Skip to content
Menu Search
  • Latest update: November 2021
  • Next scheduled: November 2022

Show media reports (29) Show ESG scores Show supply chain scores Modify score weighting
  • Landbank (oil palm)
    103,612 hectares
  • Market cap:
    207,000,000 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    FRN.V
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    FRN CN
  • ISIN:
    CA31527R8856
  • RSPO member?
    No - The company is no longer an RSPO member.
  • Website:

Company assessment: Feronia Inc – November 2021

Assessment date:

Score by disclosure type:

Total: 30.3% 39.75 / 131
  • Organisation: 12.5 / 28 44.6%
  • Policy: 18 / 45 40%
  • Practice: 9.3 / 58 16%
  • Self-reported: 4.3 / 58 7.3%
  • External: 2.8 / 58 4.7%
  • Certified: 2.3 / 58 3.9%
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership
    4.25 / 10 42.5%
    • Organisation: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Policy: 1 / 1 100%
    • Practice: 1.3 / 3 41.7%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 3 16.7%
    • External: 0.8 / 3 25%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company has different policies which cover multiple dimensions of sustainability across the company's operations covering both social and environmental issues.

    • 2. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      The company's Environmental, Social and Governance Director is responsible for sustainability and reports directly to the board. However, the information is reported in 2017, thus now between two and five years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      4. One or more members within the board of the company have responsibility for sustainability?

      Three board members sit on the ESG Board Committee which is responsible for the company's of their environmental and social performance. However, the information is reported in 2017, thus now between two and five years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      5. Percentage or number of women in senior management team?

      16% - The company reports that the proportion of management positions held by women is 16%. However, the data is between two and five years old, so full points cannot be awarded.

    • N
      0 / 1

      6. Percentage or number of women board members?

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      7. Member of multiple industry schemes or other external initiatives to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      [Externally verified] The company is a member of one industry scheme - the Tropical Forest Alliance.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      8. Collaboration with stakeholders to reduce negative environmental or social outcomes associated with palm oil production?

      The company states it is working with NGOs including CARITAS, CRAFOP, IGED (Initiation, Gestion d'Environnent Durable et Gestion Défense des Droits Human) and CADAAP but limited details are given.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      9. Sustainability report published within last two years?

      The 2017 sustainability report was published in early 2018.

    • N
      0 / 1

      10. Reports through standardised reporting systems?

    • 11. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      12. Climate risks assessment available?

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability
    7 / 10 70%
    • Organisation: 7 / 9 77.8%
    • Policy: 0 / 0 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 1 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 1 0%
    • External: 0 / 1 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 1 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      13. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      103,612 - The company controls a total of 103,612 ha for oil palm cultivation.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      14. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      22,436 - At the end of 2019 the company had planted 22,436 ha of oil palm.

    • 15. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      16. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting) (ha)?

      47,713 - The company reported 47,713 ha of unplanted area in its most recent RSPO ACOP.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      17. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      25,228 - The company has set aside 25,228 ha to HVC areas.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      18. Maps of estates/management units?

      The company reports in its RSPO ACOP 2019 to have submitted all concession maps to the RSPO and that no new concessions have been acquired since the submission of maps. The company, however, is no longer an RSPO member.

    • 19. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 20. Names and locations of all third-party supplying plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      21. Number of company-owned mills?

      3 - The company reports the number of mills in its RSPO ACOP 2018 as '3'.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      22. Names and locations of company-owned mills?

      Each of the company's three mills are located within its three estates. Even though estates are mapped, exact locations of mills cannot be determined.

    • N
      0 / 1

      23. Number (or percentage) of company-owned mills that source from company-owned operations and/or third parties?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      24. Reports total volumes (or percentages) sourced by company-owned mills that come from company-owned operations and/or third-parties?

      The company has informed ZSL that it has no suppliers.

    • 25. Number of third party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 26. Names and locations of all third-party supplying mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 27. Number (or percentage) of third party supplying mills that source from their own plantations and/or third party plantations?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 28. Reports total volume (or percentages) sourced from third-party supplying mills that come from the supplying mills' own operations and/or third parties?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 29. Total volume (or percentage) sourced for refineries that comes from intermediary traders and/or refiners rather than directly from mills?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 30. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 31. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 32. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 33. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) supply to own mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 34. Percentage of supply from third-party mills traceable to plantation level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 35. Publishes traceability data at refinery level?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      36. Publishes traceability data at crusher level?

  • Certification standards Certification standards
    2 / 11 18.2%
    • Organisation: 1 / 1 100%
    • Policy: 1 / 2 50%
    • Practice: 0 / 8 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 8 0%
    • External: 0 / 8 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 8 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      37. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      The company is no longer a RSPO member.

    • N
      0 / 1

      38. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      39. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      2019 RSPO ACOP was submitted by the company. However, the company is no longer a RSPO member.

    • 40. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      41. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      42. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      43. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      2,025 - The company expects to achieve 100% RSPO certification of estates and mills by 2025.

    • N
      0 / 1

      44. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all palm product processing facilities?

    • 45. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 46. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/plasma/associated smallholders and outgrowers within 5 years or target already achieved?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 47. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent smallholders/outgrowers/third-party FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      48. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that is RSPO-certified?

    • N
      0 / 1

      49. Sells RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • N
      0 / 1

      50. Processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

    • 51. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 52. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      53. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAS, RSB)?

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity
    3 / 12 25%
    • Organisation: 0 / 1 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 6 33.3%
    • Practice: 1 / 5 20%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 5 0%
    • External: 0 / 5 0%
    • Certified: 1 / 5 20%
    • N
      0 / 1

      54. Commitment to zero conversion of natural ecosystems?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      55. Commitment to zero deforestation?

      The company reports its commitment to no deforestation.

    • 56. Commitment to zero deforestation applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      57. Criteria and cut-off date for defining deforestation?

      The company uses the RSPO Principles and Criteria (P&C) 5.2 and 7.3 to define deforestation. P&C 7.3. dictates a cut off date of November 2005.

    • N
      0 / 1

      58. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • 59. Evidence of monitoring deforestation in supplier operations?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      60. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in own operations?

    • 61. Amount of illegal/non-compliant deforestation recorded in supplier operations?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      62. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion?

    • 63. Commitment to restoration of non-compliant deforestation/conversion applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      64. Implementing a landscape or jurisdictional level approach?

    • N
      0 / 1

      65. Biodiversity policy?

    • 66. Biodiversity policy applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Y
      1 / 2

      67. Identified species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      The company has conducted HCV assessments for all its three plantations by 'LD Biodiversity Consulting'. The HCV assessments of all three plantations of the company have information on the species of conservation concern referencing the IUCN Red list.

    • N
      0 / 1

      68. Examples of species and/or habitat conservation management?

    • N
      0 / 1

      69. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • 70. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments
    4 / 7 57.1%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2 / 4 50%
    • Practice: 2 / 3 66.7%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 3 0%
    • External: 2 / 3 66.7%
    • Certified: 0 / 3 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      71. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments?

      The company reports its commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments.

    • 72. Commitment to conduct High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      73. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for planting undertaken prior to January 2015, and associated management and monitoring plans?

      [Externally verified] HCV Assessments of Yaligimba, Lokutu and Boteka plantations are available on the company website.

    • 74. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 75. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      76. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

    • 77. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS) applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 78. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2015 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      79. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach?

    • 80. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) Approach applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 81. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments available?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      82. Peer review of all High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments undertaken since April 2015 by the HCSA Quality Assurance Process?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      83. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

      The company reports its commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs).

    • 84. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      85. Social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs) available, and associated management and monitoring plans?

      [Externally verified] The company's SEIA prepared by 'Digby Wells Environmental' is publicly available.

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions
    1.5 / 16 9.4%
    • Organisation: 0 / 4 0%
    • Policy: 1.5 / 5 30%
    • Practice: 0 / 7 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 7 0%
    • External: 0 / 7 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 7 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      86. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • 87. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      88. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      89. Implementation of commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      90. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat?

      The company reports commitment to best management practices for soils but not peat.

    • 91. Commitment to best management practices for soils and peat applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 2

      92. Evidence of best management practices for soils and peat?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      93. Commitment to zero burning?

      The company reports its commitment to no burning.

    • 94. Commitment to zero burning applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 2

      95. Evidence of fire monitoring and management?

    • N
      0 / 1

      96. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • N
      0 / 1

      97. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      98. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      99. GHG emissions intensity?

    • 100. GHG emissions from land use change?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      101. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      102. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

    • N
      0 / 1

      103. Percentage of mills with methane capture (100%)?

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management
    2.25 / 20 11.3%
    • Organisation: 0.5 / 2 25%
    • Policy: 0 / 7 0%
    • Practice: 1.8 / 11 15.9%
    • Self-reported: 0.5 / 11 4.6%
    • External: 0 / 11 0%
    • Certified: 1.3 / 11 11.4%
    • N
      0 / 1

      104. Time-bound commitment to improve water use intensity?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      105. Water use intensity?

      700 - The company reports an intensity of 700 litres of water per tonne of fresh fruit bunches processed. Data is four years old.

    • N
      0 / 1

      106. Progress towards commitment on water use intensity?

    • N
      0 / 1

      107. Time-bound commitment to improve water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 1

      108. Progress towards commitment on water quality (BOD and COD)?

    • N
      0 / 2

      109. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

    • 110. Treatment of palm oil refinery effluent (PORE)?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      111. Commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 2

      112. Implementation of commitment to protect natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • N
      0 / 1

      113. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • 114. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers, applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      115. Commitment to no use of paraquat?

    • 116. Commitment to no use of paraquat applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      117. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • 118. Commitment to no use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      119. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • 120. Commitment to no use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      121. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

    • P
      0.75 / 2

      122. Implementation of commitment to minimise inorganic fertiliser use?

      The company reports on its website that 'the use of agri-chemicals, such as pesticides and herbicides, has been suspended across the company's sites with immediate effect. The suspension will remain in place until a full review of operating practices and Personal Protective Equipment requirements for the application of such chemicals has been made, and any necessary adjustments implemented. Staff currently employed in the application of such chemicals will be allocated alternative work during the period'. Information is reported as of December 2019 and is not externally verified.

    • P
      0.5 / 2

      123. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

      The company promotes the use of IPM but information on implementation of the approach is not reported publicly.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      124. Waste management system in place to avoid negative impacts?

      The company mentions developing plans for waste treatment but this was in its 2017 sustainability report and nothing has been published on the subject since. A water waste treatment report in 2015 gave the company recommendations but there is no evidence any have been implemented.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights
    12.5 / 27 46.3%
    • Organisation: 2 / 5 40%
    • Policy: 8 / 13 61.5%
    • Practice: 2.5 / 9 27.8%
    • Self-reported: 2.5 / 9 27.8%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • P
      0.5 / 1

      125. Commitment to human rights?

      The company only mentions human rights in relation to security, it does not have an overarching commitment.

    • 126. Commitment to human rights applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      127. Progress on human rights commitment?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      128. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company respects community rights but does not mention the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

    • 129. Commitment to indigenous and local communities' rights applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      130. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

      The company reports its commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights.

    • 131. Commitment to legal and customary land rights applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      132. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

      The company reports its commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC).

    • 133. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      134. Details of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process available?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      135. Examples of local stakeholder engagement to prevent conflicts?

      The company has community relations managers who attend village meetings, have one on one meetings with community leaders and keep regular communication with communities. In 2017, the company states it would launch a community forest plan in 2018, however no plan is publicly available. Also, the information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      136. Details of process for addressing land conflicts available?

    • N
      0 / 1

      137. Supports the inclusion of women across palm oil operations, including addressing barriers faced?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      138. Commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company reports working to support local communities in farming a greater variety of crops, so as to increase food security while reducing pressure on the natural environment as a source of food.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      139. Progress on commitment to mitigate impacts on food security?

      The company reports that it supports local communities in farming a greater variety of crops, so as to increase food security. Its initiatives include seed multiplication projects, community bee-keeping projects, community fish and rice farms and encouraging the planting of fruit trees. However, the information is reported in 2017 and is not externally verified.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      140. Commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company reports its commitment to provide essential community services and facilities.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      141. Progress on commitment to provide essential community services and facilities?

      The company is involved in multiple projects to improve roads, healthcare, and water availability to name a few. However, the information is from 2017 and not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      142. Commitment to provide business/work opportunities for local communities?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      143. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

      The company does not report its commitment to equal remuneration or freedom of association.

    • 144. Commitment to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      145. Progress on commitment to respect all workers' rights?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      146. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

      The company reports its commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment.

    • 147. Commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      148. Progress on commitment to eliminate gender related discrimination with regards to employment?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      149. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

      4,341 (51.67%) - The company reports 4,060 permanent staff and 4,341 seasonal workers and day labourers. However this information is between two and five years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      150. Percentage or number of women employees?

      191 - The company reports that 'of the permanent staff 191 are women, representing 4.7% of the full time labour force'. However the data is between two and five years old.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      151. Commitment to pay a Decent Living wage?

      The company only reports its commitment to paying minimum wage.

    • 152. Commitment to pay a Decent Living wage applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      153. Progress on commitment to pay a Decent Living wage?

      The company only reports that workers are paid minimum wage through reporting legal minimum wages alongside minimum wages paid by the company. The information is reported in 2017 and is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      154. Reporting of salary by gender?

    • Y
      1 / 1

      155. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

      The company reports that it is committed to continuous improvement of health and safety in the workplace.

    • 156. Commitment to address occupational health and safety applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      157. Provision of personal protective equipment and related training?

      The company reports limited information on health and safety training in its 2017 sustainability report and on its website. Also, the information reported is not externally verified.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      158. Time lost due to work-based injuries?

      The company reported an accident frequency rate of 50 accidents per million hours worked in 2017, and 48 in 2016. However, this data is between two and five years old so full points cannot be awarded.

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      159. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      0 - The company reported zero fatalities in 2016, more recent data could not be found.

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers
    0 / 12 0%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 0 / 3 0%
    • Practice: 0 / 9 0%
    • Self-reported: 0 / 9 0%
    • External: 0 / 9 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 9 0%
    • N
      0 / 1

      160. Commitment to support smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      161. Programme to support scheme/plasma smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      162. Percentage of scheme/plasma smallholders involved in programme?

    • N
      0 / 1

      163. Programme to support independent smallholders?

    • N
      0 / 1

      164. Percentage of independent smallholders/outgrowers involved in programme?

    • 165. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 166. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 167. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • 168. Time-bound action plans (including Key Performance Indicators) for suppliers to be in compliance with palm oil sourcing commitments?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • N
      0 / 1

      169. Proportion of direct and indirect supply that comes from palm oil plantations which are compliant with palm oil sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      170. Time-bound plan to engage with all high risk mills within 3 years?

    • N
      0 / 1

      171. Programme to support high risk mills to become compliant with sourcing policies?

    • N
      0 / 1

      172. Regularly engages with a subset of high risk mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      173. Procedures in place to assess all own and third party supplying palm oil mills for risk level?

    • N
      0 / 1

      174. Regularly assesses and categorises the risk level of all their own and third party supplying mills?

    • N
      0 / 1

      175. Regularly reports the risk level of all own and third party supplying mills identified in its supply chain?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances
    3.25 / 6 54.2%
    • Organisation: 0 / 0 0%
    • Policy: 2.5 / 4 62.5%
    • Practice: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • Self-reported: 0.8 / 2 37.5%
    • External: 0 / 2 0%
    • Certified: 0 / 2 0%
    • Y
      1 / 1

      176. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company reports its commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption.

    • 177. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption applies to all suppliers?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • P
      0.75 / 1

      178. Progress on commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

      The company provides evidence that compliance to the business code of conduct is included in employee contracts and concerns regarding unethical conduct are investigated using internal audits. However, the information is not externally verified.

    • N
      0 / 1

      179. Disclosure of the company's management approach to tax and payments to governments?

    • P
      0.5 / 1

      180. Whistleblowing procedure?

      The company has a Whistleblowing Policy. However, the extent to which it will offer protection to whistleblowers is not clear.

    • Y
      1 / 1

      181. Own grievance or complaints system open to all stakeholders?

      The company's grievance procedure is open to all stakeholders.

    • N
      0 / 1

      182. Details of complaints and grievances disclosed?

Media monitor: Feronia Inc

SPOTT monitors global media sources for coverage of assessed companies. The media monitor gathers reports about specific activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess or score the validity of media coverage, but users can explore the media monitor to provide context on implementation, and infer risks associated with reported operations on the ground.

Palm oil media reports (29) Last media reports:
No article found for the selected categories.
Show media reports
All media reports
Download as CSV

1

0

0

4

0

3

2

26

0

11


SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)