Skip to content
Menu Search
Palm oil assessments

REPSA is a Guatemalan company founded in 1999, with operations in oil palm cultivation and

  • Parent company:
    Grupo HAME
  • Landbank (oil palm):
    20,201 hectares
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    Private company
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private company
  • RSPO member?
    No
  • Website:

Company assessment: Reforestadadora de Palmas de el Peten SA (REPSA) – November 2018

SPOTT assesses companies against over 100 indicators across ten categories. Click on the icons or bars below to expand each category for further details, scoring and links to reports and sources.

Assessment date:

Total: 38.9% 44 / 113
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership 4 / 6 66.7%
    • Companies should publish sustainability policies or similar covering their entire supply chain — including third party suppliers — implemented and enforced through high-level leadership that engages with wider industry schemes.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      2. Policy or commitment applies to direct and third-party suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      4. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The company provides quarterly reports on the implementation of its sustainability action plan

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      5. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve sustainability in relation to palm oil?

      UNGC and the Spanish Sustainable Palm Oil Foundation

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      6. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      7. Activities with government, NGOs or academic institutions to improve palm oil sustainability?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability 7 / 13 53.8%
    • Companies should publicly report figures on their total landbank and details of different areas under their management. They should also disclose maps of their management areas and provide details on traceability of their products, both to mill and plantation level.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      8. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      20,201.1

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      9. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      10. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      11. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      12. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      47.22 - The company provides information on one forest reserve, but this does not cover the known scope of the company's operations

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      13. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

      107.2 - The company provides information on infrastructure area within one estate, but this does not cover the known scope of the company's operations

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      14. Number and names of company owned mills?

      2

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      15. Maps or coordinates of company owned mills?

      One of the company's mills is listed on GFW but this does not cover the full scope of the company's operations. The company provides static images showing the location of both company mills

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      16. Number and names of supplier mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      17. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company provides static image maps of five estate locations

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      18. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      19. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      20. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

      100% - The company states it has 100% traceability to plantation level

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      21. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level (above 80%)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      22. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level (above 75%)?

      100% - The company states it has 100% traceability to plantation

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      23. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level (above 75%)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity 5 / 10 50%
    • Companies should commit to address deforestation and to set aside areas for conservation. They should report on any activities to manage or restore habitat in their conservation areas, or monitor deforestation in their supply chains. They should also provide evidence of species conservation and biodiversity protection.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      24. Commitment to zero deforestation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      25. Deforestation commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      26. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      HCS, HCV, peat

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      27. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      28. Examples of habitat management and/or habitat restoration?

      The company reports it is undertaking native species reforestation of riverbanks

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      29. Implementing a landscape-level approach to biodiversity conservation?

      The company refers to promoting an integrated watershed approach, but does not provide further details

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      30. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      31. Commitment to not endanger species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      32. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      33. Examples of species conservation activities?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments 2 / 11 18.2%
    • Companies should commit to the High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) approaches, and to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They should develop and publish monitoring and management plans, and provide evidence through SEIA, HCV and HCS assessments, typically published in summary form due to the sensitive nature of certain sites.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      34. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company commits to preserving HCV areas, but does not state that it will undertake HCV assessments prior to all new developments

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      35. HCV commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      36. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      37. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      38. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      39. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      40. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      41. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

      The company commits to not developing operations within HCS areas, but it is not clear that this includes applying the HCS Approach before all new developments

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      42. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      43. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      44. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions 5 / 15 33.3%
    • Companies should commit to protect peatland and undertake best management practices for soils and peat. They should also have policies on zero burning and to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies should report their GHG emissions, as well as any fires that occurred in or around their estates, along with plans for managing and monitoring fires.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      45. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company commits to no development of histosol (peatland) for all new developments

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      46. Peat commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      47. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company reports having a Soil Conservation Plan, and using a limited selection of practices to prevent erosion and improve soil nutrition, but does not commit to best management practices or mention management of peat

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      48. Landbank or planted area on peat?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      49. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company reports it has a Soil Conservation Plan, including supplying organic matter to improve soil nutrition and using natural coverings to prevent erosion. The company does not report practices for peat

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      50. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company states that it avoids using fire and agricultural burning, but it is not clear that this applies to all new development

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      51. Zero burning commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      52. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      53. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      55. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

      The company only has a vague commitment to reduce general GHG emissions

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      56. GHG emissions from land use change?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      57. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      ISCC

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      58. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

      656.01 - Figure refers to annual emissions in kg of CO2e per ton of crude palm oil. However, the company does not have a time-bound commitment to reduce emissions

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      59. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

      The company refers to methane capture, but it is not clear whether this applies to all mills

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management 5.5 / 12 45.8%
    • Companies should commit to managing water use and water quality, providing evidence through time-bound reduction plans, policies on toxic chemical use and treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME).

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      60. Time-bound commitment to improve water use per tonne of FFB Processed?

      The company only has a general commitment to use water responsibly

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      61. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

      The company only has a general commitment to avoid discharging untreated water, and to guarantee water quality

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      62. Progress towards commitment on water use?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      63. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      64. Protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      65. Evidence of treating palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      66. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company states it uses integrated pest management to reduce the use of pesticides, and uses mineral fertilisers in an environmentally responsible way, but does not commit to reduce the use of fertilisers

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      67. No use of paraquat?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      68. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      69. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      70. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      71. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights 9.5 / 19.5 48.7%
    • Companies should commit to respect human rights, including those of indigenous peoples and local communities, consulted with free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Companies should respect the rights of workers, report relevant workforce data, and comply with health and safety legislation.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      72. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration of Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      73. Commitment to human rights applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      74. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      The company states it respects the human rights of people and communities in its area of influence, but it is not clear whether this includes legal and customary land tenure rights

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      75. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights, referencing the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or ILO 169?

      The company states it respects the human rights of people and communities in its area of influence, but does not reference the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples or ILO 169

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      76. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      77. FPIC commitment applies to independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      78. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      79. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

      The company states it has a conflict resolution process, but does not provide details

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      80. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company provides agricultural training to workers to promote knowledge sharing within their communities, but does not have a clear policy in place to ensure food security for local communities

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      81. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company reports that it supports infrastructure projects such as roads and schools, but does not have a clear commitment to provide essential community services

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      82. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

      The company states that it respects the rights of its workers, but does not specify all employees

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      83. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company states it respects the Conventions of the ILO, but does not specify Core/Fundamental Conventions. It also commits to no discrimination, no forced labour, and freedom of association

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      Source

      84. tal number of employees?

      4,700 - Figure is the monthly average across 12 months, but this is undated

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      85. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      2,300 - Figure is average number, but it is undated

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      86. Percentage or number of women employees?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      87. Commitment to pay minimum wage?

      The company states that it pays the minimum wage established by national legislation

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      88. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      89. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      90. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      91. Provision of personal protective equipment and pesticide training?

  • Certification standards Certification standards 0 / 13.5 0%
    • Companies should become members of credible certification standards and report in accordance with all appropriate categories of membership. The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) requires members registered as growers to submit data relating to certification targets for their estates, scheme smallholders and independent fresh fruit bunch (FFB) suppliers, via an annual communications of progress (ACOP) report.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      92. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      No source

      93. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      No source

      94. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      Source

      95. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      In 2016 the company reported that it would obtain RSPO certification for two mills and plantations by 2017, but this target was not met

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      No source

      96. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/associated smallholders within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of scheme/associated smallholders?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      97. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      No source

      98. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      99. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified (above 75%)?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      100. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified (above 75%)?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      101. Percentage of scheme/associated smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified (above 75%)?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      102. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified (above 75%)?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      103. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that are RSPO-certified (above 75%)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      104. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      105. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      106. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      107. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAN, RSB, etc.)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers 0 / 7 0%
    • Companies should report details of any programmes or schemes to support both schemed and independent smallholders, as well as criteria to assess suppliers on compliance with company policies, and in what cases suppliers should be suspended or excluded due to non-compliance.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Programme to support scheme smallholders?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      109. Number or percentage of scheme smallholders involved in programme?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      110. Programme to support independent smallholders?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      111. Number or percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      112. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      113. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      114. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances 6 / 6 100%
    • Companies should operate in an ethical manner at all levels, providing accessible channels and clear procedures for both employees and external stakeholders to raise any grievance or complaint with the company, as well as allowing for whistleblowing.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      115. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      116. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      117. Own grievance or complaints system?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      118. Grievance or complaints system is accessible to internal and external stakeholders?

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      119. Details of grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Reforestadadora de Palmas de el Peten SA (REPSA)

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Category filter:
No articles found for the selected categories.

Research protocols: Reforestadadora de Palmas de el Peten SA (REPSA)

Research protocols guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 119 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)