmill run-off containment and wastewater treatment?
This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own sawmills
-
0.5 / 1Source
65. Time-bound commitment to improve water use?
The company has a commitment to consume less water through mill usage than comparable operations. This commitment has no specific target and is not time-bound
-
0.5 / 1Source
66. Progress towards commitment on water use?
Water Consumption for Pulp and Paper: 32.7 m3/adt (2013), 29.6 (2014), 29.5 (2015), 27.3 (2016). No specific target has been set
-
0 / 1No source
67. Commitment to eliminate chlorine and chlorine compounds for bleaching?
-
-No source
68. Evidence of minimising or recycling solid waste produced during sawmilling processes?
This indicator is disabled as the company has informed ZSL that it does not own sawmills
-
0.5 / 1Source
69. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?
The company commit to minimise or avoid the use of chemical pesticides and other hazardous materials through an IPM approach. No clear commitment to minimise the use of chemical fertilisers could be identified
-
1 / 1Source
70. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?
-
1 / 1Source
71. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?
-
1 / 1Source
72. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?
-
0 / 1No source
73. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?
-
-
Community, land and labour rights
16.5 / 19.5
84.6%
-
Companies should commit to respect human rights, including those of indigenous peoples and local communities, consulted with free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Companies should respect the rights of workers, report relevant workforce data, and comply with health and safety legislation.
-
1 / 1Source
74. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration of Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?
-
1 / 1Source
75. Commitment to human rights applies to outgrower scheme and independent suppliers?
-
1 / 1Source
76. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?
-
1 / 1Source
77. Commitment to respect legal and customary property rights?
-
1 / 1Source
78. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?
-
1 / 1Source
79. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?
-
0 / 1Source
80. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?
-
0.5 / 1Source
81. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?
The company reports it has a process for the resolution of conflicts, but limited details are provided
-
0.5 / 1Source
82. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?
The company commits to support local livelihoods by providing agricultural training and materials, but food security is not specifically mentioned
-
1 / 1Source
83. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?
-
1 / 1Source
84. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?
-
1 / 1Source
85. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions?
The company states that the ILO's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work is respected
-
0.5 / 0.5Source
86. Total number of employees?
5,966 - Direct employees (as of December 2016)
-
1 / 1Source
87. Percentage or number of temporary employees?
11,214 (65.3%) - Contractors (as of December 2016)
-
1 / 1Source
88. Percentage or number of women employees?
10.45% - Direct employment is 5,966 with 10.45% female employees (as of December 2016)
-
0.5 / 1Source
89. Commitment to pay minimum wage?
The company states that it complies with Indonesian labour law, which covers the minimum wage. No evidence of wages paid is provided
-
0.5 / 1Source
90. Commitment to address occupational health and safety, referencing the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work?
The company does not reference the ILO Code of Practice on Safety and Health in Forestry Work
-
1 / 1Source
91. Time lost due to work-based injuries?
Injury Rate (employees & contractors): Fibre 0.31; Mill 1.54 (2016)
-
1 / 1Source
92. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?
13 - The company report that 12 contractor workers in forestry and one contractor worker in mill operations lost their lives during the reporting period of 2015 to 2016. Seven deaths were also reported from APRIL's fibre supply partners (excludes market-based suppliers)
-
1 / 1Source
93. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?
-
-
Certification standards
2 / 10
20%
-
Companies should be certified by credible certification standards, or have time-bound commitments to achieve 100% certification of both forest management units and outgrower schemes. They should also commit to only sourcing certified wood/wood fibre and ensuring that their supply is verified as being in legal compliance.
-
1 / 1Source
94. Percentage area (ha) verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
100% - Sustainable Production Forest Management and Timber Legality Verification (PHPL-SVLK)
-
1 / 1Source
95. Percentage wood/wood fibre supply verified as being in legal compliance by a third party?
100% - SVLK, PEFC (as of June 2016)
-
0 / 1No source
96. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% FSC FM certification of FMUs?
-
0 / 1No source
97. Commitment to source only wood/wood fibre that meets FSC Controlled Wood requirements?
-
0 / 2No source
98. Percentage area (ha) FSC FM certified?
-
0 / 2Source
99. Percentage of wood/wood fibre supply from outgrower scheme and/or independent suppliers that is FSC FM certified?
-
0 / 2Source
100. Percentage area (ha) PEFC certified?
262,473 - IFCC (PEFC) report that PT RAPP has 262,473 ha certified as of November 2016. This figure exceeds the total landbank figure given by the company in June 2016, whilst reporting in the companies 2015-16 Sustainability Report provides only an approximate landbank area that includes supply partners (476,000 ha) As such, the percentage of the company's PEFC certified could not be calculated accurately using the available data
-
-
Smallholders and suppliers
4 / 5
80%
-
Companies should report details of any programmes or schemes to support both schemed and independent smallholders, as well as criteria to assess suppliers on compliance with company policies, and in what cases suppliers should be suspended or excluded due to non-compliance.
-
1 / 1Source
101. Programme to support outgrower scheme smallholders?
Livelihood farms, Community Fiber Farms. Providing training, seedlings, fertilizer, financing, technical support
-
0 / 1No source
102. Percentage of outgrower scheme smallholders involved in programme?
-
1 / 1Source
103. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?
The company's Policy for Association sets out the procedure used to assess and confirm the compliance of prospective suppliers
-
1 / 1Source
104. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?
-
1 / 1Source
105. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?
100%
-
-
Governance and grievances
5 / 6
83.3%
-
Companies should operate in an ethical manner at all levels, providing accessible channels and clear procedures for both employees and external stakeholders to raise any grievance or complaint with the company, as well as allowing for whistleblowing.
-
1 / 1Source
106. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?
Guidelines include provisions for fair and non-discriminatory engagement with stakeholders, avoidance of conflicts of interest and intolerance of corrupt practices
-
0 / 1No source
107. Whistleblowing procedure?
-
1 / 1Source
108. Own grievance or complaints system?
-
1 / 1Source
109. Grievance or complaints system is accessible to internal and external stakeholders?
-
2 / 2Source
110. Details of grievances disclosed?
-
Media monitor: APRIL Group
SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.
October 2018
APR Ancaman Baru Kawasan Gambut di Riau (APR New Threats in Riau Peat Area)
August 2018
Sinar Mas-April Beli Kayu 'Tebang Habis' Hutan Djarum Group (Sinar Mas-April Buy Wood "Cut Out" from the Djarum Group Forest)
August 2018
APP and APRIL violate zero-deforestation policies with wood purchases from Djarum Group concessions in East Kalimantan
June 2018
Beyond Paper Promises: Assessing the Impacts of Corporate Pulp and Paper Commitments on Forests and Frontline Communities
January 2018
Indonesian villages see virtually zero progress in program to manage peatlands
December 2017
Environmental NGO Exposes the Reason Why PT RAPP Insists Against the Government
December 2017
Paper giant RAPP bows to peat-protection order after Indonesia court defeat
December 2017
Credit Suisse grants credit to a company that destroys indonesia's forests
December 2017
Pulp and paper giant sues Indonesian government over peat protection obligation
November 2017
A total of 30 Environmental Organizations Call Stop Buy Group Products APRIL
November 2017
Paradise Papers: Leaked records reveal offshore companies' role in forest destruction
November 2017
Paradise Papers Links APRIL's Tax Avoidance To Deforestation And Banks, Impacts USD 500 Million Loan?
October 2017
Without Certainty of Land, RAPP Call Source of Raw Materials Will Be Hal
October 2017
Concern about Indonesia's Pulp & Paper Industry after Suspension Case
October 2017
RAPP Faces Massive Layoffs, Financial Losses After Ministry Voids Key Work Plan
October 2017
Minister Says RAPP Must Comply With Peatland Protection Regulations
October 2017
APRIL and Indonesian government at loggerheads over peatland regulations
February 2017
Greenpeace slams paper giant over loophole in fire-prevention policy
December 2016
Green groups raise red flags over Jokowi's widely acclaimed haze law
December 2016
As accusations fly, paper giant appears to stand by its replanting of burned peat in Sumatra
November 2016
Healthy forests, zero burning, prosperous economy: Can Indonesia have it all?
November 2016
Indonesian logging firm fined a record US$1.2 billion for deforestation
July 2016
Indonesia's forestry minister axes deal with paper firm over 'irregularities'
April 2016
Another pulp and paper supplier suspended for role in Indonesian haze crisis
March 2016
Study: Maintain Hydrological Peat on Kampar Peninsula or This Region will Drown
February 2016
Indonesia's peat peninsula being drained into oblivion, study finds
February 2015
Victory for Greenpeace as Santander pledges to stop funding forest destruction in Indonesia
February 2015
Despite green promise, Indonesian forestry giant continues to destroy forests
February 2015
2 years ago, the bad guys pledged to go good on rainforests. How'd they do?
December 2014
Huge swath of forest in Indonesian Borneo slated for clearing by 'sustainable' company
June 2014
Logger continues to destroy Indonesian rainforest despite green promises (Photos)
April 2014
APRIL Timber Supplier Allegedly Still Felling Natural Forests & Hiring Child Labor
February 2014
Indonesian pulp company blacklisted by Australian retailers hopes forest sustainability plan will silence critics
January 2014
