Skip to content
Menu Search

Korindo Group

Palm oil assessment
  • Latest update: October 2019
  • Next scheduled: November 2020

Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • About this company:

    Established in 1969, Korindo Group operates oil palm

  • Landbank (oil palm)
    120,955 hectares
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    Private
  • RSPO member?
    No
  • Website:

Company assessment: Korindo Group – October 2019

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 25.6% 45.75 / 179
  • Organisation: 13.5 / 32 42.2%
  • Policy: 23.5 / 77 30.5%
  • Practice: 8.8 / 70 12.5%
  • Self-reported: 6.8 / 70 9.6%
  • External: 2 / 70 2.9%
  • Certified: 0 / 70 0%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    4.5 / 9 50%
    • Organisation: 1.5 / 4 37.5%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 2 / 3 66.7%
    • Self-reported: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • External: 1 / 3 33.3%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company reports an Environment, Social and Governance Division, but no high level position with sustainability responsibility.

    • 4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed.

    • N
      0 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

    • 6. Percentage or number of women board members?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not publicly listed.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      WBCSD, GAA.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company contributes to multiple multistakeholder collaborations, such as Boven Digoel Multi Stakeholder Forum funded by USAID, “Medical Service Improvement for the Local Communities in Indonesia“ Project and the Kampar REDD+ project.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a POIG member.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    10 / 15 66.7%
    • Organisation: 10 / 12 83.3%
    • Policy: 0 / 1 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 2 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 2 0%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      120,955 - The company reports a total area of 120,955 ha under "Right to Cultivate (HGU)".

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      57,157 - The company stated in 2018 that it had planted 57,157 ha of palm oil plantation out of 120,95 5ha of its "Right to Cultivate (HGU)" permit.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      0 - The company stated in 2018 that development of plasma plantations has not yet begun due to deforestation issues in Papua.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      63,798 - The company stated in 2018 that it had planted 57,157 ha of palm oil plantation out of 120,955ha of their "Right to Cultivate (HGU)" permit, leaving a total of 63,798 ha unplanted.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      43,801 - 26,159 ha of HCV area and 17,642 ha of HCS area.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      18. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

      3,600 - Mill (40 ha), camp (264 ha), and road (3,296 ha).

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      19. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company's subsidiaries PT Tunas Sawa Erma, PT Dongin Prabhawa and PT Gelora Mandiri Membangun are available on GFW.

    • N
      0 / 1

      20. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • 21. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

      The company states that its CPO mills "have not purchased FFB from external supplier and have used 100% of FFB production from our own plantations".

    • Y
      1 / 1

      22. Number of company-owned mills?

      4

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      23. Names and coordinates of company-owned mills?

      The company only provides names of mills.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      24. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      25. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned plantations and/or third-party plantations?

    • 26. Number of supplier mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills.

    • 27. Names and coordinates of all third-party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills.

    • 28. Number (or percentage) of third-party supplier mills that source from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills.

    • 29. Total volumes (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplier mills that come from their own plantations and/or third-party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills.

    • 30. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills.

    • 31. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills.

    • 32. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills.

    • N
      0 / 1

      33. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

      The company states that its CPO mills "have not purchased FFB from external supplier and have used 100% of FFB production from our own plantations", however the statement is undated.

    • N
      0 / 2

      34. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level?

      The company states that its CPO mills "have not purchased FFB from external supplier and have used 100% of FFB production from our own plantations", however the statement is undated.

    • 35. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplier mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from supplier mills.

    • 36. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company is not a refiner.

    • 37. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own crushing facilities.

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    4.75 / 18 26.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 9 38.9%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 7 17.9%
    • Self-reported: 1.3 / 7 17.9%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      38. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

      The company states: "Our commitments to the responsible palm oil production by complying with policies of no peat, no exploitation, no burning, and no deforestation are already in effect." It also commits to not develop HCV or HCS areas.

    • N
      0 / 1

      39. Commitment to zero deforestation or zero conversion of natural ecosystems applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      40. Criteria for defining deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 2

      41. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      43. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

    • N
      0 / 1

      44. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • N
      0 / 1

      45. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      46. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

      The company refers to a partnership with USAID LESTARI on the development of a sustainable landscape, but it is unclear what the company's involvement is in the project.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      47. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Commitment to biodiversity conservation applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      49. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      50. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

      The company is working to develop wildlife corridors for orangutans and is working with local communities and governments to reduce human-orangutan conflicts. The company has also been involved in multiple tree planting projects.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      51. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

      The company only states it only allows hunting if it is done by the local community and in a limited manner to fulfil needs for food or traditional ceremony, however it is not clear if this commitment extends to its conservation areas.

    • N
      0 / 1

      52. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    4.5 / 14 32.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 3.5 / 8 43.8%
    • Practice: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 6 0%
    • External: 1 / 6 16.7%
    • Certified: 0 / 6 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      53. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      55. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

    • N
      0 / 1

      56. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • N
      0 / 1

      57. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      58. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      59. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

      All HCV assessments have been cancelled or found to be unsatisfactory.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      61. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      63. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

      One HCS assessment available.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      64. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company commits to conduct AMDAL evaluations before all new development, but does not commit to conduct SIAs.

    • N
      0 / 1

      65. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      66. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) undertaken, and associated management and monitoring plans?

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    2 / 20 10%
    • Organisation: 0 / 5 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 8 25%
    • Practice: 0 / 7 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      67. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • N
      0 / 1

      68. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      0

    • N
      0 / 1

      70. Landbank or planted area on peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      71. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      72. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      73. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      74. Commitment to zero burning?

    • N
      0 / 1

      75. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      76. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

      The company provides some evidence of fire management and monitoring activities but the information is undated.

    • N
      0 / 1

      77. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      78. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      80. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

    • N
      0 / 1

      81. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      83. GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      84. GHG emissions from land use change?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    3.5 / 22 15.9%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 11 13.6%
    • Practice: 2 / 9 22.2%
    • Self-reported: 2 / 9 22.2%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      85. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      87. Water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      89. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      90. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) and/or palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      91. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      92. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

      The company reports buffer zone in place, although no information is provided.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      93. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

      The company commits to reduce chemical usage, including the use of pesticides. No fertiliser policy is currently in place.

    • N
      0 / 1

      94. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      95. Implementation of commitment to reduce chemical usage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • N
      0 / 1

      100. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      103. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    14 / 46 30.4%
    • Organisation: 2 / 5 40%
    • Policy: 10.5 / 25 42%
    • Practice: 1.5 / 16 9.4%
    • Self-reported: 1.5 / 16 9.4%
    • External: 0 / 16 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 16 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      104. Commitment to human rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      105. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      106. Progress on human rights commitment?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      107. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      109. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      110. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company mentions the rights of indigenous peoples and FPIC but does not commit to the UN Declaration or the ILO Convention.

    • N
      0 / 1

      111. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      112. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      113. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      114. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      115. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      116. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to support the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced, applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      118. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • N
      0 / 1

      119. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security applies to all suppliers?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      120. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      121. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      122. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      123. Commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • N
      0 / 1

      124. Commitment to respect all workers' rights applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      125. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      126. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • N
      0 / 1

      127. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      128. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation?

    • N
      0 / 1

      129. Commitment to eliminate gender-related discrimination with regards to employment and occupation applies to all suppliers?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      9,000 (30%) - Across all of the company's operations.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      131. Percentage or number of women employees?

      6,000 (20%)

    • Y
      1 / 1

      132. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      133. Commitment to pay at least minimum wage applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      134. Progress on commitment to pay minimum wage?

    • N
      0 / 1

      135. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      136. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • N
      0 / 1

      137. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      138. Reduction of time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1

      139. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

    • N
      0 / 1

      140. Zero fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • N
      0 / 1

      141. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

    • N
      0 / 2

      142. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company only states: "Provide all necessary equipment, resources and training", as well as a short sentence on pesticide training however the data is undated.

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    0.5 / 13 3.9%
    • Organisation: 0 / 2 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 2 0%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 9 5.6%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 9 5.6%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      143. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      144. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010 for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • N
      0 / 1

      145. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      146. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      147. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within five years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      148. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      149. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      150. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      151. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/ associated smallholders and outgrowers within five years or target already achieved?

    • N
      0 / 1

      152. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/ outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

    • 153. Year expected to achieve 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own processing facilities.

    • 154. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/ processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not own processing facilities.

    • N
      0 / 1

      155. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      156. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      The company claims that its Palm Oil Division has been certified since December 2016.

    • 157. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not operate in Malaysia.

    • N
      0 / 1

      158. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB, etc.)?

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    1 / 14 7.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0.5 / 6 8.3%
    • Practice: 0.5 / 8 6.3%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 8 6.3%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      159. Commitment to support smallholders?

      The company states "we support the integration of our plasma farmers into the sustainable supply chain", but no details on the type of support is given.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      160. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

      The company states that it has supported the setting up of seven plasma cooperatives, but does not give detail of the type of support provided.

    • N
      0 / 1

      161. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

    • 162. Programme to support independent smallholders/outgrowers?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from independent smallholders or outgrowers.

    • 163. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

      This indicator is disabled as the company does not source from independent smallholders or outgrowers.

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      165. Percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company requirements?

    • N
      0 / 1

      166. Time-bound plan to engage with all high-risk mills within three years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      167. Programme to support high-risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      168. Regularly engages with a subset of high-risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      169. Procedures in place to assess all own and third-party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      170. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third-party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

    • N
      0 / 1

      172. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 1

      173. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      174. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    1 / 8 12.5%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 1 / 5 20%
    • Practice: 0 / 3 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 0 / 3 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      175. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company commits to " taking a proactive role in corruption prevention and eradication". However ethical or fair conduct is not explicitly mentioned.

    • N
      0 / 1

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

    • N
      0 / 2

      177. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • N
      0 / 1

      178. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • N
      0 / 1

      179. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      180. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company has an "assistance and grievance procedure", but this appears to only cover CSR issues.

    • N
      0 / 1

      181. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Korindo Group

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Scoring criteria: Korindo Group

Scoring criteria guide how ZSL conducts SPOTT assessments and allocates scores to ensure a fair and consistent approach, setting the expectations for companies on how they should publish ESG data. The full palm oil indicator framework contains 181 indicators across 10 categories, aligned with corporate reporting initiatives.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)