Skip to content
Menu Search

Felda Global Ventures Holdings Sdn Bhd

  • Parent company:
    FELDA (The Federal Land Development Authority)
  • Landbank (oil palm):
    784,710 hectares
  • Palm cultivation revenue:
    13.08%
  • Market cap:
    1,455,413,504 USD
  • Thomson Reuters ticker:
    FGVH.KL
  • Bloomberg ticker:
    FGV MK
  • ISIN:
    MYL5222OO004
  • RSPO member?
    Yes
  • Website:

Company assessment: Felda Global Ventures Holdings Sdn Bhd

SPOTT assesses companies against over 100 indicators across ten categories. Click on the icons or bars below to expand each category for further details, scoring and links to reports and sources.

57.4% 74 / 129 Total:
  • Sustainability policy and leadership Sustainability policy and leadership 4 / 6 66.7%
    • Companies should publish sustainability policies or similar covering their entire supply chain — including third party suppliers — implemented and enforced through high-level leadership that engages with wider industry schemes.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      1. Sustainable palm oil policy or commitment for all its operations?

      The company has a Group Sustainability Policy. Unclear if group sustainability policy applies to Felda IFFCO, a joint venture, as policy only states "includes FGV's subsidiaries and FGV's listed subsidiaries located worldwide, in which FGV holds a controlling interest and have management control".

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      2. Policy or commitment applies to direct and third-party suppliers?

      The company states that "FGV Group encourages its Value Chain Partners to embrace sustainable practices" inclusive of smallholders and other suppliers, but the company does not explicitly state its policy applies to suppliers.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      3. High-level position of responsibility for sustainability?

      Head of Group Environment & Sustainability Division.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      4. Sustainability report published within last two years?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      5. Member of industry schemes or other external initiatives to improve palm oil sustainability or transparency?

    • n/a
      -
      No source

      6. Verification report on compliance with POIG Charter, if a POIG member?

      This indicator is disabled as it is not applicable to this company.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      7. Activities with government and/or NGOs to improve palm oil sustainability?

      Felda engages with NGOs through its Sustainability Technical Unit and engaged with NGOs and government through the Labour Issue workshop on Palm Oil Plantations which was organized by Felda.

  • Landbank, maps and traceability Landbank, maps and traceability 12 / 19 63.2%
    • Companies should publicly report figures on their total landbank and details of different areas under their management. They should also disclose maps of their management areas and provide details on traceability of their products, both to mill and plantation level.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      8. Total land area managed/controlled for oil palm (ha)?

      445,687 - Total land for palm oil cultivation given as 445,687 ha in ACOP 2016 and total landbank given as 784,710 ha in 2015 RSPO ACOP. However, the company states it manages 440,622 ha of plantation landbank in Malaysia and Indonesia, excluding 475,000 ha of land under settlers who supply FFBs to FGV in its 2015 and 2016 Annual Reports, and states it has 850,000 ha of predominantly oil palm plantations on its website.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      9. Total oil palm planted area (ha)?

      414,500

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      10. Plasma/scheme smallholders planted area (ha)?

      237,298 - The company reports 237,298 ha of scheme smallholders in 2015 RSPO ACOP, but also reports 475,000 ha of land under settlers who supply FFBs to FGV in 2015 Annual Report. In its 2016 ACOP it only report 1,049 ha under scheme smallholders.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      11. Unplanted (areas designated for future planting)(ha)?

      15,700

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      12. Conservation set-aside area, including HCV area (ha)?

      13,389 - Sum of HCV areas and other conservation areas.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      13. Area for infrastructure (ha)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      14. Number of company owned mills?

      72

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      No source

      15. Maps of company owned mills?

      Mill locations have been made available, which are viewable on the SPOTT map. However, ZSL is currently unable to ascertain if the maps disclosed constitute 100% of the company's palm oil mills.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      16. Number and names of supplying mills?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      17. Maps of estates/management units?

      Concession boundaries have been made available to the RSPO and the company declares these represent 100% of their concession sites, but not all may not be publicly available due to ongoing legal issues.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      18. Maps of scheme/plasma smallholders?

      The company states that all scheme smallholders maps have been provided as part of its map submissions to the RSPO.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      19. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to mill level?

      2017

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      20. Time-bound commitment to achieve 100% traceability to plantation level?

      2020 - Target to achieve 100% traceable to plantations for FGV-owned mills by 2020.

    • Yes
      2 / 2
      Source

      21. Percentage of supply traceable to mill level (is 100%)?

      100%

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      22. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from own mills traceable to plantation level (is above 75%)?

      Traceability information is only accessible via sign-in dashboard (http://fgv-top.feldaglobal.com/signin/).

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      23. Percentage of fresh fruit bunches (FFB) from supplying mills traceable to plantation level (is above 75%)?

      Traceability information is only accessible via sign-in dashboard (http://fgv-top.feldaglobal.com/signin/).

  • Deforestation and biodiversity Deforestation and biodiversity 8 / 12 66.7%
    • Companies should commit to address deforestation and to set aside areas for conservation. They should report on any activities to manage or restore habitat in their conservation areas, or monitor deforestation in their supply chains. They should also provide evidence of species conservation and biodiversity protection.

    • Yes
      0.5 / 0.5
      Source

      24. Commitment to address deforestation?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      25. Commitment to zero deforestation?

      The company merely states that it will work with relevant stakeholders to ensure that palm oil products are derived from areas that are 'No Peat, No Deforestation, and No Exploitation'.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      26. Commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      27. Criteria for defining deforestation?

      The company pledges no conversion of primary forests, wildlife reserves, wetlands, HCV areas, peat soils or HCS areas.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      28. Evidence of monitoring deforestation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      29. Commitment to set aside areas for conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      30. Evidence of habitat management and/or habitat restoration of set-aside areas?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      31. A landscape-level approach?

    • Yes
      0.5 / 0.5
      Source

      32. Commitment to biodiversity conservation?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      33. Commitment to not endanger species of conservation concern, referencing international or national system of species classification?

      The company protects and conserves endangered, rare and threatened species, referencing the IUCN Red List and the Malaysian Wildlife Conservation Act 2010.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      34. Commitment to no hunting or only sustainable hunting of species?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      35. Commitment not to operate within internationally and nationally designated protected areas?

      The company states it shall not perform any new development in areas that are under protection, such as wildlife reserves, but does not reference internationally or nationally designated protected areas.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      36. Evidence of species conservation?

  • HCV, HCS and impact assessments HCV, HCS and impact assessments 8 / 11 72.7%
    • Companies should commit to the High Conservation Value (HCV) and High Carbon Stock (HCS) approaches, and to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They should develop and publish monitoring and management plans, and provide evidence through SEIA, HCV and HCS assessments, typically published in summary form due to the sensitive nature of certain sites.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      37. Commitment to High Conservation Value (HCV) approach?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      38. Commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      No source

      39. Commitment to only use licensed High Conservation Value (HCV) assessors accredited by the HCV Resource Network's Assessor Licensing Scheme (ALS)?

      The company does not have an explicit commitment itself, but commits through the RSPO NPP.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      40. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken between November 2005 and December 2014, and management and monitoring plans?

      HCV assessments are available for: PT Temila Agro Abadi (Aug 2014); PT Citra Niaga Perkasa (Jan 2013).

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      41. High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments for all estates planted since January 2015?

      An HCV assessment is available for Asian Plantations Limited Sdn Bhd (Dec 2015).

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      42. High Conservation Value (HCV) management and monitoring plans for all estates planted since January 2015?

      An HCV assessment is available for Asian Plantations Limited Sdn Bhd (Dec 2015).

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      43. Satisfactory review of all High Conservation Value (HCV) assessments undertaken since January 2016 by the HCV ALS Quality Panel?

      Satisfactory review of Asian Plantations Limited.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      44. Commitment to the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach?

      The company states it does not plant HCS areas, nut unclear if using the HCS approach as only states "areas that have a high stock of carbons due to the type of plants, soil and other geographic factors".

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      45. High Carbon Stock (HCS) assessments?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      46. Commitment to conduct social and environmental impact assessments (SEIAs)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      47. Social and environmental impact assessment (SEIAs) undertaken since November 2005, and management and monitoring plans?

      SEIA summaries are available for: PT Temila Agro Abadi (Aug 2014); PT Citra Niaga Perkasa (Jan 2013); Asian Plantations Limited Sdn Bhd (Dec 2015).

  • Peat, fire and GHG emissions Peat, fire and GHG emissions 8.5 / 17 50%
    • Companies should commit to protect peatland and undertake best management practices for soils and peat. They should also have policies on zero burning and to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Companies should report their GHG emissions, as well as any fires that occurred in or around their estates, along with plans for managing and monitoring fires.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      48. Commitment to no planting on peat of any depth?

      The company states it has a policy of no new planting on peat regardless of size or depth, but only for lands purchased after Jan 2016.

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      49. Commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

      The company plans to extend its peatland policy to third party suppliers in the future.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      50. Commitment to best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      51. Landbank or planted area on peat (ha)?

      2,170 - Data is more than two years old.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      52. Evidence of best management practices for soils and/or peat?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      53. Commitment to zero burning?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      54. Commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      55. Evidence of management and monitoring fires?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      56. Details/number of hotspots/fires in company estates?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      57. Details/number of hotspots/fires within surrounding landscape/smallholders?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      58. Time-bound commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions?

      2020 (25%) - The company commits to reducing GHG emissions by 25% from baseline emission in 2014 by 2020.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      59. Commitment applies to scheme smallholders and independent suppliers?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      60. GHG emissions?

      GHG reports are disclosed only for some operations.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      61. GHG emissions from land use change?

      Land conversion GHG emissions are disclosed only for some operations.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      62. Methodology used to calculate GHG emissions?

      The company refers to the PalmGHG Calculator.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      63. Progress towards commitment to reduce GHG emissions?

      The company reports 83,429 total monitored CO2 emission reduction (mt) in 2016.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      64. Percentage of mills with methane capture (is above 75%)?

      19 (26%) - The company has a commitment to install methane capture facilities in 59 mills by 2018, and had installed 19 by Dec 2015.

  • Water, chemical and pest management Water, chemical and pest management 7.5 / 12 62.5%
    • Companies should commit to managing water use and water quality, providing evidence through time-bound reduction plans, policies on toxic chemical use and treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME).

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      65. Commitment to manage water use and water quality?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      66. Time-bound commitments to improve water use and water quality?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      67. Progress towards commitment on water use?

      The company reports it did not achieve its target of water usage ratio of 1 tonne of water per tonne of Fresh Fruit Bunch (FFB) at mills by 2014, but does report its usage figures of 1.34 MT on average to process 1 MT of FFB.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      68. Progress towards commitment on water quality?

      The company reports average BOD data for 2016, 2015 and 2014 are 75 parts per million (ppm), 63ppm and 47ppm respectively. This means that the target of a BOD below 100ppm has been met although it has gone up over the last three years. Moreover, this target was only met for 98% of mills in 2015.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      69. Protection of natural waterways through buffer zones?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      70. Evidence of treating palm oil mill effluent (POME)?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      71. Commitment to minimise the use of chemicals, including pesticides and chemical fertilisers?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      72. No use of paraquat?

      The company states that it plans to eliminate paraquat use in general weed control by 2020.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      73. No use of World Health Organisation (WHO) Class 1A and 1B pesticides?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      74. No use of chemicals listed under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      75. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      76. Chemical usage per ha or list of chemicals used?

      The company plans to summarise group total pesticide usage by type by 2017.

  • Community, land and labour rights Community, land and labour rights 12.5 / 18 69.4%
    • Companies should commit to respect human rights, including those of indigenous peoples and local communities, consulted with free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). Companies should respect the rights of workers, report relevant workforce data, and comply with health and safety legislation.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      77. Commitment to human rights, referencing the UN Declaration of Human Rights or UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      78. Commitment to respect legal and customary land tenure rights?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      79. Commitment to respect indigenous and local communities' rights?

      The company commits to respect the rights of indigenous peoples and surrounding communities but does not commit to relevant international conventions.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      80. Commitment to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      81. Commitment applies to independent suppliers?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      82. Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) process?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      83. Process for addressing land conflicts?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      84. Commitment to ensure food security for local communities?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      85. Commitment to respect workers' rights, including all workers (i.e. direct, indirect, migrant, temporary, casual, etc.)?

      The company states that it is guided by the guidelines of the International Labour Organization for matters pertaining to the fundamental rights of its employees. It is not clear whether this commitment relates to all employees.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      86. Reference to Fundamental ILO Conventions or Free and Fair Labour Principles?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      87. Total number of employees?

      19,557 - The figure includes employees of MSM Group.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      88. Percentage or number of temporary employees?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      89. Percentage or number of women employees?

      2,809 (14.4%)

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      90. Minimum wage that the company pays?

      Pays above minimum wage for all employees FGV directly employs.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      91. Commitment to address occupational health and safety?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      92. Lost time accident rate?

      272

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      93. Number of fatalities as a result of work-based accidents?

      4

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      94. Provision of personal protective equipment and pesticide training?

      The company states it provides personal protective equipment, but does not mention pesticide training.

  • Certification standards Certification standards 6 / 18 33.3%
    • Companies should become members of credible certification standards and report in accordance with all appropriate categories of membership. The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) requires members registered as growers to submit data relating to certification targets for their estates, scheme smallholders and independent fresh fruit bunch (FFB) suppliers, via an annual communications of progress (ACOP) report.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      95. Member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)?

      FELDA has been an RSPO member since 2004. Felda Global Ventures (FGV) became a member in 2016 due to FELDA not having a controlling interest in FGV. Felda IFFCO has also been a member since 2010.

    • Yes
      0.5 / 0.5
      Source

      96. Submitted most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

    • Yes
      0.5 / 0.5
      Source

      97. Listed all countries and regions in which operates in most recent RSPO Annual Communication of Progress (ACOP)?

      FELDA states it operates: Malaysia (Johor; Kelantan; Negeri Sembilan; Pahang; Perak; Sabah; Sarawak; Terengganu) and Indonesia (West Kalimantan).

    • Yes
      0.5 / 0.5
      Source

      98. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of estates within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of estates?

      2021 - Time-bound of 2017 originally stated in FELDA's 2015 RSPO ACOP. FELDA is currently revising its time-bound plans due to seeking certification under FGV rather than FELDA.

    • No
      0 / 0.5
      Source

      99. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of scheme/associated smallholders within 5 years or achieved 100% RSPO-certification of scheme/associated smallholders?

      2025 - FELDA is currently revising its time-bound plans due to seeking certification under FGV rather than FELDA. The time-bound plan is more than five years away.

    • Yes
      0.5 / 0.5
      Source

      100. Time-bound plan for achieving 100% RSPO certification of all supply chains?

      Felda IFFCO, a joint venture between FELDA and IFFCO, has a target to achieve 100% certification of all supply chains by 2025 and FGV by 2020.

    • Yes
      0.5 / 0.5
      Source

      101. RSPO-certified within three years of joining the RSPO or by November 2010, for companies joining prior to finalisation of the RSPO certification systems in November 2007?

      As FELDA has withdrawn its RSPO certificates, the company currently has no RSPO-certified estates. However, FELDA certified its first plantation estate in 2010. It plans to re-certify its first estate in 2017.

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      102. Percentage of mills RSPO-certified (is above 75%)?

      As FELDA has withdrawn its RSPO certificates, the company currently has no RSPO-certified mills. Previously it had 58 mills certified.

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      103. Percentage of area (ha) RSPO-certified (is above 75%)?

      0 (0%) - As FELDA has withdrawn its RSPO certificates, the company currently has no RSPO-certified estates. Previously it had 527,931 ha certified.

      .

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      104. Percentage of scheme/associated smallholders (ha) RSPO-certified (is above 75%)?

      0 (0%) - As FELDA has withdrawn its RSPO certificates, the company currently has no RSPO-certified scheme smallholders.

    • No
      0 / 2
      Source

      105. Percentage of FFB supply (tonnes) from independent FFB suppliers that is RSPO-certified (is above 75%)?

      0 (0%) - As FELDA has withdrawn its RSPO certificates, the company currently has no RSPO-certified independent suppliers.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 2
      Source

      106. Percentage of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed (tonnes) that are RSPO-certified (is above 75%)?

      25,494.8 (2.3%) - Felda IFFCO reported 25,494.81 tonnes of CPO certified out of 1,107,044 tonnes of all palm oil and oil palm products handled/traded/processed in the year. As FELDA has withdrawn its RSPO certificates, the company currently has no RSPO-certified palm oil handled/traded/processed.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      107. Sells or processes/trades RSPO-certified palm oil through Segregated or Identity Preserved supply chains?

      As FELDA has withdrawn its RSPO certificates, it currently produces no certified sustainable palm oil.

      Felda IFFCO processes/trades Mass Balance and Segregated.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      108. Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certified (100%)?

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      109. Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) certified (100%)?

      The company states it has 3 mills certified to MSPO.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      110. Certified under voluntary sustainability certification scheme (e.g. ISCC, SAN, RSB, etc.)?

      The company states it certified 15 mill complexes to ISCC in 2014 but reduced to 3 in 2015 due to lower market demand and increased again to 5 in 2016.

  • Smallholders and suppliers Smallholders and suppliers 5.5 / 9 61.1%
    • Companies should report details of any programmes or schemes to support both schemed and independent smallholders, as well as criteria to assess suppliers on compliance with company policies, and in what cases suppliers should be suspended or excluded due to non-compliance.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      111. Programme to support scheme smallholders?

      Supports associated smallholders, also refereed to as FELDA settlers.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      112. Details of support programme for scheme smallholders?

      Preparing smallholders for sustainability certification; provide with planting materials at affordable prices; best agronomic practices.

    • Partial
      0.5 / 1
      Source

      113. Number or percentage of scheme smallholders involved in programme?

      The company states it has supported 14 FELDA settlements in obtaining RSPO Group Smallholder Certification, but do not give details on how many supported in total. The company also that it trained 54 trainee settlers in Gabon.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      114. Programme to support independent smallholders?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      115. Details of support programme for independent smallholders?

      The company states it supports independent smallholders gaining sustainability certification.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      116. Number or percentage of independent smallholders involved in programme?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      117. Process used to prioritise, assess and/or engage suppliers on compliance with company's policy and/or legal requirements?

      The company states it is committed to supplier mapping and verification, but does not state the process being used.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      118. Suspension or exclusion criteria for suppliers?

      The company states that it has severed ties with FFB suppliers growing oil palm in forest reserves, and has a target to stop sourcing from entities found to be in violation of FGV's Sustainability Policy and that are involved in human trafficking.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      119. Number or percentage of suppliers assessed and/or engaged?

  • Governance and grievances Governance and grievances 2 / 7 28.6%
    • Companies should operate in an ethical manner at all levels, providing accessible channels and clear procedures for both employees and external stakeholders to raise any grievance or complaint with the company, as well as allowing for whistleblowing.

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      120. Commitment to ethical conduct and prohibition of corruption?

    • Yes
      1 / 1
      Source

      121. Whistleblowing procedure?

    • No
      0 / 1
      Source

      122. Own grievance or complaints system?

      The company states that it plans to establish a grievance mechanism system in 2017.

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      123. Accessible to internal stakeholders (i.e. employees)?

    • No
      0 / 1
      No source

      124. Accessible to external stakeholders?

    • No
      0 / 2
      No source

      125. Grievance details, if anonymity not requested?

Media monitor: Felda Global Ventures Holdings Sdn Bhd

SPOTT gathers reports and stories from global media sources, covering specific company activities related to the assessment indicator categories. ZSL does not assess the validity of these reports.

Category filter:
No article found for the selected categories.

Map of concessions: Felda Global Ventures Holdings Sdn Bhd

Explore our interactive mapping tool for a satellite view of deforestation and fires in and around concession sites of companies featured on the SPOTT scorecard. These data can support SPOTT users in conducting further research to verify whether or not company commitments are being implemented on the ground.

Use the map search bar to find specific company concessions or locations. Click the concession sites marked by pins to zoom in for more information, then go to the company pages of featured concessions to view their assessments.

SPOTT is a ZSL initiative.
Zoological Society of London (ZSL)